3
redtoe-skipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

For those having some time on their hands, because the the rest of the family decided to take the Mock Rats advice:

https://archive.org/details/b20442580/page/n13/mode/2up?view=theater

3
redtoe-skipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting. Pre-setting the conditions of contract.

Question: how about now clicking: I agree to something you have not read, or even fully agree to?

The same goes for bill of exchange. You do not have to use their debt bill. ....

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clap for them.......

Jerusalema dance ...

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

He needs high heels to play the piano with his dick ....

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

was german just a few years ago.

It was still German, but under Polish administration under the auspices of the League of Nations.

Poland had other plans. and the German-Poland relation deteriorated vast after 1937 when a new Polish government came in.

After the WOII these areas were again part of Poland's administration based on the agreements made but ... still part of the German Reich ....

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

2 q-proofs in one post:

  1. senators 53-47
  2. in come Pam Bondi.
1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

First off: do not ask permission to the government to marry in the first place. That gives the .gov the jurisdiction to order you around.

Instead, do as it has been for ages: the decision and act of marriage is a matter between a man and a woman: it is contractual.

Prenuptial can function for good things, since the government is the biggest gold-digger no one sees coming.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are Congress members while being adjourned, with or without sine die, under the constitutional protections they are usually enjoying, and thus being able to escape accountability?

3
redtoe-skipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

House Drinker: Nervous Nacy Piglousy.

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed!

I listened to a podcast of Marianne Zwagerman and she detailed the idiocy:

There is a question regarding the issue of nitrogen. D66 ( Dutch political liberals aka The Mock Rats; most judges, academia etc) have a scientific discussion on the matter. In comes professor with 30 years knowledge base and says: well what about changing the Cow's diet to a more healthy natural one. It saves a lot in terms of food costs for the farmer, nitrogen buildup in nature, and it saves the government a lot of money in terms of compensation for forced closures of farms. On top, the turnover can exists and yields tax revenue.

He was not allowed to state his ideas any further, because his views were:

  1. not in line with the objective of the agenda 2030
  2. too much common sense.
0
redtoe-skipper 0 points ago +1 / -1

Apology accepted, although I am not upset. I am just wondering how it is to state with conviction without researching while being proved to be wrong.

To help you along: try: etymologiebank.nl: entry: Diets, and see for yourself. (deepl.com wil help you with translation)

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good question. Consider this: why is it that the after counting reveals kneepad Cameltoe Ho to jump from 67 to 74 and trump from 74 to 76.

3
redtoe-skipper 3 points ago +3 / -0

It amazes me every time that people would rather accept the spiritual ideas of another person than finding their own.

  • Think Logically
  • Trust yourself.
  • think for yourself.

What is amazing in relation to Islam, is that the words inscribed in the Mosque in Jerusalem on the temple mount, are older than the Quran itself. Verses were written on Camel's asses. These were collected by collectors, and then the process of sifting through, evaluation, discarding, and finalizing the form and umber of verses.

Mo did not write the Quran. People around the year 1000 did.

Be that as it may, coming back to my original premise: why would you accept the spiritual experience of someone else of a higher authority than your own?

Or ... do you confess to be a bastard with whom God would not want to be seen ... eh .. consorting?

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally nuts what you are saying:

Doets is a derivision of Deutsch. Ever hear of Pennsylvania Dutch? It's German alright, Hessish as in from Hessen. But there you go, the fucked up thing what is known to be bastardized Latin: aka: English.

<enen iets diets maken -1484

This means: To explain something.

Diets -> Duits
Diets -> Duiden

Diets is the language people spoke before they were confronted with the bullshit that is Nederlands (Haarlems) as General Civilized Dutch (ABN: Algemeen beschaafd Nederlandsm as if our Frysian Language is not civilized)

Hence, talking was required. Today it would be called: mansplaining.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has it occurred to you you are being visually fucked?

17th century? Look at the boots, and the green trousers! That is AI at work for you.

Do a search on the alleged painter' s name. ....

First of: Nuützen is NOT a Dutch name at all. Vermeer, Rembrandt, yeah ....

Here is some Russian AI shit: https://profhobby.ru/drawing/20318-0001564

It's all right, but not to good.

2
redtoe-skipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

And, that is exactly what IT said .... it almost sounds like common sense ...

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

A saying in connection with James Bond: Defiant to the last.

I am proposing for these MSN-fake-news outlets:

DEVIANT TO THE LAST DEVIANT STREAM NEWS (DSN)

1
redtoe-skipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the view of the Germanische Heilkunde, the reason people get sick is because of trauma.

Depending on where in the brain the trauma takes place, it is visible as a circle, the organs steer by that part of the brain will become active in remediation. In the conflict remediation, cancer may show up and when the brain heels, it may be shown as tumors.

https://en.germanische-heilkunde-dr-hamer.com/entdecker/dr-hamer

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›