2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

I posted all letters that he left lowercase.

Try removing all of the Of's, The's, and And type words might also give you a message if you only take THOSE kinds of words. Think words that aren't included in most acronyms

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Random capitalization.

All lower case letters:

A, A, O, I B, D, H, B, W, T, O, T, O H, T, T, A, T, A, I

S, T, T, I

possible hidden comms. Will look deeper later tonight

6
yep__yep__yep 6 points ago +6 / -0

This interview is from 2003.

Just so people know.

5
yep__yep__yep 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm confused by what you mean... They did show the dead shooter in both video and photos. They have body cams on the roof as well as a direct photo of his bloody head... That's a crime scene pic, no?

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bullet is moving upward at an angle, meaning the BULLET came from the crowd.

I'll be the first to say, you are undeniably retarded if you think that's a bullet. I don't care about your calculations, the bullet is moving UP from the audience...

So if you really think it's a bullet, convince me that this round was shot silently and invisibly from the fucking front few rows of the event.

Its a bug. Prove me wrong. Pro tip: you can't.

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao the slowest and quietest bullet ever. If it hit him, he might have even felt it!

Edit: did the bullet have wings and legs?

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I agree with that. I misunderstood your point.

Without a doubt, we're watching a movie, but not everything we see is by script. Bad actors are probably trying to control the script and narrative, but they've lost too much control. We get to tell the end of this story, not them. Road bumps abound, we will still win.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

The assassination attempt couldn't have been part of the movie...

  1. There's a photo of a bullet mid air.
  2. Someone in the background with an innocent and loving family had his head blown off and two more are in critical condition...

If that was staged, then the good guys are doing heinously evil shit. In essence, it was not staged.

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only problem is that if that's the case, and EVERYONE we see are actors, then the good guys are doing legitimately bad things to prove the bad guys were bad...

It's very likely that the public figureheads (lowest rungs on the higherarchy for the cabal) aren't the primary targets... Their handlers and organizers are. That's why so many of them seem helpless and directionless. They're trying to hold shit together, but it's clearly not going well. In fighting is running rampant... The good guys are letting the bad guys struggle publically and letting them commit more crimes that are objectively and undeniably guilty.

The tribunals were for the people who own the Rothchilds and such... The real top of the top.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've been able to do this for almost 30 years now. Back then they could remotely control any system in your car, like locking the steering wheel, flooring the gas, and ignoring the breaks... All via the onboard computer. You can thank the CIA and the British Royal Family for that. RIP, Princess Dianna.

Now they can control your car as if theyre sitting in it.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

That implies that the white hats are doing bad shit to good people to convince us how bad and evil dems are...

The war is still going. Don't count your chickens.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally everywhere. Your malls dont even have Barnes and Nobs (whom I do not support for tranny targeting children reasons)? Point is, they exist and I've seen several. Some small name shops, too

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

This makes me want to write an alternate history short story wherein marriage between anyone is arranged, but not by families, by the government...fucking nightmare...

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn't trying to correct you lol. Just pointing it out for those who aren't good at maths :)

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's 17 months and 17 days.

8
yep__yep__yep 8 points ago +8 / -0

My ex fiance lied to me about her vax. She would agree with everything I showed her, all the proof that it's not only not necessary, but it's a risk she didn't need to take.

She's fine, multiple boosters and vaxes.. We split because she keeps secrets and refuses to at least discuss the vax beforehand.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

It happens! People think blanks are totally safe and point blank shoot themselves or their friends, and end up killing that friend or dead themselves.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't make anything I said false, so what's your point? Nobody made sure the gun was unloaded, completely free of live ammunition, or made inoperable. , and that let Baldwin kill someone... What does it being a revolver have anything to do with my point?

Actually, can you articulate what my point even was, because I'm almost positive you missed it.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but that's why there are supposed to be weapons experts on scene to ensure the guns used in movies are either incapable of firing, or absolutely unloaded.

I understand your point, and that's how I treat guns too. They're always loaded, even if you just unloaded it, but different reasons to have a gun, and reasons to aim it at people consentingly, securely, and safely. And before you hit me with "IT'S NEVER SAFE", they usually remove the firing pin, use a solid dummy magazine, and block the barrel and chamber... If two consenting adults want to do that in a theatrical setting, then so be it, it's safe enough for them.

Of course, there's blanks, but that's a whole different story with different safety regulations because blanks can still kill you with air pressure.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›