1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Good Wife was essentially a promotional series for Hillary Clinton. As the show increasingly veered toward Clinton propaganda, Josh Charles declined to renew his contract after the fifth season.

The spin-off "The Good Fight" was essentially an anti-Trump series in which the law firm fought for the contract to prepare the Dems for Trumps impeachment. In the original series, the stories were still quite good, but later...

Another series that foreshadowed later political events was “The Blacklist,” where the cabal was first discussed in the media.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

3
yoshikawa 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Ukraine is not a Russian territory. It was given to Stalin after WW2 and they incorporated it into the Soviet Union."

No.

Brave:

"The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (Ukrainian SSR) was a constituent republic of the Soviet Union that existed from 1922 to 1991. After its proclamation on March 10, 1919, it was initially nominally independent, but in December 1922 it became one of the founding members of the USSR."

"Ukraine is a founding member of the United Nations. Specifically, the (USSR) joined the UN on October 24, 1945 as one of the original 51 founding members. This membership was granted to the Soviet Republic to secure the Soviet Union de facto three votes in the General Assembly and, at times, two in the Security Council."

3
yoshikawa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course, but give us Germans our sovereignty back at last.

But don´t forget that NATO´s been an American CABAL tool to uphold the world´s division and feed the forever wars. DC the Military, CoL the Money and the Vatican the Spirituality of our rulers.

And not only that: https://foundationforfreedomonline.com/us-funded-censorship-hubs-drive-eus-war-on-tech-companies/

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

...and were educated to eternal obedience.

Just a reminder: We are not a sovereign state. We have no peace treaty and we are legally still at war with two thirds of the world.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. In our country there are no young men left to operate those weapons. Except for the Muslims of course.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is that ALL the other parties band together and, before being voted out, change the rules so that the AfD has no chance of making any substantial changes unless it wins an absolute majority. If necessary, additional debt authorizations will still be approved by the old, ousted coalition—which remains in office on an interim basis—just as happened after the last federal election. An additional 2 trillion euros. Since the current version of the Basic Law prohibits the issuance of new debt, this is then referred to as a “special fund” in our country.

6
yoshikawa 6 points ago +6 / -0

I watched her series on “Brigitte” Macron. Candace Owens repeated what had already been published here in Europe two years earlier on various “conspiracy” websites. She succinctly presented in a series what we here had to piece together from various sources over a period of time.

It’s important to know that, over the decades, long before “she” appeared on the scene, some people ran into trouble with the state and its institutions when they stirred up the hornet’s nest of potential pedophilia in northern France. If I recall correctly, the Macrons wanted to sue Owens in the U.S. but ultimately decided against it.

Also, a doctor who wanted to report on gender reassignment surgeries in the northern French area where the alleged events took place ended up taking the direct route over the balcony instead of using the elevator in his home. Others were warned by the French domestic intelligence service about potential problems if they didn’t better control their public statements.

I wrote this from memory. Since there were many sources spanning several years, I did not save local copies of the articles. I don’t think it’s really worth trying to reconstruct everything so close to the end.

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ratzinger was an arch-conservative Catholic, and as such, he was viewed rather critically within Germany’s increasingly left-leaning Catholic Church.

Brave (German search) In the 1980s, Joseph Ratzinger () underwent a decisive transition from academic theology to the highest ecclesiastical office in Rome and established himself as a leading conservative figure in the Catholic Church.

Assumption of Office as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: In 1981, Pope John Paul II appointed Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This position made him the Pope’s most important collaborator and the guardian of Catholic dogma, and he was often regarded as John Paul II’s “right-hand man.” Conflict with Liberation Theology: As Prefect, Ratzinger exercised strict oversight over theology. He viewed Liberation Theology in Latin America with skepticism bordering on rejection, as he feared its political activism and Marxist influences, while he supported resistance against communist regimes in Eastern Europe. Criticism in the Abuse Scandal: During this period, Ratzinger was also confronted with allegations that he had failed to adequately address cases of child abuse. An expert report found him guilty of misconduct in four cases during his time as Archbishop of Munich and Freising (1977–1982), including the admission of the priest Peter Hullermann, who was suspected of abuse, in 1980. Ratzinger was later criticized for attributing the abuse scandal in part to the “climate of the 1968 revolution,” which was viewed as a scapegoating strategy. Theological and journalistic work: Despite his high offices, Ratzinger remained a prolific author. In the 1980s, he published important works such as “On the State of the Faith” (1985) and advocated for reconciliation and penance in the Church’s mission (including as delegate president of the Synod of Bishops in 1983).

I think they had compromising material to force him to resign. They couldn’t pull off the John Paul I solution again. It was enough to have placed a Jesuit on the throne for the first time—a Jesuit who ruled from the Vatican guesthouse and was not buried in St. Peter’s Basilica.

And this in such an ancient institution based on rules and traditions? Who would believe it.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all just hot air. The Bundeswehr lacks the necessary infrastructure. They can't generate the required data (everything's still on paper for the older generations), they can't get the older folks through the necessary physical fitness tests, and they don't have housing options for them (nursing barracks?).

Maybe we at GAW should suggest setting up a satire thread? :-))

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

GRINS!

During the C-periods, there were several large demonstrations in Berlin. One of these involved a dozen elderly men staging what was dubbed the “Storming of the Reichstag”

This gave rise to the meme “The Coup of the walking frames.” (In deutsch Rollator)

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

The National Socialist German Workers' Party promoted the concept of the “people's community.” This meant that a sense of unity had to be fostered that obscured the real differences within society. Among other things, this included the Sunday stew, during which the rich and the poor ate lunch together, in reality not often During the war, Hitler was very afraid of cutting people’s rations too drastically, because the memory of hunger during World War I was still very much alive among the German people.

In summary, it can be said that at least Hitler and Stalin were two sides of the same coin: National Socialist and International Socialist. Mao can be viewed similarly, but he emerged from a different historical context, which would take us too far afield here.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

A Russian gift? A very interesting historical interpretation.

Brave:

Swedish Rule (c. 1154–1809): Starting in the 12th century, Sweden began its Christianization and expansion, resulting in Finland serving as part of the Kingdom of Sweden for nearly 700 years. During this period, the Finnish language was established in writing, and the eastern border with Novgorod was defined in 1323, with Sweden gaining control of Western Karelia.

Grand Duchy of Finland (1809–1917): Following the Finnish War, Finland became an autonomous Grand Duchy within the Russian Empire in 1809, though it retained its autonomy and its own legal system. In 1906, Finland became the first European country to grant women the right to vote, before declaring independence in 1917 in the wake of the Russian Revolution.

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

How the hell is their plan – I´m German and it´s not my plan – supposed to work? Societies deeply divided and overrun by foreigners! Educational institutions in ruins! Deindustrialized economies! Totally indebted beyond repair! No raw materials! No military capabilities or people or robots to use them!

It. Is. Over.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The latter. But I see the whole thing from this perspective: You have to show people the precipice.

All this filth is coming to light RIGHT NOW during the planning phase. The end is likely just around the corner.

4
yoshikawa 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’ve been a fan of Peanuts for about 50 years, especially Linus! One of his best lines is still: “There’s no problem so big you can’t run away from it.” But they’re going to steal our security blanket, us Europeans.

That said, you Americans should always keep in mind that NATO was an American (Deep State!) instrument for maintaining the division of the world and enabling perpetual wars around the globe.

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

"... Once Trump leaves NATO, the EU will be defenseless against Russia. ..."

Goodness gracious! Why on earth would Russia want to rule over a deindustrialized and completely indebted Western Europe?

Our societies are deeply degenerate and divided, almost completely overrun by aggressive Islam, dumbed down, and impoverished.

A threat scenario carried over from the past is, at least as far as Europe is concerned, complete nonsense. Russia isn’t stupid, after all!

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, this change in the law has actually been in effect since January 1, 2026, but we didn’t know about it because it wasn’t announced in advance. In theory, the former district military recruitment offices—now Bundeswehr Career Centers—would be required to send notifications to all men covered by this law, but they have neither the necessary records nor the staff to carry this out. How is that supposed to work when we live in a country that no longer monitors its borders at all?

The whole thing is a paper tiger designed to further discredit the ruling system (precipice). Those in power hope that all men are stupid enough to obey voluntarily. Fortunately, trans women don’t have to worry about being drafted, nor do real women. They’ll be glad that they’re no longer threatened by white men and, instead, have nothing to fear from the evil Russians alongside the peace-loving male Syrians, Afghans, Iraqis, and Africans.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah, not so fast!!

The been terrorist and now head of Syria made clear that he had never said so, only Pinocchio, uhm, Merz. I guess they talked about 80 people not 80% of the people who help to increase the German criminal statistics.

5
yoshikawa 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

"...The belts endanger satellites, which must have their sensitive components protected with adequate shielding if they spend significant time near that zone. Apollo astronauts going through the Van Allen belts received a very low and harmless dose of radiation. ..."

https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/physik/strahlungsguertel/14002:

"Radiation belts, regions within a planet’s magnetosphere where electrons and protons, as well as ionized atoms of heavier elements, are trapped. These electrically charged particles move in spiral paths around the magnetic field lines and oscillate between the magnetic poles. In doing so, the particles emit synchrotron radiation, which made their discovery around the planets of the solar system possible. Earth has two such radiation belts, known as the Van Allen belts. The inner belt extends between 1,000 and 5,000 km above the Earth’s surface and contains particles from the solar wind as well as the Earth’s atmosphere. The outer belt lies at an altitude of between 15,000 and 25,000 km and consists primarily of particles from the solar wind. Due to the high radiation intensity and the electrical charges, the radiation belts pose a danger to the instruments of space probes that traverse them."

Hmmm? Instruments are endangered but no living beings? Wow! And 50 years ago the used space vehicles provided "adequate shielding"? But who am I to doubt science. Maybe some astro stuff comparable to the save Covid vaccination. Must be.

2
yoshikawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

The U.S. did not join NATO; it founded the alliance as a tool for containing the Soviet Union. SEATO, too, served to contain communism. It was—and to some extent still is—a tool of the deep state, which the Trump administration is currently dismantling entirely. It was definitely not capable of, and was likely not intended to, protect Western Europe from communism. In the event of an attack by the Warsaw Pact, the troops of the GDR and the Soviet Union—behind the Polish troops of the first wave, and thereafter expendable due to massive nuclear weapons use from the outset—would have been at the Rhine and the French Channel coast within a few days. This would have happened long before American ships had even crossed the Atlantic.

What we are seeing now is the logical consequence of the realization that the U.S., as the military arm of the Three-City Alliance, could no longer maintain global military dominance due to mainly technological and financial deficits. Hence the tripartite (USA, Russia, China) division of the world looming on the horizon.

DJT had to soothe the soul of America. The abolition of NATO is a PsyOp, as can be seen from the many, many related posts here. Judging by the tone of the threads, the psychological challenge of overcoming the notion that the whole thing might initially have stemmed from a position of weakness has been successfully met.

Germany was not "protected" by the U.S., but was always intended to be sacrificed if the worst came to the worst. It didn’t really matter, since Germany is still a non-sovereign, occupied country.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

1
yoshikawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hastings Ismay, 1. Baron Ismay, first Secretary Genral of NATO about its purpose:

Keep the Soviets out, the Americans in and the Germans down.

view more: Next ›