see also https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/2021-11-05th-the-prosecution-of-dan-andrews-victoria/
The private prosecution of the Premier and the CEO of the state of Victoria (INC) has today (3rd November 2021) been ‘filed and served’ at the electorate office of Dan Andrews at Noble Park at 2pm. This completes the legal process to activate the criminal action against the defendant for the crimes of concealing the unlawful removal of the constitutional monarch, without a national referendum (S128 Constitutional Act) Dan Andrews is scheduled to appear in court on the 17th December 2021. Police and fire services have been at this office the whole afternoon today, the office is now boarded and sealed to the public.
source please link not working thank you for finding this in line with this https://twitter.com/CabanaNot/status/1454250816379006978
we are governed by consent. step into your sovereignty.
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=%20anna%20de%20buisseret&kind=video
UK LAWYERS SERVE NOTICES OF LIABILITY ON COVID VACCINATORS WHO ADMINISTER SHOTS WITHOUT OBTAINING FULL INFORMED CONSENT HOME / COVID-19 VACCINES, PCR TESTS & MASKS / UK LAWYERS SERVE NOTICES OF LIABILITY ON COVID VACCINATORS WHO ADMINISTER SHOTS WITHOUT OBTAINING FULL INFORMED CONSENT UK Lawyers Serve Notices of Liability on COVID Vaccinators Who Administer Shots Without Obtaining Full Informed Consent by Mordechai Sones, America’s Frontline Doctors July 11, 2021
UK attorney Anna de Buisseret today announced serving Notices of Liability on COVID-19 clinics and individuals administering the experimental biological agent known as the “COVID-19 vaccine” without obtaining fully informed consent, freely given in accordance with the Nuremberg Code and UK and International law.
“COVID jabs are experimental and still in phase 3 clinical trials,” de Buisseret explained. “The Nuremberg Code therefore applies. The injector MUST obtain the individuals fully informed consent freely given. All MATERIAL RISKS must be made clear to them and an individual risk assessment conducted.”
De Buisseret said among those served is Chief Medical Officer (CMO) for England, UK government’s Chief Medical Advisor, and head of the public health profession Professor Chris Whitty.
In April, Doctors for COVID Ethics served Notices of Liability for COVID-19 vaccine harms and deaths on all European Parliament Members.
in australia we are learning that we are under no laws but Gods and under the laws of man by our consent only. (neale vs cruden 1796) all legislation in australia applies to citizens rates payers drivers people residents etc etc. ie. the public realm. so we establish agreement with our accuser/tax collector/police etc etc that we are a man/woman ie. a creation of God. ie the private realm. we then ask what authority they are acting under. they answer this act/law/directive whatever. (second witness) we then ask how does that act/law etc apply to a man/woman? game over. all acts/laws/directives etc apply to citizens rates payers drivers people residents etc etc. i notice a lot of US patriots think of themselves as citizens not as men/women. that would taken as agreement to contract by your accusers. eg. see anna von reitz
beg to differ. he's practiced martial arts a long time and displays knowledge of the spiritual dimension from an eastern perspective but with a patriotic fervor. eg. see 'falling woo'. he is optimistic because he sees morality as a superior force. however, he is realistic about the immediate future and wants to prepare people for the worst. i see this also as a spiritual mission providing constant reassurance in dark times without needing our approval or thanks. if you look for spiritual qualities in people instead of looking for spiritual forces 'out there', things can look different.
he suffered from schizophrenia and decided he was going to beat it with psychedelics or die trying.
https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/clif-high-they-want-to-kill-you-the-delingpod/
human capital https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13037-commission-study-capital-budgeting
https://freedom-school.com/buck-act.pdf
in 2013, in a US Supreme Court case, Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., it was decided that corporations could create GMO humans by injection of foreign patented mRNA or DNA and could then claim them, living people, as GMO "products" owned by the corporation under patent.
http://annavonreitz.com/countryrunbystupidpeople.pdf
see also
https://search.freefind.com/find.html?si=9931410&pid=r&n=0&charset=UTF-8&bcd=%C3%B7&query=GMO
this board is incredible! better than the movies.