3
Witsend 3 points ago +3 / -0

I need Paxton here. I want to lean on him to follow in Tennessee's footsteps and outlaw cchemtrails. I feel that there is at least a small chance. Please move along.

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

Safe to assume that they are also going to get rid of the guy at the top who is, quite clearly, behind all of that?

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you are missing my point. I get edgy with how easy it is for them to round people up. You should too.

2
Witsend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahahaha! My wife gets edgy if it gets up over 67 in here.

4
Witsend 4 points ago +4 / -0

No f#@king way Assange agrees to give up his sources. He would not have lived through all of that to turn on his sources. Even the murdered ones.

2
Witsend 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with you on this point, but would need to do a lot more research on what it was he was really trying to do there. Maybe it is in the interest of both parties. You certainly aren't going to get that from the times. Not saying that you don't have a very good example. I'm just saying that there are few things like this that can be taken at face value. However, blindly trusting most any public figure at this point is counter to everything that I have learned to date.

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

I sure hope not. There are those who you just really hope are on the side of good. He is one of mine.

3
Witsend 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hopefully, these thing are running concurrently.

2
Witsend 2 points ago +3 / -1

If I don't come back to this at some point, my point will be made in the extreme as I will only be absent by means beyond my control.

2
Witsend 2 points ago +3 / -1

In my experience, you really aren't supposed to have concerns here. You know, whites hats in control, God wins, etc. Your observations combined centuries of historical evil deeds are to be washed away with hope. Negativity is viewed as not buying into Trump and Q, regardless of how much you know, or how long you have been studying conspiracy, or how much you are truly invested in believing that great things are to come, and how hopeful you are that Q team and Trump are at the helm of this great awakening. If you aren't 100% that we win with a walk in the park you are seen as near 0% that we win at all.

3
Witsend 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm surprised that they can classify it at all. I would just check the "unknown" box and keep on down the list.

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

I concur, but I'm not going to bury my head in the sand and pretend to not see the potential dangers of the globalist agenda. For example, it's great that hunter was found guilty of something, but a large part that something is unconstitutional, and may very negatively affect upstanding gun owners. Nothing can be assumed good or safe when taken only at face value. I always want to know more about the why of things. That said, I am more hopeful than I have ever been that these bastards will get their comeuppance. In this life.

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love what they've done in El Salvador, I am even considering buying some property there. If it holds, the values will skyrocket. Beautiful place. However, if the wrong people are in control elsewhere, the mass imprisonment becomes you and me.

1
Witsend 1 point ago +1 / -0

At some point, if the globalists get enough power, the dissenters are the criminals. That's us.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›