Calling this abuse is acting like a woke snowflake. If this child were dressed as Putin the conversation would be exactly the same just on opposite sides, with the right calling it based and the left calling it abuse
Look at Trump, even he's ramping up pro Israel rhetoric (not that he ever really stopped per se but it hadn't been coming up in awhile)
Yes he's saying the right things to trick you, just like politicians have been doing forever. Don't fall for it again just because it's a billionaire and not a politician it's the exact same scam
NSA would not release an encryption into the wild that they could not break
No it was quite obvious to many that things were not as they seemed as they woke up to the COVID scam, and even before that. Trump's election as an outsider showed that people were aware of political class treachery
But those who claim to have awoken to the political scam where politicians fool people by saying one thing but doing another, seem eager to become simpering sycophants for billionaires when they do the same
If the enemy cedes ground you best be sure it's not a feint. If the enemy cedes a bridge to you, you better be sure it hasn't been rigged to collapse when you take it
More symbolic gestures to position himself as a hero of the "everyman" while leading the charge of technocracy
Fake news is pinned here all the time
Like the Fauci files?
As though they don't understand. They want to cause chaos and for the existing power structures to fall/people to lose all faith in them. Then they bring in the NWO. It's all been written in their plans like Agenda 2030, it's not a secret
So we're just going to cheer on the creation of the worldwide control grid? CBDCs are not realistic without technology like this, and when the technology itself holds little benefit vs what we already have (think 5G) who is really going to benefit from this?
Super nerd alert as I was a huge fan of dragonball Z as a kid. Goku tended to want to believe in the better nature of people to a fault, but anyone who betrayed that he would go on to attack. Two examples being when his brother asked for mercy and then Goku sacrificed himself to get him killed, and when Freeza did the same thing, Goku attacked with intent to kill him (but he somehow survived in space to become a cyborg). Many he didn't attempt to kill he had disabled like Vegeta's right hand man or the Ginyu force and they were no longer a threat, or he wasn't able to kill like Cell and supported and encouraged someone who was strong enough to kill him.
Point being, Goku doesn't have one of those no kill codes but he's merciful. Once someone is neutralized as a threat he sees no reason to keep being violent towards them. That's why if someone refuses to repent or just has no inclination to repent at all he works towards either injuring them to the point of neutralization or if they're too dangerous even then, killing them. Probably the only exception here is Vegeta. But you could argue Vegeta never really betrayed the mercy he was shown. I don't think Goku is a great example of what Qtoad was talking about
I don't really find it worthwhile to engage in the brand of omphaloskepsis that involves spending all kinds of time interpreting these posts. If "nothing can stop what is coming" and "patriots are in control" then it doesn't matter, I've been awake to this stuff since I was in high school over a decade ago so I will continue to do what I can in my personal life towards what I believe to be right as I've always tried.
But I do find it interesting that a lot of the Q plan seems to be to allow the deep state to do what they want so they will get their comeuppance later, as though they never planned on there being consequences to their actions. When even agenda 2030 calls for people to lose faith in all their governments and institutions after the actions they've taken against the people. So we continue to let them do what they want or push it along as with the vaxxes and as some people speculate with Israel (I mean how could they possibly have known this would happen in five years without being in on it? Though personally I find the delta dubious anyway so it might be a moot point), and then play into their future plans. It's interesting
Oh believe me, I haven't. It has seemed more likely to me for a long time
Those crazy white hats have all the time in the world for games because they're already in control so hard
What should America do when a foreign nation attacks another foreign nation? Should we be the world police? I agree that there should be a meeting to at least discuss possible implications of the action but why should we expect the president of the United States to respond to every attack that happens anywhere in the world. Or is Israel special?
That doesn't answer the original question though. It's a phrase that's been elevated to an axiom by Q followers but doesn't answer anything about what was asked
Not just don't care but actively promote when it happens to the other side
What evidence is there for this aside from it being convenient to believe?
The conversation was never going to go anywhere with you, that much was obvious from the start. It's unlikely there are any spectators left, who the conversation was actually for, so it's just not any effort anymore
I feel like I read about someone who'd do that in a book somewhere...
They'll just say if vaccines only killed hundreds of thousands it was better to take it because covid killed millions