1
hundro 1 point ago +1 / -0

The wording is confusing. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say our biggest problem is that we DO believe that the people in control couldn't possibly be that evil?

4
hundro 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. I remember many years ago there was a weird story about an FBI (?) agent that confronted a Russian ambassador outside their embassy trying to get him to look into some information he had come across. He was talking about "something they were going to do" and that they "had to be stopped".

Then, there was a manhunt for the agent with media saying he was mentally unstable and a threat to himself. I think they eventually found him suicided and then they arrested another agent that worked with him for child porn.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is very interesting, considering the apparent role of DOD in actually developing the jabs. It seems counterintuitive for DOD to conclude from actual testing that the best treatment for coronavirus is IVM/HCQ, then 15 years later to suddenly decide "No, let's try something completely unproven instead".

Remember-- big pharma wanted to keep a lid on what was in the jabs. What if DOD tasked Pfizer, etc. to produce vaccines (using their recipe) that were safe and effective, but the DS decided to use all of its power to convince people that the jabs were deadly, people were dying on TV, etc.?

This theory relies heavily on a consensus-based reality.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even a fella like me could get his self smart hangin' around this forum. Thanks for the knowledge.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. You made me laugh loud enough that my wife wondered what I was looking at.

1
hundro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you're right (I google-earthed it), but you might be a racist.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry for the delay. The article popped up on my default homepage, which is about the only MSM news I ever see. Unfortunately, it refreshes to new content, so here is the nearest I could find to a source:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/osama-bin-ladens-dead-son-is-alive-and-well-and-has-taken-over-al-qaeda-as-dads-heir/ar-AA1qwhda

1
hundro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ditto. I occasionally go to "the news" to have a laugh at what they are trying to spin.

4
hundro 4 points ago +4 / -0

I assumed it was Trump intentionally misspelling in order to get MSM to share his post.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's funny how the taxpayers bought the donuts, but justine is presenting them as a gift from him. Fuck off.

2
hundro 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you say "They are criminals… period.", I can't tell which side you're talking about.

3
hundro 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it was a privileged, private, privy council conversation, how does he know about it? I'm not doubting it, I just want to be prepared for the obvious question from doubters/vaxxers.

Edit--here's the answer: https://torontosun.com/news/national/privy-council-advocated-downplaying-covid-vaccine-injuries-or-deaths

3
hundro 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wish the cowards that quietly went along with things because speaking out would be difficult/dangerous would just admit that. Instead, they feel compelled to tell us of their tortuous ordeal as they wanted to-- but just couldn't tell the truth all these years. The very people that had enough credibility to actually get the truth out there were too scared, so the world assumed that if the Naomi Wolfs of the world weren't concerned, then there was nothing wrong. I'm sorry, but her explanation for her lateness to the party means nothing to me.

5
hundro 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's emblematic of this moment in time. You exerted yourself to find a pixelated and audibly garbled clip of a candidate endeavoring to save the country and the world, while the dems exerted themselves to lure people in with the promise of a concert in an effort to save themselves from being criminally prosecuted for their crimes.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›