1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

After a bit of coaxing i got ChatGPT to summarize a realistic analysis of TRUMP / KAMALA economic recovery plans. Any one of these sections could be expanded into great detail, let me know if you have any questions.

Trump’s Plan: Core Strengths Restoring Domestic Manufacturing and Jobs: Trump’s plan prioritizes bringing back U.S. manufacturing and creating jobs domestically. By implementing targeted tariffs, the plan discourages reliance on artificially cheap foreign imports and incentivizes companies to produce within the U.S., strengthening supply chains and creating stable, high-quality jobs.

Incentivizing Business Growth and Investment: Trump’s approach includes tax cuts specifically designed to encourage new domestic production. This policy is based on the principle that any revenue from new investment is beneficial, and a surplus to the revenue not collected if that investment never occurred. It stimulates economic growth organically, rather than through continuous government funding. Lower tax burdens also help make U.S. businesses more competitive globally.

Revenue Generation through Tariffs: The plan’s strategic use of tariffs creates a direct revenue stream that can offset the cost of tax cuts, support infrastructure, and reduce dependency on deficit spending. Tariffs act as a self-funding mechanism that, while protecting key industries, also contributes to the federal budget.

Reducing Dependency on Subsidies and State-Run Programs: Trump’s plan focuses on fostering a market-driven economy rather than relying on subsidies for specific industries. This approach encourages industries to become self-sustaining and competitive rather than dependent on government funding.

Kamala Harris’s Plan: Core Weaknesses Reliance on Subsidies and Green Energy: Kamala Harris’s plan is heavily focused on green energy, which, currently requires substantial taxpayer support to be viable, or require government forced green energy mandates which drive up energy costs. Without sustainable demand, this approach risks creating industries that depend on constant government subsidies, draining public funds without long-term economic gains, and increasing energy costs.

Centralized Economic Control and Bureaucratic Expansion: Harris’s approach expands government control over the economy, adding regulatory and administrative layers that increase costs for businesses and reduce economic efficiency. This model aligns more closely with a centrally planned economy(communism / socialism) which can stifle innovation and growth.

Short-Term Job Creation, Long-Term Fragility: While green energy and infrastructure spending create jobs in the short term, these jobs are not sustainable without ongoing public support. Furthermore, focusing on select industries without addressing underlying economic inefficiencies risks creating temporary employment rather than long-term economic resilience.

Ignoring Core Issues of Trade Imbalance and Regulatory Burden: The plan does not directly address the trade imbalances or regulatory barriers that have driven U.S. businesses offshore. Without correcting these foundational issues, the U.S. remains dependent on foreign goods, with high domestic costs that weaken competitiveness.

Why Trump’s Plan is Superior Focuses on Core Economic Strength: Trump’s plan targets the root issues that have eroded the U.S. manufacturing base and weakened domestic competitiveness—trade imbalances, regulatory burdens, and the need for a level playing field.

Prioritizes Long-Term Economic Stability: By encouraging self-sustaining industries, the plan reduces the risk of dependency on government funding. Tax incentives and tariffs create a balanced approach that drives growth without compromising economic sovereignty.

Increases Resilience and Self-Sufficiency: Trump’s plan seeks to reduce U.S. dependency on foreign production and aims to establish supply chains that are resilient to external shocks. This enhances national security and economic stability, which is critical for long-term prosperity.

In conclusion, Trump’s plan offers a more sustainable model by fostering a competitive, market-driven economy with a focus on self-sufficiency, whereas Kamala Harris’s plan relies heavily on subsidies, centralized control, and short-term job creation. The fundamental strengths of Trump’s plan make it better suited to drive lasting economic growth and stability, addressing the real issues that have challenged the U.S. economy.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just look at Nobel award wining economist of Paul Krugman, if you want to know how seriously to take these people.

He is literally wrong about everything he ever says. The establishment economists are just as bad as the politicians, they push agendas and they are f*cking morons.

these are just a few of his highlights https://thespectator.com/topic/the-top-five-things-paul-krugman-has-gotten-wrong/

3
freedomdude508 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd say he is more of a Pimp than a human trafficker. I don't think the lover boy method of getting girls to go on webcam, is necessarily in the same realm of human trafficking as its commonly understood.

4
freedomdude508 4 points ago +4 / -0

I never even considered that before, i usually just saw whatever amount of millions for people stating in his hotels seemed like a reasonable figure. But when you think about it, the profit to the Trump organization is far less than that. Democrats love to twist the facts, that's not net revenue to trump from foreign countries, thats Gross. So deducting the cost of goods or services that figure is substantially less. Probably at least by a figure of 50%. But that's the game they play because even i uncritically just accepted that figure at face value.

3
freedomdude508 3 points ago +6 / -3

I don't get the fixation to try and investigate these things as false flags. We all just witnessed them killing millions of us with the Covid, they slaughter thousands and thousands in their Wars.

Do you think they are losing any sleep over dropping 6 people in a school or even a thousand?

They may do false flags, but they are real events. 9/11 was real, op Northwoods was gonna be real. Dumping chemicals in our water and derailing trains are all real. Poisoning our food, injecting us with poison vaxes and blocking access to covid stopping drugs. They aren't staging shit, they are trying to kill you.

0
freedomdude508 0 points ago +1 / -1

I hope Trumps security team is on high alert, this situation is very concerning to me. Seems like there is going to be a lot of chaos in that city, and trump is not going to be at arms length distance protected by the usual motorcade and layers of security.

this is not good...

2
freedomdude508 2 points ago +2 / -0

its very likely they will try to take him out, this would be their best opportunity. Especially with all the chaos in NYC if they have all these cops running "protection" it would be really easy to plot to have some psycho pull a JFK

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

let's just hope JOK doesn't have any non-compete language in any of his contracts. that would be the only issue with him just starting up another company.

In an industry like his, where you could start a new company overnight, I can see why that may be the case. Ultimately I guess it depends on who is donors were and how closely they got involved in the business.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope they at least have to give up an organ before the possibility of getting out early. Flagging themselves as a donor is already what most people do anyways.

They should at least have to give up a Kidney, or a portion of their lung, liver, pancreas or intestine before they could get any benefit.

im not making any judgments on if this is a good plan or not, but I'm guessing if a democrat made this bill, it won't require anything that would be an imposition to let a criminal out of jail.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can thank this very line of thinking for the fact I sit here today unvaccinated.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +2 / -1

Kind of misleading, i wouldn't say they "sell" sex dolls with genitals for faces.

They have sold some super creepy art by a couple of strange artists and probably pedos, but this headline and framing, is making it seem like they are mass-producing cum sleeves.

-1
freedomdude508 -1 points ago +1 / -2

why dont you just post the sauce you found and save everyone the trouble with digging down every rabit hole. you're not q, there is no reason to frame everything as questions. q has legit national security and classified intel reasons why can just cant post the answer to every question? I'm guessing you do not.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need Trump to go "death con 3" today.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see what's wrong with ONLYfans, if some chick wants to get naked and sell her pics to a bunch of dudes, why would we condone the government getting involved in that transaction?

This type of morality policing is what opens the door to democrats abusing government power when they have control too. We should reject government intervention in any private commerce.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

Awesome fucking edit, dude. That's serious talent. Nice work !!!!!

10
freedomdude508 10 points ago +10 / -0

What I dont understand about this theory is how would they expect that the only copies of whatever documents, electronic or otherwise, is just sitting in Trumps safe. Trumps people had no redundancy or backups of the most damaging political data in this country's history?

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

The existing system is pretty close to a social credit system as it is... you would be shocked to know the extent of what's gathered on your credit/report consumer databases.
Combine that with our criminal record system tracking of every dumb decision made since you turned 18 and it's enough to get someone blackballed from the marketplace.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

This video was genius, putting the case to music helps people remember. Whenever I need to recall the fact pattern of events this video pops in my head every time. hat-tip to the meme maker.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

thats photoshopped no way is that the body proportions of someone 6-9

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

classic libtard.... write 4 paragraphs threatening a violent revolution, then capping it with "I'm not the organizing type".....lol

2
freedomdude508 2 points ago +2 / -0

So in order to get the same nicotine dose, which is the addictive part. People will now have to ingest 2x as much of the chemicals and smoke.
If anything they should be increasing the nicotine.

Every idea a democrat has is enterirely backward.

1
freedomdude508 1 point ago +1 / -0

this has glowie written all over it. Demoralization attempt.

view more: Next ›