I don’t think distributing child porn or snuff films is part of the plan.

You’re being hysterical. You don’t write like a woman though.

Then the moderator debates back even more.

Scott Adams says LOVE TRUMPS HATE was terrible persuasion in Win Bigly and explains why (the first two words say LOVE TRUMP). But I agree that they are professional gaslighters and sometimes their persuasion is strong. Owen Benjamin is also brilliant with this stuff: language, branding, and rhetoric, and that’s why they had to cancel him harder than anybody, and for less (he said a four-year-old can’t be trans back when everyone thought the trans movement was SOOOOO great).

I think they are mostly pretty weak when it comes to brainwashing though and are only getting by because they were handed full control of the machine. They aren’t even especially smooth with their programming anymore, but just try to ram it down by force. Star Wars for example. If they had been smarter and more creative, they could have turned Star Wars demonic and gay but they got impatient, rushed it, hired the wrong people, and ruined the property. Exactly like a bunch of inexperienced old money rich kids who were handed the keys to the castle and immediately start breaking shit. Or the tranny shit. Dylan Mulvaney was terrible branding for them. They’ve realized it now and pulled him but at one point they thought he was going to help them? Stupid.

They’re like kids playing a videogame with an invincibility cheat code. But they’re still losing because they can’t get the timing right on a complicated jump pattern because as much power as the cheat code gives, it can’t do everything.

As soon as I hear the Mockingbird keyword “bait” I know somebody has been staring too hard into their TV and has been brainwashed. You open your mouth and out comes little rainbow clown cars.

Your thoughts - are they even your own?

If the Clowns In America had decided to turn on Kamala, and the keywords instead were SCARED and UNPREPARED then that’s what everyone would be repeating instead, thinking THOSE were their true thoughts and true perception. “I watched the debate tonight and I don’t know man, Kamala just looked SCARED and UNPREPARED.”

They could have swapped him out in October and then there would have been no time to expose her. Debates would be over. Most of the campaign would be over. She could have avoided the press for two weeks easily. Maybe done one or two rallies. With hardly any time for Trump to brand her or Republicans to expose her positions.

It could be they were going to swap out Biden for Harris in October so she wouldn’t have to debate or do rallies or interviews and Trump and the Republicans wouldn’t have time to expose her. By debating Biden, Trump might have forced the swap out sooner so she would have to campaign and debate him.

At the town hall Trump said the true poll numbers were 75% to 25%.

There seems to be a breed of dude on the right who isn’t evil but simply can’t be bothered to read the Q drops themselves. I think it might be one of those things where they are so late to the game, that even trying to look into them seems exhausting and confusing. These people also seem like they might be Sensers on the Meyers-Briggs personality spectrum so they really hate anything that seems like a riddle, or indirect. These were the types who back at the time would get super mad at Q and say, “Enough riddles! Say it directly!” They never understood or accepted that Q was declas without declas - that it was a loophole to get around the official rules of declas. And it made it difficult for them to prosecute or impeach Trump for it because Trump had plausible deniability.

The other problem I think these people run into is they start on Q post number one, it says Crooked Hillary will be indicted, she wasn’t (?), and so they tap out right there. “Clearly fake.” So they never go any deeper or look into it beyond that. They’re not curious how or why millions of people would think there is something to this. And I believe it was designed that way. For anyone who needs a quick out because they were not going to be able to handle declas, Q gave it to them. The choice to know will be yours.

Is that true? I took the horse paste and thought I measured it out properly (it was a small dollop) but actually feel like it might have done some damage?? I’m all for Ivermectin but since then I’ve thought maybe taking actual horse medicine wasn’t totally wise. Can’t get the actual stuff. Doctors won’t prescribe it. If you order it online, they confiscated it at the post office.

DEI was supposed to be their soft friendly replacement for CRT. Then we memed DEI so hard they themselves now think of it as a slur. It’s THEIR fucking word.

Trump is shaking the box. This is where the establishment loses it because all their advisors and experts don’t have a playbook for this.

My theory is she was the one who was tasked with implementing the Jussie hoax. I suspect once Jussie was caught, he flipped and ratted on Harris. Showed them the texts, e-mails, how it was coordinated, all of it. Then Harris, now caught, ratted on whoever put her up to it (Obamas?). And as part of her plea, she was controlled and used for this role.

Biden I think it was similar. They probably caught him through Hunter and Biden flipped on the Obamas too.

My hunch though is the Obamas won’t flip and even if they are shown proof of their crimes, their attitude is, “The American public loves us so much, you guys don’t have the guts to expose us.”

The part of this that doesn’t make sense to me is even if Harris turns on him, it’s not automatic. Biden is allowed to challenge it. Then it goes to the Senate and they need 2/3rds to remove him. If Republicans don’t vote with the Democrats, Biden stays in.

Could be more that Biden wanted the negative press to stop and that was part of the agreement? “Step down and we’ll make you a hero again”?

The best evidence of more than one shooter is the audio signature that is consistent across multiple different recordings from multiple different locations.

First there were three muffled shots fired from Gun A and Location A, followed by about five unmuffled shots fired in a burst from Gun B at Location B, then a third gunshot fired from Gun C and Location C.

After that about ten seconds go by, and then there is a fourth shot, which appears to be the sniper counter-shot that killed Crooks.

The difference between Gun A and Gun B is very distinct (muffled/unmuffled, different pitch) and the different timing in the echo suggests different locations.

The first three muffled shots all appear to have been at Trump, and the second burst appear to have been more in his general direction, hitting the crowd.

The body on the roof (probably Crooks) only had one gun beside it so it doesn’t seem likely that he could have fired two different guns.

I know they say there were eight shell casings near Crooks, but I believe that is a lie. First because Cheatle refused to commit to an initial number, and second because when they did first answer, they used vague language: the area, the vicinity.

GoFundMe for every soldier who defects?

Why does Owen Shroyer censor the word “shit”?

That’s interesting. Perhaps the third “mystery shot” was the one that took out Crooks and the sniper shot that took him out ten seconds later is a decoy.

The location of the event seems perfectly designed for an ambush like this. Who chose that location? Was there a different location originally and then it was moved there?

Maybe because in that timeline nobody knows about the attempt and the assassins are able to regroup and try again and MAGA doesn’t go into high alert and the Mayorkas/Cheatle fake Secret Service detail stays in effect. And the TDS hysteria never gets shocked out of the American people.

If she is smart she has flipped on the criminals above her who plotted the assassination and is willing to testify against them.

I think they wanted every single blood droplet frozen in time and space to rub in the face of Trump supporters for maximum humiliation and demoralization.

Instead they got the bullet whizzing by. And probably the most iconic and heroic photo of any President ever. TOTAL BACKFIRE.

They must be seething.

I would like to know if he was photographing Trump’s previous three to five rallies, or conveniently just this one, at a ridiculously high shutter speed.

They keep talking about assassination protection but also say Pence was Deep State. How could it be both? If Pence was Deep State, why didn’t they take out Trump? Did Trump have assassination protection from 2016 - 2020 or not?

Flynn isn’t a media master. He can get tripped up and put his foot in his mouth. So can Carson to some extent. So far Vance is smooth like Pence was.