If Nazis can't complain about Jews,
If leftists can't complain about Nazis,
If KKK members can't complain about blacks,
If conservatives can't complain about commies,
THEN IT'S NOT A FREE SPEECH PLATFORM.
Antisemitic speech is actually an important litmus test to determining whether or not it's actually a free speech platform.
All the Jews in the 1960s were big free speech proponents. I'm sure they don't need daddy social media to police people's speech to "protect" them from "hate facts."
The dose is 222 mg / day
Exactly. Once these psychos all have videos of each other murdering children, they will NEVER turn on each other. They will stay united and in the shadows and play the whole thing out.
It's so easy to imagine this slowly taking over world politics...
--- First acknowledge the fact that intelligence agencies, even if they don't produce this material, will still stumble across it from time to time. For example we know the FBI uncovered a large cache of blackmail videos when they searched Epstein's place in Manhattan.
--- Once you accept that, it's easy to imagine certain intelligence agencies such as the Soviets, the Chinese, etc exploiting this material to control foreign assets, even if it would be morally beneath them to produce the material themselves. The Soviets even had a word for it: Kompromat. Why for example, would Soviet KGB have any problem with using found blackmail material against a foreign adversary?
--- It's easy to imagine an agency like Mossad using such material, even if they find it unethical, if it is for the purpose of protecting Israel. ("Never again!") If they though it would prevent a Holocaust, they would have no qualms whatsoever about using such material. And we already know that such material exists.
--- From there it's not out of the realm of imagination that an unethical intelligence agency would have any problem PRODUCING such material. There is a drug that is known to be used for that purpose (Devil's Breath). This drug can cause the dosed victim to lose all willpower and for a period of a few hours, obey every command like a robot. If that victim is a politician who is not properly under control, they can dose him, then order him to do something unsavory to a child while they video tape it. From that point on, that politician is OWNED and he will do whatever the fuck he is told. Shadowy control over his activities will continue indefinitely as long as he is in office. In fact, powerful entities will even have a great reason now to KEEP him in office as long as possible. He's a useful asset.
--- Once you understand that, then it's easy to imagine that psychopaths desiring to be promoted in their careers, would even WILLINGLY provide such compromising materials on themselves, in return for rewards of positions of power and influence.
--- Maxwell's father was Mossad. Maxwell was almost certainly Epstein's handler, and his activities provided Israel with "arm's length" access to an inexhaustible supply of blackmail material to be used against American politicians and other luminaries. Meanwhile these luminaries probably cooperated KNOWINGLY. After all, they get to sleep with underage girls AND have their careers promoted.
And so over time the cabal grows and grows more powerful.
This must have been going on all throughout the 20th century! It was only with the advent of the Internet that the NSA came along and would have been able to see that all of this was going on. From there, white hats could have devised a plan to do something about it.
I have not used Facebook for years. I can't understand how all these normies keep using it like a bunch of sheep.
How many more YEARS must go by before we decide that we've been had?
The real problem here is that men can no longer control their wives.
Husbands should be able to sue anyone who performs a medical therapy on their wife without first getting the husband's informed consent. Same as with children, and for the same reason.
"I will execute judgment against all the gods of Egypt, for I am the LORD!" Exodus 12:12b
If you think Christianity isn't about evidence and facts, you haven't done your research.
The main reason to string them along until the deadline comes is because they often extend the deadline only at the last minute.
If you're not supposed to record it, you can probably still record it for your own personal use and then publish a transcription. I don't really know since I'm not a lawyer, but a transcription would be more useful than the recording anyway and you don't have to release the recording itself.
I think they were convicted of "felony murder" which is not the same as "murder." It refers to a situation where someone dies during the commission of a separate crime.
The "separate crime" presumably in this case is doing a citizen's arrest over a misdemeanor. If that is a felony and if someone died during the arrest, then they would be able to nail them on felony murder.
IMO this case is still a huge miscarriage of justice and does not portend well to those who want to simultaneously have the right to defend their neighborhood while also living among blacks.
People may have to simply live apart from blacks in order to avoid these problems in the future.
This is a miscarriage of justice. People keep saying they "should not have chased him" but that is absolutely incorrect. Everyone has a right to defend their neighborhood against burglars. Arbery was NOT a "jogger" as we all know. He was repeatedly filmed trespassing on properties where things had gone missing. There was an ongoing problem in that neighborhood which is why the neighbors were on alert.
If we did not have the right to defend our neighborhood from this kind of thing, then we therefore could not possibly delegate this power to the police. You can only delegate powers that exist.
Furthermore, these men did not "hunt him down and shoot him." They tried to detain him for the authorities. He did not have to assault them either. Remember it was only when Arbery caused a struggle over a gun, and someone feared for their life, that he was shot. He did not have to make this choice.
Calling this "murder" is an absolute miscarriage of justice. At this point, with the authorities so corrupt and evil, what choice do people have except to live in communities where there are no blacks?
Do we have a right to be left alone?
Actually only God can make laws. Anyone who tries to make laws outside of God's law will only cause injustice to reign.
The 60s is when it really got started in earnest.
"Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?"
Yes but to be clear, if you search Amazon for NAC, it will show you N-Acetyl Carnitine, NOT N-Acetyl Cysteine. The good stuff is missing from Amazon.
Make sure it's not N-Acetyl Carnitine
Amazon also has it
I don't think they do. They carry NAC but it's not N-Acetyl Cysteine. That got removed from the site months ago.
Try Swanson vitamins.
Otherwise they'll just kill more babies.
Women are too socially conformist to be trusted with important medical decisions. For their own safety and for the safety of our children, women should need the permission of their husband or father to get such injections.
If they unleash this shit
They already did.
Any debt-based money is automatically usury since it is impossible for the amount of money owed to ever be paid back using the money in circulation. There is always more owed than even exists.
That is excessive.
There is only one other Q post that uses the [L] in a killbox, and it refers to Lynn de Rothschild.
I don't know if they are connected but those are the only 2 posts with an [L].
One was on Nov 11 and the other on Nov 13 (different years).
The commies won WW2.