The Cocaine drug addicted with his dick on high heels dressed in a bolero piano playing dwarf has the ability to speak.
It does not mean he should utter a word as his insanity becomes manifest. But ... to his defense I should say: he speaks the words of his masters in a foreign tongue.
Virologist Vincent Munster, trained at Erasmus MC with Marion Koopmans and Ron Fouchier, helped cobble together the Covid virus, American researcher claims in explosive new book.
https://deanderekrant.nl/is-sars-cov-2-van-nederlandse-makelij/ [title: sars-cov-2 of dutch make]
It is good to remember that this same University: Ab Osterhaus, filed a "peer reviewed" paper on sars back in 2013 using a system called the Amended Koch Postulates (Rivers et all).
No one has ever published a replication .... save Dr Landa. He shows this is a load of gobbledygook.
About the same time, a study was published about zinc and ionophores. Which lead to the prof. Raoul regimen (tropic disease institute of Marseilles, France: which you better know as the Zelenko regimen.
- Osterhaus
- Koopmans
- Munster
- Fouchier.
The question can be posed: why these Dutch? What proxy role are they fulfilling?
There was a version of uprising with a video showing the usual suspects, starting with wiener deleting his stuff ... trump making all kinds of arrests ....
Amnesty was nowhere to be found during COVID.
The best they have is their book club.
It is said that <80.000 is entering the max pain. Well, I would venture a guess here:
To restructure, a flushing out is needed. This was already quite visible when Doge started to really come out of the woodwork and closing down USDAID and other spigots.
Now, it is terrorism financing ....G7 has been put on notice, secondary sanctions are in the air aimed at IRGC. But also think Ukraine, but at a later time, perhaps (interconnected). .... It would not surprise me if old wallets are going to be flushed out.
But my suspicion is that a lot of money is hidden in Monero/ ZEC/ Litecoin/ BCH. Given the congressional testimony of Paccom about BTC and "securing networks", it would not surprise me if there is a mapping, and Bessent is targeting one layer after another.
Zero? No, that would defeat the purpose. See thesis called: Softwar by Space Force Major Jason Lowery. On top: your BTC is safe! That is a promise to be kept by CoC. And given Trump's track record, I see no reason to doubt the end result.
So, how do you flush out, without breaking the China in the cupboard? Max pain. It is all a matter of how do you finance over time. The costs of financing, especially in a low interest environment, is an order of magnitude smaller. 1% of the total costs.
And it would also not surprise me, if several "black-budgets" are being brought to bear.
There is a rational to play around with a concept of access denial in an environment where a supply shock is quite feasible. There are certain mechanism within several larger central exchanges who multiply an applied force: be it a sell or a buy.You get erratic behavior due to overleveraging and rehypothecations.
Chart analysis perspective: [not gospel;apply salt];DYOFR
There are some value gabs that have yet to be resolved.Call it structural imbalances, created by surges. Surges come from floods of money poring in. Money, typically flowing through CoL infrastructure.
58472 -> most likely if a resolution is reached -> it will bounce somewhat and slowly recover. Monies in BTC will flow to Iran rebuilding. 49391 -> not likely; weak point for a bounce 48181 -> potential target. painful but manageable. Veer point. Perhaps even in a violent cascading sell off, like 10-10-25. 29140 -> weak hands sell all. 14117 -> strong hands; total reset. But then ....
Even microstrategy has to strategize around it. If they still can? How about LEDN? their customers won't be happy.
It would be a great time to buy, though.
We are almost at a point where one could pose the question: Is there anything in nature not helping to defeat the spike protein?
Yes ... And BTC just dropped to 67K. .... It seems the correlation is uncanny ...
what is a demo? [demos: whence went the S? BS for you, 99% for them?] what is a crat? [cratos-> cratia -> power? might? virility? Savvy?
The answer then is: NO. because the name gives it away. [nomen omen est]
Not random. .... Group of former judges .....-> east virginia. ....not random, but carefully chosen.
hmmmm This matter has been reported on before, back in feb-2026.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5759186-trump-midterm-elections-national-emergency/
According to this article, Trumps response seems to indicate surprise to such a notion.
The way I look at it currently, from a high level, without diving into the nitty gritty:
- Trump indeed could ISSUE such a finding and Proclamation.
- I think the problem might be found in delegated powers. .... a. States should make sure that the way in which they conduct the election fulfills the constitutional requirement: election day. b. What id a state thinks: fock it, We're doing our own thing. And make it election months. .... b1. So, although there seems to be no clear cut SCOTUS decision when it comes to elections and national emergencies, b2. There is the insurrection act. b3. There is 18 USC 241/242/
I'm not so sure it is as clear cut as Dr Corsi and Company seem to think.
There is one contingency I did not mention, and it has to do with NFT's, non fungible tokens.
Certain criminals sens out an nft into a self custody web3 wallet ( all kinds of tokens running om EVM: Ethereum virtual machine) . When the recipient is not careful, he/she may unwittingly agree to a smart contract that allows the criminal to sweep the wallet contents.
Such things could also be leveraged against any State actor.
That because you have to make the distinction between self custody and custody wallets. Any third party holding the seed phrase is liable to cooperate with seizures and forfeitures.
Some people used central exchanges. And wonder how the hell they lose access to their money.
Self custody cannot be seized. Unless of course you have your seed phrase lying around.
Central exchange wallets, fren.
Think of it as: if you put dollars in a bank account, those dollars can be seized.
Crypto wallets on central exchanges can be seized. It happens all the time, everywhere.
That is why banks love to custody your crypto. There is really no business case for them here. Why?
Enter self custody wallets.
For instance, if you were to use cake wallet, a so called self custody wallet, there is only one way to seize the content of it: that when the holder of the seed phrase /key hands it over.
Think of Ros Ulbright. He gave some keys, but not all. Also see the story of Bitcoin Jesus.
In other words, the topline here is: not your keys, not your money.
Currently, is is possible to have self custody IBAN accounts, self custody visa card accounts, self custody btc, user, usdc, fuss, zano, erg, accounts.
And if you really want to play nice, you go with zano, zwc, bch, xrm.
In effect,. You could have 10000 wallets with a 1000 in there. If you need to pay for goods and services, you could Simply transfer the seed phrase instead of money.
Just like you could handover your physical wallet, and say: here's a thousand.
Again, in crypto world there is only one word: self-custody. Anything else is crap.
I am glad I can read such posts on x. My daily dose of the precursor to pannicanism.
It bears repeating: the quote in an of itself is constructed of 3 parts. It would behoove those who use it, to indicate such. [cherry picking?]
The rest of the quote is mined and assembled from two paragraphs. The first half can be found (quote mined section in green) in chapter 8 called “Monopoly, or Opportunity”:
However it has come about, it is more important still that the control of credit also has become dangerously centralized. It is the mere truth to say that the financial resources of the country are not at the command of those who do not submit to the direction and domination of small groups of capitalists who wish to keep the economic development of the country under their own eye and guidance. The great monopoly in this country is the monopoly of big credits. So long as that exists, our old variety and freedom and individual energy of development are out of the question. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom. This is the greatest question of all, and to this statesmen must address themselves with an earnest determination to serve the long future and the true liberties of men.
And the latter half is found in chapter 9, called “Benevolence, or Justice?” (quote mined section in green):
We are at the parting of the ways. We have, not one or two or three, but many, established and formidable monopolies in the United States. We have, not one or two, but many, fields of endeavor into which it is difficult, if not impossible, for the independent man to enter. We have restricted credit, we have restricted opportunity, we have controlled development, and we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.
It is clear that the power to expand or restrict credit is indeed a power to domination.
Just host it on github, and link here.... or....
Make a video-post with cross links.
https://gist.github.com/BHaFSec/928e9fd6f876b7d2f552cfb846dddf3a
Forensic Audio Analysis — Full Report
Date: May 29, 2026
Analyst: bike_maker @ bhafsec via manus
File: AQOYZAVEmkLI3kLCRE0TrCG84RHhP13f6atAh0OfD3P0VTczXv2asvH1s_LqjaiTEm4ApRsQtpgkIanYn_xlwbRS978f_I0KgTPJzJOPQA--Yg.mp4
Foreign money .......
Another nail for Hussein.
I guess he would have been better of by having been President of Kenya, or Indonesia, Pakistan for that matter ..... But the US? ..... ah .... not a good plan when you are suffering from a constitutional handicap.
Interesting that 4h ago, BTC hit 73033 ...just that hour 1000 dollars down , it then dropped another 300 points and started to recuperate.
I kid you not. You want to know how the peace negotiation is going? Check the BTC price. The correlation is uncanny.
My view? 95440 is a level to break to consider it somewhat neutralized. Breaking 78078 we might indeed see better prospects at a improvement of relations.
Breaking 82798 and holding, I would consider that a potential to a peace treaty and slow normalization of relations. Even, membership to the board of piece.
As long it is the 1:1.9 at the home ....
4 USC:1,2,3
So, Spain refused the use of the airfields .... and gets ....
publication of the way in which socialist around the world unite around fraud. ....
Nice. FAFO.
Meanwhile, police also seized over 100 pieces of jewellery from the safe in the former Prime Minister’s office during a raid on May 19th, including bracelets, chains, earrings, rings, and watches. RTVE reported that a woman who worked at the office told officers that the haul of jewels was merely gained by Zapatero’s wife through inheritance or “travel gifts”. However, at least one of the necklaces appeared to bear the former PM’s name in an engraving.
Pope text derived from UNAM SANCTAM/ Romanus Pontifex 12th century AD.
See also: European treaties bearing upon the United States and its dependencies by Francis Gardender Davenport.
https://archive.org/details/europeantreatie00paulgoog/mode/2up
PDF downloadable. 4 part series. Part 1 Treaties till 1648 AD.
That looks like a Republican frigate from Endless-sky
http://endless-spoiler.tejat.net/img/ship/frigate.png