2
BeerMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's true for most states, but not Nebraska. Nebraska has a single legislative body when most other states have two.

5
BeerMan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Meme War III just started boys!

u/#checked

21
BeerMan 21 points ago +21 / -0

So when do the arrests start?

Soon (TM)

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Vaxxed die off. Vaccine free humans get rounded up into camps. The elite and their servants/slaves inherit the earth.

Now let's hope Trump and the White Hats can flip the script and save humanity 🙏

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

A "trade" means you have a counterparty. So if you want to buy, someone else has to sell, and you both have to agree on price.

I'm saying that I don't see a way for Elon to convince more than half of Twitter shareholders to sell their shares, which would give Elon a controlling majority. The only feasible way to do it would be to end up paying much more than the shares are worth right now.

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do not respect the SEC

https://youtu.be/cRNypdYQoWk

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

The $33B evaluation takes the last price for a single trade and multiplies it by the total number of Twitter shares in existence.

But you could only buy half of Twitter for $16.5B if half of the current shareholders agreed to sell at the last price for a single trade. Most, if not all, current shareholders of Twitter won't sell for that cheap. I suspect the index funds and other institutional investors won't sell for any price. So it would cost significantly more than $16.5B to buy half of Twitter.

It's like someone trying to build a shopping mall where there's currently a neighborhood of houses. Each house might be worth $200K, but there will be some homeowners holding out for a larger payment, and some that might not sell at all. You can't build the shopping mall until you have all of the land.

2
BeerMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it even possible?

  1. Does Elon have the cash to be able to do it?
  2. Are there that many shares available for sale? I would think institutions own the majority of Twitter and they are probably not selling.
4
BeerMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does no one else remember Brandon's campaign trail promise to cure cancer if he was elected? Sounds like he's known all along.

9
BeerMan 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hey, I've seen this one before...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_French_presidential_election

I want Le Pen to win, but I think the deck is stacked against her

1
BeerMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

France rigged the election last time

Minutes after the election was over, Macron was declared the winner by some absurd margin and Le Pen the loser.

I 100% believe the French election will be rigged again.

18
BeerMan 18 points ago +18 / -0

If it wasn't happening, then you wouldn't get upset about a law banning it from happening.

3
BeerMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Were they controlled opposition? Because they looked like controlled opposition.

What's the best way for the DS to prevent 1776 v2.0? When the people are ready for a revolution, you start the revolution yourself, take charge of it, and then let it fizzle out. That prevents the real revolution from ever being realized. Freedom Convoy may just be the latest iteration. We've seen it before with Tea Party, Romney 2012, etc.

There were good people in all of these movements, but the leadership failed. Maybe on purpose.

5
BeerMan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Several of the past Presidents have been pedophiles, so that's probably worse.

6
BeerMan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is that really the reason?

I think it's entirely possible that he got bored with it and/or it cost too much to maintain and his income is down due to COVID shutdowns.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›