Kind of sounds like they want more aborted babies. Wonder why though?

There is no better illustration of the decrepitude of Western civilization than the deification of a washed-up junky just because of the circumstances around his OD death. A man who lived like he died: worthless. But buried in a golden casket in a farcical clown-show mockery of the solemn ceremonies of death.

It's actually kind of great, to be honest. Its like we get to see Rome burn in slow motion from front row seats.

After so much effort setting this all up, why would they undermine their own success this way?

Ars is a woke cesspit and has been for a long time.

Anyway, they call it that because while it's technically physically the same substance, the statement 100% bullshit because it didn't say Comirnaty on the bottle and you won't be able to sue Pfizer if your dick falls off after the injection.

Remember the clique of popular kids in highschool? That's the cabal.

While their unified goal of any group of aristocrats is to become more an aristocratic (i.e. a person who has zero accountability who has complete control of someone else's survival), the inner sphere is always it's own crab bucket of betreyal and villainy

The only thing a cabal hates more than us plebs is each other, and only external threats like the threat to globalism from Trump forces them to unify their unimaginably powerful forces.

Turn the other cheek means something completely different.

Hitting on the cheek is what a superior does to an end inferior to put him in his place.

Turning the other cheek is to accept the pain of the hit as an equal instead of accepting your position as an inferior.

It's not just that.

Covid is the pharm industry's gravy train for years to come. First the vaccines, then the vaccine 2.0 boosters, then the "miracle" drug suddenly discovered just in time for the normie realization that the vaccines killed thousands of people and aren't safe or effective. And you know this miracle drug will just be a patentable molecule with the same mechanism of action as ivermectin. Maybe a derivative of some sort. Literally hundreds of billions of dollars on the table

But no one is getting anything if the disease is cured by common generics.

Check out Ivor Cummins and his synthesis of the research around heart health and diet.

Basically, if you go on a really low carb (or even carnivore) diet, you'll probably get a few more years out of your ticker.

The business isn't a person and can't care about anything.

The people running the business obviously care about money, but they get fistfuls regardless.

Once you have shitloads of money, more money is rarely a motivation for anything. It's more about power, status, access, adulation from the plebs etc. etc.

Leftism can give you all those things on a personal level. Making a business profitable cannot.

Oh there's absolutely no point in trying to figure out which bullshit definition of "racism" is being used or what the implications are.

That's the whole point. You have to reject the entire thing outright, at the root. Not because the construct is illogical or irrational, it isn't. But because the construct is useless bullshit with no practical or functional purpose outside the personal increase of wealth and power for those insidious bullshit-smiths who crafted the thing in the halls of academia.

Again, you're looking at this mess and thinking "this makes no sense" and thinking there is no logic here.

But there is. It's just that the words "empowered" and "misogyny" aren't defined the way you think they are, as fixed, discrete and continuous concepts defined once.

No, misogyny isn't a fixed value. Misogyny is a function. Misogyny = f(x,y,z). And the actual value you get depends entirely on the context and value of the variables (which are themselves functions)

Whether or not something is misogyny depends on who did the action being judged, their social status, their location in space and time, their nationality, their race, their sexuality, their prior actions and adherence to the faith etc etc etc. And this is by definition.

Within this definition, a man killing women because he hates them can be totally non-misogyny (think trans male POC muslim attacking TERF women at a Trump rally) while a woman buying a dress for her daughter can be totally misogyny.

Trying to argue logic within this framework is useless. You need to argue semantics.

Neither logic nor rationale work. They argue with feelings as if ours don’t matter

That just isn't true.

Starting with Marx himself, all the ideas are rational, logical and analytical. This is largely why the ideas became so popular. People turned away from religious thinking towards "scientific" thinking.

The problem isn't that it's not logical. The problem is that the definitions and axioms that serve as the foundation of the (rational and logical) models lead to models that don't work as such.

The point is that you shouldn't be arguing logic. The logic is fine. You should be pointing out that their models completely fail to predict reality every single time (which what a model does) and the reason this happens is because their definitions are useless bullshit.

Leftism is basically like solving a physics problem by placing yourself in a randomly accelerating point of reference. The math to solve this could be completely fine even though the result will be bullshit.

No they aren't, which is one of the reasons why the vast majority of people die in a do or die type situation.

To start with, you have to understand that you're in that type of situation.

You just basically said that you don't feel sympathy for these women because they aren't heroes.

Imagine they did that to a literal retard.

You don't even need the practice.

First of all, the nice man at the pharma company will be more than happy to help with a proper methodology. Second, you can publish absolute dogshit as long as it fits the narrative. "Lancetgate" happened because it was beyond the pale and completely fake, and even then it was just a retraction without any real long-term consequences. If you make a paper without blatantly fake data you'll be fine.

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine"

• Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine

It's not insane. It is completely logical and rational

But it is a completely different semantic framework, where none of the words mean what you think they mean.

You'll never be able to counter this if you don't wrap your head around the source of the issue. These people aren't insane or idiots. They just define the world in a completely different manner, one that is useless for sharing information, but useful as a tool for getting power. And the way to fight it isn't to misunderstand their thinking and call it insane, but to reject outright the retarded definitions the ideology is based on.

Because we are stupid, by and large. They are too, but that doesn't matter

To elaborate a bit, surgeons wear masks because saliva is really nasty (compare a bite wound to a cut of similar size) and has all sorts of bacteria that should never, ever go into an open wound. Surgeon's masks are very effective at reducing the amount of saliva that gets into the air, especially when talking, sneezing etc.

Reducing the amount of saliva in the air does nothing to protect against respiratory viruses. No surgeon in the history of ever wore a mask so that his patient didn't get the flu during an operation.

And it's not just about servility, it is safety theater.

Mask don't anything at the scale of these particles.

As it should, because it's way more dangerous if you aren't an 80 year old or 500 pounds.

She meant that she has a hard time understanding anything Biden says.

I understand complying with the rules even if they are retarded. I don't understand why you would do so in good faith.

If you're going to put on a mask, or let your kid wear one, put on some bullshit mesh mask. It is exactly as effective as any other mask. Q

I wonder why the parents of children forced to wear the masks don't simply provide them with 1 layer of gauze.

I didn't mean to call you a retard and I'm sorry it came across that way. The point was that the idea that this whole vax thing is all somehow tied to IQ is retarded. Because it is outright wrong, tied to emotions and doesn't fit into an accurate model of reality.

IQ is measured by a statistical test that seems to approximate your basic cognitive capabilities (which seem to be mostly physiological) in relation to others. Things like working memory etc.

But the speed with which your brain can process patterns and the amount of data it can store and retrieve in its cache have nothing have nothing to do with the correctness of your conceptual model of reality. If you feed the fastest brain in the world 100% wrong data, it will just go literally nuts-off-the-wall crazy trying to understand a reality that cannot make sense. Literally what gaslighting does.

Your processing speed doesn't affect your emotional state, or the filters this puts on your senses. It doesn't make you not ruled by both passions and chemicals. It could be argued it makes you more susceptible because you'd be better at rationalizing your irrational behavior.

To vax or not to vax is tied not to IQ, but to your levels of fear (something that is not controlled by IQ in anyway, it requires different methods), your levels of trust in authority and your desire to conform. Again, none of those is strictly tied to IQ (there might be a relationship on the low-end in terms of trusting authority as a learned behavior because you have to do it much more often if you're stupid).

If you trust "the experts" (and all of must do so necessarily to a certain degree for a given value of expert ) and you want to conform (which is a completely natural desire) and you're terrified of the disease (which, no wonder, I was terrified of it myself) you will take the vax. This doesn't make you stupid.

Lacking in wisdom and experience, yes, maybe, but not stupid.