Old joke--- Two townsmen are walking past the local graveyard at midnight and are shocked to see the dead Beethoven sitting up in his coffin, hastily erasing notes from sheets of music. "What on Earth is that?" says one townsman. "Why it is Beethoven, decomposing in his grave," says the other.
??? This is marvelous---literally (and not in a bad way). I have to think that "the MAGA movement" is more than meets the eye.
Shouldn't the denominator be the number of total potential voters? I presume the 250 million is the number of supportive voting Americans.
Hear, hear. My model for what is going on is the extirpation of a mass psychopathic cult, which will require full exposure / disclosure of the truth, its establishment as unarguable fact, a coming to terms with all the implications to all the presumptions and assumptions we have been working under, fatal decisions about the disposition of culprits and false ideals, blood sacrifices of expiation, and learning how to function in a spiritually clean world. None of this works if the truth is not fully faced, because honesty is the foundation of integrity.
If the parallel is not obvious, I am talking about the journey any criminally insane person must travel to become free from pain and horror, and live a sane life. For us, what is going on simply begs to be understood as psychological problems and conflicts.
From what I can tell by his recent commercials, Lindell has totally branched out from pillows into other areas of sleeping comforts. He is as lusty in his commercials as ever. It may be a sign that he has taken his (contrived) market rejection and counter-attacked with a broader product line and a broader market base.
Human beings are capable of the greatest evils, according to "sane" thinking and behavior. Don't trivialize this evil choice by thinking demons are required to make it happen. All that is required is abandonment of God.
The Q statement irritates me beyond description. Human beings of any age must cope with natural disasters since millennia (e.g., Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina, sinking ships, tornadoes throughout the Midwest, volcanic eruptions tantamount to a nuclear bomb, horrific car crashes with terrible lifelong injuries to the survivor, debilitating cancer, the indiscriminate destruction and privation of warfare). What can conceivably be worse than all these physical intrusions of chaos, ruin, death, and maiming injury? I don't buy it. Ordinary people survive all these things, including family treacheries and tragedies. I can accept that it might send 99% of the hard-core leftists to the mental hospital, owing to a psychotic break occasioned by cognitive dissonance, but that would be it. We are not children. And my reserve toward Q is exactly on account of this premise that we are children.
I am also hard core on the belief that truth belongs to God, and the closer we are to truth---as harrowing as it may be---the closer we are to God.
Sorry. Wasn't aware. Thought it would make it easier to read. Will comply.
Yes. We underestimate the level of psychotic mentation among the general populace.
I don't believe that for a second. Plenty of stuff they don't reveal, until it is too late.
The only valid legal definition is the one that appears in the Constitution. It is worth looking it up. What is posted is not it, and is too broad and fuzzy.
Yep. And how far did it go? All the way to the White House. Twice. When you have the media in your pocket, what do you have to fear from the truth?
That would have to mean that, upon examination, their vote on bills could not have counted. And that they enjoyed salaries and perquisites of office illegally, and therefore fraudulently.
So, they all take an oath to defend and support a foundational document that the Democrats regard as being partisan trash? Does that make them institutional liars?
The known history would seem to support the thesis that Israel had substantial assistance from France in the theory and development of a nuclear device, yet was capable of advancement and innovation on its own, leading to an observed nuclear test (the Vela Incident) in 1979. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel#Nuclear_testing
"Well, Kamala can CLAIM she worked at McDonalds---at a location and time that cannot be verified. But everybody in the world saw me working at McDonald's yesterday. That's the difference between us: she says...and I do."
If Gates, through his agents, acting under his employment, committed malfeasance against Dutch citizens, I think he would be held liable. What happens after that is a question. Suppose he had simply beaten up these people and skipped the country as a fugitive criminal? How would that be different?
Or Flynn actually disavows Q, and any connection between him and Q is illusory. Sometimes, a cigar is only a cigar.
This does not fall under the Constitutional definition. "Sabotage" may be more applicable. Certainly one hell of a civil suit, if nothing else.
It is a real problem with addicts and mental patients who are on their own recognizance, agree to prescribed medications, but will simply not take them. And they don't respond to treatment. It takes a while to sort out that this is happening, and then you have to invoke a more stringent regime, where someone else is administering the prescription medicine. But a recalcitrant patient may contrive not to swallow the pill and spit it out afterward. This all happened with my stepdaughter. Fortunately, we finally got her into a more favorable environment and she has been living clean since doing so.
So, it may be interesting to those who have not heard of it, but it is totally commonplace in the realm of healthcare.
I definitely agree. The interviewer is obliged to ask clear questions. The interviewee is obliged to give clear answers. If the Interviewee veers off on some tangent, the interviewer has the right (and responsibility) to get the interviewee back on topic. How can you "interrupt" a non-answer? Time was fleeting and the interview had already been pre-emptively cut in half.
A case of "Shoot! Ready! Aim!"
Of course it's a coincidence. The odds are about 1 in 7 for placement in the week, and we have twelve of them (17th of month) in a year. So the combined odds are about 12/7 = 1.7 times/year. But it is nevertheless a noteworthy coincidence.
I read it also as bitterness. As though she has a presentiment that she will lose, maybe on account of the Baier interview. The bitterness of the entitled, denied.
It turns out people didn't get the joke reference at all. I heard on talk radio afterward from some person who was very familiar with Puerto Rico, who said that the joke reference was to the massive overburden problem that Puerto Rico has with its sanitation dumps. They no longer know where to put the garbage. So, the joke was actually about the Garbage, not about the Puerto Ricans.