I like it. I'm all-in for their program. We get to implant chips into the brains of the elite, turning them into hackable animals. We get to inject false memories into their heads, for example erasing any memory of them ever being in charge of anything or of ever having been invited to Davos to discuss plans for the future for the world. On top of it we don't have to have a vote on this because we already know it's what the majority wants for them. Plus the other six things.

“We choose to do this to the Davosians in this decade, and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are deserved”. - some friendly bear I know

Fresh out of new mod boot camp, am I right? Only the brave of heart make it through the training program.

I hope Mike Lindell sleeps well tonight.

First, I must warn you that most of you will find the linked article by Martin Geddes to be REALLY heavy reading.

It is relatively light reading compared to his Omega Lambda Delta Sigma structural framework that he recently came up with and has been trying to apply to all manner of things. Martin has a weakness for over-intellectualizing the world into formalized computational structures. Still a great guy, though a little too brainy for his own good.

Ground-based, airplane-based, satellite-based, or a coordinated combination? Anyone here deep into military tech able to elucidate?

One Leads To Many

Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example] Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today. ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER. ONE LEADS TO MANY. Crimes against Children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][mass pop awakening]. Have faith in Humanity. Q

"Q [Team] is behind the Trump administration." is the correct ordering.

Birx may have played an even more pivotal role, but Saint Fauci's demeanor of sanctimonious superiority really grates, doesn't it? I rarely feel the emotion of pleasure at someone else's downfall, but in this case I make an exception.

Just as long as they don't paint everything as Fauci's fault, throwing him under the bus in order to halt investigations from looking any further.

Thanks. That's a new one for me. Mind you, I'm congenitally allergic to "meditation, kirtan, and yoga wisdom". Oh bother, another weird word to look up in the dictionary. What the heck is kirtan? Something that probably appeals to the new age California-centered peace love and inner balance crowd. I guess Tulsi grew up in that milieu.

The genetic reality is that blacks are superior at pretty much every sport benefiting from a high complement of fast twitch muscle fibers. Come to think of it, the marathoners and middle distance runners from various African countries have for decades been a step above the rest of the world.

Doping though. Pervasive in nearly all sports at the highest level from cross country skiing to soccer. Just the way the world works.

The bigger scandal here is all the (millions of) autopsies that never occurred. Before they launched their Covid war on humanity in 2020/21, looking back at the operation, they needed to have the entire {coroner / medical examiner / forensic pathologist} professional complex wrapped up, on board, and under full control. The scope of corruption that exists in medicine, in law, in policing, and at the intersection of medicine, law, and policing is mind boggling. To wrap my head around it all I'd need a brain at least ten times larger that what I happen to have.

Watching Tulsi's trajectory for the past eight years or so I'm inclined to think she was a long-range strategic white hat insert into the democrat party, to be flipped over to the republican party at the right time. Could be wrong, but it makes sense that infiltration works both ways in this war. What was the dodgy cult?

My suspicion is that Greenspan was always a Tribe member of the Globalist Bankers, and was sent into Ayn Rand's discussion group to keeps tabs on movement. His essay Gold and Economic Freedom published in The Objectivist stands as a good piece to this day, but writing it was probably how he kept his cover. When Greenspan became Chairman of the Federal Reserve the mainstream media brushed away his endorsement of the gold standard as the misguided thinking of a young economist. In retrospect it is quite possible that he did not believe what he wrote even at that time. That fact that he made no more contributions adds to my suspicion that he was a temporary insert.

It may depend on how you have X configured. In my case I read X posts without being logged in. Which means that for me timestamps are in Greenwich mean time (or UTC), which is 4 hours ahead of Eastern Daylight Savings Time, 5 hours ahead of Central Daylight Savings Time, etc. You can test it by noting the relative time of the most recent post (e.g. "17 minutes ago") then clicking on it to see the absolute time. Example: current time for me is 5:49 EDT. Latest White House X post shows as 17 minutes ago. Click on item. It shows 9:32 PM. 5:49 - 0:17 + 4:00 = 9:32.

P.S. I didn't make up the 17 minutes part. Got lucky on that one.

The fact that both Wall Street Journal and Barrons have published articles on this today (within minutes of each other) tells me that there was an embargo on their release. Already written and ready to go when given the signal from the WH press coordinator.

Those timestamps are in Greenwich mean time (or UTC), which is 4 hours ahead of Eastern Daylight Savings time, 5 hours ahead of CDT, etc. You can test it by noting the relative time of the most recent post (e.g. "28 minutes ago") then clicking on it to see the absolute time.

The invisible character on line 48 is simply a plain old regular space (ASCII code 32). In the json dump posted by u/merf it is the last character of the first line of backslash n's (newline characters). It's what permits the GAW formatter to treat it as a single "word" and break the line.

It might be a hidden reference to Q post number 48, or just a spare space amongst all the newlines used to push the punchline out of view. Either way, amazing troll. The Q overlays are getting increasingly frequent and obvious. Showing it to Mrs. Fuzzy Bear just now made her do a little dance of delight.

Correct. Sergey Brin. Too bad we don't have a reliable billionaire scorecard tracker.

I don't think we're as far apart as you suggest. My position is that intelligence is solely a property of conscious beings. Computers as we know them are not conscious. Therefore what modern software exhibits is not intelligence in its true form. (Among AI researchers this position is considered hard-line.) I prefer to use the term Intelligence Mimicry, not that I expect the term to catch on. You might have heard of the Eliza Effect. That's the tendency of humans to impute intelligence onto entities that do not possess it, especially computers.

The big "yeah but" to all this squabbling over intelligence is that it hardly matters. The capabilities of modern AI are becoming fearsome, and if you don't believe that you have not been paying attention. When the enemy's AI-powered military strike force out maneuvers our human-loop decision process on the battlefield (hypothetically), that it happened at the hands of "dumb computers" is small consolation.

To the mindset of the Executive Vice President of Sales at Lockheed Martin, China are the good guys (creates market demand). New companies on the scene such as yours are the bad guys (creates excess supply). Harsh, but once you peer into the mind of Sales it's not much of an exaggeration.

Caveat: while never having met them I do hold a fondness for Kelly Johnson and Ben Rich.

Intelligence is indeed a difficult word to define. Capacity for abstraction and complex thought is a handy concise formulation. But that restricts itself to the upper reaches of intellect. As a working definition I like: the ability to correctly assess the current situation and to successfully project future consequences. This covers a broad range, including animal intelligence.

Here's a really homey example of (low) intelligence that fits into my definition. I'm upstairs in my home office finishing my lunch. I go to the upstairs bathroom. The toilet paper runs low. Not being completely clueless so as not to run out, I go down to the the basement to retrieve another roll before the current one is empty. When I return upstairs I spot my empty plate sitting next to my desk. DOH! That was dumb. I should have grabbed the plate, dropped it off in the kitchen, then gone to the basement to fetch the toilet paper. If I were smarter I would have folded both tasks into one trip.

When it comes to the computer software, now near-universally called AI, I prefer the term Intelligence Mimicry. LLMs are a far ways from full-on organic intelligence, but still impressive in many tasks that exists at the surface level interface of human intelligence, e.g. question & answering, written responses. Today's frontier models do better than most humans at college entrance exams to graduate school. MMLU-Pro: A robust and challenging evaluation of a language model's multitask accuracy, benchmark and paper.

And if I may round out with a racist comment, the paper I linked has 17 authors contributing from three universities. All three universities are prestigious, 2 Canadian and 1 in the U.S., top-tier in computer science. Judging by the names the authorship consists of 2 Indians and 15 Chinese. Unless we reverse our education system there our culture is so screwed.

"When the billionaire class flips sides to Trump it's over for the deep state." - Edward Dowd, 2024-ish

Nicole Shanahan flipped sides, and that turned beneficial for the MAHA sub-movement of MAGA. Don't know if her ex-husband is having any second thoughts.

I love Edward Griffin. And still being productive, albeit physically weakened, at 94 is an inspiration. But, "How Our Rulers Use Controlled Opposition to Destroy Us" explained on the Alex Jones Show? Ironic anyone? Or am I misreading the loyalties of Alex and should put him back into the camp of maybe-a-good-guy?

That is a saddening reality. Were not for the replacement migration the kill-off of whites would be too obvious to not discuss. Because the streets and businesses and economy would be just so hollowed out. As Godisglory puts it, "Where are the US Citizens?" Got to hand it to the bad guys. They thought through the cover-up.

"when I was shaking things up at the Pentagon. I learned that generals don’t make big decisions or they get thrown out of the club."

This is a very interesting comment, one with an obvious follow through. Who does make the big decisions for the military? What is the real chain of command above the echelon of generals?