Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean?
It means that information that it doesn't exist at all is disinformation. I think such provably false "information" is intended to make those looking into it look bad, make them look like "conspiracy theorists" as this guy looks like. It gives the people pushing a false narrative fuel to discredit those who say negative things about the narrative.
What constitutes a case?
There are symptoms that have been discussed that match previous SARS cases. This virus seems to attack a certain type of cell that expresses the ACE 2 protein (notably specific cardiopulmonary cells), and I think cells in the nose and throat as well (I'd have to look that up).
People have been tested when not even being sick. Why?
The type of test used (PCR) is being used fraudulently (too many cycles). The test itself is already only useful in certain situations, but for a test of this type it is almost useless even in the best of cases. But much worse than that, the protocol that was pushed by the WHO (at nearly twice as many cycles as standard PCR) was guaranteed to produce many, many false positives.
Using the test in this manner can only be for one reason: to falsely get the numbers up, to push fear through the population, to force draconian responses, and to make the population subservient to their fear and those political and health department leaders that were "trying to help them". There is no other logical reason they would have used the PCR test in such an obviously incorrect manner, and every single research biologist in the world who has ever done PCR knows it, which is basically all of them.
Is it even contagious?
I think it may be very contagious. I think it was modified to be very contagious. I haven't looked into its actual biology as much as I should have. I have been concerned with other aspects of it. Once I realized it was not very deadly these types of effects became less of a concern for me.
Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world
Most definitely not. Its a bad cold. Before we had good therapeutics it may have been a problem, but just vitamin D and zinc are likely sufficient to prevent serious harm in all but those who were very ill before encountering the virus. HCQ and zinc do seem to be excellent if taken even in those with comorbidities if taken before serious damage is done.
wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance
Wearing cloth masks is useless to prevent the spread of the virus. Wearing masks of any type without constantly replacing them with sterile ones does more harm than good. Constant sanitation reduces the strength of our immune system, making us more likely to get seriously ill or die if we do encounter the virus (or any infection). Socially distancing may or may not help stop the spread, but we don't actually want to stop the spread. THEY want to stop the spread so they can keep us living in fear longer.
We live in fear because they are programming us, and for no other reason. I believe that SARS-cov-2 is a real virus, and I believe it gets people sick. I believe it has killed some people, but almost all of them were sick with other things first (cancer, diabetes, etc.). The evidence also suggests that HCQ and zinc, maybe an antibiotic as therapeutics, if you do get sick, are likely enough to prevent serious damage from this virus (if done before it gets bad). Not one other thing seems to be necessary.
All evidence I have seen, doing probably thousands of hours of research suggests the worlds overreaction to SARS-cov-2 is a scam designed to take us into their "Great Reset" aka the NWO.
If you looked you would see that I have three independent sources. The first two sources are the CDC (which is what I think you are referring to) and if you were to actually look at them (and you had sufficient knowledge to understand the information (which is non-trivial)) you would know that these CDC sources, when you really dig in, destroy their own narrative.
The third link I provided happens to link to a site that is related to the CDC, but that is only because pubmed links to pretty much every peer reviewed paper. You can find the paper on many sites that have nothing to do with the CDC.
The 4th and 5th links go to researchgate. This means they have not yet passed peer review. Researchgate has nothing to do with the CDC. In fact, it is the place to most likely find real science that refutes the CDC.
I DID look at your sources...all have been caught in a lie.
I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned....?
If not isolated, cant create vaccine...
Say and link whatever you want. This is Planned-demic...not even sure what you're trying to prove anymore.
My point is that using links from lying organizations with that are profiting from lying...seems odd and disingenuous...but feel free..im moving on.
The CDC links (at least the second one) prove that the whole virus narrative is false (if you know how to look at the information). If nothing else, this proves that not everything at the CDC promotes the "covid-19" narrative. On the contrary, most of the data does the opposite. They expect people to not look, and those that do look they expect to be too afraid to say anything, or be discredited by those of their peers who are.
As for the peer reviewed paper I linked, it is a peer reviewed paper. You can find it on literally every single publisher of peer reviewed papers. Here are a few non-CDC links:
I can list a hundred more if you want. Its a peer reviewed paper. This is just how it works. It goes to all peer reviewed journals.
If you want to talk about how all peer reviewed science is suspect, that's another topic. It would be one that every scientist in the world agrees with, and has through all of time. In fact, that is how science works.
What it is however, is credible evidence. To refute scientific evidence requires refuting the arguments and analyses within the work. It never works to just say "your source is not credible because I don't like them." That is the opposite of debate.
That is called an ad hominem attack. It is a weak tactic by those that have no actual counter arguments. You can only provide a counter argument in a scientific debate by understanding and cogitating on the original arguments.
Your attacks on the researchgate papers are completely not credible, and you obviously have NO IDEA what researchgate is. It is literally the best place to find real science in a world trying to hide evidence.
I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned
How many more would you like? I can do this all day (although I won't).
I am not saying these are all credible sources. I have not vetted them. I looked at the first one, and as someone who has performed similar experiments it looks completely legit at first glance.
But if I were to say these specific labs stating explicitly that they have isolated the virus are lying I would have to read each one in detail and find evidence of the lies. If I were to just make the claim they are lying because I don't like them I would become a non-credible source of information myself.
Thank you for taking the time to read what I wrote. It is good to know that people are not so bound up in their own beliefs of fear that they are willing to look at evidence that runs contrary. It is wonderful that instead of making blanket claims of "Fake News" or "shooting the messenger" people are willing to think about another persons argument and then provide well thought out and researched counter evidence to promote the discussion and come closer to the truth, whatever that may be.
Logic is sound too! It makes more sense that they would post real experiments that most average citizens wouldn't take the time to look into much less be able to comprehend to a degree high enough to see behind their false narratives put forth in the media
Than it would be for them to put the time and energy to conduct a second false experiment with false findings, for every true experiment done, and to publish those false ones to the public while keeping the original true versions logged separately only for private eyes.
I mean I guess it would be possible, but I think once they felt a certain degree of comfort in being able to steer narratives, they would be inclined to not need to put in all the extra work and just lie instead.
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side..
I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended..
makes no sense..
I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."
You're So right...Everything you have typed...I was wrong to think i could match your wits.Forgive me typing-ill of the CDC or any of your favorite research sites. I sure will think twice about repeating any of my "idiotic" or" ignorant" ideas next time.
Thanks for teaching me, and everyone that Covid-19 is Real and that its not actually just influenza strains in an altered state. Man glad we got that cleared up. Ill put my mask back on and shut up mr Fauci.
...just wow....you heard it here first folks...we got a RealVirus on our hands!!! Lol...And since i cant or wont source you and mr "smarter=than=anyone-else", by your own logic, i wont be trusting you either..Thanks for lining me out though. Lol
...And using CDC and NIH is no different...
Lets agree to disagree...
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).
And the crow house.com put this video out. The only Derek Knauss I could find was at prepare for change.net, who writes about the intergalactic federation
I don't believe Covid is as dangerous as they say it is but I do believe something is out there that the CCP released. It's not the regular flu due to some of the symptoms, loss of taste for example is unusual for the flu.
I also believe that like most everything made in China, they f'ed it up and it's not as deadly as they hoped it would be. I am concerned for how they mutate it and possibly make it more dangerous to certain genetics than others in rounds 2 and 3 if they get that far.
I think that some countries' numbers are honest, Australia and New Zealand for example, even though their response is so totally disproportionate and clearly about another agenda. I posted earlier today how in England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland have separate Public Health orgs), doctors have only reported 17,000 cases across the one year to the statutory statistical returns, but yet to turn on your TV or listen to our 'politicians', we've had 120,000 'deaths', never mind how many 'cases' based on the false positive tests. Extrapolate the 120,000 by the 99+% survival rate, to our population of 68 million, and that means more than 3 out of 4 UK residents should have 'had COVID19'. Yet the vast majority of people you talk to will say they don't know anyone, or just 1 or 2 people who it then turns out fit the known 'most at risk' brackets, even ardent mask wearers and pro-vaxxers.
All viruses are good viruses. Viruses are not contagious. The human body is 90-99% bacteria. Viruses are not alive they cannot replicate the idea that they can is a false assumption based on hoax petri dish science which is the science of dying cells. The body can make hundreds of thousands of types of viruses that are made by the body for a specific purpose and change every 72 hours. Vaccines are a supposed solution to Stop viruses under the assumption that viruses are deadly when they are in fact healthy and disease preventing. Practically no person has ever died from a flu they died from medical intervention that too is another hoax. Basically everything they say is wrong. All info available is distributed by big pharma so you will never find the truth using their approach utilizing flawed assumptions assures you cannot ever figure it out. When I get out of the bath Ill post the links.
But if you want to find the truth I recommend Aajonu s Vonderplanitz and his 40 years of empirical research using raw meat and dairy he was able to cure any disease with rawmeat and raw fat from animals. Animals as well as humans do not get diseases if they eat the diet which is optimal for their nutrition. This is why they push veganism because they know every single cell is made in part by fat. Eventually you dry out from the inside out and organ failure kills you prematurely whereas tribes who ate raw meat and dairy lived to be 150 on average. So rockefeller medical halfed the human lifespan essentially but its always been artififically reduced due to malnutrition and ignorance of nutrition. Even after the flood people lived to be hundreds of years old according to the bible.
I mean, within the last 4 days I have developed symptoms that I have not experienced in my life. People have to stop labeling the virus a hoax; and instead label this for what it is: to introduce a new world order under the guise of The Great Reset.
Edit: Idiots downvoting me because they can't accept reality.
Hmm... funny... the handful of people I know who have ‘had it’, said it was no different than the common cold. Meanwhile the one guy my age (40’s) who got the vax (healthcare worker) ended up in the hospital, almost dead of a heart attack, 4 days after the second shot.
Loss of smell and taste; and an overall lethargic enery level. I typically like to take 15 minute hot-hot showers, but I can barely handle two minutes recently. My mind feels very foggy, too. I have noticed my speech being affected too at times i.e. stuttering.
Hmmm... I had the same symptoms feb 2018. Was that covid? Or the common cold? How could it be covid if it didn’t exist back then? Or maybe covid been around much longer? It doesn’t matter. You aren’t dying or in the hospital and neither is anyone else.
I'm a critical care doctor so I take care of these people when they are bad shape.
You're right that many healthier, younger people have some mild symptoms, but it caused disease pathology we've never seen.
Disease pathology like blood clots and lung scarring? You mean as a side effect of the damage of putting people of ventilators, and then later attributed to covid?
Curious Dr., I am a coder and by guidelines we never code strictly from lab reports, you know this. Why then this one time we can? We can code positive covid19 tests from lab results. We can't do that for normal flu tests or any other labs, just cytology or pathology signed by a Dr, Np or professional equivalent. Why should Medicare pay more just for this disease, thousands more in fact, if they go on a ventilator up to 39k for that one patient. It looks like it's all about the money to me.
I think there is a real virus SARS-cov-2. There is zero reason to think a "modified flu" is more likely than a "modified SARS". One is no more likely than the other, and there is a lot of evidence to support a real SARS-cov-2.
Having said that, I have seen evidence that a lot of the DEATHS (and people just being sick) that have been attributed to SARS-cov-2 are in fact actually due to the influenza virus.
That could explain why the real flu is MIA - many people have crap immune systems right now and get knocked on their butts by a common cold. They get the actual influenza - messed up, can't breathe, ventilator, die. Rig up some fake tests, call these case C19.
If it's a supercharged influenza - well, now that's gonna cause some serious problems. Especially in a nation with a very large elderly population. Like China.
This same thing was posted a couple weeks back. If I remember, it was thought to be fake news as no one could find any credible articles to back this up.
Corona viruses are said to be responsible for 30% of our colds. Sorry, I didn't take notes when I read that, or saved the article. There was a young female Chinese biologist whistle blower who said that she worked in the lab in Wuhan and the virus was GMO'd there. I also read that the genetic engineers were trying to make the virus' "feet" stickier, which makes it more infectious. If true, that means the scientists probably know the gene sequences for the changes they were attaching to the DNA.
It looks plausible to me that there is a GMO virus called COVID 19, but it doesn't look to me like it has caused a pandemic. That is just media hype.
The flu can also affect senses temporarily and it just so happens to have mysteriously disappeared off the face of the earth in March 2020.
It doesn't matter if Covid is real or not though, what matters is that the mortality rate is no worse than a bad flu season and the threat does not justify the countermeasures in the slightest.
Oral thrush is one thing that can cause loss of taste. Dentists are reporting seeing a sharp rise in oral thrush cases, and have attributed it to mask-wearing. Oral thrush is also transmissible to others.
Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
....And find me the lab, in the entire world, that will Show they actually have a covid-19 virus isolated within that lab....Ill wait...
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
What exactly would you like to see?
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
It means that information that it doesn't exist at all is disinformation. I think such provably false "information" is intended to make those looking into it look bad, make them look like "conspiracy theorists" as this guy looks like. It gives the people pushing a false narrative fuel to discredit those who say negative things about the narrative.
There are symptoms that have been discussed that match previous SARS cases. This virus seems to attack a certain type of cell that expresses the ACE 2 protein (notably specific cardiopulmonary cells), and I think cells in the nose and throat as well (I'd have to look that up).
The type of test used (PCR) is being used fraudulently (too many cycles). The test itself is already only useful in certain situations, but for a test of this type it is almost useless even in the best of cases. But much worse than that, the protocol that was pushed by the WHO (at nearly twice as many cycles as standard PCR) was guaranteed to produce many, many false positives.
Using the test in this manner can only be for one reason: to falsely get the numbers up, to push fear through the population, to force draconian responses, and to make the population subservient to their fear and those political and health department leaders that were "trying to help them". There is no other logical reason they would have used the PCR test in such an obviously incorrect manner, and every single research biologist in the world who has ever done PCR knows it, which is basically all of them.
I think it may be very contagious. I think it was modified to be very contagious. I haven't looked into its actual biology as much as I should have. I have been concerned with other aspects of it. Once I realized it was not very deadly these types of effects became less of a concern for me.
Most definitely not. Its a bad cold. Before we had good therapeutics it may have been a problem, but just vitamin D and zinc are likely sufficient to prevent serious harm in all but those who were very ill before encountering the virus. HCQ and zinc do seem to be excellent if taken even in those with comorbidities if taken before serious damage is done.
Wearing cloth masks is useless to prevent the spread of the virus. Wearing masks of any type without constantly replacing them with sterile ones does more harm than good. Constant sanitation reduces the strength of our immune system, making us more likely to get seriously ill or die if we do encounter the virus (or any infection). Socially distancing may or may not help stop the spread, but we don't actually want to stop the spread. THEY want to stop the spread so they can keep us living in fear longer.
We live in fear because they are programming us, and for no other reason. I believe that SARS-cov-2 is a real virus, and I believe it gets people sick. I believe it has killed some people, but almost all of them were sick with other things first (cancer, diabetes, etc.). The evidence also suggests that HCQ and zinc, maybe an antibiotic as therapeutics, if you do get sick, are likely enough to prevent serious damage from this virus (if done before it gets bad). Not one other thing seems to be necessary.
All evidence I have seen, doing probably thousands of hours of research suggests the worlds overreaction to SARS-cov-2 is a scam designed to take us into their "Great Reset" aka the NWO.
A quote from someone who agrees with me. He doesn't have to exist.
If you looked you would see that I have three independent sources. The first two sources are the CDC (which is what I think you are referring to) and if you were to actually look at them (and you had sufficient knowledge to understand the information (which is non-trivial)) you would know that these CDC sources, when you really dig in, destroy their own narrative.
The third link I provided happens to link to a site that is related to the CDC, but that is only because pubmed links to pretty much every peer reviewed paper. You can find the paper on many sites that have nothing to do with the CDC.
The 4th and 5th links go to researchgate. This means they have not yet passed peer review. Researchgate has nothing to do with the CDC. In fact, it is the place to most likely find real science that refutes the CDC.
Check your statements before making accusations.
NIH=Fauci CDC=Fauci
I DID look at your sources...all have been caught in a lie. I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned....? If not isolated, cant create vaccine... Say and link whatever you want. This is Planned-demic...not even sure what you're trying to prove anymore. My point is that using links from lying organizations with that are profiting from lying...seems odd and disingenuous...but feel free..im moving on.
But apparently did not listen to what I said.
The CDC links (at least the second one) prove that the whole virus narrative is false (if you know how to look at the information). If nothing else, this proves that not everything at the CDC promotes the "covid-19" narrative. On the contrary, most of the data does the opposite. They expect people to not look, and those that do look they expect to be too afraid to say anything, or be discredited by those of their peers who are.
As for the peer reviewed paper I linked, it is a peer reviewed paper. You can find it on literally every single publisher of peer reviewed papers. Here are a few non-CDC links:
https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/49/D1/D706/5921286
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33585048
https://covid19.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/gess-a-database-of-global-evaluation-of-sars-cov-2hcov-19-sequenc
I can list a hundred more if you want. Its a peer reviewed paper. This is just how it works. It goes to all peer reviewed journals.
If you want to talk about how all peer reviewed science is suspect, that's another topic. It would be one that every scientist in the world agrees with, and has through all of time. In fact, that is how science works.
What it is however, is credible evidence. To refute scientific evidence requires refuting the arguments and analyses within the work. It never works to just say "your source is not credible because I don't like them." That is the opposite of debate.
That is called an ad hominem attack. It is a weak tactic by those that have no actual counter arguments. You can only provide a counter argument in a scientific debate by understanding and cogitating on the original arguments.
Your attacks on the researchgate papers are completely not credible, and you obviously have NO IDEA what researchgate is. It is literally the best place to find real science in a world trying to hide evidence.
Is that all you want?
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida
NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories
University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)
McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research
How many more would you like? I can do this all day (although I won't).
I am not saying these are all credible sources. I have not vetted them. I looked at the first one, and as someone who has performed similar experiments it looks completely legit at first glance.
But if I were to say these specific labs stating explicitly that they have isolated the virus are lying I would have to read each one in detail and find evidence of the lies. If I were to just make the claim they are lying because I don't like them I would become a non-credible source of information myself.
"Fake News......you know im changing the name right?.... to Very Fake News..."
Donald Trump..your POTUS
Thank you for taking the time to read what I wrote. It is good to know that people are not so bound up in their own beliefs of fear that they are willing to look at evidence that runs contrary. It is wonderful that instead of making blanket claims of "Fake News" or "shooting the messenger" people are willing to think about another persons argument and then provide well thought out and researched counter evidence to promote the discussion and come closer to the truth, whatever that may be.
/s
I can appreciate your scholarly asf work there.
Logic is sound too! It makes more sense that they would post real experiments that most average citizens wouldn't take the time to look into much less be able to comprehend to a degree high enough to see behind their false narratives put forth in the media
Than it would be for them to put the time and energy to conduct a second false experiment with false findings, for every true experiment done, and to publish those false ones to the public while keeping the original true versions logged separately only for private eyes.
I mean I guess it would be possible, but I think once they felt a certain degree of comfort in being able to steer narratives, they would be inclined to not need to put in all the extra work and just lie instead.
word
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side.. I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended.. makes no sense.. I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."
You're So right...Everything you have typed...I was wrong to think i could match your wits.Forgive me typing-ill of the CDC or any of your favorite research sites. I sure will think twice about repeating any of my "idiotic" or" ignorant" ideas next time. Thanks for teaching me, and everyone that Covid-19 is Real and that its not actually just influenza strains in an altered state. Man glad we got that cleared up. Ill put my mask back on and shut up mr Fauci.
...just wow....you heard it here first folks...we got a RealVirus on our hands!!! Lol...And since i cant or wont source you and mr "smarter=than=anyone-else", by your own logic, i wont be trusting you either..Thanks for lining me out though. Lol ...And using CDC and NIH is no different... Lets agree to disagree...
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).
And the crow house.com put this video out. The only Derek Knauss I could find was at prepare for change.net, who writes about the intergalactic federation
I don't believe Covid is as dangerous as they say it is but I do believe something is out there that the CCP released. It's not the regular flu due to some of the symptoms, loss of taste for example is unusual for the flu.
I also believe that like most everything made in China, they f'ed it up and it's not as deadly as they hoped it would be. I am concerned for how they mutate it and possibly make it more dangerous to certain genetics than others in rounds 2 and 3 if they get that far.
I think that some countries' numbers are honest, Australia and New Zealand for example, even though their response is so totally disproportionate and clearly about another agenda. I posted earlier today how in England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland have separate Public Health orgs), doctors have only reported 17,000 cases across the one year to the statutory statistical returns, but yet to turn on your TV or listen to our 'politicians', we've had 120,000 'deaths', never mind how many 'cases' based on the false positive tests. Extrapolate the 120,000 by the 99+% survival rate, to our population of 68 million, and that means more than 3 out of 4 UK residents should have 'had COVID19'. Yet the vast majority of people you talk to will say they don't know anyone, or just 1 or 2 people who it then turns out fit the known 'most at risk' brackets, even ardent mask wearers and pro-vaxxers.
All viruses are good viruses. Viruses are not contagious. The human body is 90-99% bacteria. Viruses are not alive they cannot replicate the idea that they can is a false assumption based on hoax petri dish science which is the science of dying cells. The body can make hundreds of thousands of types of viruses that are made by the body for a specific purpose and change every 72 hours. Vaccines are a supposed solution to Stop viruses under the assumption that viruses are deadly when they are in fact healthy and disease preventing. Practically no person has ever died from a flu they died from medical intervention that too is another hoax. Basically everything they say is wrong. All info available is distributed by big pharma so you will never find the truth using their approach utilizing flawed assumptions assures you cannot ever figure it out. When I get out of the bath Ill post the links.
But if you want to find the truth I recommend Aajonu s Vonderplanitz and his 40 years of empirical research using raw meat and dairy he was able to cure any disease with rawmeat and raw fat from animals. Animals as well as humans do not get diseases if they eat the diet which is optimal for their nutrition. This is why they push veganism because they know every single cell is made in part by fat. Eventually you dry out from the inside out and organ failure kills you prematurely whereas tribes who ate raw meat and dairy lived to be 150 on average. So rockefeller medical halfed the human lifespan essentially but its always been artififically reduced due to malnutrition and ignorance of nutrition. Even after the flood people lived to be hundreds of years old according to the bible.
I mean, within the last 4 days I have developed symptoms that I have not experienced in my life. People have to stop labeling the virus a hoax; and instead label this for what it is: to introduce a new world order under the guise of The Great Reset.
Edit: Idiots downvoting me because they can't accept reality.
Yep. It ain't no hoax. I've seen people die of things/ways we've never seen.
Pretty stupid and reckless calling it a hoax
Hmm... funny... the handful of people I know who have ‘had it’, said it was no different than the common cold. Meanwhile the one guy my age (40’s) who got the vax (healthcare worker) ended up in the hospital, almost dead of a heart attack, 4 days after the second shot.
This is nothing like any cold I have had.
In what way?
Loss of smell and taste; and an overall lethargic enery level. I typically like to take 15 minute hot-hot showers, but I can barely handle two minutes recently. My mind feels very foggy, too. I have noticed my speech being affected too at times i.e. stuttering.
Hmmm... I had the same symptoms feb 2018. Was that covid? Or the common cold? How could it be covid if it didn’t exist back then? Or maybe covid been around much longer? It doesn’t matter. You aren’t dying or in the hospital and neither is anyone else.
Is this the hill you are going to die on? The strain exists; it was most likely engineered under the direction of the CCP to usher in The Great Reset.
I'm a critical care doctor so I take care of these people when they are bad shape. You're right that many healthier, younger people have some mild symptoms, but it caused disease pathology we've never seen.
We are better at taking care of it now tho
Disease pathology like blood clots and lung scarring? You mean as a side effect of the damage of putting people of ventilators, and then later attributed to covid?
They say it may have been a failed chinese bioweapon built from flu strains
This is what I have seen Australia claim. Modified flu
Curious Dr., I am a coder and by guidelines we never code strictly from lab reports, you know this. Why then this one time we can? We can code positive covid19 tests from lab results. We can't do that for normal flu tests or any other labs, just cytology or pathology signed by a Dr, Np or professional equivalent. Why should Medicare pay more just for this disease, thousands more in fact, if they go on a ventilator up to 39k for that one patient. It looks like it's all about the money to me.
if 94% of the deaths are inaccurately labeled as "from" covid when in fact were "with" covid and 2.5 other factors, is it real?
If upwards of 80% of the tests were flawed due to overcycling the PCR test, is it real?
You're claiming to have seen strange things. Fine. There probably is SOMETHING out there.
But if "Teh Ronas" is 80 to 94% fake, how much fakeness qualifies as being fake?
My point has always been that there is so much bullshit re: C19 you can make VERY strong arguments it doesn't even exist at all.
On Principle. To make a point. It's completely overblown to the point that it no longer matters if it's real or not.
I saw a few Australian articles claiming that Covid is actually modified flu. I will try finding them and post
I think there is a real virus SARS-cov-2. There is zero reason to think a "modified flu" is more likely than a "modified SARS". One is no more likely than the other, and there is a lot of evidence to support a real SARS-cov-2.
Having said that, I have seen evidence that a lot of the DEATHS (and people just being sick) that have been attributed to SARS-cov-2 are in fact actually due to the influenza virus.
Some day we will likely get the truth of this.
That could explain why the real flu is MIA - many people have crap immune systems right now and get knocked on their butts by a common cold. They get the actual influenza - messed up, can't breathe, ventilator, die. Rig up some fake tests, call these case C19.
If it's a supercharged influenza - well, now that's gonna cause some serious problems. Especially in a nation with a very large elderly population. Like China.
I'm not convinced that it even exists. I've heard that it hasn't even been isolated.
Trump saved millions of lives from the hoax China virus.
Had to replay it many times. Hope he doesn't get Clintoned..
Why we can't see the video?
Been saying it since day one. Fear is the disease
Pesky science, ban it all.
Upload this somewhere else Streamable is mega cucked
This same thing was posted a couple weeks back. If I remember, it was thought to be fake news as no one could find any credible articles to back this up.
OK, so if Covid-19 doesn't exist, what illness did I have last year (that an independent lab stated i now have the antibodies for)?
I agree. And who or what controls our minds and beliefs?
Corona viruses are said to be responsible for 30% of our colds. Sorry, I didn't take notes when I read that, or saved the article. There was a young female Chinese biologist whistle blower who said that she worked in the lab in Wuhan and the virus was GMO'd there. I also read that the genetic engineers were trying to make the virus' "feet" stickier, which makes it more infectious. If true, that means the scientists probably know the gene sequences for the changes they were attaching to the DNA. It looks plausible to me that there is a GMO virus called COVID 19, but it doesn't look to me like it has caused a pandemic. That is just media hype.
The flu can also affect senses temporarily and it just so happens to have mysteriously disappeared off the face of the earth in March 2020.
It doesn't matter if Covid is real or not though, what matters is that the mortality rate is no worse than a bad flu season and the threat does not justify the countermeasures in the slightest.
Have people really forgotten having the flu and being so stuffed up and runny nose that they lost smell and taste at it's peak?
Oral thrush is one thing that can cause loss of taste. Dentists are reporting seeing a sharp rise in oral thrush cases, and have attributed it to mask-wearing. Oral thrush is also transmissible to others.
Yes you asked the question I can't seem to figure out