4
bitsfps 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bruh, literally just a volcano.

this Title is just madness, not everything is Q related, in fact, most things aren't.

by BQnita
5
bitsfps 5 points ago +5 / -0

so, what about the people who were born before? weren't they "worth" this? this is just stupid.

by penisse
3
bitsfps 3 points ago +3 / -0

how are y'all falling for this shit, ffs how dumb are you, it literally says 5G and Covid-19 in a book from 1989, this doesn't exist.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

I Liked the movie, it's not about a single side, it's both, both are shit and corrupt.

Yes, Yes, the writter clearly pokes more at Trump supporters, but the President and her son are both a mash of multiple personalities and bad stereotypes.

The movie is alright, it's not about Covid, it was written before it, but the message is alright, just open your eyes to Government+Media bullshit.

The "Dont look Up" shit is really cringe tho.

3
bitsfps 3 points ago +3 / -0

HCQ is far less effective than IVQ, based on Studies on https://c19early.com/

2
bitsfps 2 points ago +2 / -0

In EVERY Case, Negative rights are superior to Positive rights.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a very basic way: Negative Rights: you Allow people to do things. Positive Rights: you Force people to do things.

There are no legitimate Positive Rights, every single one of them is comparable to Slavery.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP searched Smollet instead of Smolett, it's just highlighting.

7
bitsfps 7 points ago +7 / -0

no source, no names, nothing.

fucking larp

2
bitsfps 2 points ago +2 / -0

I Disagree with some of the things Elon does, mainly the China Plant and pushing Bullshit Tech/Infrastructure like the Hyperloop, but even that is irrelevant near any of the people you mentioned.

He's really something else.

4
bitsfps 4 points ago +4 / -0

i mean, he has 300Bi in liquid assets, and most of those are because he owns a HUGE portion of Tesla and SpaceX, two of the most innovative companies out there, if you're agreeing that he has "too much money", you understand neither how much money he actually has, nor how much those companies matter to the public.

people dont get rich (legally) without providing something other people want, if you agree with this shit you're just dumb.

3
bitsfps 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bad Headline. "73.8% Democrat or No Party Affiliation" is meshing two numbers together that shouldn't be together.

Democrats: 43.97%, Republicans: 22.21%, Non Declared: 29.83, Independent: 2.55% Libertarian: 1.13% Green: 0.12%

Yes, the declared numbers for Democrats are twice the number for republicans, but that doesn't mean that the Non Declared are voting for them, i would even suggest that they're Republicans who don't want to speak out with fear of backlash, "Non Declared" doesn't mean not affiliated, just that they don't want to talk about it, and what democrat would not talk about it?

I Think most of the 29.83% is made of Republicans, Libertarians and Independent Voters, since recent times have shown how the average conservative American isn't that willing to openly talk about it.

That being said, really bad take on this numbers, we have really important things coming out of AZ, this doesn't seem to be one of them.

That Being Said(2), This could be still be Fraud Stuff, just masked as "balanced numbers", but in the end they could all still be used to vote in whoever they want.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it's not.

its to say FBI Manipulated Jan6TH (which i believe), but in the case of this post, is a manipulated title to an article that has no mention of January 6th... BECAUSE ITS FROM 2016.

ALL this article talks about is how the FBI DOES IT, not a SINGLE relation to the ACTUAL 6th OF JANUARY.

again, I THINK THEY DID DO IT, but this article isn't proof that they did, just that they've done it in the past.

also, Title, "FBI Infiltrated... ...in order to engineer the events of January 6th" The Title is also implying that they did what they did, JUST FOR JAN 6TH, not that they already had infiltrated, but they infiltrated SPECIFICALLY for Jan 6th

This post is a LIE, and should be treated as such.

The Title is an Affirmation, the Article is a Justification for the Affirmation. The Title is a BLATANT LIE, the Article has NOTHING TO DO with the affirmation of the Title, thus, A COMPLETE LIE.

Being Right in your belief doesn't allow you to pretend you have the evidence for that specific affirmation.

ZERO TOLERANCE TO PROPAGANDA.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, because having two citizenships means moving forever and destroying the place where you left.

listen, people have MORE things in life than "i love this country, thus, i'm staying here forever", people have different reasons to go different places, be "i just want to live elsewhere for some time", be running away from your family, be running away TO your family (there are tons of American-Born citizens AND Immigrants who have family overseas, and citizenship gives them the safety that they can life it all behind to go help their family if they need)

stop thinking about it as the country, America is just land, it can be whatever the government can enforce it to be.

Thinking about America as one thing is already bullshit, America is divided into states, the same "pick a country" can be said for "pick a state", same for "pick a city"

do you get how your argument has NO foundation, and it based on a nationalist view that makes no sense?

yes, America is great, if someone leaves it IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE DESTROYING IT.

PEOPLE HAVE LIVES OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY FOR FUCKS SAKE.

you can live ANYWHERE ON EARTH and be more supporting of American Principles than a person born in the US, Stop limiting Americans to just people who live exclusively in America, it doesn't work like that, you know that.

America is just this great place because people made it like it is, Stop invalidating people fighting to liberate other countries or make them better, PEOPLE MOVE, IT HAPPENS, doesn't mean they're betraying the other place, doesn't mean they're putting the new countries "interests" (whatever that means to a private citizen) in front of the old one.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah, with a gun i could kill a innocent person in the street.

or, listen to me, i WOULDN'T.

it's almost like, it isn't about what tools you have, but what you do with them...

it's almost like Citizenship doesn't determine what your goals are in life, or what country you favor more

3
bitsfps 3 points ago +3 / -0

Family first, faggot.

you're not messing up America because your bitch ass is leaving to another country to help your family, its just you, your business, don't act like its a act of treason to go to another place to take care of someone.

you CAN claim allegiance and keep the foot at the door, the foot doesn't mean betraying the country, it means JUST MOVING THERE FFS.

Not every country has a pledge of allegiance to be a citizen, AFAIK Most dont, so you're not pledging allegiance to both.

also, Who the fuck cares about Allegiance to the country? you're just a citizen, don't act like you're that big of a deal, like anyone cares about what country "you're favoring", Private Property is supreme, i do what the fuck i want with it, for the reasons i want to do it, don't act like you can ban a random citizen from their private property for "putting other nation's interests in front of America's", because this means NOTHING, except when treason is commited, which is a OBJECTIVE thing, not a subjective concept like what you're describing.

dumb fuck

2
bitsfps 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, this doesn't work.

Citizenship doesn't mean you're "invested in", it means that you can live there.

sometimes for work reasons, sometimes for family reasons.

WHY would anyone revoke their own right to live in the nation of their family, when things can go bad and they might need to go back at any moment?

you're mixing up Citizenship with... i dont even know, How much you care about the country? who do you prefer? i really don't get what you're implying here

Citizenship doesn't mean you're giving your "investment" to both countries, people have different reasons to live in different places, you can't just make it what you want.

people dont "invest on" a country, they invest in where they want to be, if a country is going to shit, they have the right to leave it, just like Americans living in other Countries have the right to go back home.

don't make a double-standart that you can't keep up.

1
bitsfps 1 point ago +1 / -0

i mean, yeah, but only full-on communists, not "i'm married to a left-lib congressman".

In Brazil we have a party known as "PCO" (another labor party, "Party of the Worker's Cause"), but this one is full-on communist, and people from my thinking (Extreme Lib-Right) agree with them FAR more than any other party in the scene.

They're Pro-Guns, Anti-Big Government, Localists and etc. it's really strange but day after day we agree with each other even more, and that's because they're true Localist-Communists, not Commie Internationalists who will end up starving under the rule of Stalin or Che.

12
bitsfps 12 points ago +12 / -0

nah, he's a Left-Liberal.

i'm from Brazil, he's know here for being very "politically engaged"... specially since his Husband is a Congressman for one of the most Left-Leaning parties here, PSOL (Socialism and Liberty Party, but the whole thing is a joke, like, the most bizarre kind of left-lib you can imagine, and they're not that left-lib either, they're as Communist as Mainstream commies can get.)

so, i have a problem with Greenwald, he seems a very honest person when i see his international work, but everything he's done here in Brazil seems like the work of a Grifter, not that he's lying about it (technically), but some "outside efforts" had to be made so the Prison of ex-president Lula could be made, since Brazilian corruption runs so deep that it is very difficult to arrange it.

so he made a big thing about "corruption inside the government" when the entire thing was just so they could arrest one of the heads of the biggest corruption scandal on earth.

unfortunally you can't always do things by the book when dealing with a corrupt system, Greenwald knows this and made a big thing out of it.

i really can't understand him, he SEEMS like a honest guy in international work, but he's a full-on commie in Brazil, even going out of his way to defend how "Dilma fought against Brazilian dictatorship and was arrested by it", Dilma being a former Brazilian president (female) who was impeached in the middle of her term, she was a part of "PT" (labor party), who had absolute control of Brazil for 13 Years, spent Hundreds of Millions of dollars in foreign infrastructure (like the 100 Million USD in a harbor... IN CUBA, which they never paid us back) .

Dilma was also a Communist Revolutionary during the Brazilian Dictatorship/Regime that the left loves to vilify, like, sure, they were bad, any military dictatorship is bad when there's censorship and political killings, but the Death Count of the Dictatorship is a mere 434 People.

Brazilian Government is corrupt to its roots, and has been in control of the Communists friends with Fidel and African Dictators for a long time, now we have Bolsonaro (who isn't the brightest and definetively isn't capable of dealing with the inherent corruption, so he's fallen for it apparently and has become a part of it)

ALL THAT BEING SAID: my point is, Greenwald is a Commie, don't trust him to portrait facts as they are, because he doesn't.

EVEN I'M not certain about what to think of him, and that's why i'm careful with what he says.

by BQnita
20
bitsfps 20 points ago +20 / -0

Yeah, the whole world is looking at the Audit, trust me, the ENTIRE world, EVERY SINGLE THING in the world right now is just the Audit, that supposed Drone Attack almost happening more than one month before the Audit results is only a distraction from the Audit result.

everything for the past 2 months has been about the audit, a person says anything and its the audit being censored.

/s

(for real now, this forum has been going down for a long time, real stuff gets lost in tons of shitty baseless claims that mods stick, look at the McAfee thing last week, "OMG HIDDEN KEY" literally a facebook generated code for the picture that doesn't do anything, i've seen more than one stick about it)

2
bitsfps 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes yes, but in no way "alarmingly huge" means hundreds of thousands in a single country.

my points is: you dont know the number, i dont know the number, i can't refute your "hundreds of thousands worldwide" and you can't prove it either, THAT number seems to big, but tens of thousands? i can see that.

at some point, the scale is just too large for them to be able to hide it effectively. also, most abductions seem to be lone kidnapers, not an organization.

2
bitsfps 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, i'm not saying i think it would be released today, i thought it just... was supposed to be released today, like, Officially.

i didn't even know this was speculation, people were talking about it like it was, not that it could be.

yes, there are thousands of kids that go missing every year, but hundreds of thousands? in a single country? there were 3.8 million Births in the US, having 460k go missing EACH YEAR would mean that, considering that more than one baby per pregnancy is quite rare, for every 8.2 Mothers, ONE WOULD HAVE THEIR CHILD STOLEN, PER YEAR.

Do you see how absurd this data is? can you THINK about it? the data is CLEARLY 99% "teenager ran away" and "my daughter didn't come home at the expected time", because THAT TYPE OF MISSING CAN REPEAT ITSELF, unlike the "missing children" which are never seen again, thus, CANNOT be added twice.

this is basic data ffs, anyone can see how absurd "hundreds of thousands a year" is.

YOU'RE MAKING US LOOK BAD.

stop messing up the movement trying to save the children with fake absurdist data which is CLEARLY what they say it is.

just to clarify: not saying there are few children going missing, nor that this isn't a global problem in large scale, but around A THOUSEND each year is already enough, that's 3 children per day.

Having 460 Thousand go missing each day would EVERY SINGLE DAY THERE ARE 1260 KIDS MISSING, CAN YOU SEE THE ABSURDITY OF THAT STATEMENT?

i know the number of victims of child trafficking/pedofilia is in the thousands, but DEFFINETIVELLY NOT HUNDREDS, LIKE, NOT EVEN CLOSE.

4
bitsfps 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, most of this community is "look at this unverified shit i found online, it has numbers so it must be true", and mods end up pinning either this shit or shitty memes.

Isn`t today the day they release the initial Arizona Results? WHERE IS THIS SHIT HERE? not a SINGLE post in the top 10 posts are about it, even tho its fucking today.

every day that passes this community disappoints me even more, not even a week ago we had that ~OMG HIDDEN CODE IN MCAFFE Q PICTURE~ which was literally auto-generated facebook metadata, but even after people pointing it out EXTENSIVELY those posts still end up PINNED BY MODS.

at this point im starting to wander how many mods arent compromised (or just dumb)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›