CodeMonkeyZ believes we are in an excellent position in Arizona
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
I kind of suspect the military does "have it all" however, it was obtained under unwarranted wire taps so is inadmissible in court. However, if they were to guide the investigators towards what they need to look for, they'd find it legally and can then charge the criminals.
From what I remember she was missing for a while. Then she resigned and was seen once but we really don’t know if the photo was actually recent.
An interesting tidbit is that she once wore a dress with a white hat print. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dyr_KgdWkAAkSNc.jpg
So does the NSA collect information with a warrant?
I don't think they do but I don't think what they collect is used in US Courts of law either. They could alert the FBI about something, the FBI "finds" a confidential informant and gets a proper warrant. Of course, they are all run by evil bastards so who knows?
I read a book in the 90s, Spooky 8 by a former black ops clown, said that they were listening to all electronic traffic even back then. It appears they were luckily infiltrated by some white hats.
I will bet money they have FISA warrants on all these fuckers for the last 4 years.
But is the military bound to the usual laws regarding warrants, wiretapping, etc., when it comes to treason?
what happened at the election was already 'mathematically impossible' ... that is SCIENCE and should be enough to prove the case of fraud regardless of any audits
What kind of science?
Real Science or Fauci Science?
numbers do not lie, REAL SCIENCE
yeah but some of these assholes think 2+2=5.
Well then they can eat my poop if I call it chocolate pudding or they can admit they are full of chocolate pudding
the settled kind of science
Fraud doesn't matter when the people who should handle it are in on it.
List of insiders who have said or strongly hinted that 'they got em':
Jovan Pulitzer Dr. Frank Mike Lindell Patrick Byrne Matt DePerno
Q+
obvious shill ^^^^^
is mark @Honeybadger?
Of course there was security measures on the ballots. Assuming that they exist isn’t confirmation bias, it’s common sense. The ballots are legal documents akin to money or naval logs. Establishing basic counterfeit protection and secret security verification markers is as basic a basic gets.
And just like legal tender, why would the issuer ever fully reveal the security measures? This would defeat the entire purpose of the protection.
I don’t know if we will ever find out all the details, what if they want to use them in the future?
I would hope so because people have been saying this for a long time now.
If Ron thinks they have it then we know we're screwed and don't have it. That guy is the king of lies and false hopium.
Sorry about the dupe post. First time in a while making an image post.
I thought codemonkey was a planefag. Since when did he become an expert on the election fraud based on watching aircraft take off and land? LMAO
I think you're confusing codemonkey and monkeywerx
Thank you. He is just a computer nerd who runs a website, that doesn't even live in the US. Why do we put him on some massive election integrity pedestal? It's aggravating
Codemonkey (Ron Watkins) was the 8chan/kun site administrator. I think he has more inside info than just some "computer nerd who runs a website.
If I was the Q team I def would leave information comcerning the Fate of the free world in his hands. For sure.
You too ? honestly I absolutely see Ron being trusted by military people on a mission to save the world, he seems pretty based and trust worthy
pretty sure he's had direct contact with the Q team so that makes him 100000x more reliable of a source than most people posting on this channel
do codemonkey posts now attract all the shills?
Time to make some codemonkey posts involving flat earth and NASA fraud, that should keep the paid shills busy....
But do they have standing?
Sweet. Love new Q posts.
He doesn't know shit and is just speculating like the rest of us.
Question - is CodeMonkeyZ the same guy as MonkeyWerx?
did you even watch it or did you just read HBO's absurd conclusion? Ron didnt say he was Q. You have zero crediblity
thats exactly how they wanted to portray him and you fell for it
you didnt see the recorded words and actions that were edited out. why do you pay so much attention to someone you clearly are biased against lmao??? shill
uh.. the attempted coup by pence did happen, as reported by many sources... why do you think Paul Ryan suddenly vanished from one of the most powerful political positions? The battle vs dominion is still on going; the courts were thoroughly corrupt and the rulings were not based on evidence; plenty of time for his "predictions" to play out.
You are also free to believe what you want, but you sound pretty uninformed