The thing that seems to fit best is that, sadly, mass vaccinating injury and death is part of the plan. What else would make normals hate their leaders so much they wouldn't be able to walk down the streets? Having them push a poison on them. This plan causes innocents to suffer and die from the vaccine and the virus.... it's not a plan for everyone. But discerning researchers will not be able to take the jab. It's the only thing I can think of that makes sense, while also being very sad.
Wtf is this shit
Very similar to the Facebook "whistleblower", this targets useful pawns. Zero US, Canadian, or Australian corruption.
I need one in Winnipeg. We need an FLCCC in Canada
This is exactly why people make fun of us. CDC says the PCR test is not reliable, which is true; you can increase amplifications to a level that shows anything is present. However there are many other tests, and hospitals tend to use more traditional blood tests for their patients; these tests are not variable like the PCR test. Also, people claim SARS-COV-2 has not been isolated; well that was true for like a month early on - but many researchers have since repeatedly isolated it. People in our circle see a conspiracy and take it two steps too far, then everyone else gets to laugh at all of us. Sad.
I wonder if Viva Frei would help setup the Canadian branch. Dear Lord we need that up here too.
The world needs this
Exactly. He banned most of our AR alternatives in what amounts to an executive order, but we can still own guns..... just not ARs or most variants thereof.
The law stipulates you can bring your own pen. They use single use pencils because they are the cheapest disposable option (according to them). But yeah, bring a pen.
This is the same city where Chinese scientists were caught sending viruses to Wuhan's lab, you know, no biggie.
Even with coal power, EVs are much more efficient, especially after the first 5000 miles, where any mining emissions are offset. However, unlike ICE vehicles, EVs can improve on emissions with nuclear or solar or other sources. Just because GM can't seem to find a government bailout from their design failures, doesn't mean EVs aren't the best path forward. But they don't need any incentives, the tech is better, goverment just needs to get out of the way. Stop forcing companies to make EVs. If they don't make them, they'll eventually die out and market share will go to those that actually want to make them.
Yeah, this is the problem. Testing of the populace has been using PCR. However research testing has been done properly, using proper multi day growth testing. So we can't trust the case numbers, but the papers discussing the virus tend to be based on reliable tests.
It's been isolated. It's been sequenced. Just not by simple pcr tests. You can check for yourself. Some Chinese scientists shared the sequence early in before the CCP found out and shut them down. Other countries have since verified the sequence. The main issue is that pcr tests don't isolate it well and give false positives. This means case numbers are wrong, but doesn't mean labs haven't identified it with other tests.
Basically, the idea that SARS-COV-2 doesn't exist or hasn't been isolated is false. The similar, but very important idea that SARS-COV-2 isn't properly tested for in the rapid testing almost everyone uses, is true. The way we are made to look dumb is that these two ideas are often conflated.
Here's one random study early on. Virus was isolated from a urine sample: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32342724/
PCR is the most common test, but traditional lab testing is still being done.
Delta is caused by the vaccines having low efficacy. They allow for high viral load (infection and transmission) while tending to help reduce severe symptoms. This causes selection for vaccine resistant variants and also causes increased transmission rates. These jabs aren't good enough to reach the threshold for vaccine, so they are causing the variants, but don't contain them.
Boosters will continue this trend until the jabs offer no protection at all, as Pfizer's CEO admitted recently.
Best keep the facts straight so we don't look like idiots to those looking to discredit us; pundits from the left and right get this stuff wrong all the time.
This is a big misinformation trend that makes us all look crazy. The PCR tests used by almost everyone aren't meant to detect who has the virus, and those "tests" therefore can't isolate variants or prove one has the virus. However researchers have sequenced the virus gene, and variants and some traditional lab testing is still being done, showing which variant people have etc.
SARS-COV-2 exists, has been sequenced, and found to be infecting lots of people. The real scandal though is that PCR tests give false positives, and COVID deaths have been given an obscenely low bar, including sometimes having symptoms or positive PCR "test", but dying for some other reason.
That all said, I am still suspicious of the phrase "with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness"; what are these differences. I couldn't find anything. But saying they are the same formulation seems to cover the chemical differences, hence why I think they are referring to the legal differences (liability).
I did some more research. Looks like the Doc is wrong on this, but there is still a lot of ammunition in the letters. I made a larger comment about what I found.
Ok so it looks like the Dr. is wrong about the two drugs being different, but right about the differing liability / legality of the two different labels, and about the admission of myocarditis pericarditis concerns (and others), and the insanity of full approval while studies have barely begun. Details below:
In the FDA site, they state the following: "The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty" https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
In the FAQ section, they elaborate: "The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness." https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
So, these are in fact the exact same drug, but with different labels they carry different legal statuses. If you are worried about liability therefore, this is ammunition to avoid the Pfizer and wait for Comirnaty. If you are instead worried about long-term health effects, there is more here...
Cominarty's package insert has charts showing adverse effects and effectiveness studies that encompass just 7-days. https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download
This same insert notes that adverse effects that were unsolicited (!) were recorded in 4 to 6 months after the second dosing. This means, the only data we have so far after 7 days is both unsolicited, and at a maximum of 6 months.
This insert also mentions: "The safety and effectiveness of COMIRNATY in individuals younger than 16 years of age have not been established." So why are many mandating vaccinations in 12+? Because that age group is covered by the EUA, which has no liability and is based on their best guesses (not data).
This insert also mentions there is an ongoing pregnancy study, so no data exists yet on how this will affect birth defects or miscarriage rates.
Further to the insert, the approval letter itself has lots of ammunition about long-term effects concerns: https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
Safety Study for 12-15 year-olds deferred, scheduled to complete May 2023 Safety Study for 6mos-12 year-olds deferred, scheduled to complete November 2023 Safety Study for 0-6mos-olds deferred, scheduled to complete July 2024
Myocarditis and Pericarditis safety study #C4591009 set to complete June 2025, #C4591021 and #C4591021 in March 2024, and long-term study #C4591036 in Dec 2026. There are many other studies, with the soonest study, #C4591031 completing June 2022.
A pregnancy study #C4591022 won't complete until 2025.
There are more studies that are required to finish and submit reports as conditions of this license......That should really be the huge issue here. How can we have a licensed drug, on the condition that if this licensed drug starts to kill people in 2 to 5 years, they would really like to know about it then.
It's not a vaccine, it's a therapy.
So no approval for Pfizer at all.
It's been said before this guy isn't the best expert, misleading about what he means by Oxford etc. Best focus on FLCC etc.
Click bait. This was in Singapore. He was deported, didn't have to serve the full sentence, and the eval was done midway through the court proceedings.
Stuff on GAW goes into the ether quickly.... did anyone have a link to the site where docs listed all this stuff? Was it the FLCC?
Thank you!