3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which would mean she senses patriotism is en vogue.

If patriotism becomes the new thing to virtue signal over, I'm ok with that.

28
magavoices 28 points ago +31 / -3

The question is, would Q pull off a psyop that uses the same tactics as the cabal has used.

For instance, with the cabal, school shooter psyops have crisis actors and fake deaths.

If Q would do that, then it certainly could have been staged.

Assume for a moment this hypothetical ...

  • The firefighter was a trained crisis actor who would be given another identity
  • The shooter never actually shot anything and given another identity
  • Trump had a blood squib squirt from his ear

If Q decided they would do that, planned and executed with military-grade precision, then there would be no way to disprove it.

So again, the question becomes "Would Q do that?" I think with all that is at stake, they would -- and I don't see any moral dilemma with it if it actually happened that way.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm curious, and like comparing our news bubble to what democrats are consuming.

News of Michael Wiseman popped up about 22/23 hours ago as I post this.

I then searched if anyone has attempted to unalive Biden and found the name Jason Aladay, who apparently was arrested for making threats against Biden 3 days ago.

I then compared google trends on the names Michael Wiseman vs Jasaon Aladay, to get a sense of how many Americans cared that Biden was threatened vs how many cared that Trump was threatened.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=Jason%20Alday,Michael%20Wiseman

The result ... even though Biden was threatened 3 days ago thus more exposure and news coverage, interest in Michael Wiseman is listed at 100% compared to 24% for Jason Aladay.

10
magavoices 10 points ago +10 / -0

Unpopular opinion, but here it is anyway.

The belief that Q is real, and the belief that Trump's security was so compromised, are incompatible beliefs.

Many, if not most of us, believe that Trump is still president right now, through the process of devolution. You can't believe that and simultaneously believe that Trump's security was based solely on Biden-controlled security.

For months, if not years, we've been awed by Trump's massive security details and official vehicles, while laughing at Biden's lack of security and run-down vehicles.

This could very well be a psyop. We know the left stages fake deaths in their school-shooter psyops, why assume Q wouldn't do the same? Every piece of media released could have been staged.

Trump's popularity surged. Democrats were shamed. The photo op was huge.

I'm not entirely convinced either way, but the possibility certainly exists.

I'm ok if Q is fighting dirty, and I'm ok if the truth makes democrats appear as unhinged conspiracy theorists.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't like the VP pick.

Johnny-come-latelys are welcome. But if you didn't enthusiastically support Trump by the 2016 election, your powers of reasoning don't meet the standard that a VP should have.

In the 2016 election, it was widely understood that up to 3 SCOTUS appointees were on the table, and Hildabeast was going to fill them.

To be a never-Trumper in 2016 after the primaries were over, with no other considerations than the 3 SCOTUS appointments on deck, is INEXCUSABLE. Period, end of story.

Johnny-come-latelys are welcome, but sorry ... if you only come to your senses at the last moment to make reasonable choices then you don't meet the bar required to be VP.

I would have liked to see Tucker Carlson or some other guy who lost things to make the right choice, instead of guys who make bad choices and risked nothing.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is probably the best meme I've ever seen.

Congrats!

1
magavoices 1 point ago +2 / -1

Clif High.

Watched one of his videos. Just one.

He said something to the effect that the Talmud was written about aliens.

Complete 100% fruitcake.

4
magavoices 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is capitulation. Extreme capitulation. I can't think of any other company who went woke and then tried to undo it to this extent.

You don't punish those who yield because nobody will ever have incentive to yield. They should be rewarded for their new stance.

15
magavoices 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not hard at all. Quite easy, in fact.

Block their ability to use banks or transfer money. Many come here to earn money to send back to their families, completely block their ability to do that.

Put the onus on renters to verify US citizenship before they rent to anyone.

Put the onus on employers, significant fines for employing those without papers.

Then have free waiting stations where any non-citizen can go to be taken to the border to cross back to Mexico. Free bus trip and meals on their way down.

The only time you would have to go arresting is if they're breaking the law, then if they're found to be a non-citizen, take them in cuffs to the border.

Hyper enforce that there is no further border crossings, you might catch 90% of the illegals over the course of a decade.

7
magavoices 7 points ago +7 / -0

Makes you wonder how many paid actors there are out there today.

Both on the left (like AOC) and controlled opposition on the right (looking at you Posobiec).

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

In reality, it's probably in Q's plan to have Trump treated this way in order to normalize it happening, so when it actually happens to the other FPOTUS it won't be challenged as illegitimate by people who actually care about this country.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alex Jones is Mossad.

AJ's job is to slather truth with his ridiculous bombastic persona so that people reject the truth, if no other reason than AJ said it.

3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are unable to make a distinction between don't talk about something and don't believe something.

If you visit dragracing.win and get banned because all you want to do is post about knitting, it was because you're muddying up the forum with off-topic bullshit. Not because the people on the forum hate knitting.

And then, after being told to go to knitting.win with other like-minded forum users, you refuse for some inexplicable reason.

It's not because your topic is verboten, it's because it's off-topic. Not to mention hyperbolic, nobody ever got banned here for saying they think the moon landing is fake.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

Step 1: Set up 1000 fake profiles for reportees and 1000 for fake reporters.

Step 2: Have the fake reporters report the fake reportees.

Step 3: ???

Step 4: Profit

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are attacking indiscriminately

You said they were targeting Christians in the title. Now you're saying they're attacking indiscriminately.

That's called lying.

There are extremely valid and legitimate reasons to not support either side of that conflict.

Have you considered that you're taking the same side as the communists? They're also pro-Palestine. Only they don't lie about Christians being targeted.

That's right. The communists are being more truthful than you are in accomplishing the exact same thing -- supporting Muslims in Palestine, and supporting Hamas.

Less than 1% of Palestinians are Christian. 1.9% of Israelites are Christian. Seeing that Christians being subjected to this conflict is the single most important factor to you, I'm curious if you just changed which side you support.

it helps some understand that yes they actually are human

And those in Israel aren't?

Do you own research rather than wait for handouts

Clearly I'm the only one who has researched your claims in this entire thread.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, they're not. Let me introduce you to words in the right column of the page:

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

And regarding

Thus, this is not exactly a forum for free speech (sadly).

If this were a "free speech" forum, DARPA AI bots would have every other comment saying Hitler did nothing wrong and promoting stuff like flat earth so that everyone who ever gets exposed to Q gets psyoped into believing we're proper morons and to disregard Q altogether because of it.

0
magavoices 0 points ago +3 / -3

I don't like the video.

At 2:06 it starts injecting ridiculous speculation about things best suited for conspiracies.win.

"Project "blue beam" is going to be initiated at an eclipse of the moon, earthquakes will reveal artifacts, blah blah"

Q never mentioned muh project blue beam or any of the batshit crazy baloney that starts at 4:50 about comets and the bulk majority of the other idiocy that is being conflated with truths about Q.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution of the United States of America does not declare the President as infallible.

But Catholic dogma declares the pope infallible.

Papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church which states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope when he speaks ex cathedra is preserved from the possibility of error on doctrine "initially given to the apostolic Church and handed down in Scripture and tradition".

Your tangent on the president/constitution seem out of place and completely unrelated to this thread. If it was an analogy, it was a bad one.

1
magavoices 1 point ago +1 / -0

Papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church which states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope when he speaks ex cathedra is preserved from the possibility of error on doctrine "initially given to the apostolic Church and handed down in Scripture and tradition".

"you don't understand papal infallibility" ... I don't understand how anyone could believe it, you mean. Along with indulgences, purgatory, praying to saints rather than to the Father through Christ, vain repetition of prayers and a host of other protests that makes one a good protestant.

The notion that you get to pick and choose which elements of Catholic dogma you get to believe or not believe as a proper Catholic is cute though. Imagine being a baptist but insisting that baptism is optional, or that it can be accomplished with sprinkles of water.

3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's a whole lot of people who frequent this board who are not "us".

I was curious what type of speech the OP thought should be allowed here that isn't, so I checked some past comments.

Fact: "Jews" stopped existing after Christ died and resurrected. They either became Christians or rejected Christ and are Satanists.

PSA to mods: thank you for deleting 99% of the bullshit comments like this before I have to see them.

Jew hatred is not on-topic for Q. Go post wherever stormfront retards post.

3
magavoices 3 points ago +3 / -0

I haven't paid taxes, either state or federal, since 1996.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

Am I supposed to start bagging on Muslims while in a thread discussing Catholics? Or is it Mormons with Catholics? I’m confused.

I'm saying that many religions are equally fucked up, but for some very odd reason (cough psyop cough) Jew hatred receives 99.99999% of the focus.

I don't read about Catholic haters here on GAW -- where are the people going on about purgatory, indulgences, the Spanish inquisition, the joke of the pope being the Vicar of Christ or any number of other extreme fallacies?

Why aren't these anti-Catholic zealots not here scolding me for not reading my bible?

Why aren't these anti-Catholic zealots referencing DOGMA from 1k years ago to bolster their BS talking points?

Why aren't these anti-Catholic zealots challenging my very salvation based on not hating the Catholic faith as much as I should?

Because it's fucking stupid, that's why.

Equally as stupid as muh Khazarian name stealer bullshit.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2012-07-01%202024-01-31&q=Khazarian%20mafia&hl=en

Oh look. The term was popularized as Trump first ran for office in 2015. Again, we are creatures of pattern recognition. Why, exactly, were the Khazarian mafia such a concern after Trump ran for office, but not before?

Stop being obtuse. You fell for a psyop.

Answering my own question, muh Khazarian mafia was conjured as a means of infiltrating pro-Trump messaging forums and making them appear hostile toward Jews, using the term as a synonym so they can contaminate everyone else as Nazis by association while skirting getting banned with semantics.

https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/whatever/3954290

I have slowly been red pilling a few family members and a friend by telling them how worried I am about the "Khazarian Mafia." Of course they have no idea what Khazaria is but listen to all my stories of how horrible these people are... I simply say it's an ancient country near Russia... I never mention "jew." I am hoping once they are hooked and start to research further they will make the connection to the jews... seems to be working but will have to see.

2
magavoices 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does this evangelical sound like a Jew loving Israel first sycophant?

Nobody gives a shit. This forum isn't the place to hash out the finer talking points of your Jew hatred dogma.

Where are the OCD Muslim hating patriots who are completely obsessed with posting shit about Muhammad here?

They're not here, why? Is it because the Muslim faith isn't completely fucked up? No.

I'll tell you why they're not here ... because there's no currently ongoing psyop designed to infiltrate GAW and gaslight everyone against Muslims.

There are hundreds of fucked up perverted religions. Why aren't you going on about the flaws in Mormonism? Scientology? Catholicism?

We are creatures of pattern recognition. We notice patterns and also where patterns don't exist.

Somehow, all the other religion haters in the world haven't found their way into the Q community but there you are with your Jew hatred bullshit (insert overtones of Naziism and all the leftists who are pro-Gaza and anti-Israel).

You are one of two things. You're either a DARPA AI bot pulling off a psyop, or a weak minded fool who believed the psyop.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›