It sure looks like you missed the point.
Lucifer the light bearer was a carrier of the light but not the originator of the light, until his Fall. Now he is a mere shadow of his pre-Fall self, and now all he bears is shadow, the absence of light. Thus what the Freemasons worship now is shadow, which is the absence of light, of good and of God: that is to say, they now worship evil.
There is no confusion in StormzAComing's statement to "be the light", that is to say partake in the Light of God, while condemning the Satanic adversary, Lucifer the light bearer, because they are not the same thing. Praise the fig fruit (light of God), but if the fig tree bears no fruit (Lucifer, former bearer of light, now bearer of shadow), then the Lord will strike it down.
You would do well to realise that Lucifer's name is now an ironic mockery of his former role.
That attempt will backfire miserably, because no one knows who Brandon is or what he's accomplished but they'll certainly know who Biden is and how blatantly destructive he is. Plus it just makes them look like they're trying to hide something.
Lucifer was the Light Bearer, but never the source of Light. He rebelled against God the Light of the World and sought to elevate the light of humanity above the Lord and in His absence. Thus as Lucifer's punishment he is now forever denied the opportunity to bear the Light in any capacity ever again, to the day he and his followers are cast into the lakes of fire.
Do not ever glorify Lucifer, for then you will step into the same world as those who have committed the most unspeakable sins.
Well illustrated. That very much sounds like Mass Formation:
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zfvWfPpW/mass-formation-clinical-psycholo/c/
Without God, they have lost a fundamental sense of purpose and meaning.
In place of a wholesome faith, the people who relished the shot have been baptised into the Church of Jecovid's Witnesses, and proclaim a Spiky Gospel from the Blighthouse.
I hope so! Or it was never a mandate in the first place. The Andrews state government has a very nasty way with public pressure, weasel words, and bait-and-switch tactics.
I could be very wrong and they could turn around and make it all real, but Dan Andrews is known for being very good at appearing as clean as possible while convincing other people into folding all on their own.
EDIT: The premier still has the announcement among his media releases. However, it is buried in the archive and not linked to from the homepage: https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/vaccination-required-protect-workers-and-victoria
Note: This does not necessarily mean that they won't have legal backing by October 15, but for an announcement this big, the legal framework being absent makes me think this is more of a fear-based push to pressure people into booking for vaccinations.
In related news, Teacher challenges Victorian government's COVID-19 vaccine mandate
EDIT: The premier still has the announcement among his media releases. However, it is buried in the archive and not linked to from the homepage. It is also not the same as a law as a premier cannot legislate by decree:
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/vaccination-required-protect-workers-and-victoria
You better get your definition of "liberal democratic" straightened up real quick, because traditionally it refers to classic liberalism, which is much more in line with free market enterprise, libertarianism, capitalism, individualism, etc. and is very much anti-communist.
In the US you have this weird co-opting of the definitions by the leftist Marxists who want to go all 1984 on us and flip and manufacture definitions.
Link to Chat Line:
10/01/2021: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XnnZX5EcjE
Compilation Index:
Volume 1: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hl5CQ7Im/chat-line-compilation-index-to-d/c/
Volume 2: https://greatawakening.win/p/140c4ldmeF/chat-line-compilation-index-volu/c/
Link
https://files.catbox.moe/9z0c9r.pdf
Source From ZeroHedge
https://mega.nz/file/HZNmyRKB#xF15FrsAEZkwBPi4tdUP5toBBqeRHDJJAHzZt6Hg_Qg
Originally posted by u/Merkava_4
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zNAspa7j/the-spartacus-letter-explains-ev/
Here's the PDF:
There's a version via ZeroHedge that's a copy of the likely original document:
https://mega.nz/file/HZNmyRKB#xF15FrsAEZkwBPi4tdUP5toBBqeRHDJJAHzZt6Hg_Qg
Try use catbox.moe links instead. If you're linking correctly, it might be that the ".cloud" domain is not being recognised as a valid link.
There's a version via ZeroHedge that's a copy of the likely original document:
https://mega.nz/file/HZNmyRKB#xF15FrsAEZkwBPi4tdUP5toBBqeRHDJJAHzZt6Hg_Qg
Catbox Mirror:
No, I think you misunderstand what's happening here. As I understand it, "the majority decision" refers to the original ruling "by majority" against Ms Kimber. That majority decision was appealed by Ms Kimber, and the Fair Work Commission overturned that majority decision in common agreement, qualified by a joint document. There is no dissenting opinion recorded in this document.
Is "Wor-ces-ter-shire" acceptable?