2
farmforfreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isn't about your current bitcoins or dodgecoins folks. Central bank digital currency is a coming

3
farmforfreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Silence is too. Shit...

3
farmforfreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is by design. The masses are either chasing the comforts they feel they've earned or are too busy trying to survive. Leaving us trying to convince the rest it's time to pay attention.

by PepeSee
2
farmforfreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

All loyalty out the window to bust a nut.

1
farmforfreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn't write the agenda. But surely read it.

1
farmforfreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. They talk about how he's always done this heart. Was he chosen naturally? Was he grooming people all along?

37
farmforfreedom 37 points ago +37 / -0

You get some documents, you get some documents, everyone gets some documents!

2
farmforfreedom 2 points ago +3 / -1

Here is what the "anarchists" say about property destruction:

"Violence against Property vs. Violence against People

Again, some people reject that violence is the correct word to describe property destruction. Because physical objects cannot feel pain, they argue, tools like spray paint and accelerants can’t be considered weapons and their use is not violent. I think the distinction between sensate beings and insensate objects is crucial. So is property destruction violent or nonviolent? This question is both pragmatic—we do need to call it something—and experiential. Destroying property can be done without harming a single sentient being and with great effect to stop an unjust system. Can anyone really argue against the French resistance blowing up railroad tracks and bridges to stop the Nazis?

But violence against property can also be an act meant to intimidate. This is the source of the unease that many progressives and radicals may feel toward property destruction. If you have been a person so threatened, you know how effective it is. Indeed, if violence against property were an ineffective approach to instilling fear and compliance, no one would ever use it. Burning a cross on someone’s lawn is meant to traumatize and terrorize. So is smashing all the dinner plates to the floor. A friend who survived a right-wing terrorist attack on the building where she worked was later hospitalized with severe PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder). Property destruction can have a crippling effect on sentient beings.

Whatever we decide to call property destruction, we need to weigh the consequences and strategic benefits and make our decisions from there. Again, “violence” is not a bad word, only a descriptive one. Obviously, many more people can accept an attack against a window, a wall, or an empty building than can accept violence against a person, and that’s as it should be. But wherever you stand personally on this issue, basic respect for each other and for our movement as a whole demands that we acknowledge the distinction between people and property when we discuss violence."

https://deepgreenresistance.net/en/resistance/liberals-radicals/categories-of-violence/

2
farmforfreedom 2 points ago +3 / -1

The blame is on Acuity Brand according to articles, big light manufacturing company in Atlanta. So, they suck and should no longer get the business of our tax dollars if true. Also, they should replace faulty bulbs. That's business. But this is just weirdly suspicious.

6
farmforfreedom 6 points ago +6 / -0

The amount of news articles about this being defect makes one suspicious. Gonna do anything about these defective lights? Or just one day all the lights happen to be defective all over the country...

3
farmforfreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

They had that creepy ritual with the bull at those common wealth games, they tamed it with a crystal from space or something.

Nations fighting over rare earth mineral?

7
farmforfreedom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Crack cooks better on propane, cmon man

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›