2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

TWSUF is right about the interpretation of the post.

To evaluate its underlying meaning we have to understand "time". The current basics of our understanding of time are in special and general relativity. Time is interesting and is intimately joined with the speed of light - a universal constant and a universal limit.

Briefly - time in relativity theory exists as a single block or "loaf" for the whole universe. The loaf is cut at various angles through an observer's present moment. The slices are the observer's simultaneity and the angles of the slicings are determined by relative motion.

So what other events are in your past, present or future are in this sense determined by your "travel", i.e. by your motion relative to other events. Q may have been referring to this fact.

Then there is a fascinating experiment of quantum optics known as the delayed choice quantum eraser, due to M.O. Scully and others (Robert Druhl, a non-physicist, originally conceived it). Scully's experiment shows (conslusively) that events in the future of other events can and do affect events that have already occurred. So in this sense future does not only prove past, future can determine past.

Google has some fairly good pages on the Scully delayed choice experiment and its derivitaves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed-choice_quantum_eraser

The Kim experiment of 1999 is the most interesting version.

8
jfunction 8 points ago +8 / -0

Baier is a jerk who makes himself less relevant day by day, broadcast by broadcast.

His reputation would be served by quitting ASAP.

Kari Lake is on track for high national office.

4
jfunction 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thought same.

Smells of specious from across the room.

1
jfunction 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the cabal does have a doomsday weapon and we know about it - that would explain Q's, "had to be" phraseology.

Personally, I took the, "had to be" literally as meaning, "we had no choice at all about this" rather than as meaning, "this was by far the best option".

My opinion - my interpretation.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm 80. My dear, highly accomplished older brother died at 79 from a nerve degenerative disease that was certainly alcohol related.

Personally, I'm looking to make 100 years. ATM see no reason why not. I will tell you that if you stay healthy the later portions of life can be the richest years you will live.

Keep that in mind.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very intelligent analysis of why Q can't be coming from the cabal side.

However the forecast of what an armed fight against the cabal might be like is way off - imo.

You seem to think the whole of the military and law enforcement would side with the black hat factions and that is very far from true.

The majority of the military, imo at least 60% is committed to their oath and would side with the People. Probably about the same for LE.

So there would not be a long, bloody war, Viet Nam style. If a civil war does break out it is going to be brief. The only thing I really wonder about that could be really bad is that the cabal may have a doomsday weapon of some kind they are holding over the white hats and the world.

Do they have a nuke planted in the Yellowstone Caldera? A dirty radiation bomb in some major American city? An effective bioweapon?

They may, and defusing such a threat may be a big part of the reason we have moved as slowly as we have.

Bringing the normies along never has rung true to me. Not completely. The normies can be educated in the aftermath - when things are cool and mellow. There is no reason to educate them in this hideous in-your-face way.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you use PURE oregano oil be careful with it because it is very powerful. If you want rapid, powerful results try it. I've used it quite a bit and recommend it as an antifungal.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of these days she may be our President.

Would she agree to run for VP with DeSantis heading the ticket?

I don't know but that would be a real powerhouse.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. I eat once a day, period. Keto. Today, was a pound of organic ground beef. More often is bacon and eggs and sometimes fish and eggs. A few vegtables. A few berries. Moderate exercise. About half an hour today.

No bad consumption habits - one cappuccino a day. Vitamin and mineral supplements are vital, imo.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. The Trump-Putin alliance has been clear since Helsinki and the kinship-of-rivals relationship with Xi has been (a little less) clear since Xi was at Mar-a-Lago.

Personally, I wish DJT would channel a little more of his inner Putin.

5
jfunction 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, my first thought was that Garland's trip is the beginning of what will become the massive media effort of the US coverup of our (the democrat-globalists - that is) many crimes in Ukraine beginning with human trafficking, money laundering and bioweapons R&D.

The globalists have to shut down the crimes and cover them up to save their lives. They won't succeed but I see this as the beginning of the public effort.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a US VPN and a US landline phone and am unable to join - without a cellular phone.

Is this an oversight on their part ot is it because they won't let you join unless they can track your movements?

Have tried to join several times and just hit a dead end.

3
jfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

6; 4" too and almost wrecked a girl friend's Jaguar XKE because the bottom of the dashboard blocked my knees and I couldn't operate the brakes and clutch.

Once I was in a crowd where there was a wall of mirrors, it was in a movie theater, and I saw myself a full head above the crowd. In the first instant there was a flash of wonder, "Who's that?" - and then I realized, "Oh, that's me".

I wouldn't want to be any taller.

2
jfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's certainly the popular opinion in the comments under this ridicule-debunk.

The comments are so consistent It's almost as if a group of allied people had gotten together and decided to make RRN and anyone who gives it credence look ridiculous, so the site will lose readership.

So I wonder how many of the comments in this list are really written by independent thinkers and how many are from people operating from other than independent thought.

5
jfunction 5 points ago +5 / -0

This "debunking" is a ridicule job. That's its problem.

It's effectively calling RRN a conspiracy theory. Now who else does a lot of that?

To really be effective a "debunking" would expose the "obvious fallacies" RRN publishes. That would be very easy for someone with firm contrary knowledge to do because RRN stories are full of name and rank and firm-worked-for detail.

ANYONE with real contrary knowledge who wanted to could easy cut RRN down with one stroke of his truth sword but (to my knowledge) that has not yet happened.

Now on the other hand many people are scared of ridicule.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›