Sorry for the ambiguity, by "here" I meant GAW

*by promoting gay pride

You forgot to mention that at least one of them is Jewish, which seems to be relevant here

Dan Scavino intentionally follows 955 people so that you know that next week there will be three booms.

Do you use the term "they" broadly? Does it include grifters like Romana Didulo, Charlie Ward, etc?

not much here so let's randomly add 12 hours to get what we want

No Coincidences.

View count and connecting on the word "example". Yeah. A lot of reach here.

Mossad, unlike the Clowns in America, are a top notch intelligence service. Also unlike our Clowns, they're not at all afraid to take the gloves off and get their hands filthy dirty when it comes to what they perceive as protecting their existence.

You might find some people around here (and everywhere) disagreeing that the CIA's hands are clean. Try the Iran/Contra scandal for one.

No false flag theories for this one?!

It's a nice laugh, just don't share it with Debbie Downers who will tell you how it's an oversimplification

He's still second in the polls and Trump wants to make sure all his supporters jump to his ship

It's because his show leans left. A republican candidate so desperate for camera time that he'd show up there is not a good look

Every time I see that watch and people talking about 10:10..

It's a standard. Image search watches and 90% of the time they're set to 10:10 for aesthetic display purposes.

RINO's voting with Dems to keep him as speaker

But.. the dems are voting to oust him as speaker??

RINOs voting for or against McCarthy? I can't keep up now with Trump continuing to endorse McCarthy

I'd love to see more context on this. It's not hard to find two experts disagreeing on something in their field.

Check the drops, he said he did. I guess you can chalk it up to "misinfo" for whatever reason, but then it looks like cherrypicking

"Seeking to avoid the vote" but then how do you reconcile the fact that he voted YEA on it?

That's how I took it, and it flies in the face of the 'bipartisanship" they claim to be looking for

Why didn't dipsh*t McCarthy do this sooner?

Probably because it was unpopular with a lot of his party members. He had to work with the democrats to get it passed and they're bragging about it already.

I just don't understand why he lied about it; he voted FOR the bill that was delayed by the tactic.

What conspiracy theorists were talking about Epstein before the media / investigations?

He gets treated as "the one" who debunked it for effect. There is little to no relationship between him and pizzagate.. yeah that one article from 4 years after the fact lol

Legitimately funny, I'm glad the top comment wasn't too ghoulish