0
propertyofUniverse [M] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're definitely over-reacting fren. This is just a small correction.

Just pull back a bit on your posting, there is no need to stop altogether.

No need to delete your account.

No need to berate yourself.

No need to feel guilty and

no need to apologise.

We are not disallowing you, we just want you to keep your posts high quality and on topic

You can do this, you make lots of high quality posts.

4
propertyofUniverse [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hi fren,

this really isn't personal, don't take it that way.

This is just about keeping the posts on target.

If we have too many overly personal or special interest posts then they cause forum sliding. ie. breaking news and important posts are harder to find.

I suggest you see what posts which other people are making get good engagement and then you can see what's most useful.

The way most of the community here sees it, we are a research and discussion community first and a support and interest community second. We can't afford to swap those over or we will not be contributing to the great awakening, which, right now is often about learning about money, politics and how we are being manipulated. It also includes personal spirituality, but we can't allow that to drown out the news and analysis.

If you think you are the only high volume poster who we have politely asked to keep on topic, you aren't. I think at one time or another, we have asked ALL of them, EVERYONE. Just ask them, it's true.

4
propertyofUniverse [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hi fren

Can you keep your posts on topic please. Q or geopolitics related.

16
propertyofUniverse 16 points ago +16 / -0

When someone is always right, why WOULDN'T you want them to be your president?

2
propertyofUniverse [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're welcome fren!

1
propertyofUniverse [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi fren

I just stickied an earlier post

5
propertyofUniverse 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, and there is also the possibility of a planned escalation of the Ukraine war. A false flag or a severe provocation of Russia is all it would take.

I note that Russian aircraft were attacked on the ground in the arctic region recently.

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

This video is full of mistakes and assumptions.

For example, they say both snipers left the window behind Crooks, but weren't there three staff assigned there?

They also say that the counter sniper on the roof killed crooks and never question that.

Here's the big one, they assume it was Crooks who took a shot which hit Trump and that he was working alone.

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think it will register with the deeply incurious normies.

They don't even ask why 3 towers went down demolition style when only 2 planes hit.

Or why Lucky Larry said "Pull it" as if it's a matter of hours to organise a tower demolition instead of months.

1
propertyofUniverse 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeh, some of those other ISIS affiliated Chechens have been fighting alongside the Ukrainians.

5
propertyofUniverse 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kadyrov's Chechen soldiers have been fighting alongside the Russians for years in this conflict. AFAIK they specialise in storming buildings.

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with you about the crash.

Previous crashes have been engineered by the cabal to facilitate transfer of wealth to them.

I think the white hats are more or less in control of whether and how the market crashes now so any crash now might be different in nature. ie. it may asymmetrically affect the cabal.

Look at the short squeeze play as an example of funds in the market being segregated between white and black hats. if the MOASS occurs, the cabal are all on the short side and retail investors an patriots are on the long side. That would be a crash, but just for cabal funds. I'm sure there are other examples of this. Maybe within crypto as well, although I do not understand this area.

What I am trying to say is that any crash will hit the cabal hardest this time.

2
propertyofUniverse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I debate whether it is really necessary to concentrate on Q to be an effective anon these days.

I know Q is / was our main backchannel from the white hat portion of military intelligence and the Trump team, but it was always designed to be deniable pattern recognition for the first and second wave anons, the most autistic anons, and it bootstrapped the movement.

As the number of anons grow, the pool of new re-entrant autistic thinkers has been depleted and people who are more normie are awakening.

Q was never meant for those guys.

In some ways I think the awakening is phased and the mission of the Q phase is completing and the next phases of the great awakening will occur. The normie awakening, the full scale recognition of the cabal, the revelation of our stolen history and the extent of our slavery to the cabal.

This site is what I consider to be a second wave anon site, we aren't 4chan, we are less wild-west and more about communicating to a new audience.

I am also a second wave anon. I would myself not have been able to do the analysis that the early anons did.

4
propertyofUniverse 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder where your co-worker thinks Trump has lost supporters?

I'm here in the UK far away, but I don't see an area where Trump has lost any supporters.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›