3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

hmm, not sure if I like it

Trump decided to go with the republican party and take it over, rather than risk going 3rd party and SEVERELY diluting potential votes.

The only thing wrong with the republican party are the RINOs, which as the name implies, they aren't really republicans to begin with.

3
magavoices 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, that was kind of my point but I probably made it badly.

My point was that Jew haters intermingle with us, trying to pretend they have anything at all as a shared interest -- when they clearly don't.

They absolutely hate Q+, even when Trump does things that should coincide with their world view (like calling out bankers who inflict usury). They completely forget they hate Trump for about 2 moments and then they default back to hating Trump.

Because deep down they have far more in common with radical leftists, or (more likely) are a psyop perpetrated by the same people pushing radical leftism.

3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

Congress makes their pennies with salaries.

They make their billions with USAID-kickbacks and insider information.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +5 / -1

shylock (/ˈʃaɪlɒk/ SHY-lok)

Verb (uncapitalized):

To lend money at extortionate rates of interest: This describes the action of lending money with the intention of profiting unfairly from the borrower's inability to repay.

Jew haters have it both ways. On one hand, they absolutely insist that Trump is a puppet of Israel -- on the other, any remark Trump makes that can be construed as anti-Jewish they laud as brilliant and definitely intended.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

What college did you attend that indoctrinated you to hate wealthy people to this extreme?

Does it trigger you that Q+ is a billionaire?

14
magavoices 14 points ago +15 / -1

Laura Loomer is part of the rat pack of conservative influencers that all spawned onto the scene simultaneously, including Jack Posobiec, Scott Adams, Mike Cernovich and other Alex Jones associates. I remember videos where Posobiec was chilling with Loomer -- they're all Mossad assets.

She is doing and saying things that are in the best interest of Mossad. Any focus on caring about Americans is only done as a pace-and-lead measure in order to gain influence amongst us.

I don't fall for the "Trump is incompetent, he doesn't know how to fire bad people in his administration" schtick. Trump or Q has vetted all their own administration and (even if they are bad players), they're there for a reason.

Sometimes Trump sticks people on a pedestal to give them enough rope to hang themselves. Sometimes its to get the public noticing them -- the people who will be holding the hot potato when the music stops playing.

Being a conservative pundit pays nothing. All these individuals were propped into the positions they currently hold with funding from somewhere -- and it's not from ad revenue on their twitter feeds.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do we know what Trump wants, unequivocally? No

This is a main argument of detractors, not saying you're one ... but the main argument is "Oh, so you'll blindly follow Trump?"

Make a good argument and I'll question Trump.

But what's the actual argument? A bill from Trump (that the guy I'm responding to didn't even read), is being directly compared to a bill from Biden (which the guy I'm responding to also didn't read), and hypothesizing they're the same thing.

Is that a good argument? No ... I'll default to Trump has done nothing wrong all day long, every day under that circumstance. Make the case he did something actually wrong that is even slightly credible and I'll research it and consider it.

And even if there ends up being a good argument against Trump, in the end, I'm not so naive to think that WW3 won't have casualties. I don't expect everything the whitehats do to be great moves without collateral damage. But if I'm still here under the notion that Q allowed half the country to have decades shaved off their lifespans through covid shots -- I doubt anyone is going to provide an example more damning against Q than that.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump endorsed McCain.

Trump endorsed Romney.

Trump said he would join the Paris Accord if they make a few adjustments.

Trump said he would make a path for DACA dreamers to become citizens if democrats funded the wall.

We know that Trump hates McCain and Romney, that he wanted nothing to do with the Paris Accord and that he was never going to make a path for DACA dreamers to become citizens.

I think it's a mistake to judge Trump on anything in particular, because it makes no allowance for 3d chess moves.

If I had any problem at all with Biden's bill, it was mainly the pork going to NGOs. That's practically gone under Trump, so I don't see how Trump's bill could be comparable to Biden's.

And even when the money went to NGOs under Biden, I believe it was all recorded and those who took the money will have to give back the diamonds.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +5 / -1

(I think everyone knows it’s just, “Trump said so!” for 80+% of us

Make the case that it is imperative to second-guess what Trump wants. Why shouldn't Trump just asking for it be enough?

Knowing that

  • there's a near unlimited amount of proofs that Trump is coordinating with Q
  • you're on a Q board
  • the premise is there's a plan in place
  • there are hundreds of moves and counter moves the public isn't privy to

For all we know, Trump will recover trillions that were misspent through USAID.

For all we know, we'll go back on the gold standard and Trump is milking the federal reserve in the interim before the corporate US is declared bankrupt.

Hell, for all we know there could be a jubilee and all debts being vitiated because of the entirety of fraud that underpins the entire corrupt system.

I find the notion that we need to armchair-quarterback Trump's every decision to be silly, especially after 8 years of Q proofs demonstrating there actually is a plan and things are going in the right direction.

Anything else is blackpill.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +4 / -3

Snowden is a clown traitor, according to Q.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can we all sit back and appreciate how absolutely wrong the Jew haters were.

Every single one of them denounced Trump. Every single one of them drew a line in the sand declaring Iran off limits. It's mind-boggling what an incredibly non-deviating monolithic Borg they are.

Almost like they received marching orders or are all running the same NPC software.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

You skipped they planned it.

I can predict I'll wear a blue shirt tomorrow. When tomorrow comes and I'm wearing a blue shirt, am I a prophet or a time traveler?

Super duper AI didn't tell us when McCain was going to die one month in advance, to the exact minute and calculating for daylight savings. That's just the date they scheduled to execute him. Simplest explanation.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you considered that they might be part of DARPA's 4+ billion budget? AI bots sent here to taint us all as Nazis by continually spouting Nazi rhetoric in our presence?

I could write an AI bot using ChatGPT to browse this forum, monitor threads and look for opportunities to make responses that tippy-toe the line of getting banned with anti-Jew rhetoric.

If I can do it, certainly DARPA with their 4 billion dollar budget can do it. It's not a stretch of the imagination that they're ahead of what is available to the public by 5 years.

The Jew-hating peanut gallery such a non-deviating Borg that it's not hard to imagine.

10
magavoices 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think he's probably a patriot, as well as Tucker and Candice.

But the 4D chess moves are beyond their paygrade.

8
magavoices 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fun fact: Steve Bannon was removed from Trump's administration when he came out against Trump's "Fire and Fury" positioning with NK.

You think he would have learned his lesson then.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +5 / -1

Might as well put "I hated Jews so much I considered Iran an ally" on there.

11
magavoices 11 points ago +11 / -0

Wait a minute.

All the Jew haters insisted that we were going to war permanently in Iran on behalf of Israel.

They insisted Trump was Israel's puppet, and that Trump was -- for the first time ever -- going to initiate a new deployment of US troops in the region, wasting hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in the process.

I don't understand. How could they have been wrong ... again? Certainly at some point they'll get something right?

6
magavoices 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do you think that's what Uranium One is all about?

Maybe you should read some Q drops.

https://qagg.news/?q=u1

U1 = Uranium One. There's 39 drops for you to catch up on.

After you read them all, post your answer to the question, "Do you think the Clinton Foundation was working hard to generate electricity in Iran?"

3
magavoices 3 points ago +4 / -1

That's called pace-and-leading.

You can't be good at controlled opposition if you don't throw bones to your target demographic.

No different than Mossad-agent Posobiec.

Massie isn't MAGA.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, exactly.

Trump did Iran a favor by removing all doubt whether they could still have nuclear capabilities.

13
magavoices 13 points ago +14 / -1

FFS, read some Q drops or something.

Uranium One ring a bell? You know ... Hillary supplying Iran with materials for nuclear weapons?

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are the one that has broken rules sir. "Civil Discussion ONLY: They want you divided.

Oh, you can read forum rules. Excellent.

I guess you skipped over the one that states Q supporters only.

No veteran of Q, after having survived 4chan, 8chan and Voat, has such delicate sensibilities that they consider my comments rude. Saying I'm not civil though, that is hilarious -- coming from the Jew hater peanut gallery. Again -- one trick pony, insult Jews.

Divided you attack each other

You've gone out of your way to state that you are not a Q follower, here on this Q forum. Why so divided? How can you be divided when you were never together in the first place?

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

However, it certainly is suspicious that dajews are not allowed to be criticized ever.

The Chinese have funded the overthrow of our elections. They're using Chinese students as spies, 3 million of them. Where is the anti-CCP peanut gallery chiming in on how much they absolutely loathe the Chinese at every opportunity imaginable?

Show me the threads about China that have "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted" in the comment section. Where are they?

Mulsims have set up no-go zones all over Europe. They have rape gangs. Now they're trying to set up Muslim-only cities in the US, where Sharia law governs the area. Where is the anti-Muslim peanut gallery explaining how they absolutely loath Muslims at every opportunity?

Neither of those groups exist. Why? We've given more money to Afghanis and Ukraine than we've given to Israel. Where are the anti-Afghani and anti-Ukraine peanut galleries?

Yet somehow, the Great Awakening has a swarm of Jew haters. The criticisms they are most vocal about are usually over the most pettiest of shit -- muh hat, muh nose, muh Talmud. They imagine muh Talmud is so incredibly evil, where is the peanut gallery criticizing the Quran? They don't exist -- yet equally bad shit is found in there.

Your group is so compelled to push this psyop that they consistently break forum rules, getting mole-whacked in nearly every thread on the forum having anything to do with Israel -- yet they persist, create a new account after getting banned and they're back.

It is unnatural behavior. It is a psyop. Those pushing this unnatural behavior are most likely DARPA AI bots, but I will concede there are also likely weak-minded fools who believed the psyop.

Sweeping generalization is a terrible argument.

You got to be kidding me. You -- what? Team "I hate Jews" is a one-trick pony. Their only argument is to make sweeping generalizations about Jews.

then by default I am not only hostile to Q ... My unsolicited advice is "Listen to all, follow none"

You are on a Q board, and after 8 years of Q's existence -- you're still here. But you're proselytizing to others that they should not follow Q. That is being hostile to Q.

Go find a leftist forum and tell people there they should not follow democrats and let me know how long your account lasts.

So yea, we're on the internet. Humans are pattern-recognizing creatures. I'm going to make broad assumptions about your positions based on pattern recognition I've gleaned from past arguments with thousands of Jew haters over the years. I might be wrong in some cases, but not that wrong.

For instance, you think discouraging people from following Q on a Q board isn't being hostile to Q. I think it is, so I my pattern-recognition still worked as intended.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +5 / -1

Obvious AI bots are obvious.

4-year accounts developed for no other reason than to draw a line in the sand, clutch their pearls and declare Q a fraud when "Iran Next" came into play.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›