Found a better link for it. Looks like the original:
http://mcmmadnessnews.blogspot.com/2020/04/
Notice "George enters a timewarp and reemerges in the year 2020". I believe this is the source of many of the theories.
I had never really thought about this before, but someone on the 4chan autist thread pointed out that he couldn't find the term "CASTLE ROCK" in the Q drops. Turns out he was right. Q never says "CASTLE ROCK". He says "CASTLE_ROCK". Notice the _ character. Q did it 3 times too. Not an accident. And it was never used without the _.
So what does the '_' imply? Castle 'Under' Rock? I think there are probably multiple meanings for this term. It may in fact mean the studio, but I think it clearly means something else as well. Q told us multiple meanings exist.
Could it be people? Who would be Castle, and who would be Rock? Or things? Or does it mean something else? Just started thinking about this...
Following this line of thought, in drop 4433, it would read
CASTLE Under ROCK Under God Speed and a picture of the flag.
Reminds me of the Pledge of Allegiance. One nation under God.
As Dave of X22 Report would say "Now isn't that interesting."
The problem is this analysis doesn't place Castle Rock at the apex of this tree of confusion. It is merely using the same agents as whatever complex structure has been set up for this "United States Corporation."
If not for Q's drops with the name CASTLE ROCK there would be little reason to suspect them of anything. There is likely more to this story that has yet to be uncovered. Still, fascinating dive into the complex nature of how ownership of a company can be obfuscated in modern times.
Anyone want to take bets that the rich and powerful of the deep state are using this kind of structure to hide the real ownership of a lot more than just this one bankrupt United States Company?
What I am really confused about is what does it mean to use a corporation as the last line of an address after the country. Does that have a legal meaning under the law anywhere in the world? I have never seen that before. Would love to hear from a knowledgeable attorney on what that actually implies.
Unfortunately this completely misses the point. Flat earth makes many predictions about what you will see that are demonstrably false. By using logic and mathematics we can show that flat earth theory is a failure. Not because of details and connections, but because of falsifiable predictions. That is called the scientific method.
(Sidenote:Of course, any theory can be modified, and there are people that consistently work trying to improve the flat earth theory. However, the standard model of the universe makes so many more successful predictions, that between the 2 nobody takes flat earth seriously. Do a Yucktube search for the work of physicist Sabine Hossenfelder who actually did a great video on this - Flat Earth, wrong but not stupid - if you would like to learn more.)
The Q phenomenon has made only a single prediction: That there is a plan to destroy the deep state. So far, nobody has been able to prove that this prediction is false. These details and connections that you speak of are merely hints along the way giving us hope that the predictions of Q will eventually be confirmed. Nothing has yet proven or disproven Q. The coming destruction of the deep state is what ultimately proves or disproves Q. This is the falsifiable prediction.
So flat is earth is false, and Q we are still waiting to confirm. They belong in completely different categories. Provably failed theories like flat earth don't belong on GAW. But I am hopeful, given all the indicators, details and connections you mention above, that the Q plan will ultimately be proven real.
So you are incorrect. We are better than the MSM or the deep state, because we do follow the science. We aren't just blindly accepting any fanciful narrative without critical thinking. This is what the great awakening is all about. Using your logic and senses to gather actual data and come to reasoned conclusions.
One of the last issues of George Magazine was "Platform 2020 A survival guide for the future." This is the reason many people feel the plane crash was faked and this plan has been in the work for decades. You can find the cover of the issue all over, but the year 2020 was only mentioned on the actual article inside. It is hard to find a good picture of that. The best one I have seen is here: https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcRjnKaXzxobX87nEbpUXJ4TgKdSP9G551OdGt6z513Q92ZyiJA%26s&sp=1612374063Te25ad2871a1e0edf57ac90bad60815331f43b6d1598f56900efc8944d5125b07 So the point is Trump and JFK Jr. were known to be close friends. George Magazine foreshadowed surviving until 2020. People are just putting 2 and 2 together.
BTW, this I've always thought is one of the most compelling "Future proves past" predictions of Q. If true, it shows just how deep the plan really goes. This is over 20 years in the making.
Personally I think Dorsey likely cut a deal already. I think he's an agent provocateur now. Think about it. Somebody needed to kick off the social media censorship paradigm, and I think Dorsey was forced into being that someone. It is the only way Q could know for sure that Trump's accounts would be blocked. How else does Q know all this stuff will happen 2 years before it occurs? Q even told us how at one point. Control.
Now, it might not be Dorsey, but someone inside Twitter very high up must be controlled by Q. There is no other plausible explanation for what has happened.
Zuckerberg, on the other hand, has always been a CIA stooge. I see no redeeming qualities in that cretin. I am proud to say I have never had a Facebook account, and I never will.
This is a copy and paste from another post I commented on. Just some background.
I am an American expat in Thailand. As such, I am not intimately familiar with Myanmar, but I have a general understanding of what was happening there. Understand that the current regime led by Aung San Suu Kyi, the NLD party, was very popular a decade ago. She came to lead the government with a lot of hopes. The Burmese constitution is basically a power sharing arrangement between the military and the political establishment. Each keeps checks on the other.
Over the years people have become less enchanted with Aung San Suu Kyi. She has forged close ties with very corrupt individuals, and the high esteem she started with has eroded dramatically. Worse, Myanmar has developed a reputation as a hotbed of human trafficking. The stateless Rohingya providing a near perfect source of children for the disgusting cabal, and Aung San Suu Kyi doing absolutely nothing to stop this state of affairs at best, and encouraging it at the worst. In short, she wasn't the savior the people had hoped for. And her party was going under.
So, she did what any corrupt politician does...she cheated. During campaigning they allowed each party to have a small amount of airtime on TV to present their case to the people. But the government refused to allow these parties to say anything bad about Aung San Suu Kyi or the NLD during these broadcasts. Many parties boycotted the rigged official statements. The government also systematically hindered voting in areas critical of the NLD party. And, of course, we now know they used corrupt Smartmatic voting software to rig the vote.
All of these tactics were designed to weaken the power of the military and unfairly strengthen her position. I doubt this was done without the support of the international cabal, given her compliance in providing them with Rohingya children for their sick practices.
The Burmese military is not known for being angels. In fact, they would rather not have democracy at all. But they are still viewed with more reverence by the average person in Myanmar than the corrupt police or politicians. So this is a complex situation, and I am not sure how closely it really parallels the situation in the USA. The one thing this does do however, is put the human trafficking pipelines in check for a while. And for that, I think we all have to be thankful.
The Burmese constitution is a power sharing arrangement between the political class and the military, with each keeping checks on the other. Aung San Suu Kii derived a lot of her power and support from human trafficking and the international cabal support she received as a result of that. The Burmese military's moves to end this practice was basically a political move to weaken her.
It is important you understand the motivations of the players. The military absolutely would have ended this practice, even though paradoxically they were the ones who started it many years ago. Aung San Suu Kii's NLD party was seriously declining in popularity among the people. The military were gaining in strength. An important aspect of her power base was the supply of children she could supply the international cabal from the stateless Rohingya. To keep this support, she needed to maintain and expand the influence of the NLD party.
So, like any corrupt, increasingly unpopular politician, she cheated. And much like the USA, it wasn't just the Smartmatic voting software. It was a concerted, systematic effort to rig the outcome of the election. It is a complex situation that requires understand the political player involved.
But the fact that the human trafficking pipelines have been put in check, at least for a short while, is a good thing. I can't say I am sorry to see the Burmese military take the action they did.
I am an American expat in Thailand. As such, I am not intimately familiar with Myanmar, but I have a general understanding of what was happening there. Understand that the current regime led by Aung San Suu Kyi, the NLD party, was very popular a decade ago. She came to lead the government with a lot of hopes. The Burmese constitution is basically a power sharing arrangement between the military and the political establishment. Each keeps checks on the other.
Over the years people have become less enchanted with Aung San Suu Kyi. She has forged close ties with very corrupt individuals, and the high esteem she started with has eroded dramatically. Worse, Myanmar has developed a reputation as a hotbed of human trafficking. The stateless Rohingya providing a near perfect source of children for the disgusting cabal, and Aung San Suu Kyi doing absolutely nothing to stop this state of affairs at best, and encouraging it at the worst. In short, she wasn't the savior the people had hoped for. And her party was going under.
So, she did what any corrupt politician does...she cheated. During campaigning they allowed each party to have a small amount of airtime on TV to present their case to the people. But the government refused to allow these parties to say anything bad about Aung San Suu Kyi or the NLD during these broadcasts. Many parties boycotted the rigged official statements. The government also systematically hindered voting in areas critical of the NLD party. And, of course, we now know they used corrupt Smartmatic voting software to rig the vote.
All of these tactics were designed to weaken the power of the military and unfairly strengthen her position. I doubt this was done without the support of the international cabal, given her compliance in providing them with Rohingya children for their sick practices.
The Burmese military is not known for being angels. In fact, they would rather not have democracy at all. But they are still viewed with more reverence by the average person in Myanmar than the corrupt police or politicians. So this is a complex situation, and I am not sure how closely it really parallels the situation in the USA. The one thing this does do however, is put the human trafficking pipelines in check for a while. And for that, I think we all have to be thankful.
I think you are reading more into the words than what is actually being stated. Nobody is guaranteeing a specific outcome. Only that all roads lead to only 1 logical conclusion.
If you've ever played chess, there comes a point where you realize you have won the game. That no matter what your opponent does, he can not recover. It is just a matter of waiting for him to see what you already see. We don't label that absolute certainty "irrational", even though the specific details of which path to victory is not yet established.
I am convinced there is nothing that can happen at this point which will ever give the deep state back what they really need to control us. Even wholesale murders will only cause the rest to deepen their distrust. Even full police states rely on the complacency of the citizens to hold onto power. They will never get that now from the American public. That ship has sailed. That is why they are in panic. They've lost control of the narrative. We have reached critical mass.
On the other hand, they can still cause a great deal of death, destruction and misery in their final days. They will eventually go, but it could still get very messy. When Flynn says his confidence is a 10, he's being hyperbolic. Trump could slip and die on a banana peal tomorrow, negating his presidency. Nothing is ever guaranteed 100%. But things become so obvious at a point that to deny it just makes you look silly.
Still, I could really use this timetable accelerated. Those of us who have lost jobs and have bills to pay do not appreciate all the uncertainty.
They've been talking about 3 Gorges Dam failing for months now due to age and cracks in the dam. Most everyone downstream in the flood path has already been evacuated as a result of the perceived threat. It will flood thousands of hectares of land, but the actual death toll would likely be very small. And there is a ready made cover story for it.
Not saying it will happen, but circumstances have been set up so that it could happen if they decide it to be necessary.
Mynmar is a well known hub of human trafficking. Aung San Suu Kyi has been criticized many times for not only failing to put an end to it, but actually allowing it to grow on her watch. I doubt that the picture above is unconnected to this somehow.
Date fagging is frowned upon, but I just can't help thinking there is too much lining up on Feb. 8. 30+ days since the "Go home" remark. Start of the sham impeachment trial. And Q drop 4866. Trying not to be too disappointed if nothing develops...but still hopeful. Edit: oh yeah. And the day after the Super Bowl to boot.
Why wait for the NG? No reason an existing US marshal could not have served someone before that time. Assuming the Insurrection Act was declared after Trump told everyone to go home on the 6th, then we might even expect to see the first trials sooner than that. In fact, the start of Trump's sham impeachment trial on the 8th would seem to line up perfectly for that purpose. No point in speculating though. This is all happening above our pay grade. It'll play out on their schedule, not ours.
From the link:
"wants the lawyers to focus on to the FALSE notion that he lost the presidential election to Joe Biden because he is a victim of widespread election fraud"
How can anyone even read this stuff without throwing up a little bit? Are these <laugh>journalists</laugh> so ignorant as to believe anyone gives them any credence at all any more? Why even keep the pretense that they are trying to report news?
When I see bias like this, I immediately assume the whole article is nothing but disinformation by a very frightened media. Does anyone have the real story behind this from a reputable source?
Yeah...well I'm running out of fuel and will need to divert to my alternate if the weather doesn't improve very soon.
Besides, Memphis has a Cat III ILS. It's about time we get better equipped aircraft with trained pilots.
I have always thought that an entity's ability to short should be limited to the number of shares they hold long. Shorting is a very valid mechanism for hedging against future downside. The day they allowed this to become a technique for generating wealth was the day the market stopped being about business and started being a game for the wealthy. I am aware of the arguments that shorting helps liquidity. I eschew them. The practice of making money on someone else's misfortune should never be glorified or encouraged.
Anyone who has ever had their small cap business destroyed by shorting and forced into a nightmare spiral of toxic financing knows what I am talking about.
Maybe now is finally the time that some Congress critter will have the moral courage to try and stop this hideous practice?
Everyone needs to stop thinking anachronistically. The artificial distinction between the Democrats and Republicans was simply a function of the deep state. Once they are gone, that distinction ceases to matter any more. There will simply be Patriots and Establishment.
So who cares whether we split the Republicans. This is a whole new world, and we need to concentrate on getting 50% into the Patriot Party free of any former labels. There are some Democrats who voted for Trump as well. All are welcome. I bet more than half of the electorate moves into the light and joins the new party. Let the Republican Establishment RINOs stew in the cesspool of whatever is left of their party. They will be irrelevant anyway.
You are correct that state legislatures are allowed to choose the electors, and Congress is allowed to certify the electoral votes, but that presupposes all sides have followed the Constitution in doing so. Otherwise, their actions were not properly conducted within the Constitution and therefore are not binding. SCOTUS does get to determine if something is constitutional. If SCOTUS decides that an election violated the equal protection clause of 14th Amendment, then the fact that Congress or a state certified it is meaningless, because the whole process is already unconstitutional even before the certification. Indeed, this is exactly the argument SCOTUS used in Bush v. Gore in 2000. So it is not willy nilly invalidating electoral votes. It is invalidating a result specifically because the process used violated the highest law of the land.
In your example, if minority voting rights genuinely had been disproportionately violated due to voter ID, in violation of the 14th Amendment, and that violation demonstrably changed the outcome of the election, then SCOTUS would not only have the right but also the duty to correct the problem. We have arrived at this point in time today specifically because SCOTUS vitiated their oath to uphold the Constitution.
So, no, they never override a legislature's appointments. They simply rule that the legislature never legally appointed anyone in this circumstance because the procedure they used violated the Constitution. Then, they can offer remedies on how to correct the illegal action.
There is actually a Part II to this series as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-3_FGyhg4k