Tune in tomorrow morning.
Adam Aaron took the bait and is forced to do everything possible to tank the company. I bought $1k a good ways back and he has diluted that to $50.
Trade it if you want but how can you expect a blackmailed CEO to make any headway?
I always thought the strategy here would be that Hunter would appeal all the way to SC and that Form 4473 was unconstitutional.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82797/gov.uscourts.ded.82797.40.0.pdf
It'd be the perfect opportunity to do so since liberals would be motivated to find Hunter innocent, and conservatives would be happy with it too since it'd leave all his other potential charges outstanding.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the least damaging, least constitutional, most beneficially precedent-setting charge was brought against him...
Hunter isn't the ultimate target here. He was the money mule. The high value targets are the politicians who committed treason & violated their oaths of office.
They're being forced to share data at the expense of their reputation and time, so possibly.
On the other hand one might argue it's just standard warrant compliance...
X Corp. is asking the justices to consider whether social media services can be forced to share data about their users with government investigators while being barred from informing those users about the requests.
In an unprecedented end-run around executive privilege, Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained a nondisclosure order preventing Twitter from notifying former President Trump of a warrant for private communications that he sent and received during his presidency. Although Twitter had provided these communications to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the government informed Twitter and the district court that it “did not want to obtain data from NARA, as it would require notification [to the former President] pursuant to the Presidential Records Act.”
So the act of being precluded from informing the user seems to be critical here.
Twitter argued the order was a prior restraint on speech subject to the procedural safeguards of Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965), which requires that challenges to prior restraints be resolved in time to preserve the status quo
That is, Twitter sought to notify former President Trump in a manner that, like the PRA, protected potential constitutional privileges while accommodating any legitimate interest the government had in nondisclosure.
Meanwhile, the First Amendment rights of service providers like Twitter to notify users in time for them to assert privileges can be irreparably injured.
Ok yeah so first amendment rights of Twitter seem to be a big part of the case...
I'm having ChatGPT compare to the prior version and they seem highly similar.
When ChatGPT isn't being lobotomized about a topic it's quite fun to interact with. e.g. You can give it a prompt like "i'm looking for whether the writer of the more recent doc has created a loophole for themselves to fail to deliver shares in the coming weeks" and it'll go all conspiratorial.
Take a look at "Equity trade Capture & Reporting". The items that stand out to me as being useable:
Although it is an unlikely event, NSCC will process and accept Shortened Settlement (T0 Same Day Settling) orders submitted prior to 1:30 PM ET, if Exchanges are closed
PCF stands for "Portfolio Composition File". So it sounds like if an exchange closed, the participant could submit their PCF file early (before in-the-money options are automatically exercised at end of trading day).
PCF files for the following trade date will be accepted or, ETF Agents/ Sponsors have the choice to allow NSCC to Carry Forward prior days PCF for Standard baskets only. NSCC does not carry forward Create, Redeem, Cash or Custom PCF’s, these basket types may be submitted in primary or next day supplemental cycle.
It sounds like this would allow participants to essentially submit their prior day's PCF file--again, this would be before in-the-money options were automatically exercised).
Both those loopholes become irrelevant if DFV exercises early.
Oh this is dasting, looks like the first archive snapshot of this same document was March 2020.
We all know this isn't ultimately about Trump's content on Twitter, but rather Obama and others'.
Something to watch out for. I suspect the SC will give us a bit of nuance as to what white hats can extract and what the process should be.
Trump goes first so that the precedent is set and white hats know what to do & not so that their cases succeed.
^ This, TBH.
It's a classic strategy to have a dedicated goon to rough up and psych out the opposing team's star. Hockey informally recognized the position for decades:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforcer_(ice_hockey)
Where Clark's team failed was not having someone to fill this role and reciprocate. There should have been someone tearing off the bench to meet out immediate justice and force the refs to call double flagrants.
I'm convinced that healthcare is a multi-layer scam and most people are only wise to the outer most layers (if that)
-
Make people think that God hasn't given us what we need to be healthy (plants, resources, intelligence, companionship, etc.)
-
Make people think that decades of study and accreditation are needed to understand health and make health decisions.
-
Make people think that because health is valuable and hard to understand, caring for your health must be expensive.
-
Make people think that because they imagine healthcare is expensive, that insurance for healthcare must be necessary.
-
Make people think that because they imagine healthcare is expensive and that they imagine insurance is needed for exorbitant expenses, that said insurance must also be expensive.
-
Make people think that only the government could cover something so expensive as health insurance because their income never could.
And that's how you pay $20k a year for "health insurance" that rarely pays on claims, for "healthcare" that just makes you sick and frustrated, and why your doctors and nurses work in very nice buildings and drive very nice cars..
In a November 2021 interview with Kara Swisher, Buzbee said the journalistic independence of the Post from its billionaire owner Jeff Bezos was "never in question at any point" during her hiring process.
Beats me, but figured track the resignations.
There's definitely a different appearance to the words OP marked.
https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#pca
You can see it with the forensics tools if you're skeptical of your peepers.
https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/accessibility-privacy-coop-files/January2017FCD1-2.pdf
I think this would be an archive of Obama's version:
Holy shit, he specifically seems to confirm ownership of 120k the June 21st $20 calls...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1d6r5vp/gme_yolo_update_june_2_2024/
The only thing that is suspect to me--and this may be a unit conversion matter-- is that my humble little Fidelity terminal shows total open interest on this call at ~22k contracts. Yahoo does show ~144k though:
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GME/options?date=1718928000
Maybe that's 22k contracts within Fidelity?
I checked the archive earlier and found nothing. Seems to be a nothing burger.
Don't know why everyone is excited. Feels like no one is staying frosty...
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/JudicialDirectory?2
Fren I thought this post was a bit lazy at first but it's got my gears spinning now..
The photo is from a hurricane relief concert on Oct 22, 2017.
https://www.eonline.com/news/888592/lady-gaga-poses-with-all-5-living-ex-presidents-at-hurricane-relief-concert
https://www.instagram.com/p/BaiKfAeAu7N/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/21/politics/hurricane-relief-concert-five-former-presidents/index.html
Maybe it's symbolic of the "left" and "right" putting aside their differences and aligning against Trump? These posts are from quite early in his administration and there did seem to be a point at which the "R vs. D" narrative transformed into the "Democracy vs. Trump" narrative...
[H]arvey, [I]rma, and [M]aria were the hurricane names.
HIM?
Here is Trump's message:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G46NYFFBWyo
I notice that in the photo, none of the five presidents have a tie. (Tie removed?) Trump is wearing one. Trump's response is posted Oct 21st apparently.
The presidents don't appear to be in any sort of order that I can discern.
If you bring up the Oct 21st posts they are a pretty comprehensive call-out of human trafficking.
https://anontools.xyz/?text=oct+21
The two Bush presidents appear to be the only one with their suits unbuttoned.
Friend of mine says diamond imagery indicates Presidential-level escort. Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, Beyonce.
High priestess between two pillars?
https://imgs.search.brave.com/Rhif0Sp5Zv7Onhq_u7V5EcK0hy3UOn3eQUhzISus630/rs:fit:860:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9zdGF0/aWMud2l4c3RhdGlj/LmNvbS9tZWRpYS8x/ODk3MmVfYTYzNjE4/NGFjMzNlNGM4ZTlm/ZGJkODMwYjg1OWEy/NjB-bXYyLmpwZy92/MS9maWxsL3dfMjc3/LGhfNTAwLGFsX2Ms/cV84MCxlbmNfYXV0/by9UaGUlMjBIaWdo/JTIwUHJpZXN0ZXNz/LmpwZw
So all that is to say, I'm still a bit lost on how 552 and 255 connect other than through the storm/hurricane theme...