3
Buttery 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a self reported weight, submitted before he arrived.

I figured he gave that weight (and height) as a troll to show how meaningless the booking was.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'd probably go with "nothing is 100% effective" before that ;)

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you think that part of the drop had to do with how many people were having direct contact with HRC, and not.. the rest of the drop, which seemed to imply that they had logs of the emails those people sent while on a NK network.

4
Buttery 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you're setting yourself up for disappointment asking specifics from a post composed nearly entirely of Q quotes

3
Buttery 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of people here seem to think so, though some are hedging their bets based on previous disappointments.

8
Buttery 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm no fan of Z but I didn't see a "tough guy act".

And why bring up a "real street fight" when Z referred to it as a sporting competition? Tweet came off as childish.

4
Buttery 4 points ago +4 / -0

This'll get you the same looks you get when you ask for a White History Month, or an International Men's Day.

13
Buttery 13 points ago +14 / -1

Well that's two better explanations than the initial theory

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been posted many times here, and the general consensus is that he watched the Faces of Death tape, which absolutely shouldn't have been shown to a minor, but but is still not what he believed it was.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not hard to imagine, cause it happenned.

They made a big deal in the media about Ivanka getting hard-to-come-by patents in China when she joined her then-president father on an official trip there.

5
Buttery 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is great, and should be the stickied comment informing people of what actually happened in an unbiased way.

People thinking the judge unilaterally sided with Trump (for whatever reason) will look incredibly uninformed saying that in public.

One point that's glossed over is that the final comment the judge made was clearly directed at Trump, essentially a warning.

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much what I was going to say. Both sides asked for more than what they wanted with the expectation to lose some battles.

For example the judge wasn't going to ask the doj to individually classify 11.7m pages as sensitive or not, per Trump's team's request, but it doesn't hurt to ask.

by b472113
0
Buttery 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you posted this without reading the top comment that clearly shows it's not Schumer and it's just some grandpa and his granddaughter? There's do your own research and there's do your own research.

by BQnita
5
Buttery 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is that Bill Barr on the left? Even with just Durham, this hasn't aged gracefully

2
Buttery 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that the account was omitted is a big red flag. Could just be rage-bait, whether faked or from a troll account.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›