17
SpiritusVeritatis 17 points ago +17 / -0

That shot of the bridge is most likely playing on a loop that just happens to cut when ducks are flying by. Makes more sense than them being photoshopped out or something.

2
SpiritusVeritatis 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are on a PC - Click on the gear wheel by your name in the top right corner of the page, then click settings, then click the box under community styling and select off and save.

After downdooting you can turn community styling back on if you prefer it.

6
SpiritusVeritatis 6 points ago +6 / -0

It can be a good practice to provide a link to the relevant post on a Q aggregator site like so for people who are on mobile or who have community styling turned off.

3
SpiritusVeritatis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Google translate

The tyrannical scores:
The defeat of Saturday October 7 cannot be recovered from, you brought this calamity upon yourselves
2
SpiritusVeritatis 2 points ago +2 / -0

This blast was a warning shot at a convoy of supply trucks entering Rafah from Egypt. They were previously warned that any trucks bringing supplies into Gaza would be bombed.

https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/18677

https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/18706

1
SpiritusVeritatis 1 point ago +1 / -0

James 5:3

Your gold and silver have corroded, and their rust will be for a testimony against you and will eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded up treasure in the last days.
6
SpiritusVeritatis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Faschists

Rothschilds

Perhaps?

6
SpiritusVeritatis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually, the correct suffix is menta/mentum, not mente.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-mentum#Latin

Suffix
-mentum (plural -menta)

instrument, medium, or result of; e.g. monumentum

2
SpiritusVeritatis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I agree. Just like Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She was so old, her death is no surprise to anyone.

2
SpiritusVeritatis 2 points ago +3 / -1

🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣🀣

1
SpiritusVeritatis 1 point ago +2 / -1

I got it from the verses in Deuteronomy that I already provided.

But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak [...] that prophet shall die. And if you say in your heart, β€˜How shall we know the word which the Lord has not spoken?’— when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the thing does not happen or come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord has not spoken.

If a prophet speaks a word that doesn't come to pass, it is not from the Lord and they are false. That means EVERY word must come true. Always. Else they are a false prophet.


I read the chapter you referenced. Paul did not give a wrong prophecy as you claim.

He said β€œMen, I perceive that this voyage will end with disaster and much loss, not only of the cargo and ship, but also our lives.”

This is not a prophecy, he didn't say it was from God, he said "I perceive" which means that he was giving his opinion, that he feared for their lives.

It wasn't until verse 23 that he claims to have received a revelation over night from an angel who told him not to be afraid, and everything the angel told him came true.

6
SpiritusVeritatis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, I have been anticipating this post for months, but it was very much a wait and see what happens kind of situation.

It had to be said.

4
SpiritusVeritatis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jesus called the religious leaders of his day a "den of vipers" and likened them to a white-washed tomb filled with dead men's bones. People didn't take kindly to His accusations, either. πŸ˜‰

3
SpiritusVeritatis 3 points ago +4 / -1

I was addressing the implication behind the reasoning of your argument, not the argument itself.

To address your "prophets don't need to be right" argument, here is my rebuttal:

When a supposed prophet says "Thus sayeth the Lord" they better damned well be getting it from the Lord, and it better damned well be right, because the Lord is never wrong, and his word never returns void.

Isaiah 55:11

11 So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth;
It shall not return to Me void,
But it shall accomplish what I please,
And it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.
3
SpiritusVeritatis 3 points ago +5 / -2

What you're saying is that King Charles may have relented from his evil works like the Ninevites (Who supplicated very publicly and profoundly), and so God relented from judgment. Nonsense. Last I heard, they are holding a Summit in September to Accelerate implementation of Agenda 2030. Full steam ahead on the evil works front.

It is far more reasonable to conclude that this word was not from God.

view more: Next ›