6
lkjsdf9845 6 points ago +6 / -0

Men should redirect their funding towards a school system where only men have a vote in who is on a school board, and only men are allowed to serve on such a board. If that is not the situation, then they shouldn't even be funding it.

"Step up and vote" isn't enough to fix the problem at this point. It's time to put our money where our mouth is.

Heartily agree with you about the school choice money.

7
lkjsdf9845 7 points ago +9 / -2

The whole problem with school boards is that we allow women to serve on them.

Anyone who saw the video of the school board meeting about masks a few months back knows exactly what I am talking about. (The one where the teacher hyperventilated).

5
lkjsdf9845 5 points ago +5 / -0

The US Constitution doesn't grant any rights. It presumes the rights are pre-existing and granted by God. All the Constitution does is prohibit the government from infringing on those rights.

In Australia you have the same rights granted by the same God. Your Constitution may not be as explicit in prohibiting government violation of those rights, but that does not mean the rights don't exist.

8
lkjsdf9845 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes but they can't be fired for an illegal cause.

8
lkjsdf9845 8 points ago +8 / -0

Since Alaska is controlled by Republicans, the Republicans in Alaska are corrupt.

Power corrupts.

Also there are a lot of government employees in Alaska.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ Danish RCT study

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/ no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.

https://www.uea.ac.uk/about/-/new-study-reveals-blueprint-for-getting-out-of-covid-19-lockdown mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data University of Illinois concluded face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372 cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2 An April 2020 Cochrane review (preprint) found that face masks in the general population or health care workers didn’t reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1 "evidence is not sufficiently strong to support widespread use of facemasks”

http://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/13523664 Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus”

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 A 2015 study in the BMJ Open found cloth masks may increase infection risk

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2019/02/01/Millions-in-Japan-affected-as-flu-outbreak-grips-country/9191549043797/ Japan, despite widespread use of masks, had influenza epidemic

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817 The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a time in the past when Texas had neither a property tax, nor an income tax.

How did Texas pay the bills then? Return to what worked before.

And cut spending.

It must be said, the property taxes in Texas are a serious problem. They're as bad as New Jersey!

0
lkjsdf9845 0 points ago +3 / -3

You people shouldn't be shopping in Wal-mart anyway. You're supporting the globalists who put local shops out of business.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

DISCLAIMER: OUR MASK POLICY DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES. Mask mandates can promote misperceptions that masks can prevent or treat a disease, which is an illegal deceptive business practice. There is no waiver of liability under deceptive practices, even under a state of emergency. FTC Act, 15 U.S. Code § 41, states: “It is unlawful to advertise that a product or service can prevent…disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence… substantiating that the claims are true.” The CDC, after reviewing face mask studies worldwide found “no reduction in viral transmission with the use of face masks.” Accordingly, be advised that our mask policy does not provide any protection against covid-19 (coronavirus) or other viruses.

ADVISORY: YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO REFUSE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MASK. It is illegal to mandate Emergency Use Authorized investigational medical therapies without informed consent and right-of-refusal. The right to avoid the imposition of human experimentation is fundamental, rooted in the Nuremberg Code of 1947, has been ratified by the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, and further codified in the United States Code of Federal Regulations Section 360bbb-3€(1)(A)(ii)(I-III). As such, mandating masks for employees or the public, or similarly forcing use of any other non-FDA approved medical product without the wearer’s consent, is illegal. See something, say something! Businesses in violation should be reported immediately to appropriate authorities. You may be entitled to a legal remedy.

WARNING: HEALTH RISKS OF MASK WEARING INCLUDE BREATHING DIFFICULTIES, HYPOXEMIA OF THE BLOOD, HYPERCAPNIA OF THE BLOOD, SECONDARY BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA, SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION, THE GROWTH, INVASION, AND SPREAD OF CANCERS, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS INCLUDING HEART ATTACKS, AND ADVERSE CEREBRAL EVENTS INCLUDING STROKE.

WARNING: EAR-LOOP MASK WILL NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES. Mask use for viral transmission prevention is authorized by the FDA for Emergency Use only. The FDA Emergency Use Authorization for surgical and/or cloth masks states: “must not state or imply… that the [mask] is intended for antimicrobial or antiviral protection or related, or for use such as infection prevention or reduction.”

7
lkjsdf9845 7 points ago +9 / -2

"This BS" will end as soon as we go out with pitchforks and torches and string these scumbags up from the nearest tree. These are crimes against humanity and there's going to be hell to pay.

0
lkjsdf9845 0 points ago +3 / -3

What's wrong with shill accounts? I'm sure you can block any user you don't want to hear, and personally I don't need to see anyone's posts in the first place if I'm not already following them. If I choose to follow a shill, then sure, show me his posts. Otherwise why would I even be seeing it at all?

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who IS Q really? Is it the Hapa guy who lives in Manila? Is it his father who likes pens? Is it the hot wheels guy? Is it some weirdo from Italy who made up a satanic cult?

Who can it be????

Just ignore the actual Q posts and Q proofs. Look at the wheelchair guy some more! Maybe it's the cicada guy!!

Pay no attention to Q's writings!

by BQnita
2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +3 / -1

certain cultures

Such as?

by NotACop
1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +2 / -1

I had a few dozen articles saved in google Keep.

"SAVED" IN GOOGLE KEEP

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

I can't believe anyone is still using/trusting Google/Facebook/YouTube/Twitter with ANYTHING. It's 2021... still supporting those sites??

-2
lkjsdf9845 -2 points ago +1 / -3

You're still filing your personal financial information with the IRS??

Don't they use that money for buying baby body parts and other evils?

Not sure why anyone is complying with this stuff. You're complicit.

No taxation without representation.

If we all ditched the bullshit at once it would end overnight.

People like you keep the evil alive.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +2 / -1

If all of those cargo ships have children inside the cargo, then that is the important part -- not the names of the individual ships.

3
lkjsdf9845 3 points ago +4 / -1

To wake up the entire population, expose the blackmail videos / confession videos of the deep state, showing that they really are trafficking in children and being blackmailed over it.

In other words, they could have woken up the population years ago and instead they are sitting on the information.

Imagine if Hillary and a bunch of others had already been convicted in military courts and there were video recordings of their confessions and crimes. If this was publicly known, the entire public would have united behind Trump years ago.

WHY ARE THEY SITTING ON THIS INFORMATION AND KEEPING THE POPULATION DIVIDED?

6
lkjsdf9845 6 points ago +10 / -4

You are an obvious shill.

2
lkjsdf9845 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Living God?"

"I AM, and you will see the Son of Man standing by the Power and coming on the clouds of heaven."

-- I AM is the "tetragrammaton" or the unpronounceable name of God that was revealed to Moses at the burning bush. (Apparently in anticipation of Jesus' upcoming trial...)

-- "The Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven" is a reference to a prophecy in Daniel about a Son of Man who would be worshipped by all people.

-- "Blasphemy" the high priest recognizes Christ's claim to be God by calling the claim "blasphemy". Why else have a death penalty?

There are plenty of other examples of Christ's claiming to be God. For example, his claim to have the authority to forgive sins. As well him referring to himself as the "Lord."

0
lkjsdf9845 0 points ago +2 / -2

Maybe Jesus isn't God, but Jesus certainly claimed to be God. It's a historical fact that he was executed for sedition by Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius Caesar. That is, he claimed to be king.

"Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews" was on the sign above his cross, and a polemic was recorded between Pilate and Jews who complained about the sign. The crown of thorns, the purple cloak, the reed in his hand, the soldiers bowing down mockingly saying "Hail King of the Jews", it all corroborates the fact that Jesus was executed for making messianic claims.

He made these claims in open court...

The high priest said to him, “I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God.”

“I AM,” Jesus replied. “And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.”

Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. What do you think?”

And they all condemned Him to be worthy of death.

Then they spit in his face and struck him with their fists. Others slapped him and said, “Prophesy to us, Messiah. Who hit you?”

A few weeks later, thousands worshiped him as God in the same city where he was executed and buried, with his tomb empty and hundreds claiming they had seen him back from the dead.

0
lkjsdf9845 0 points ago +1 / -1

Open carry is dangerous. It's a good way to get yourself hit over the head from behind and robbed. What people need to do is conceal carry, and ignore the laws. Everyone needs to buy a sidearm and conceal carry it. If you are a criminal then you will eventually get thrown up against the wall and searched for robbing a 7-11. But if you do not rob 7-11's then you will not have that problem.

1
lkjsdf9845 1 point ago +1 / -0

The ignorant (or malicious) often claim that the Bible has been altered/corrupted over time, or that the canon selected at the Council of Nicaea was not representative of scriptures in common use and circulation in the churches. And those who are uneducated on the matter always fall for it.

But in fact the fidelity of the New Testament texts rests on a vast multitude of evidence, including thousands of complete manuscripts and tens of thousands of fragments, some dating back as early as the first and second centuries. Contrast this with ANY other ancient text to see the vast gulf between them. There is no other ancient text that is better verified than the New Testament.

We know that no substantive changes were made after the fact because copies were already circulating in the early churches -- it was too late at that point to introduce any changes. That is why the book of Acts (a history of the early church) fails to record the death of Paul. It was too late to add new changes by the time of his death in AD 62.

And we know Luke must have been written before that since Acts is a sequel to Luke. And we know Mark must have been written before that since Luke contains a nearly complete copy of the text of Mark. And we know that the pre-Markan passion narrative must have been written before that.

Christ was real, and he was executed for his Messianic claims. Consider the crown of thorns, the reed, the purple cloak, the soldiers bowing down to him mockingly, the "King of the Jews" sign above the cross, the polemic where Pharisees complained to Pilate about the sign, and he replied "What I have written, I have written." Christ claimed to be God and was executed for it. A few weeks later, thousands believed he was risen from the dead and worshiped him as God, in the same city where he was executed. Over the next few centuries the Greeks and Romans entirely discarded their pagan gods, which became mythology, and Western Civilization was born.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›