It's part of a resolution adopted by the United Nations.
The World Health Organization is considered a "special agency" so would be granted certain pivelages. Examples of other "special agencies" would be:
- International Labour Organisation
- International Civil Aviation Organization
- International Telecommunication Union
You can see the full document that was in this tweet here
This should be "Pepe-on-a-shelfe"
This is kind of garbage in my opinion, it should include:
- An apology
- Promise of back-pay
- Dishonorable discharge of higher ups that pushed for this and criminal penalties where appropriate
- List of steps or plan they will put in place to ensure this never happens again
Anything less is a joke.
How very transphobic of her, she should just accept getting pummeled for diversity! This innocent guy just wants to beat on some females so he can win, does no one think of his feelings? (Oh sorry "her" feelings)
When you start looking into some of these charities you'd be amazed at how much money gets soaked up into "operational costs". A lot of these charities will see something like only 1-2% of the money ever reaching the intended recipients.
One of the most egregious examples being Haiti. They got over $13,000,000,000 in donations without anything to show for it, and even MSM has a hard time explaining that away.
There's a reason why all these corrupt politicians run charities (i.e Clinton Foundation, Romney Foundation, McCain(No-name) Foundation)
There is little scrutiny or oversight, and it's a great way to launder money.
It's not like ChatGPT has intelligence or anything. It takes in a string of characters, tokenizes them, and predicts what comes next. That's it. There is no thinking involved. It's trained on data written by humans, and tweaked and tuned by humans (with their own agendas).
Yeah sometimes it makes me wonder "Did they even proof read this one time?! Just one time?"
Although I guess in this instance, proof reading zero times would count as one time. 😛
Maybe eventually it will be a good thing. Scientists wondering "How come we're seeing so much better health outcomes will all these people with this certain code?"
Probably just wishful thinking though.
I do wonder if this should have been left up though. I see a bunch of posts of this guy's tweets on the forum, none that have been this crazy though. It could be some nice context for those wondering if he is legit, trustworthy, or worth your time.
You mean you don't think Elon Musk is going to blow up Betelgeuse and kill the Orion dark lords? You think he has not been given control of the Giza pyramids which grants him power over space activity? You just don't want humanity to evolve into the 5th dimension huh? /s
Hey wait a second.. did anyone notice that this "il Donaldo Trumpo" guy kind of looks like President Trump if you take the mustache away?! 🤯
Referring to the lucifer telescope, the fact check on that is hilarious:
They claim it is false. Their reasoning?
The LBT Near Infrared Spectroscopic Utility with Camera and Integral Field Unit for Extragalactic Research (LUCIFER) has actually been renamed to LUCI
And the Vatican and its observatory are not among the research institutions listed on the LBT Observatory website as operating or owning the LBT.
And the other 14% continue to get their Government benefits
From the article:
A paedophile who raped a 10-year-old boy, a hit man who blew up a pregnant woman with explosives and a sex predator who attacked elderly women are among the criminals allowed into the community.
All were released after the High Court ruled that indefinite immigration detention is unlawful where there is “no real prospect” that a person’s removal is “reasonably practicable in the foreseeable future.”
I'd agree that indefinite immigration detention should be unlawful in the case that the only crime was illegally entering the country. In which case they should just be deported. But apparently this judge says migrants can commit any crimes they want and just get released.
I guess it could also be interpreted the same as the phrase "Trust me bro"
Can you imagine if Congress fought against something like "Child Porn" with the same tenacity and vigor that they do for stifling American's freedom of speech?
The solution to every problem seems to always be:
- More Government spending
- More Government control
- Less accountability
- Outsourcing said power to unelected bodies
- The Government must be the arbiters of truth
- Infantilization of the American people
Please big brother govenment, just protect me from myself, don't make me use discernment and my own brain for anything, tell me what to do, think and say!
I guess some people actually do find comfort in a system like that, it's just sad 😞
Vital statistics that are always left out of the gun debate:
US Murder Statistics
In 2020, there were 21,570 reported cases of murder or non-negligent manslaughter in the United States.
US Murder Statistics by Weapon Used
8,029 Handguns + 2,863 firearms = 10,892 involved guns
US Violent Crime Statistics
In 2020, an estimated 1,313,105 violent crimes occurred in the United States.
Foundation for Economic Education Statistics
According to the Foundation for Economic Education, guns prevent nearly 3 million crimes a year.
Approximately 400,000 potentially life-threatening violent crimes are prevented annually with the use of firearms.
Let's say just 10% of that 400k would have actually resulted in a death (although I suspect that percentage is much higher) Then that is 40,000 lives saved per year
- Gun homicides ~ 30 per day
- Guns saving lives (most conservative est) ~ 109 per day
- Guns saving lives (most speculative est) ~ 1095 per day
Not to mention deterrence:
60 percent of felons surveyed admitted they didn’t commit crimes if they were aware potential victims were armed. What’s more, 40 percent of the surveyed felons reported being discouraged from committing crimes if they simply suspected potential victims were armed.
Finally, it is not likely, and certainly not clear whether those 30 gun related homicides per day would otherwise not occur with some other weapon. Not to mention that the people committing those homicides are criminals and would ignore any gun laws anyways.
And here is the recommended amounts from Dr. Peter McCullough (the guy in the video):
- Nattokinase 2000 FU (100 mg) twice a day
- Bromelain 500 mg once a day
- Nano/Liposomal Curcumin 500 mg twice a day
🙄But be careful guys, apparently this totally legitimate and unbiased organization says it's not true: FactCheck.org In fact they say the covid 19 vaccination is safe and effective, and they cite honest and trustworthy sources like the "CDC" /s
Coding would actually be a useful thing if it was used for good. Being able to sus out health issues on a population level could help a lot of people. We probably already have all the information needed to show any harm or benefit for a lot of medical products, but the people are sold out for $$$
Yeah it sucks that Medicine has become so corrupt. I hate not being able to trust my doctors, and knowing that they pretty much take bribes to push Big Pharma products on patients. Hope you're eyes and feet are feeling better friend.
I wonder if they would ever consent to have the whole thing filmed. Probably not.. since medical error is like the 3rd leading cause of death in the US, they try everything to cover their butts.
I thought it's about getting their bribe money, not about liability. Don't doctors get kickbacks from big pharma if a certain percentage of their patients get vaccinated?
Do you know anything about that? Or would that be separate from what your job was?
Never has a victory been so demoralizing. I'm still astounded that this is even a thing, and that this went mainstream, and people just went with it.
This is very true! Unfortunately the bureaucracy in medicine makes that almost impossible. Our medical system is broken because of insurance. Insurance should only be for catastrophic and extremely rare cases, everything else should just be paid for directly from patients. If that was the case competition would drop prices and improve quality of care. Going to the doctor would be on par with something like getting a hair cut, and something people could easily manage in their budget.
Instead, doctors can't go into private practice very easily unless they are part of an insurance network. That's the only way they can get paid. To be in those networks means submitting to insurance companies and getting a contract with them. Those contracts require the provider to follow certain "rules", and if they don't, they're out, and when they're out they can't sustain themselves.
On the surface, the "rules" that need to be followed would seem like a good thing. Something to weed out bad doctors, that perform unsafe and lackluster treatments. But it often involves following operational procedures of woke medical boards, following edicts from on high to the detriment of the patient. Not to mention that these boards and insurance companies are in the pocket of big pharma.