For the recent surge in "Flat Earthers" in GAW, this is for you.
(media.greatawakening.win)
✈️ Planes ✈️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (335)
sorted by:
Finally, thank you. Flat earthers on here make our whole movement look like a bunch of idiots. Our focus is the Elite and Cabal, the DS, the MSM, and the pedos ruling the world. Leave your stupid flat earth ideas to the side until we deal with these threats first.
This x 100.
If people come here are start talking about flat earthers, chemtrails, reptile people, and other conspiracy theories, it makes this entire movement look loony.
Take it to other sites. This about Q discussions, and Q was quite open and shut about it this nonsense.
EDIT: by this nonsense I mean flat earthers.
Ok but chemtrails are actually a thing though. So are condensation trails. But there are literally patents, which have been used on a large scale, for injecting aerosolized particles into the atmosphere as a form of geo-engineering.
I get that it’s not the crux of what this forum is all about, but please don’t be so quick to dismiss something just because of some bad PR, and some less than eloquent messengers.
Edit: a word
Q literally tells us that the full truth can’t be revealed because it would sound too preposterous to people.
I am not telling anyone what to believe but consider what that might be.
And when Q says people would refuse to believe, he might not just mean the normies. He might mean the conspiracy theorists too.
I am fine if certain conspiracies are soft banned (discouraged) from here because some topics just railroad the discussion, whether you believe or not.
But I think being too dismissive of anything at this point is a mistake. If you have any belief in Q, then you have to consider this “too preposterous” idea.
I agree with you. I understand this isn’t the place to be discussing things like chemtrails. I can understand how the perception of such a theory can detract from the main purpose of this forum, and scare away some people from considering other theories related to Q.
BUT, if someone is being close minded and mocking or belittling people for entertaining ideas like this, I’m going to pipe up and remind that person where they are. This is no place for being closed minded and dismissive.
I'm not dismissing it. But these things are what folks go to with conspiracy theories and the crazies out of there.
This forum is not the place for it. Everybody here knows it.
Bringing this stuff into discussion makes the movement look foolish. Q doesn't delve into these things. Q delves into the tangible and the links that are connected to the tangible. That is why he said with a definitive no in regards to flat earth. Inviting these discussions to this forum will invalidate the movement. People need to go elsewhere to discuss it, or read a friggen' physics book or astronomy book and educate themselves on the subject.
Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering is not the same thing as flat earth.
Q talked about chemtrails and reptilians? Sauce?
Not that I know of. I was referring to flat earthers.
The point being as these are wacky conspiracy theories that when attached to Q, they make the movement look insane.
Cool... But as I posted below...
"Simple verdict.
Give us ONE satellite (of thousands) with a LIVE feed of our plane-t? ONE. Surely corporations would sponsor it as their site would have millions of hits daily. Why NASA hasn't done this already is curious.... No? Then again they admit to artists renditions... of everything"
'Flat earthers' have been around since the first paid Scientism shill fabricated the spherical earth theory. You can not fault the 'flat earthers' for seeking a place at the table of discourse. It's a hungry world out there, starved of substantive truths since mankind's expulsion from Eden. They will pound the clarion bell until allowed a voice.
We are all called, but not to the same cause. There are many who have a calling to expose/explore some particular line of inquiry. If you have supported DJT you have also gone where not wanted and dropped your truths.
Someone made a reply in this thread that ships on the horizon prove a spherical earth. That person hasn't even gotten through the kindergarten door of study on this fascinating topic.
Flat Earthers have been around for awhile yes, and in all there time they have produced exactly zero mathematical models or any evidence whatsoever other gross misunderstandings of actual math and science that show definitely that it is an oblate spheroid as all other celestial bodies are due to gravity. Cope.
Just words. You have not researched this subject at all if you stand by such a blanket statement. Cope.
I haven't researched huh? Lmao why haven't any of you flown to the edge and taken pictures for us yet?
Lol sorry bud Earth is an oblate spheroid, always has been. God didn't make a flying pizza.
Hyperbole theorizing can be fun for sure. Linear thinking limits these theories however, pun intended, get it Linear Flat. But one pesky question that I have been unable to find resolution to or even seen any theory proposed to provide explanation. How does a or ANY flat earther describe the clear existence of Precession. Now we cant stop there because this isnt Linear. Before anyone has an extraordinary answer of profound nonsensical wisdom. How does a or ANY flat earther prescribe the relationship of verifiable and quantitative realized proof of Precession and celestial bodies, objects, constellations as they track mathematically calculable in position geometrically and astronomically through time and space and placement along horizons and arc minutes of sky from horizon and quantified to specific celestial time events in relation to time space on earth.
Explain this I will be a TRUE believer.
Hey look, no answers! Almost like these guys just come here enough to say “the earth is flat herp derp” for the sole purpose of making us look stupid. Look at all their comments- “you haven’t looked into it”, “you’re ignorant”, “you supported Trump which is going against the grain”, etc.. Not once in this thread have I seen anyone say “here’s the evidence” because there is none. They’re just here to make us look bad.
Oh look it's a ship going over the horizon. Let me get my binoculars, oh look, the ship is going over the horizon, let me get my telescope, where the hell is the horizon?
When they took that long range camera shot across a great lake to capture Chicago??
Something is odd.
"They" made someone look stupid. But it wasnt "us" "They" made someone look bad; This also wasnt "us"
Precession, as in Axial precession the tilt of the earth?
Trying to sound smart it seems with big words, but this runoff sentence needs punctuation. Rephrase or inbox me to clarify.
Precession, as in Axial precession the tilt of the earth?
Critiquing grammar on a forum. Subvert and off topic, mean while providing the same need for said grammar critiquing. There is your clarity.
Back to the question. Explain Precession (not defined intentionally) from a flat earther perspective. I am all ears. Since you missed the rest of it, explain Precession in relation to solar, celestial and sky calculated and predictable movements. There I simplified it for you. Expecting no answer as all, 1st prediction, grammatical analysis by you, 2nd prediction, whimsical Wiki reference with crayon sketch showing how Precession could exist in the TRUE Flat Earth, 3rd prediction. Or you over achieve and do all 3 with some additional nonsense to circumvent the question and talking point.
There's also the geometric experiments you can run to calculate approximate circumference from shadow length; it disproves flat and anything but some spheroid or derived from a spheroid.
Last person I told this to I believe came back and then believed it was a pear.
Bloody hell!
Absolutely. I used Precession as a singular topic and talking point. They are probably trying to Wiki/Google edumacate right now on it. There are a zillion other ways to ask a question for explanation based on their vast knowledgeable understanding of alternate universe theory and punch a hole in that wet bag. But wasnt necessary since one single topic derailed the truman show train
They belong on Conspiracy.win. NOT here.
The aggressive and reflexive nature that people on GAW attack "flat earthers" is concerning. We are either over the target, and GAW has many enemies lurking. OR, its like you say, and many of these people who claim to be awake are still deeply entrenched in propaganda and havnt even taken 1 step towards questioning the truth.