Kalergi Plan. That’s it. Love that Wikipedia immediately says that there is a conspiracy about the Kalergi Plan to end the white race, but then you can read a synopsis of the books and it openly says they wish to change populations from white to brown because they feel brown peoples are a more docile, and controllable population. Book spells it all out; anyone who defies you call them racists and xenophobia! These fuckers are sick!
White people (specifically red-haired) are the original species of humans and present a threat to the 'elites' (who are part of the slave species). Look into the rhesus +ve, -ve factor. Very differing red blood cells w/ oxygen uptake Two different types of humans roam the Earth.
Whether or not you think this is true, I don't think this is the forum for this PARTICULAR topic. When the "qanon" hit pieces look for stuff to attack us on, it will be posts like this one that lead them to call us a bunch of white supremacists.
You just have pointed to an interesting thought stopper.
When Q says: they want you divided by race, it not only refers to the narrative of institutional racism against non-whites. The elephant in the room needs discussion.
The problem is not immigration, but unbridled immigration. The problem is not different cultures, but unbridled influx so as to upend the culture in a country. By introducing elements that are non-adapting, non-embracing of the values our society is based on, it becomes a breeding ground for shredding of Constitutional provisions.
And guess what? This is exactly the Pedotus Biden Regime Plan.
And by stoking these divisions, in a Byzantine manner, those who wish to remain in power, remain in power.
Of course, it only lasts till the Camel back is broken, as with the Byzantine Capital: Constantinople, after the Venetians completely plundered the capital.
This topic is the core of the problem worldwide - loxism. It is an attack on the west which is critical to ALL OF US! Who cares. It’s only them who complain. It’s falling on deaf ears more and more. You cannot be repulsive visually and by your actions all while spewing hatred of others and pushing for child molestation and then cry victim. People don’t care as much as you think.
This meme sounds nice but Q supporters must be careful not to get caught up in rejecting the term "anti-racist". The forum rule is "no racism" and it rejects race labeling. Therefore being "anti-racist" is a good thing, and should not be redefined as "anti-white", which is of course "racist". (Calling things by their opposites is a hallmark of Newspeak that was deprecated by Isaiah: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!)
We don't need an ADL for Caucasians and this is not the way to fight. Whatever facts this meme contains must be combatted by training the mixed multitude in the unifying polity of Yahweh. America is proud of being a melting pot because liberty unites and allows us to agree on essentials and to promote diversity in nonessentials and charity in all. We saw this unity among diversity in the Tea Party and the Ron Paul Revolution; we did not see the coded speech and redefinition described here.
Please do not fall for factors that forum-shift anonymous effort away from the Q movement and into ineffective tangential matters.
Please help me understand. We are all against racism. May we use the word "anti-racist" to describe that without it being redefined as "anti-white"? Anti-whites are racist by definition. If you prefer "color-blind", that's fine, but I don't know that people like that word either.
What is the best word for being against racism that does not get one's position being confused with a racist position? You see the quandary.
Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!
Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description?...If I'm missing something obvious
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide;
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
Proverbs 14:34
Righteousness [moral and spiritual integrity and virtuous character] exalts a nation, But sin is a disgrace to any people.
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.
Kalergi Plan. That’s it. Love that Wikipedia immediately says that there is a conspiracy about the Kalergi Plan to end the white race, but then you can read a synopsis of the books and it openly says they wish to change populations from white to brown because they feel brown peoples are a more docile, and controllable population. Book spells it all out; anyone who defies you call them racists and xenophobia! These fuckers are sick!
This is why: Kalergi Plan https://rense.com/general96/kalergiplan.html
Whites are a threat to the Satanic UN Cabal.
White people (specifically red-haired) are the original species of humans and present a threat to the 'elites' (who are part of the slave species). Look into the rhesus +ve, -ve factor. Very differing red blood cells w/ oxygen uptake Two different types of humans roam the Earth.
Gingers were the original uhhhh.. neighbors
That little girl is beautiful and I don't mean that in a pedo way.
I wish I had her thick hair!
People have called it, "White is racism, black is race," around here, officially desensitizing the people from overt attacks on white people.
Yeah, I wonder who...
pretty much but at the same time there arent many non-white countries worth going to LOL - i guess this is a shot at asians(?)
I have looked fairly extensively and there are none. When you list countries by standard of living it becomes pretty clear.
Genocide..pure and simple
100% accurate.
Whether or not you think this is true, I don't think this is the forum for this PARTICULAR topic. When the "qanon" hit pieces look for stuff to attack us on, it will be posts like this one that lead them to call us a bunch of white supremacists.
You just have pointed to an interesting thought stopper.
When Q says: they want you divided by race, it not only refers to the narrative of institutional racism against non-whites. The elephant in the room needs discussion.
The problem is not immigration, but unbridled immigration. The problem is not different cultures, but unbridled influx so as to upend the culture in a country. By introducing elements that are non-adapting, non-embracing of the values our society is based on, it becomes a breeding ground for shredding of Constitutional provisions.
And guess what? This is exactly the Pedotus Biden Regime Plan.
And by stoking these divisions, in a Byzantine manner, those who wish to remain in power, remain in power.
Of course, it only lasts till the Camel back is broken, as with the Byzantine Capital: Constantinople, after the Venetians completely plundered the capital.
I agree. Q promotes unity, not division. We should be focusing on unity.
This topic is the core of the problem worldwide - loxism. It is an attack on the west which is critical to ALL OF US! Who cares. It’s only them who complain. It’s falling on deaf ears more and more. You cannot be repulsive visually and by your actions all while spewing hatred of others and pushing for child molestation and then cry victim. People don’t care as much as you think.
Not white but agree ?. Loxists hate everyone but especially whites... but we can’t say that can we mods? ??♀️?
Total agreement with the meme in the OP>
It's definitely not just white countries. George Soros promised that no place will be free from forced diversity.
It's just whites.
This meme sounds nice but Q supporters must be careful not to get caught up in rejecting the term "anti-racist". The forum rule is "no racism" and it rejects race labeling. Therefore being "anti-racist" is a good thing, and should not be redefined as "anti-white", which is of course "racist". (Calling things by their opposites is a hallmark of Newspeak that was deprecated by Isaiah: Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!)
We don't need an ADL for Caucasians and this is not the way to fight. Whatever facts this meme contains must be combatted by training the mixed multitude in the unifying polity of Yahweh. America is proud of being a melting pot because liberty unites and allows us to agree on essentials and to promote diversity in nonessentials and charity in all. We saw this unity among diversity in the Tea Party and the Ron Paul Revolution; we did not see the coded speech and redefinition described here.
Please do not fall for factors that forum-shift anonymous effort away from the Q movement and into ineffective tangential matters.
Genocide.
So many cryptos
Please help me understand. We are all against racism. May we use the word "anti-racist" to describe that without it being redefined as "anti-white"? Anti-whites are racist by definition. If you prefer "color-blind", that's fine, but I don't know that people like that word either.
What is the best word for being against racism that does not get one's position being confused with a racist position? You see the quandary.
I didn't go further. If you love Yahweh, you love truth. Let's start by speaking the truth. Not everyone is against racism
Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!
Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.
We know ?