If it’s compressed, or has artifacts, it will look pixilated. I work with lots of 4K footage and see this stuff often, especially if I export with a low bit rate. They would look like boxes, “pixelated”. The top of your head doesn’t disappear. Your hands don’t look super imposed over microphones. Green screen is the only way you get these errors.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
A green screen appearing on St. Patricks Day can only mean one thing- divine intervention.
Kek!!
ní féidir le haon rud stop a chur leis an méid atá ag teacht
You know, cuz St Patrick's :P https://www.all-translation.com/translation/irish/to-english/
You just blew my mind, Pede.
?
Love this plan
Q 3097 from 3/17/19
BOOM!
They've been pulling this green screen hoax since Sandy Hook. Used to be lots of footage, but much of it has been scrubbed.
Believe half of what you see and none of what your hear (or something like that) If it looks fake, it probably is!
they didnt even try to hide the sandy hook shenanigans, total psyop
Look at the shadowing.
Notice that, for Biden, the sun (or light source) is to his right (left as you look at the photo)... and shadows on his collar and shirt show that the sun is pretty strongly from that direction (despite the overcast day).
Now look at the person walking in the background. No real shadow. Look at the car along the roadway. Shadow is basically under the car. If you look at the trees to the far left of the photo (nearest the green fencing), it looks like those shadows may be going to the left (opposite of Biden's shadows).
What lighting was shining on Biden that wasn't shining on anything else?
Sorry patriots.win has debunked this claim with their super pragmatic and Superficial wisdoms.
That's why I don't go there, too mainstream for me.
The same guy who did this composite also made Barry's fake passport.
Someone who is this inept at using layered compositing would never be able to pull off what some of you are claiming they did with a green screen. Biden is definitely ‘there’ but where ‘there’ is looks like a public park and there doesn’t seem to be any company.
But then the media is going along with it. That's the fascinating part.
No, they filmed an empty road, then panned. They keyed the pan to coincide with when Biden's inserted greenscreen layer walks off, tracking using commonly accessible software ticks, and inserted the mics and reporter heads strategically to obfuscate Biden's feet. Zooms were achieved as Biden approaches digitally which lets them occur whenever they like, and the proof is when this is all 480p and shit because that's a lazy way to hide artifacting. You'll never see this shit in 1080p or 4k.
That and how they only bothered to show you Biden's feet when he was in grass, and then only two steps because elements interacting with the ground and casting shadows are the two hardest and time consuming parts. Another 12pm overcast day with the sun directly above. How telling.
Yup, been making this same point. High noon on an overcast day. We get two steps with his feet sinking into dry grass in cold ground, with the rest of the time his feet always obscured. They tried at least.
Remember when Trump said luck is a very important word?
Luck of the Irish ? ?
Why does the guy in the left look like he took a step. Serious question.
There is also the funny warping of proportion created when separate images from two cameras in motion are combined then one of the cameras stops moving before the other does. The stationary object (Biden in this case) no longer moves in sync with the locale behind him until both cameras stop moving. Biden turns into a balloon for a split second - floating and inflating - until both images are static.
If it’s pre-filmed, then this shot could have been filmed in 2017, shortly after Biden became Bidan.
The SUV in the back is an old model. not the current ones. Monkey Werx has the comparison there, talks about the security detail being sloppy also,
https://youtu.be/Qt_hmNGQUYw?t=561
"What lighting was shining on Biden that wasn't shining on anything else?" That's easy. God's spotlight. He's keeping track of Potatus for His own reasons.
One thing I have not seen anyone else mention: his hand comes closer to the camera than that light gray mic, and yet the mic still looks to be twice as large as his hand. If perspective was right, and the mic was the same size as the hand it would appear somewhat smaller due to being further away.
For that video to be real as-is, that mic would have to be the size of a volley ball. Completely unbelievable.
It's a boom mic
As we “red pill” others, just another “why?” tid-bit! Can you explain that?!
Vid link please?
So I've been wondering all day. Was the whole clip a greenscreen, or were the reporters / microphones added later?
It looks a little like the cheesy zoom or teams "custom background" stuff too, when that glitches and cuts off the top of your head.
If the Biden clip were real, WHERE is all his security? When Trump approached crowds security was all over.....Biden....not one in sight......unless you count the one in the distance walking in the opposite direction! haha this is all a joke now.
What video are you referring to? If we're talking about the one from The Hill and then the other perspective, that is actually a deep fake algorithm that uses compositing. Xe's not at the WH.
No AV expertise required to see it
Adding the mics wasn't even necessary. I'm not sure we would have even noticed from that angle that mics were missing. It's just so strange.
hey OP there's a video out there showing a gal walking through an elaborate green screen stage, complete with elevator, multiple rooms, etc. All green screen. It shows the raw footage and the finished CGI.
Astonishing what can be done, would be good to post in this Bidan context.
So what do you make of that 9/11 footage where the plane's wing momentarily disappears behind the set of buildings before the plane makes contact with the tower?
Since so many people use cell phones for seemingly everything these days, maybe they hope that stuff like this would slide. I don't use one that often, but I imagine all these goofs might be rather hard to detect on such a small screen.
Except this isn't what happened...
Why would Bid3ns hand float on the mics if the were masked?
Why would Biden be masked at all?
Both Angles... the grass footsteps.
The angle of the shadows vs. Time.
The absurdly loud Helicopter WHILE USING BOOM MICS....
Come on man.
Okay, so following the technology and logic in the first video you shared.
Biden's hand should have disappeared...instead, it appeared infront of the mic. So it's definitely not the same technique of "mic removing" editing you claimed in the first link.
Care to explain? I'm trying to be critical of the "green-screen" theory as well, but these 'debunked' talking point is also not answering the question.
Trust me, and the others. It is a failed green screen effect. Dont know why they did it, dont know why they didnt clean it up before release.
Maybe the guy rendering the scene didnt know what he was doing, maybe rushed for time, maybe done on purpose and the tech is now dead?
Regardless, this is a green screen, and a poorly done one. This looks very similar to what I did in college (multimedia minor for my IT degree). At least, the first time I did green screen, this is amature mistakes.
How do you account for other angles of the same scene which shows him walking off onto the grass behind him?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAPYk1XjwhU
Not OP but wouldn't that just be multiple cameras on the same green screen? See what I can't get is how you would get these commie journos who have Twitter accounts to go along with this.
Could have been done live and there was no way to fix it.
Hard to know but probably the reverse of the mic removing. They cut out the background from Biden, then the background they replaced it with had the mics in.
What's the purpose of manually cutting out Biden's hand from a supposedly non green screen footage, and then also cutting out the microphone manually (because no greenscreen) and then smooshing them together?
That theory is a non starter.
Presumably Biden was cut out of a bad background. Maybe he was then put into the same background shot from a different angle/distance. Hence the booms looking like they're waist height and wrong scale, depth, etc.
It's basically the same as greenscreen, you just use greenscreen to make it easier to comp elements. The mistakes here are evidence that they weren't greenscreening because it's so crappy.
Whenever we shoot in my job we always shoot plates - the scene but empty - so that absolutely everything we shoot can be removed in the edit.
But this wasnt a controlled shoot, it was random and scrappy.
Basically you're saying it just a video splice.
They took a video of reporters interview someone else.
Film Biden walking and splice it with the original video.
I think it was a mistake, it was a quick lube "editing" job that they threw to some tech guy and after the splicing this is the best the tech guy came up with.
Given all the tutorial video you linked here. There are 2 control variables that MUST happen to make editing easy and spotless.
Judging from these points, this is WHAT REALLY HAPPENED: So you got 1 layer for the original video of the mic and background and a layer for Biden.
BUT! the mics come in the clip at the end making it almost impossible to have a still frame to edit the mics out! So they have to resort to just keeping it to 2 layer, the biden layer and the original background and mic layer. They spliced it together and call it a day and hoping people won't see the mistakes. Yes, we could debunked our selves and say "well why the evil master mind make this mistake". First of all, I think this was supposed to be quick and dirty job to prove Biden is getting interview by the press. The order came from the higher up (who know nothing about technologies) for the tech team to quickly produced a fake interview...they grew complacence since the inauguration video production...not knowing that to fake things you will need a lot of still shots. The tech team probably see the mistake, but got a deadline since the Mainstream News already put the words out and NEED the footage immediately! Just send it out anyways. Mainstream Media, who also not technology savvy doesn't see the mistake as well...and this is where we are.
Something like this can realistically happen, I work in the tech field and communication between the technical team and the executive team always have problem....since 9 times out of 10, the executive team will overlooked a lot of the technical limitation and try to push the tech team to just do it.
They clearly did...
I now believe there was no greenscreen involved, but still plenty of motivation for trickery.
https://i.ibb.co/X76M16p/image.png
https://streamable.com/4m5xli
https://twitter.com/AlKapDC/status/1372207813355839503
That 4chan post makes no sense lol
For your first suggestion to work, you need a lock off. I don't think the videos of Biden are lock off. The 2nd video is a comedy piece, but point taken and I agree.
Yes but they don't clip through the speaker. Also ask yourself why they didn't keep them out of frame like they always did before and didn't pull them back if Biden simply got too close or why his arms should have at least knocked one of them out of the way but it floats there like he isn't also occupying that space.
Lol this guy, it's under then over and the perspective is so bad it's jarring. Literally impossible with the two videos and two perspectives we have.
Nah, it's just badly comped from two cameras. This is a nothing burger.
You again? When are the mods going to deport you.
What is 'badly' composited? Because you haven't responded to the direct evidence in ANY of my replies.
You can't get a mic behind Biden without HIM being masked. And you don't mask Biden if you're just comping mics into a shot.
And this ignores why you'd ever in the first place even comp mics into a damn shot.
So answer why Biden is masked at all if he isn't green screened in? Answer it or piss off. But I know you can't, because there's zero reason to ever do that in your scenario, which means it must therefore be some other scenario.
And it is a thigh sized boom mic then.
I’m analyzing footage from my perspective. You lost all credibility. I clearly state this is my opinion based on things I’ve done and had experience with. “For what it’s worth” is my opinion. So please, the door is over there, don’t let it hit you on the way out ?
I have a bachelors in digital filmmaking.
We’re with ya OP. Can’t argue with dummies, you only encourage it.
Thanks fren ❤️
Nice! So you're aware of the lens angle of view's ability to distort perspective, right?
https://twitter.com/Aesthetic_Degen/status/1372053858332123137
Came from cspan I do believe
NATRUAL ORDER HAS SPOKEN, WE ARE ALL SAVED NOW. THE SAVIOR OF TRUTH HAS ARRIVED, tho Natural order smells like pure dog shit. Tell us, what makes your opinion gospel when others, including close personal friends of mine who do this for a living all say that was manipulated footage. Tell us, all mighty internet lord, how will we ever live?
Doors that-a-way buddy
4ish years studying a field to get a degree is not a "nothing source". For many, that's what would be called a "well informed opinion", or a good candidate for providing their own analysis of the data.
Also, if someone has expertise in a subject, they really don't have to show someone else's work to say their opinion is right, although they can choose to cite the effect in question. However their own work should be enough to say that their analysis on that subject bears consideration.
To be fair, 50-70% of a Bachelor's Degree is nothing but bullshit indoctrination classes that have nothing to do with that said profession. True knowledge (in my opinion) comes from doing said work in ones free time, researching that profession in ones free time, and actually spending years working in the field of that said profession. But I get what you're saying :) I have a Bachelor's Degree and I absolutely hate the College University education program... it's a complete joke and needs a complete overhaul.
Fair point on unis needing total rebuilding using scientific methodology rather than fee-fee driven postmodernism
Before we make blanket statements like that please tell me how 50-70% of my Chemical Engineering degree was indoctrination when over 70% of it was courses in physical science and lab work?
Because it comes from a institution that constantly indoctrinates our society with their liberal agenda. Just because you didn't follow it doesn't mean the other 95% didn't.
Don't take your frustration out on fellow pedes.
i think you need some brain force. I know a guy, he will give you a GREAT deal, 60% off sale, free shipping store wide. GEt that and mix it with top sleep aid DOWN AND OUT. We cant keep doing this sale, so it will end soon.
Don't forget the Super Male Vitality!
Haha! You're at least open to the whole hands passing through mics post editing theory whereas I'm on the end where I have no reason to believe any of it has been faked. You can imagine how well that has gone over with many here right now, I'm apparently now suspected of being a dirty hidden shill for daring to question.
The irony of it all is so rich all I can do is laugh. Downvote away, boys! If only downvotes paid bills then I might care.