Summary = we are all mad data poor deluded fuckwits. That's made us all reconsider..NOT
By Damien Stewart MAPS 🧐
Personal observations about conspiracy theorist clients
In addition to the research behind conspiracy theory belief, I would also like to add the following observations about people I have encountered, both within and outside of therapy, who espouse conspiracy theories.
Evidence for their theories is usually wafer thin or does not meet the usual standard for evidence or proof - the evidence is often as implausible as the theory itself. Generally, believers point to online videos or websites that are populated by people and articles that support the believer’s beliefs. These articles and videos similarly lack any evidence other than to refer to vague notions of “I’ve heard”, or “people have told me”.
Explanations tend to be couched in terms of questions, rather than answers. People won’t be able to point to evidence but will instead make their argument by bringing into question an idea or notion, such as “don’t you think”, or “isn’t it strange that”, or “I’m just asking questions”
People must convince you of their way of thinking, they need to be validated. A denial of their thinking is therefore not a rejection of their thoughts, beliefs, and opinions, but a rejection of their very being.
Once evidence or argument is discredited, you are explained away as “one of them”, the “other”, placing you not in the position of someone who can make an argument about the issue at hand, but placed into the other ideological group. Therefore, your opinion is explained away because of the group you belong to, the enemy, not because you possess a rational argument.
Once a conspiratorial argument is discredited, an interesting dynamic ensues. The issue that was being discussed slowly disappears, and you the person become the subject of attack. The conspiracy theorist cannot win the argument based on the facts, so they attempt to win the argument by discrediting you the individual. If the person can discredit you, their belief in their argument can be maintained, because the discussion has left the original point and is now about something else completely, you as a person.
The argument is like a slippery fish 🐟, it moves and bends and is hard to hang on to as the point shifts into something you can’t argue, or both agree on. Once again, the original ideology can be maintained because it is no longer the point of discussion.
Ironic https://d3con.de/Speaker/1097-claire-atkin/
Coinkydink or planned?
As a brand safety advocate, she holds the surveillance adtech industry accountable for abuses against advertisers and consumers in the popular newsletter BRANDED
New Zealand Loyal will not only criminally investigate everyone who was involved in the covid-con, but we shall also track all communications, funding streams, agreements and meetings that have led to this shameful and deliberate attack on all of you, on all of us.
Wait, Ukraine destroyed the bridge.
But they conceal secrets like giants here maybe 😂
Spot on!
The concept that CO2 emissions cause climate change is a flawed theory and it has involved a political agenda of taxation that has been incessantly promoted for decades. This agenda has detracted and distracted significantly from peoples understanding of what real environmentalism is and involves.
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modelled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modelled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change. Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases, such as CO2, and ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. Furthermore, relevant data showing temperatures were higher in the early 1900s than today appears to have been omitted (7).
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth. Thousands of actual industrial pollutants exist, but CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide (8).
The UN Agenda 2030 plan and the Paris Agreement goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 7% per annum until 2030 is in effect a plan that will disable the resource mechanisms of the industrial economy for the food, energy and goods that enable human life and survival. This is being done before humanity has transitioned away from the flawed trans-national industrial economy toward self-sufficient local economies. Whether you believe the ‘plug is being pulled’ intentionally or not, this inevitably amounts to a de-population outcome. The dependency of humanity was created for decades by an international political corporate hierarchy rampantly promoting and implementing flawed trans-national systems for agriculture, energy and goods. I conclude, that the science and data behind the IPPC CO2 narrative is flawed and the Paris Agreement plan to reduce CO2 emissions so quickly would have a de-population effect. These potentially genocidal narratives must be exposed.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/great-zero-carbon-criminal-conspiracy/5736707
I know there is Q and Anons - I'm not the author of that headline
The important thing, it seems, is to keep alive the potency of the original narrative, and keep it connected to the day’s events. Conspiracists now use old Q posts like Nostradamus’s prophecies, reinterpreting gibberish in light of new events to retroactively claim there’s been a plan all along. The YouTube videos and podcasters who accrue social capital around QAnon these days do so by interpreting the evidence of the day as proof that the plan is working.
Gibberish hey. I just smell fear.
Colin Dickey wrote the hit piece. It would be a shame if bad reviews were left on Amazon for hsi latest book:
Sorry but you are talking through your arse. As a registered nurse with a son who has Bipolar 1 I take offence at the bullshit you are aiming toward folk who suffer from mental illness. You have zero knowledge of bipolar disorders and the logic in your argument is facile.
He may well form a party like Liz Gunn did in NZ and she is on fire
Surprise surprise - mainstream media attacking her.
Best picture of Joan ever
Donovan previously led a project called “The True Costs of Misinformation” at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy.
The Shorenstein Center’s 2018-19 annual report reveals funding from notorious globalist “philanthropies” the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation and George Soros’s Open Society Foundations.
An example of the private ownership and control of a central bank can be found in the research of G. Edward Griffin in his book, the creature from Jekyll Island, which I recommend you buy and read and study. Even if a central bank’s frontmen are appointed by politicians and the bank's legal creation is facilitated by statute, this still has no bearing on the ultimate ownership and control of that bank. Just sit with that for a moment. Let this soak in. It's important everybody understands what is going on. That same story is likely with the creation of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, the RBNZ, and that these so-called national banks are all middle banking management for a much larger and centralised system, overseen and master controlled by the Bank of International Settlements, the BIS in Switzerland. Here's a key. That BIS answers to no one, not even to Swiss national authorities
United Australia Party Senator for Victoria Ralph Babet says the news today that Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews is resigning from his position (effective 5pm Wednesday) is huge relief for the state of Victoria.
Senator Babet spoke of his “overwhelming joy” upon hearing the news as Victorians continue to ponder the perilous condition of their state.
“I haven’t felt so much joy since I was a five-year-old waking up on Christmas Day,” Senator Babet said.
“When I think of Dan and his governance of our state, I have not one positive word to say. His resignation is nine years too late. He has left a trail of economic and social destruction that we may never overcome. We’re flat broke because of him.
“Victorians will never forget the sadistic brutality of Labor Premier Dan Andrews and Victoria will immediately be a better place without him at the helm. May this be the end of the woke socialist regime in our state of Victoria.
“He locked us down for longer than any other people in the world. In my opinion, he acted like a tyrant who trampled on basic human rights. We will ensure that he is ultimately held to account for his actions.
“This megalomaniac locked down our state for a shocking 262 days and yet excess mortality in Victoria was the second highest in Australia, topped only by Tasmania.
“School closures in Victoria had a devastating effect on children. More than 50 per cent suffered a decline in mental health, almost twice the national average.
“Andrews bullied and demonised unvaccinated Victorians. He resigns two days before the second anniversary of Victorian police shooting rubber bullets at peaceful protesters, even as they fled in terror.
“For everyone who is suffering from post-tyranny stress disorder, please reach out for help. This man has caused immeasurable pain which many of us are still suffering today,” Senator Babet said.