No such thing as federal crime. Federal law is civil. Corporate law has criminal elements they claim are federal law. Research Admiralty and Maritime law. Very eye opening.
This is the correct answer. I lost count at how many times my governor (Cuomo) has said "It's the law for you to socially distance....It's the law for you to wear a mask...It's the law for you to be quarantined."
No, it isn't the LAW. Laws are made in consultation with state legislatures. Everything above was done by executive order - which is not law. It's the musings of one, power drunk tyrant in the Governor's mansion.
Surpringly (at least to me) it looks like they actually have quite a bit of authority.
United States Federal Laws and Regulations for Control of Communicable Diseases
United States Code
The United States Code is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. Sections 264-272 of the following portion of the code apply: Title 42 – The Public Health and Welfare, Chapter 6A – Public Health Service, Subchapter II – General Powers and Duties, Part G – Quarantine and Inspection. Links are provided by the Government Printing Officeexternal icon.
Not exactly, the authority is derived from laws going back at least 100 years. The links to the actual statues are available in the link I provided previously. I'm reading through some now, and it's a bit scary actually.
“Law” and “statute” are different from each other as a law refers to some common rules made and followed by the society for a long time which are still being followed. These are not necessarily written whereas a statute refers to laws which have been passed as bills by the legislature of a country or have been written down and are consulted for use.
http://www.differencebetween.net/language/words-language/difference-between-law-and-statute/#ixzz6lG2qJc6W
The supreme court has basically already ruled that masking is constitutional. (this is a copy of another comment of mine, but I think it shows the intent of the courts)
But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In the midst of a small-pox outbreak, local authorities could mandate vaccination on penalty of a fine for refusal: “Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members."
And this
Our Constitution principally entrusts “[t]he safety and the health of the people” to the politically accountable officials of the States “to guard and protect.” Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 38 (1905). When those officials “undertake to act in areas fraught with medical and scientific uncertainties,” their latitude “must be especially broad.” Marshall v. United States, 414 U. S. 417, 427 (1974). Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary,” which lacks the background, competence, and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people.
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
“no constitutional right is infringed by the Mask Ordinance’s mandate … and that the requirement to swear such a covering has a clear rational basis based on the protection of public health.” More to the point, the Court continued, “constitutional rights and the ideals of limited government do not … allow (citizens) to wholly shirk their social obligation to their fellow Americans or to society as a whole…. After all, we do not have a constitutional right to infect others.”
"According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
Greenmedinfo.com reports: Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.”
CDC is also listed on Dunn & Bradstreet (only for private companies) as a for-profit company.
That's very interesting. However, given what the Supreme Court has already said about masking, I highly doubt any attempts to challenge the CDC mandate is going to be successful. We'll see though, if lots of people aren't complying, they'll probably give up enforcing it. Wouldn't want to be one of the people they make an example out of though.
I'll copy/paste a other comment I made. Hope this helps!
But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In the midst of a small-pox outbreak, local authorities could mandate vaccination on penalty of a fine for refusal: “Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members."
And this
Our Constitution principally entrusts “[t]he safety and the health of the people” to the politically accountable officials of the States “to guard and protect.” Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 38 (1905). When those officials “undertake to act in areas fraught with medical and scientific uncertainties,” their latitude “must be especially broad.” Marshall v. United States, 414 U. S. 417, 427 (1974). Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary,” which lacks the background, competence, and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people.
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
“no constitutional right is infringed by the Mask Ordinance’s mandate … and that the requirement to swear such a covering has a clear rational basis based on the protection of public health.” More to the point, the Court continued, “constitutional rights and the ideals of limited government do not … allow (citizens) to wholly shirk their social obligation to their fellow Americans or to society as a whole…. After all, we do not have a constitutional right to infect others.”
The ecowatch article no longer exists, I'm just pulling up of debonks for that article, or articles quoting it, but no other sources on DDG. Do you have anything?
Unconstitutional...period. corporate united states certainly came up with that. Healthy people are not a risk so why have a compliance law when you can just removed the diseased people. Called a quarantine. Their corporate rules are designed to enslave while brainwashing you its for the public good all while promoting fear for a flu virus and exacerbating the sickness with mask Nd other useless but harmful rules. The sheep all go baaaaaaa. Enjoy the show.
This is not just to dehumanize but also to make us comply with their will.
It is also making people sick AND taking down their immune systems. Lots of people are getting bacterial pneumonia from wearing them. Kids especially.
I also think they want as many of us to take their vaccines as possible. I believe they are meant to kill off as many of us as they can. If not right away later on when no one will equate it to their COVID Vaccine.
I had this thought very early on, I honestly figured that they would use the AI and face recognition software to identify the people that just said fuck masks - making it way easier for anyone who disagreed with masks to be identified and later rounded up...
I chalked myself up as crazy when I had that thought clear back in mid early 2020.
I don't seem so crazy now, but I am concerned that I wasn't wrong.
Yes,
the social distancing aids in A.I. facial and clothing Identification.
Plus, anyone carrying cell phones are easier to identify and segregate then due to the "required" distance.
That's why everyone has to keep with the same cheap masks.
Same non-descript clothing, same walking gate, shoes, etc.
Make it impossible for them to I.D. anyone.
We have rights as defined in the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Or you could go the other way and wear everything like that of another person, shoes, mask, etc.
Walk with same gate, shop the same place, etc.
Effectively twin another person.
Payment could be a problem, but of that other person used cash you're all set.
Not criminal to fool an allegedly illegal survailence computer system.
Yes, but you also need to wear sunglasses, as the eyes are the main thing they use now. They've been updating the systems since mask wearing became common place.
In the beginning the theory I heard was that the masks would help with facial recognition. I thought it was crazy. How is it possible for them to recognize faces with just the eye area?
But then I started seeing all these idiots on Instagram posting pictures of themselves with masks on, and tagging each it other. Then it clicked for me. People are helping the A.I. improve the facial recognition algorithms. After all, they have that creepy ability to automatically recognize and categorize pictures by individuals. This mask thing is is just helping them fine tune that ability.
Well,
I think teeth are a natural, and almost permanent, unvarying facial recognition item.
Dental records are used a lot to identify so there's that as well.
Those dentists are always pushing a full 3d scan of people's teeth so there you go.
Flesh can vary a lot more, depending on year and edema (water load, etc.).
Retina scans or eye features are very good, but that probably can't happen if farther than 5 -10 feet or so.
That's where one's gate comes into play.
Identification is made at farther distances via someone's walking gate.
The Supreme Court has held that adults have the right to personal autonomy in matters relating to their own medical care. Adults, as long as they are competent to understand their decision, have the right to refuse medical treatment, even life-saving medical treatment, though a state may require clear and convincing evidence that a person wanted treatment ended before it allows termination. A state may restrict family members from terminating treatment for another, because this right belongs to each individual.
But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In the midst of a small-pox outbreak, local authorities could mandate vaccination on penalty of a fine for refusal: “Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members."
And this
Our Constitution principally entrusts “[t]he safety and the health of the people” to the politically accountable officials of the States “to guard and protect.” Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 38 (1905). When those officials “undertake to act in areas fraught with medical and scientific uncertainties,” their latitude “must be especially broad.” Marshall v. United States, 414 U. S. 417, 427 (1974). Where those broad limits are not exceeded, they should not be subject to second-guessing by an “unelected federal judiciary,” which lacks the background, competence, and expertise to assess public health and is not accountable to the people.
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
“no constitutional right is infringed by the Mask Ordinance’s mandate … and that the requirement to swear such a covering has a clear rational basis based on the protection of public health.” More to the point, the Court continued, “constitutional rights and the ideals of limited government do not … allow (citizens) to wholly shirk their social obligation to their fellow Americans or to society as a whole…. After all, we do not have a constitutional right to infect others.”
What does this new "law" say about people who have genuine medical conditions and cant wear one? How can they force someone with medical issues to wear one if they need to travel - isn't that discrimination?
They say it is a FELONY to not wear a mask on all public transportation and all federal lands. This sounds like this would include all national parks. I wonder if this would include interstate highways They specifically noted that truck drivers and individuals in cars were not required to right now. I’m sure that will be coming shortly.
We're getting pushed to a line in the sand, folks. Team Q is focused on 40,000ft stuff, which is great, but us individuals on the ground are going to have to act on our consciences; probably sooner rather than later. We're going to have to have each others backs when it happens and "law enforcement" is going to have to make some decisions about where they stand.
Well even under Administrative law, they have to give notice and comment period before an agency rule has the force of law. Also there has to be a statute delegating the authority to them to pass such a rule. Without knowing if such a statute exists or having read it, the rule is likely invalid but most people will be too afraid to challenge Federal law enforcement.
Same can be said for all of Biden's EOs. If the Dems truly won all branches of the Government, why aren't they pushing through their corrupt legislature? Certainly they would have the votes to do so.
They've been saying a lot of things that people (public officials and private citizens alike) have ignored. Not sure why this suddenly matters so much to so many
That's hilarious! I'm betting they would argue that since your eyes aren't covered, your identity isn't concealed. Since is says "any portion of the face is so hidden... as to conceal the identity of the wearer."
Would be an interesting case nonetheless.
If you LET unelected officials dictate the "laws", they will dictate the laws that govern your life.
The American public has been asleep at the wheel and allowed congress to delegate thier authority to agencies like the EPA and the CDC.
Were you expecting something different?
How many "agencies" can control your life? Do you even know? I imagine the Bureau of Land Management even dictates what you can do with your own property. There's probably some National Highway and Safety Traffic Adninistration law that says you cant put a wreath on the front of your car at Christmas time because it might offend someone.
It used to be that congress had to vote on every new regulation that a 3 letter agency wanted. But at some time the congressmen got lazy, corrupted, paid for, whatever. They passed a bill allowing most 3 letter agencies to create their own regulations. No I don't remember the bill or even the time frame but it happened. Now the EPA, BLM, CDC, etc all get to do their own thing. It's referred to as "REGULATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION"
The most egregious one was Obammy's "waters of the united states " rule. Trump had it done away with. It regulated ALL water. Even what you caught off your own roof into a rain barrel, or the mudholes in your driveway. It kept many Americans from building on their own property because there could be a chance for standing water. It was a regulation designed by the EPA so that it gave them authority over anyone they wanted to attack/destroy politically/ destroy financially, etc...Under Biden it will be back no doubt.
Even better,
politicians should wear maskING TAPE over their mouths AND noses.
We'd be completely safe after a about 5 minutes or so.
Someone please slip in "ing tape" to this retarded order.
Let's see who wins the Darwin prize.
Could be quite a lot of state funerals all at once.
If you click any of the links in the article it takes you to a Celine Dion weight loss article. It’s click bait The CDC cites “guidelines” and then other agencies like TSA would attempt enforcement “infractions” By pointing back to the CDC saying this is what they have declared a fact
I am searching as we speak for an official opinion. Muddy waters though when they [unofficial sources] claim extended powers and authorities for the CDC in times of crisis.
I will be die before I remove my identity and depersonalize myself. I will fight this tyrannical ordeal every step of the way and never give in. When I'm in the camps, you'll know why. See you there frens
Muzzle mandate can suck my fucking balls and go home to China and Islam
I don't know the answer to your question. But right now the federal government is not operating constitutionally at all. Many state govs too.
Tyranny has been installed. But We the People will not tolerate it.
Well hopefully the military won't.
Their families now live under a tyranny that is taking bloom at a breakneck pace.
Prove you aren't.
Just wait until it becomes a federal crime for anyone to say we won't tolerate it.
No such thing as federal crime. Federal law is civil. Corporate law has criminal elements they claim are federal law. Research Admiralty and Maritime law. Very eye opening.
The definition of the word federal is contract. So when i see "federal crime" i think contract crime. Now, show me the contract i am in breach of.
I have looked into that and found it quite cringeworthy. It's up there with "sovereign citizen" theories.
Court of law or Court of equity comes to mind.
This is the correct answer. I lost count at how many times my governor (Cuomo) has said "It's the law for you to socially distance....It's the law for you to wear a mask...It's the law for you to be quarantined."
No, it isn't the LAW. Laws are made in consultation with state legislatures. Everything above was done by executive order - which is not law. It's the musings of one, power drunk tyrant in the Governor's mansion.
Please refer me to the executive order from Trump that forced private citizens to wear and do things he (and he alone) decided was best.
Adios, handshake account.
No respect for rule-of-law allows the Left to go full on communism. Agencies enforce laws...they do not to create them.
Surpringly (at least to me) it looks like they actually have quite a bit of authority.
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/specificlawsregulations.html
Not exactly, the authority is derived from laws going back at least 100 years. The links to the actual statues are available in the link I provided previously. I'm reading through some now, and it's a bit scary actually.
1 Gov does not =legislative body
The supreme court has basically already ruled that masking is constitutional. (this is a copy of another comment of mine, but I think it shows the intent of the courts)
But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
And this
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19a1044_pok0.pdf
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
yes, opinions
"According to RFK Jr., the CDC is not an independent government agency but is actually a subsidiary of Big Pharma.
Greenmedinfo.com reports: Mr. Kennedy told EcoWatch, “The CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.”
CDC is also listed on Dunn & Bradstreet (only for private companies) as a for-profit company.
Dirty people work their.
That's very interesting. However, given what the Supreme Court has already said about masking, I highly doubt any attempts to challenge the CDC mandate is going to be successful. We'll see though, if lots of people aren't complying, they'll probably give up enforcing it. Wouldn't want to be one of the people they make an example out of though.
Missed it do you happen to have exact phraseology from Supreme Court?
I'll copy/paste a other comment I made. Hope this helps! But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
And this
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19a1044_pok0.pdf
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
But there aren't lots of people not complying. They will always comply.
Over half the population in MS, LA, FL and AL ignore the mandates in the places I've been
Depends on where you live I think. Here in my county, probably only 40% mask.
The ecowatch article no longer exists, I'm just pulling up of debonks for that article, or articles quoting it, but no other sources on DDG. Do you have anything?
Unconstitutional...period. corporate united states certainly came up with that. Healthy people are not a risk so why have a compliance law when you can just removed the diseased people. Called a quarantine. Their corporate rules are designed to enslave while brainwashing you its for the public good all while promoting fear for a flu virus and exacerbating the sickness with mask Nd other useless but harmful rules. The sheep all go baaaaaaa. Enjoy the show.
Masks, masks, masks, what the hell are they afraid of we might see their forked tongue?
https://i.maga.host/gWIVqbw.png
It’s about dehumanization. About breaking the populace psychologically. Separating us from each other.
This is not just to dehumanize but also to make us comply with their will.
It is also making people sick AND taking down their immune systems. Lots of people are getting bacterial pneumonia from wearing them. Kids especially.
I also think they want as many of us to take their vaccines as possible. I believe they are meant to kill off as many of us as they can. If not right away later on when no one will equate it to their COVID Vaccine.
Could mask wearing be a way of avoiding people being I.D.ed by some kind of crazy A.I. surveillance system?
Just putting it out there.
I had this thought very early on, I honestly figured that they would use the AI and face recognition software to identify the people that just said fuck masks - making it way easier for anyone who disagreed with masks to be identified and later rounded up...
I chalked myself up as crazy when I had that thought clear back in mid early 2020.
I don't seem so crazy now, but I am concerned that I wasn't wrong.
This is a really good point.
Yes,
the social distancing aids in A.I. facial and clothing Identification.
Plus, anyone carrying cell phones are easier to identify and segregate then due to the "required" distance.
^this
actually they teaching the AI to do facial recognition with masks
That's why everyone has to keep with the same cheap masks.
Same non-descript clothing, same walking gate, shoes, etc.
Make it impossible for them to I.D. anyone.
We have rights as defined in the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Oh but i thought the homemade Etsy masks with sparkles are so beneficial to ones health lol. Gayness. Oh and very good point fren!
Or you could go the other way and wear everything like that of another person, shoes, mask, etc.
Walk with same gate, shop the same place, etc. Effectively twin another person.
Payment could be a problem, but of that other person used cash you're all set.
Not criminal to fool an allegedly illegal survailence computer system.
Lol. Now that is some serious effort
Yes, but you also need to wear sunglasses, as the eyes are the main thing they use now. They've been updating the systems since mask wearing became common place.
Yes,
but not at 10 feet+.
Still, shades are a real good idea.
Everyone has to wear them though.
In the beginning the theory I heard was that the masks would help with facial recognition. I thought it was crazy. How is it possible for them to recognize faces with just the eye area?
But then I started seeing all these idiots on Instagram posting pictures of themselves with masks on, and tagging each it other. Then it clicked for me. People are helping the A.I. improve the facial recognition algorithms. After all, they have that creepy ability to automatically recognize and categorize pictures by individuals. This mask thing is is just helping them fine tune that ability.
Well,
I think teeth are a natural, and almost permanent, unvarying facial recognition item.
Dental records are used a lot to identify so there's that as well.
Those dentists are always pushing a full 3d scan of people's teeth so there you go.
Flesh can vary a lot more, depending on year and edema (water load, etc.).
Retina scans or eye features are very good, but that probably can't happen if farther than 5 -10 feet or so. That's where one's gate comes into play.
Identification is made at farther distances via someone's walking gate.
You will not recognize the foreign soldiers dressed as American soldiers.
Fuck them. I will never wear a mask
I mean, how do you do that, and still participate in society? Asking honestly
Strength in numbers. Shopping groups etc. but If you can't be bothered to stand up for yourself you will be stepped on.
Lol
Cdc is not a legislative body. Lawsuits should be happening right now.
This is the UN revealing itself.
The globalist cabal's plans all assume they capture enough of the world's countries
before declaring the UN as being The single government for the whole world.
Biden's pretend presiduncy has emboldened some of their devotees.
Everything you said!
The Supreme Court has held that adults have the right to personal autonomy in matters relating to their own medical care. Adults, as long as they are competent to understand their decision, have the right to refuse medical treatment, even life-saving medical treatment, though a state may require clear and convincing evidence that a person wanted treatment ended before it allows termination. A state may restrict family members from terminating treatment for another, because this right belongs to each individual.
https://www.justia.com/constitutional-law/docs/privacy-rights/
But the Supreme also said this (note, I am not arguing the merits, simply sharing the legal justifications for such mandates)
And this
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19a1044_pok0.pdf
Which was then used in Florida to uphold a mask mandate, after being challenged by citizens. Where they said this:
What does this new "law" say about people who have genuine medical conditions and cant wear one? How can they force someone with medical issues to wear one if they need to travel - isn't that discrimination?
I've issued a mandate telling people to quit listening to CDC mandates...and I've done it with just as much authority as them.
They say it is a FELONY to not wear a mask on all public transportation and all federal lands. This sounds like this would include all national parks. I wonder if this would include interstate highways They specifically noted that truck drivers and individuals in cars were not required to right now. I’m sure that will be coming shortly.
T
Y
R
A
N
N
Y
There goes trains, planes and automobiles.
I envision some ballsy high speed chases...
Yet Resident Joe doesn't wear his mask on Feral property as he dictated.
Thanks for the link...just what I was looking for.
This ruling regards petitioners asking for their commissions and appointments to be delivered to them. I'm not seeing a connection.
Gotcha!!
2A.
We're getting pushed to a line in the sand, folks. Team Q is focused on 40,000ft stuff, which is great, but us individuals on the ground are going to have to act on our consciences; probably sooner rather than later. We're going to have to have each others backs when it happens and "law enforcement" is going to have to make some decisions about where they stand.
Our "government" is now a 3rd world joke.
Well even under Administrative law, they have to give notice and comment period before an agency rule has the force of law. Also there has to be a statute delegating the authority to them to pass such a rule. Without knowing if such a statute exists or having read it, the rule is likely invalid but most people will be too afraid to challenge Federal law enforcement.
CDC is part of the USA Inc, same thing for DOT, they are all part of the corporation.
So, by this point...not enforceable outside DC.
Remember the brainwashed are in the corporation and will be acting out their roles until stopped by an outside force.
Same can be said for all of Biden's EOs. If the Dems truly won all branches of the Government, why aren't they pushing through their corrupt legislature? Certainly they would have the votes to do so.
Do not conform to SLAVERY, there are more of us than them.
People who have had the vaccine need to be labeled as a bio-hazard.
https://www.ft.com/content/a1955694-3ae4-11e5-bbd1-b37bc06f590c
That day may well come.
That's not how that fucking works at all CDC. Fuck off.
They've been saying a lot of things that people (public officials and private citizens alike) have ignored. Not sure why this suddenly matters so much to so many
The CDC can't do that. Period.
They've weaponized the corporations against us
They cannot legally do this. See US Code 18 section 241/242.
That's hilarious! I'm betting they would argue that since your eyes aren't covered, your identity isn't concealed. Since is says "any portion of the face is so hidden... as to conceal the identity of the wearer." Would be an interesting case nonetheless.
If you LET unelected officials dictate the "laws", they will dictate the laws that govern your life.
The American public has been asleep at the wheel and allowed congress to delegate thier authority to agencies like the EPA and the CDC.
Were you expecting something different?
How many "agencies" can control your life? Do you even know? I imagine the Bureau of Land Management even dictates what you can do with your own property. There's probably some National Highway and Safety Traffic Adninistration law that says you cant put a wreath on the front of your car at Christmas time because it might offend someone.
Think, sheeple. Take your lives back.
It used to be that congress had to vote on every new regulation that a 3 letter agency wanted. But at some time the congressmen got lazy, corrupted, paid for, whatever. They passed a bill allowing most 3 letter agencies to create their own regulations. No I don't remember the bill or even the time frame but it happened. Now the EPA, BLM, CDC, etc all get to do their own thing. It's referred to as "REGULATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION" The most egregious one was Obammy's "waters of the united states " rule. Trump had it done away with. It regulated ALL water. Even what you caught off your own roof into a rain barrel, or the mudholes in your driveway. It kept many Americans from building on their own property because there could be a chance for standing water. It was a regulation designed by the EPA so that it gave them authority over anyone they wanted to attack/destroy politically/ destroy financially, etc...Under Biden it will be back no doubt.
Infuriating.
That's the goal - make normies and the brainwashed beg for an end to the insanity
Yes, and you have to wear a mask WHILE WAITING!!! for the bus, train or whatever. Seriously? LOL!!!
Even better,
politicians should wear maskING TAPE over their mouths AND noses.
We'd be completely safe after a about 5 minutes or so.
Someone please slip in "ing tape" to this retarded order.
Let's see who wins the Darwin prize.
Could be quite a lot of state funerals all at once.
If you click any of the links in the article it takes you to a Celine Dion weight loss article. It’s click bait The CDC cites “guidelines” and then other agencies like TSA would attempt enforcement “infractions” By pointing back to the CDC saying this is what they have declared a fact
Not happening for me. Check your browser.
I am searching as we speak for an official opinion. Muddy waters though when they [unofficial sources] claim extended powers and authorities for the CDC in times of crisis.
Agreed. I went to the cdc website (ugh) and its language is all “guideline”s.
In digging i found this. They are power grabbing through HHS.
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/Mask-Order-CDC_GMTF_01-29-21-p.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law#:~:text=Section%20242%20of%20Title%2018,laws%20of%20the%20United%20States.
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SKLHewCr/2020--the-year-conspiracy-theori/
I will be die before I remove my identity and depersonalize myself. I will fight this tyrannical ordeal every step of the way and never give in. When I'm in the camps, you'll know why. See you there frens
Muzzle mandate can suck my fucking balls and go home to China and Islam