Obama (and likely the others) counted "turnbacks" at the border as deportations. I'm pretty sure no one but Trump has truly done mass deportations since Operation Wetback.
I asked AI in depth about the autopen pardons and the results are not very encouraging.
Here is a summary of the key legal and historical points discussed in this thread:
- Scope of Presidential Pardons No Specificity Required: The U.S. Constitution gives the president broad clemency powers. Pardons do not have to name a specific crime.
Precedents: Historical examples include Gerald Ford’s blanket pardon of Richard Nixon for any crimes he "may have committed" and Jimmy Carter’s generalized amnesty for Vietnam War draft evaders.
- Legal Validity of the AutopenIntent Over Mechanics: An autopen signature is legally valid if the president explicitly authorized its use for that document. It becomes invalid only if staff use it without the president's knowledge or directive.
No Physical Signature Mandate: The Constitution does not explicitly require a pardon to be written or signed by hand. The legal test is whether it reflects the actual will of the executive.
The Doctrine of Ratification: Even if staff used an autopen without permission initially, a president’s subsequent public statements claiming ownership of the choice legally validates the action retroactively. Joe Biden did this with regards to Fauci.
- The Current Autopen Controversy The Dispute: President Donald Trump and House Republicans challenged the validity of former President Joe Biden’s end-of-term pardons (including Dr. Anthony Fauci's), claiming they were invalid because they were stamped via autopen.
The Evidence: Biden's authorization is backed by official White House press announcements, formal DOJ pardon warrants, internal White House signing logs, and Biden's own verbal confirmations to the media.
Current Status: No active court cases exist. A federal criminal probe into Biden's autopen use was quietly shelved by prosecutors due to a lack of a viable criminal case. The dispute remains a political and legislative debate in Congress.
- Historical PrecedentWidespread Use: Joe Biden is not unique in using the machine. Nearly every modern president—including Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump—has utilized mechanical or digital signature duplication to handle high-volume or last-minute executive paperwork and pardons.
Isn't that Soloman clip from back when the immunity ruling was made? I don't think it is current.
More evidence Pascal Najadi is a grifter paytriot.....
Here's a good article that includes a link to a video: https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/asu-moves-seize-raze-historic-phoenix-home-medical-school-40673272/
Video: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYuZcQTI8Ke/?igsh=ZjM2MnNsaDIycmp2
You're ignoring the historical aspect of it. Last house of its kind. Already officially designated an historical property. The main house looks to be in pretty good shape and could be turned into a museum of the history of the area.
Eminent domain should not be allowed for situations like this. It should be for government only (not corporations like ASU) and only for greater public good like roads. Building a university campus should not involve eminent domain!!
She won't sue because of one word: discovery
And how much does Paramount+ cost?
I thought they were going to try to use the emergency room only to find it full of illegals....
My mistake. Sorry. Don't know what I was thinking, LOL!
I don't comment much, maybe I should keep it that way.....
This is from May. Why are you posting it as if it is current news?
Jury nullification in a district that voted 94% against Trump. No way they would ever get an indictment there - especially with such a politically-charged case against Democrats! The people hate Trump and just love being able to hand him a defeat. Surprised the DOJ even tried this. Where is the military tribunal and court martials?
You have a right to "peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances," not riot and attack law enforcement because you don't like what they are doing. There is no right to resist arrest. You comply with law enforcement and if what they are doing is unlawful, you address it afterwards in the courts.
I saw reports that he was trying to get his fellow protesters cars to drive into the ICE operation. Someday the truth will come out. More videos are surfacing.
He was not legally carrying his firearm.
He had no photo ID on himself, let alone the concealed carry permit as required by law.
He was illegally carrying a concealed weapon and he put himself in a volatile situation with it. Two of the things any responsible concealed carrier would never do.
The first thing they teach you is to try to defuse the situation and try to escape, long before taking out your weapon. He didn't defuse, he escalated by violently resisting arrest.
Old news. Don't know why this person is posting this as if it just happened. I believe Trump signed this shortly after taking office.
Denmark has no say. Back in 2009, they put in place the ability for Greenlanders to decide their own fate. They can decide to leave Denmark without Denmark's "approval." This is what scares Denmark and the rest of the EU globalists: self-determination.
Catch the music playing?
The Lone Ranger theme: hi yo silver!!
If this isn't comms, I don't know what is...
True! I have nearly all of my money with Fidelity and it makes me nervous trusting my future to them. All I can go on is their reputation.....
Not Trump, but I don't trust anyone to hold onto my physical precious metals. It's simple: if it's not in your hands, anyone could steal it.
Sorry, just saw this now. I already have the silver in my possession. Ordered 12/12, delivered 12/22 including the wait for the funds (ACH transfer) to clear.
15 1 oz silver rounds varied condition, any mint $65.25 each when spot was ~$64.50. 1.15% premium. Total paid $978.75. Free shipping.
Right now JMBullion has several gold coins on sale at spot! Zero premium. I just bought four Great Britain Gold Sovereigns....
I've been buying from them for years with zero problems!
It's not your silver if it's not in your possession.
What's to keep these depositories from making off with your silver when the price spikes? You are counting on their honesty and at the failure of that, the court system to hopefully help you get a fraction of it back. Eventually.
I don't trust anything but my safe in my home and even then I worry about someone breaking in and ripping it from the floor and stealing it all, LOL!
Buy from JMBullion, you'll get a far better deal than any coin shop....
This guy is all hype and bullshit. Silver is available all over the Internet. I just bought 15 1 oz coins from JMBullion, no problem. Only 1.55% premium.
You spelled Michael wrong
Considering many of them are trannies, they will not fare well in men's prison, which is where they are going....