1
suleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

You forget, this is britain (not great, never was) we're talking about.

Where you need a LICENCE to have a TV (so not only do you get brainwashed, but you pay for it too!)

Where you go to jail for facebook comments.

Where rapists are free to roam but YOU go to jail if you call them rapists.

Where they have a ... thing as 'mayor' of London(istan).

Where there are cameras everywhere recording your every move.

Where you pay a 'mile tax' for driving or some other such bullshit.

Where their 'secret services' have organized most if not all of the nefarious activities in the last CENTURY, including the Trump smear of 2016, 'chemical weapons' hoaxes of Syria, destruction of Nodrsteam, etc etc. List is endless.

They are so, so messed up over there. They have gone full totalitarian slavers. Like they always were, but now since they have run out of other people to enslave/oppress, they turn on their own.

And for those that are not paying attention: this is what happens when:

  1. You have no constitution but are a 'subject' to some clown that calls himself 'king'.
  2. You give up your guns.
3
suleo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not even accurate anymore. The human in the 'info hub' is replaced by a chatbot ("AI").

12
suleo 12 points ago +14 / -2

If you're 'chosen' you're allowed to steal from slaves. Because it's not stealing in chosenite terms, you're just getting what 'god' wants you to get.

That's actually how they think. The indoctrination starts from birth in their tribe.

4
suleo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is who keeps electing them:

Dead people 50%, illegals 40% and 10% demoncrap retards.

And 100% dominion of course.

15
suleo 15 points ago +15 / -0

He actually went one step further. He said:

"In the event of an escalation of aggressive activities, we will respond decisively and reciprocally. To the ruling elites of those countries who are planning to deploy their own troops against Russia, I strongly advise them to seriously reconsider. It goes without saying that, if necessary, and as a retaliatory measure, we will choose to use weapons like the ‘Oreshnik’ against targets in Ukraine, and we will instruct the civilian population, as well as citizens of friendly nations, to leave the danger zones in advance. We will do this for humanitarian reasons. We will make this public, openly, without the danger of any countermeasures from the opponent, who will also receive this information.

Why can we do this? Because, as of today, there are no countermeasures against this weapon. The missile strikes targets at a speed of 10 Mach…"

So basically, we'll tell you what we're going to hit in advance so that you can get out of the way, but whatever we choose to hit WILL BE HIT and there's nothing you can do about it.

FAFO is reaching the FO stage.

1
suleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed. I commented about this a couple of days ago and got downdooted, and called names, by 'veterans'.

Sorry, but those actions are disgraceful, and the US military is, AND AWALYS HAS BEEN, the enforcement arm of the cabal.

Well, maybe before 1860 it wasn't that. But since the Civil War it has become that.

Smedley Butler even wrote a book about it. He knew, he was part of the enforcement arm. United Fruit, back during the day.

1
suleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's because those missiles are bunker busters. The explosions were under ground.

They're coming down at a very high terminal velocity. They WILL penetrate the ground and go boom underground. That's their purpose.

Soviets built a lot of underground stuff. They learned the lessons from WW2.

1
suleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes that's true. Patriots in theory cannot intercept the Sarmat. But I guess the Russians wanted to make a point (NATO, your AD sucks), and also wanted to be damn sure the Sarmat hit.

Incidentally I read somewhere that it was a newer version of Sarmat. MIRV, 6x6. That's a lot of stuff coming at you.

7
suleo 7 points ago +7 / -0

We graduate 100s of lawyers, realtors, political scientists, womens studies, and all other FIRE economy trash degrees for every one engineer.

And that one engineer goes to work for a hedge fund because there is no actual engineering to do in this country anymore (besides construction, that part is going well).

Look at the elementary math curriculum. Then look at the ones the Russians have. 10+ years of difference.

Attempts to close the intellectual gap were made with immigration (the legal kind), so this is why you see so many indians/chinese in universities. But they are woefully short because there is also a lack of CULTURAL BINDING among them (i.e. they're in it for the money).

On top of that, Russians were always good at math & engineering AND they had advanced missile technology programs even back in the Soviet days. They just decided to use their (significantly less) resources in efficient weapons systems.

Meanwhile, we build billion dollar aircraft carriers to go bomb the next iteration of Saddam. And those carriers will get sunk with a salvo of ~20 hypersonics which cost a fraction of the price of the carrier.

This is what happens when you let a satanic cabal, and the middle managers of Wall st & Mckinzey run your country. They run it, to the ground.

4
suleo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Test them against patriots? No, they have been tested already, they are designed, among other things, to DESTROY patriots.

Patriots cannot intercept hypersonic khinzals which have a vertical terminal phase. There is at least a 30 year technological difference between the two, and the patriot system was not great even when it was introduced. Remember 1991 and Saddam's scuds?

No, what happened was that patriots are still able to intercept the Sarmats (the 'ICBM'), so the khinzals were sent to destroy the patriots, and then the Sarmats did the bigger booms.

In older days we called this SEAD. But now you don't need aircraft to do it.

2
suleo 2 points ago +3 / -1
  1. The only country that has ever used nuclear weapons is ____ (hint, not Russia).

  2. Russia has massive conventional weapon dominance. The updated doctrine clearly states the causes for a nuclear strike, and this one is not it.

So all this "Russia will use nukes!" is typical deep state projection. They always attribute to others what THEY THEMSELVES want to do. The danger, if any, is that the satanists that are around in the gov & mil will decide to use a nuclear device themselves, first. After all, american nuclear doctrine is first-strike.

Ritter has talked about the above quite a few times.

-6
suleo -6 points ago +2 / -8

No, and that's not going to happen.

But the fawning over 'veterans' and 'us military' needs to stop.

THEY are the ones doing the killing and helping the nazis. US military personnel fired those missiles. US command & military personnel assisted in the flight assignments & corrections. Or do you think Soros went there and pushed the button in person?

The russians are the adults in the room, so I am not concerned about the survival of this country. But the us mil is a disgrace.

6
suleo 6 points ago +7 / -1

That might very well be the actual reason the pedo 'gave permission'.

US mil has been doing this stuff from the beginning of the conflict. US mil supports the nazis and IS a co-belligerent. Always has been.

It's just out in the open now. Which could play into Trump's favor.

0
suleo 0 points ago +2 / -2

Really?

So the people pushing the buttons are NOT americans?

NOT us military? You know, the military, that is supposedly the only way?

THERE ARE AMERICANS FIGHTING WITH THE NAZIS RIGHT NOW. And have been for the last 2.5 years. Some of them wore the uniform before, SOME ARE WEARING IT RIGHT NOW.

The us military, like every other fed institution in this country, is an utter disgrace. "I was following orders" is not an excuse.

17
suleo 17 points ago +17 / -0

Why is that a surprise?

These aren't the first ones that have been shot down by the russians. They've been many others.

In the last 25 years, Russia focused their weapon systems into defeating the american ones. They have very modern missiles AND anti-missile & AA defense.

In the last 25 years, American weapon manufacturers focused on...their top & bottom line. Expensive stuff that doesn't work, can't last in a protracted conflict, is old (old technology), and we can't even make enough of them. But look at lockheed's stock price.

Also, fighting glorified police operations (iraq, afghanistan) is not a way to keep up with the other nuclear superpowers.

10
suleo 10 points ago +10 / -0

They absolutely are. And depend on US satellites for guidance & targeting information.

Which should be a GIGANTIC HINT HINT about the status & capabilities of US weapons vis-a-vis Russia (and China).

This isn't iraq in 1991.

9
suleo 9 points ago +9 / -0

You should see how they teach two-digit multiplication.

Even in Florida. In a good private school.

The rot is generational & systemic.

Also about the relationship of the numbers: 9 is a gay muslim trans lesbian, 2 is the opposite.

13
suleo 13 points ago +13 / -0

Before people start freaking out like unhinged libtards, let's divide things into political and practical.

Politically yes, it is an escalation since the only thing changing is Nato admitting it using ATACMS.

Practically, nothing changes since 200 - 300 ATACMS missiles have already been launched at Crimea, Donbass and Russia. I don't think they have any more capacity with this statement. Right now they have very little capacity after only small proportion is left. Moreover, Russia's AD is top notch and it shoots down almost anything. In this particular case, 5/6 were downed, one got damaged and did only minor damage to the target.

But those actions certainly will help Lockheed's stock price. The stockpiles need to be replenished. But that's the thing; the actual CAPACITY of the american weapon production is pitifully low compared to Russia's. Not only does Russia have massive escalation dominance in the theater of conflict, it can also vastly outproduce the entire west AND it has superior weapons to boot.

What changes from Russian perspective is that Nato, through its own words admittance and actions is providing legitimate basis for them to take out some British, French or US assets. Without the statement, and the subsequent actions, it would not be so obvious.

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll buy the libtard's FL house for cash.

60% off 'market' value, that's my best offer. You want cash on hand, here's a dollar.

4
suleo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait, you mean there's a DIFFERENCE between the catholic church and israel?

view more: Next ›