Not only do the "Peacekeepers" have sex with children all the time, not only do the members of the UN do the say, they have child sacrifice rituals there (and across the world). It's as evil of a place/organization as it can possibly be.
Nesara (all versions) would destroy the economy and indeed, the whole world. It is nothing but fuckery. It looks good on paper, until you think for five seconds about what would actually happen if it came into being. The second version, which "looks" even better, is so bad it would bring about the instant end of the world.
The only and necessary path is for people to understand what has happened (The Great Awakening). People need to understand that their "truths" are ALL false. All of the world is controlled by controlled opposition. From that knowledge we can create a Free Market (something that has never existed) made from people who understand the Primary Teaching: i.e. (in this context) what it means that All People are Sovereign; coupled with an understanding of what our Jurisdiction is. That Jurisdiction is, loosely, the Right to defend Ourselves, Our loved ones, Our Liberty, and in any reasonable society, our Property.
You are the King/Queen of You. You are also the King/Queen of your property. That NEVER CHANGES. Disputes are handed as Sovereigns, because that is the only possible way to resolve conflict in Reality. The concept of other "Kings/Queens/Presidents" or "Governments" etc. is a complete and utter FRAUD (an attempted violation of Natural Law).
Only a Conscious Entity can be Sovereign. No Conscious Entity can be a "subject" (by Natural Law, though they can be convinced that they are) AKA You are the Ultimate Authority of You, and ALL Conscious Entities are equally Sovereign (the Ultimate Authority of Themselves AKA their Jurisdiction). We all have the same domain (definitionally speaking) as our Jurisdiction.
THAT IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW.
AND EVERYONE ELSE NEEDS TO KNOW IT TOO!
This knowledge is the primary obfuscation. The PTBs have been hiding it in every way they possibly can for forever.
Other than this world wide revelation of the Primary Teaching/Knowledge, every thing else is fuckery (intentional or not). "Nesara"" or any other "addons" or "modifications" to our (or any other) economic or governmental system is meaningless. Only the revelation of the Primary Teaching matters.
The NDAA is the king of fuckeries.
As another example of this carte blanche law, the 2012 version passed the Senate on Dec 23. It was a day when most of the Senate were on vacation (just like they did when they passed the Federal Reserve Act exactly 99 years earlier). Coincidentally, it was also the day of the winter solstice, a day of witchcraft.
In this 2012 version, Obummer (et al) eliminated the prohibition that effectively stopped the government's ability to push propaganda to the people (at least legally). They said the original prohibition was an "artifact" and "no longer applied to our more cultured world" but was instead designed to "fight the Islamic (Somali) propaganda in MN."
Of course the C_A/DOD/etc. had been pushing propaganda on the American people from day one despite the law., but the 2012 NDAA law made it legal, so no more pesky "Congressional investigations" getting in the way of :"what they had to do" for "National Security."
Honestly, they have so many ways to cheat, it doesn't really matter if we control the entrances. What we need to do is watch the back doors, and we need EVERYONE to see it happening. It's not about controlling the cheating, it's about EVERYONE believing it is happening.
The rules work for the House, and the House always wins. The "SC" works for the House. EVERYONE works for the House.
We can't win until we burn the House down, and we can't burn the House down until EVERYONE understands who the House is.
There is a Single Source of All Things. (As opposed to 0, 2, 3, ..., n, inf, etc. truly distinct (topologically completely disconnected) Sources.)
Other than the most extreme type of narcissist (which is intrinsically contradictory), all religions and/or philosophies and/or cults and/or investigations (including both The Science and all of legitimate science, math, information theory, etc.) all agree with that statement.
But that doesn't mean that there wasn't another entity (another Derivative of Source, possibly another spiritual entity or other physical entity ("The Aliens")) that modified (and/or created) the species that we call Homo Sapiens sapiens for their own purposes. While it's far from certain (plenty of reasonable doubts), there is a fair bit of evidence that supports that idea. Even the book we call "the bible" supports that statement substantially; especially if you look further afield than the "Canonical 66" (most Protestant versions) and/or use it as an archeological document rather than "Written by God (YHWH, the god of the Jews and/or Israelites) exactly and perfectly."
As far as I'm concerned, it is proper to be skeptical of your beliefs and other evidence that both supports and casts doubts on them, no matter what the "source" may be. Any other method of investigating evidence is nothing but dogma (AKA following your programming/brainwashing).
Once you truly appreciate that ALL THINGS come from Source (and what that implies), only then will the next veil be revealed. I don't know if that will be revealed in Disclosure, but there is a lot of stuff out there in the zeitgeist right now that is showing that quite dramatically.
Why THAT is (according to my investigation), is an evidence chain that will almost certainly not be in this movie.
Come on man. Your responses make it perfectly clear you aren't listening to what I'm saying at all.
REREAD WHAT I SAID AND LISTEN NEXT TIME.
Listen to understand, not to respond.
Only if you can understand what I'm saying can you respond in a meaningful way. Otherwise it's meaningless to engage.
As just one example, so you can see how you ignored what I was actually saying:
But every one of those criticisms is a criticism of fiat currency, not crypto.
Actually, every one of my criticisms was a criticism of a non-asset based currency. NON-ASSET BASED CURRENCY. HEAR MY WORDS. It has nothing to do with "fiat" except that both are usually (in this context) non-asset based.
Only if you can see what I'm actually saying will your response will be meaningful, otherwise it's nonsense.
One more attempt, because your premise is so profoundly false.
Gold was valuable because people valued gold.
Gold was valuable because people valued it's real qualities. On the easiest example, it is beautiful and rare. Jewelry was desired for the same reasons, and while jewelry could be used in trade, it was never used as a currency (as far as I'm aware). But it does show that "beautiful" and "rare" are BY THEM SELVES desirable qualities. Have you ever looked at gold? The idea that it has no "real qualities" is utter nonsense.
To continue: currently it is used for jewelry because of it's physical properties (luster, lasts forever (doesn't oxidize, degrade from acid/base reactions, complements many colors (clothing), etc.), has incredible thermal properties, is both physically malleable and strong (It used to be used as the best possible mortar e.g. ("City of Gold" wasn't just a meme), filling in both the gaps in large stones at a very useful temperature range (lead was used for similar reasons, but had the nasty "poison" quality), and absorbing energy from earthquakes, etc., etc.)). These ideas that it had no intrinsic qualities are DEMONSTRABLY FALSE STATEMENTS. All arguments that push that IMMEDIATELY FALL APART, and any investigation into it recognizes is ludicrousness immediately. Your premise assumes people will listen to you without using their eyes or their brains.
That doesn't count the fact that there is some substantial evidence that the Egyptians (or pre-Egyptians?) used gold for large scale electrical conduction, making it the best conductor possible in an environment intended to last forever and safely carry a massive EM load (the top of the Pyramid was capped in gold, and it looks like it was a power system of some type, using gold as the best possible conductor). There are other possible technological uses given by "hidden history" (speculative, but more existent than you might think if you look) that are even more "out of this world" (both in effectiveness and literal "out of this world-ness").
Try again. Listen next time.
Then you can respond meaningfully. Otherwise I won't engage again.
I'm guessing this is a canned response since it has exactly nothing to do with my statement except the last sentence, which was completely disconnected by the rest of your "response."
Your gold and silver intrinsic value collapses the moment we start mining asteroids.
That is a false argument, suggesting that any inflation automatically and instantly "collapses" the economy. For example, if we had a gold based free market economy (we'll call that "best case scenario" for now) and we had an immediate tripling of all gold influx, that would be (by your contrivance) a tripling of inflation. That is a contrivance, and an impossibility, but I'll play.
the moment we start mining asteroids.
Your contrivance would not "collapse" the economy. Instead, it would just cause inflation. We can work with inflation, and indeed, history shows that with real assets (gold, silver, copper, and bronze specifically), the increase of PMs tends to adjust well into the system (for various reasons, not the least of which that they are useful regardless of their use as a currency, because they are real assets), stabilizing (to an extent) the economy and eventually reducing the inflation (through deflation through other uses), despite the total increase.
Yes, it is conceivable that at some point in the future (which at the moment doesn't actually exist and is thus a red herring argument) a substantial increase in gold and/or silver will, within a free market (which too doesn't actually exist and never has in over 5000 years of evidence) will cause inflation commensurate with the total value v. the demand (which also changes based on the population, technological uses, etc.).
But the truth is, according to the evidence, the value of both gold and silver has been incredibly stable (with some caveats that I won't elaborate here) for the entirety of human history. That's despite massive mining efforts and massive population swings. Yes, it has changed, yet those changes in the PMs has remained more constant than any other assets throughout all of all time (not counting the specific and world wide coordinated fuckery occurring during the past ~150 years to change things which has been designed to destroy the world for their "Utopia").
And that is the BEST argument presented here by you.
All other arguments are nil (with a couple caveats of the usefulness of some of the qualities of crypto in general (not as a currency, but as a technology), which I will get to later).
Let's look at just a couple of your other arguments, so we can look at how bad they really are. And note, none of them are relevant, because they are based on the opposite of my statements, nevertheless, I'll play.
The argument that "crypto is not a viable asset because it isn't backed by anything" is one of those claims that sounds profound right up until you ask what exactly backs the U.S. dollar.
Actually, it falls apart immediately and it never makes a lick of sense. The U.S. Dollar hasn't existed in any meaningful amount since 1913. The Federal Reserve Note (FRN) on the other hand is based on the future labor of all citizens of America. That "future labor" doesn't actually exist, thus it too is a red herring. But it gets much worse than that. A FRN is a debt instrument. It comes into being in a negative, balanced by a zero value ("future" labor) pretending to be a "positive."
To be more meaningful, the way it actually works is; Money = Debt, or rather, Money + Debt = 0. Which means if the US were to pay off their debts, all their "money" would be exactly 0. The entire economy would cease to exist.
But that's really a false statement, because "money" isn't equal to debt, it's equal to debt + interest. So "money" = debt + interest. That means that the future labor of all US citizens (through the 14th amendment) + the USURY ON THAT DEBT is owned by the people who create "money" (as it turns out, from nothing).
In other words, we are forever enslaved by the people who take out loans ("debts") from the Federal Reserve (a private bank), which is to say...
...the US Govt (AKA We The People, through coercion and fraud) must legally use FRNs to buy anything (infrastructure, medicare, transexual assistance for people in Pakistan, etc.).
What does it mean that the people who create the FRNs got "interest" (usury) on our future labor? It means you are legally completely owned, body and soul, by "law" for all of time.
So any ideas that the "US Dollar" is:
backed by the full faith and credit of a government
shows that you have NO FUCKING CLUE what is really going on. Thus any argument based on that premise is instantly invalidated.
So what's the solution?
Well, it is well known that no matter what is used as a currency, as long as a real asset can be used, any non-backed currency would immediately be eliminated as a currency, because no one would use a non-backed currency if a real asset could be used instead. E.g., would you sell your car for someone's non-backed crypto if you could get gold instead? Maybe you would, as a true believer, but most wouldn't, not assuming the option existed. That's the difference between "faith" and in your hand reality.
You noted a couple "pluses" for crypto. Those pluses (and more) do exist. But you can tie real assets to crypto and get the best of both worlds. It is trivial to do so, and such things already exist (NFTs e.g., which can be tied directly to stocks, art (real and virtual), all precious metals, land, etc.).
The concept of using a non-asset currency requires a non-free market (free market PMs would destroy non-asset crypto immediately in all cases). Thus something like BTC requires that the market be a redheaded little bitch, controlled by a Centralized Authority 1984 style (which is what currently exists).
The ONLY way to have sound money is through a free market. That is the only solution for any concept of social human freedom at all. Any efforts working towards any other "solution" other than creating our own truly free market is doomed to fail, so any other "solution" must be immediately abandoned (like BTC) for people to be free.
Let me tell you what it means to be simple:
If I have silver, and you have land, or bread, or a car, etc., I can trade my silver for your real asset if we agree on the amounts. Similarly for gold and any other real asset. That's because these assets have intrinsic value. It's value is not ambiguous, it is as clear as a fucking golden bell.
For anything that doesn't have real value, like FRNs, or BTC, or any other nonsense where you have to explain HOW it has value, it's nothing but a FUCKING PSYOP.
It's really THAT SIMPLE.
He was the curtain and the man behind it
While he certainly played a meaningful part of "the curtain," he was not the man behind it. On the contrary, he was nothing but a front man, nothing more. He was an actor. A good one, and well paid for his part, but he had no actual power.
Same with FDR and every other president (with a couple partial caveats)..
That is how controlled opposition works. The only possible way to ensure you always wins is to be both sides.
And the House always wins.
The reasonable assumption is that it's "all about winning." But it's not about just winning. It's about controlling the narrative, ensuring all people focus on the "opposition," never knowing there is a man behind the curtain controlling "both sides" or even that there is a curtain at all.
You can read a great deal of that in my book. Other sections are currently unpublished, though I suggest what is there fully supports the statement that "EVERYTHING is controlled opposition," i.e. there are no independent agents, and how could there be?
Woodrow Wilson was an agent of Rockefeller, acting as controlled opposition. He did everything he could to prevent the creation of the Fed and the Cabal end game of WWI in his speeches, and then did everything he could to ensure all of those things would happen in his actions. He was as evil as they come. All you have to do to figure that out is dig into what actually happened, and who he worked for (primarily Rockefeller and secondarily Rothschild).
Look specifically at his involvement in the General Education Board (as Pres. of Princeton), how he won the election for Pres., his deep ties to Raymond Fosdick, how America was funding both sides of WWI through Wilson's policies (and how it ended, ensuring that Germany would be bankrupt), and his help in creating the League of Nations (Rockefeller/Rothschild's first NWO which they knew would fail, ensuring WWII, the UN, and the State of Israel).
That's just to start. It get's so deep.
Follow the money; follow his career; follow his speeches and look at his actions. He was a spy working against We The People, and it couldn't be more obvious, as long as you look at ALL of the primary evidence.
Stick to the point.
I suggest I couldn't have been more on point. You are attempting to distract from the absolute conclusions of 2A as framed or (legally) imagined after Disclosure (probably within the next few weeks).
Yes, disarming humanity is not the path and has been used for great evil. Everyone knows that. Maybe it was something to talk about 5 years ago, but it hardly even needs to be stated at this point. It's more like kicking a dead horse, at least in America. But 2A as stated is not the path, and that DOES need to be addressed.
"Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space" -- Michael Kratsios, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
I'm not entirely sure I want my former neighbor down the street (who is a legitimate psychopath and murderer) to "own weapons sufficient to rival our current military".
I have a lot of thoughts on Sovereignty and how it might apply to a reasonable government (specifically 2A), but I don't think Nuclear Weapons, DEWs, other WMDs, Black Hole (or wormhole/time) Machines, or only God knows what, should be available for purchase to every Tom, Dick, and Harry with PTSD and a penchant for being an angry drunk.
When you dig into the origins of the apparently disparate entities of what we might call, "The Powers That Be", you find that Conspiracy Theory/Theorist, Anti-Semite, and Heresy/Heretic all come from the same place, and control the narrative for the same reasons.
This method of controlling the narrative (the Play Book), and the people employing it (the PTB), has been going on for a very long time.
does God have any front men in the game?
This question, as framed, (I think) requires a "Christian" (Apostle's Creed made in 390AD) version of "God" (a modified version of Judaism's YWYH, the god of the Israelites) which is, I suggest, a distinct entity (or as distinct as an entity can be) from The Source of All Things (that Jesus was teaching about). The difference between the 390AD version of "God" and the teachings of the the first Church led by James (brother of Jesus) in ~30-60AD couldn't be more different. People don't really think about (and are discouraged from investigating into) the development of the beliefs about Source (or "God") during the 350-400 years in between, and of the concepts and the "details" of Source/"God" (useful dogmas).
We talk about the "Church Fathers," but we are pretty much clueless about what they actually said, and especially when things were said: the sequence of who said what, and in response to whom; who benefitted from the changes, both money and power; the history of their changes, and who (without controversy) deleted other people's writings/teachings. We know about those deletions because the Church kept the "rebuttals," but the rebuttals themselves were completely deleted, often noted as "heresy", including called "heresy" from other "Church Fathers" and even James (brother of Jesus) himself.
These changes are well documented, but almost completely ignored, except the parts that fit the final dogma (circa 390). In the case of the "Catholic" AKA "Universal" (AKA the version that killed anyone who believed differently (later called "heretics") and burned all their books) Church, it assumes "God" was/is a distinct, jealous, vengeful, turned "caring"/"loving" entity, but most importantly, an entity strictly distinct from Self. In the case of the teachings of Jesus (prior to it's reimagining from Saul of Tarsus), "The Father" (or "Source" or "The One") is not a distinct entity from Self, but rather You and The Father are One.
"the kingdom of God is within you"
This distinction of the concept of Source is essential to understand what is meant by the words "good" and "evil." Having said that, it is possible to address your questions on a less complete level.
it is not difficult to conceive of multiple factions vying for control
It is not difficult, but that's not what happened according to the evidence. The evidence suggests that their ("evil") stranglehold of the world was COMPLETE, and every attempt to thwart any true opposition to the "evil" rulers of the world failed completely and utterly. The teachings of those opposition movements have been living in hiding for millennia. Every time the "good" (think "Q" but in a broader scope, call it Q++) tried to teach the Primary Teaching, or otherwise attempted to beat the "evil" (the Cabal) by other methods (economic e.g.) they were utterly destroyed (the lawful genocide of "heretics" e.g.) .
There is a long string of documented evidence of true oppositions (Q++) against the "evil" group (Cabal), in their coherence (same or connected group the whole time), and their (by necessity) hidden nature, starting from when Paul/Saul tried to subvert and destroy them (and succeeded), though before Jesus the world was controlled by other means (kinda, but also, not really). There are striking similarities both before and after Jesus and other (albeit related) opposition movements v. the PTB; which is not at all surprising since the teachings of Jesus are fundamentally the same as many other learned men (Lau Tzu, Buddha, Zarathushtra, Socrates, etc.) and their teachings are all derived from the same premise: There is a SINGLE Source of All Things (as opposed to two or more fundamentally distinct (topologically disconnected) sources. (There is a great deal more to say about that, but that simple premise is the beginning of that discussion.)
All of those Teachers all taught the same Primary Teaching, and it has been hidden by similar methods of control directly connected to the "evil" entities suppressing the same teachings by the same methods.
For "evil" to remain dominant, the Primary Teaching MUST NOT BE UNDERSTOOD IN FULLNESS, though it must be taught in part, and then obfuscated. That's how it sells and is controlled. All of those teachers taught the exact same Primary Teaching. We think there were differences because other entities changed the meaning using "intermediaries" and/or changing the focus of the teaching from Primary to (various intentionally distinct) secondary teachings to create a false division (controlled opposition).
I think the distinction between good and evil is critical.
I can't disagree with that statement, but I don't think it means what you think it means (within the scope of the Primary Teaching). I think it might include context that, I suggest, is fundamentally flawed. Having said that, there IS a distinction between good and evil no matter the definition. But on a fundamental level, I think it is essential to understand the fundamental meaning of "The Respect of Sovereign Entities" AKA all entities with a Soul deserve Your Respect (as do You from Everyone Else) AKA You are the Divine Spark AKA Me and My Father are One AKA I am Source and You are Source AKA We have Free Will (and no entity without Free Will, i.e. a Soul, can be Sovereign by definition) AKA You are Sovereign AKA You are the Ultimate Authority of You (which are all the exact same statement).
what is the nature of conflict?
Conflict arises because of two reasons:
- We are ALL Derivatives of Source (We are ALL Sovereign)
- We live in a culture were we are bereft of that knowledge (we have been taught to forget that we are Sovereign, what "Sovereignty" means, and what our Jurisdiction is) and instead, by extension, we are taught that others don't necessarily deserve their Fundamental Respect.
Even the most "evil" entity deserves our Respect as a Sovereign Entity. That is fundamental. Associated with that understanding is that their (and our) Authority only extends past their (and our) Self ("You are the Authority of You"); i.e. our Jurisdiction. In any honest working social system, our Jurisdiction also extends to a persons Property, but that extension of Jurisdiction is only useful, it does not derive from our "Divine Sparkness" like Self does. This fundamental Respect doesn't mean there won't be conflict. It doesn't mean we won't or shouldn't kill each other (or otherwise take other people's property, etc.). What it means is, we currently do it without knowing what we are doing, doing it for all the wrong reasons, and shoving the responsibility of our actions to someone else, usually a "corporation" (like a government, or "the law", etc.) AKA an entity that doesn't actually exist and can't be responsible by definition.
If we knew what we were doing, that WE are completely responsible for our actions, we would be a lot less likely to, say, call for the murder of another person just because they themselves are a murderer (a common call for "Justice" or "Justification" without fully appreciating the full reality, fundamental respect, and individual responsibilities of the situation). That doesn't mean we shouldn't take someone out. Sometimes a thing MUST HAPPEN for the coherence and health of society to continue; excising a tumor e.g.. It just means that if we know that WE are doing the action, we are killing another Sovereign Entity e.g. (no matter the reason), and no one can absolve us of it, and there will be consequences for your actions (there are ALWAYS consequences), we would be a lot more likely to be damn sure we are doing the right thing, and maybe instead trying to find a different solution (if one exists and is appropriate).
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone
This statement is designed to show you that YOU are responsible for your actions. The "Law" (which is always a contrived fiction (not counting the Natural Laws)) can't ever absolve you, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, so be aware of what you are really doing.
Who are the conflicts between?
Between INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE (the only entities that can actually be Sovereign), not nations, or governments, or groups, but individuals. People can act as a group, but the complete fundamental understanding of the individual responsibility is essential for all conflict resolution. Any other "understanding" (false teaching) shoves responsibility somewhere else (under the rug), making it false.
The only path to solve these problems is for us all to fully understand (a cultural grokking) that fundamental Truth (the Primary Teaching). That is why it has been hidden (worse, misapplied by divisive tactics) for forever by the Cabal.
Perfect addendum.