They all think in terms of statistics. They expect a certain amount of adverse effects. The fact that there is even a rumor of them considering this matter means to me that it is pretty bad, it is outside their expected range, and it is extra upsetting that it seems to affect younger people, because they are about to go for children and babies who didn't for the most part even need it. Not only could it cut into that big market, but if kids start getting hurt it will cause more outrage than older people kicking off suddenly. There is a plausible deniability there, for a while. Not forever.
"Thank you all for coming to this meeting today on such short notice. Let's begin todays session by presenting some forward thinking ideas on how we can utilize our media assets to shape a narrative that will deflect public attention away from our guilt in committing crimes against humanity. Jim, let's start with you..."
"Thank you Jim, that is a terrific example of the kinds of ideas we need to make this meeting fruitful, and help guide public opinion.
Susan: "I would like to add that the narrative to assign fault to Trump would be more impactful if it came from his own people. I have reached out to my colleague at FAUX News, Paul Ryan, to assist with shaping that narrative from Republican party angle, and Paul is a proven asset."
(Susan) Sir I completely agree Romney or Ryan would be an excellent angle to start this "Narrative". May I make a suggestion though? We should consider bringing in the Russians. They could enhance the public perception to a global scale.
"Excellent idea! Perhaps we can blame the inflamed heart condition on a rare vaccine reaction only cause by a "Russian variant" of the novel corona virus. Thoughts?"
"Interesting idea Johnson. I think I see where you are going with this. When Trump pulled the US out of the Paris Accord, it caused a sudden spike in global warming that caused cracks in the Chyrnobal containment, allowing radioactive energy to mutate the corona virus into the new Russian variant. Putin hid that fact from the public, so our vaccine researchers were unable to account for the Russian variant, leading to the rare heart inflammation caused by our vaccine reacting with it. Eureka! Now that's how to brainstorm! Great work Johnson!"
The problem is China didn’t poison their population but the west might have. It’s basically a guaranteed WW3 loss if NWO/China is actually able to take out 70% of the world’s population. That’s why it doesn’t make sense to cheer it on. Wipe out 70% of every industry and that also completely fucks up the economy too. It collapses every business with more than a couple employees. It’s not good. That’s why it’s so hard to believe the U.S. Miltary is just letting it happen, although, yeah, that is what appears to be happening. The U.S. Military appears to have surrendered to China.
Good. Too bad they define emergency as anything that interferes with their revenue stream.
Just heard that there are 9 children in my state diagnosed with ALS after getting the shot. I don't have a link. It was mentioned in testimony before Congress this week. My heart hurts for these families.
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Thursday that it will convene an "emergency meeting" of its advisers on June 18th to discuss rare but higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines."
I love how even in the golden age of remote work, the fastest a well-funded government agency can respond in an emergency is the end of next week.
Because you know, for government employees Thursday is basically the start of the weekend and you'll be shocked if they're anywhere near the office past 3:00 on Friday.
Would also be interested to know if the "CDC Foundation" is counted among those advisors?
Well this is interesting, on the night I received news that my grandmother had a heart attack today. She’s on a chopper flying to a major hospital to receive a heart stint. She’s vaccinated, of course. Makes me sad that an innocent woman like herself trusted some bad people. Lord help her.
Just think how many cases they aren't included in these reports. For every 1 adverse side affect that gets attributed to the jab, there are likely 100's that are ignored or covered up.
The meeting itself is a joke. An hour, at the end of the week, scheduled a week in the future? Ooh I can feel the urgency.
This may have more to do with "signalling" the bounds of acceptable inquiry. Just like mention of the lab leak theory was drowned out by shrieks right up until a member of the regime mentioned it, at which point it was totally okay to talk about. Talk about jab side effects was banished to the outer dark, but will now be acceptable for people to investigate without the risk of professional ruin.
They can't come right out and say "we may have killed everyone due to our Trump Derangement Syndrome", so they just have to signal that it's okay to think that the vaccine may have flaws.
I’m shocked there are actually articles reporting this. As one commenter said, these are just the reports they are admitting to. I wonder what the real number is.
Higher than expected...
Expected...
Yes, they expect adverse effects.
Is this the same CDC who hated Trump, and inflated the death totals of the virus by 95%?
What makes them trustworthy now?
Peddled fear then, peddling fear now. Deep State Run Organization.
Specifically... They expected heart inflammation.
They all think in terms of statistics. They expect a certain amount of adverse effects. The fact that there is even a rumor of them considering this matter means to me that it is pretty bad, it is outside their expected range, and it is extra upsetting that it seems to affect younger people, because they are about to go for children and babies who didn't for the most part even need it. Not only could it cut into that big market, but if kids start getting hurt it will cause more outrage than older people kicking off suddenly. There is a plausible deniability there, for a while. Not forever.
"Thank you all for coming to this meeting today on such short notice. Let's begin todays session by presenting some forward thinking ideas on how we can utilize our media assets to shape a narrative that will deflect public attention away from our guilt in committing crimes against humanity. Jim, let's start with you..."
(Jim) -Lets blame Trump
"Thank you Jim, that is a terrific example of the kinds of ideas we need to make this meeting fruitful, and help guide public opinion.
Susan: "I would like to add that the narrative to assign fault to Trump would be more impactful if it came from his own people. I have reached out to my colleague at FAUX News, Paul Ryan, to assist with shaping that narrative from Republican party angle, and Paul is a proven asset."
(Susan) Sir I completely agree Romney or Ryan would be an excellent angle to start this "Narrative". May I make a suggestion though? We should consider bringing in the Russians. They could enhance the public perception to a global scale.
"Excellent idea! Perhaps we can blame the inflamed heart condition on a rare vaccine reaction only cause by a "Russian variant" of the novel corona virus. Thoughts?"
(johnson) Sir I believe we could incorporate the Russian narrative with climate change and the Chernobyl disaster to some extent.
"Interesting idea Johnson. I think I see where you are going with this. When Trump pulled the US out of the Paris Accord, it caused a sudden spike in global warming that caused cracks in the Chyrnobal containment, allowing radioactive energy to mutate the corona virus into the new Russian variant. Putin hid that fact from the public, so our vaccine researchers were unable to account for the Russian variant, leading to the rare heart inflammation caused by our vaccine reacting with it. Eureka! Now that's how to brainstorm! Great work Johnson!"
This has been a fantastic dialogue. I still have tears of laughter in my eyes.
(Dan) But sir isn't all of this bulllshit (excuse my language)
If what all of us believe to be true, is 100% true. We will have a major problem on our hands. I am at a loss of words. Help us God.
The problem is China didn’t poison their population but the west might have. It’s basically a guaranteed WW3 loss if NWO/China is actually able to take out 70% of the world’s population. That’s why it doesn’t make sense to cheer it on. Wipe out 70% of every industry and that also completely fucks up the economy too. It collapses every business with more than a couple employees. It’s not good. That’s why it’s so hard to believe the U.S. Miltary is just letting it happen, although, yeah, that is what appears to be happening. The U.S. Military appears to have surrendered to China.
Good. Too bad they define emergency as anything that interferes with their revenue stream.
Just heard that there are 9 children in my state diagnosed with ALS after getting the shot. I don't have a link. It was mentioned in testimony before Congress this week. My heart hurts for these families.
Oh, but the vaccine is "mostly harmless."
Just like the riots were "mostly peaceful."
How about holding a meeting on the dozens of peer reviewed studies showing Ivermectin can prevent and cure Covid? Wouldn't that be worthwhile?
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Thursday that it will convene an "emergency meeting" of its advisers on June 18th to discuss rare but higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines."
I love how even in the golden age of remote work, the fastest a well-funded government agency can respond in an emergency is the end of next week.
Because you know, for government employees Thursday is basically the start of the weekend and you'll be shocked if they're anywhere near the office past 3:00 on Friday.
Would also be interested to know if the "CDC Foundation" is counted among those advisors?
Well this is interesting, on the night I received news that my grandmother had a heart attack today. She’s on a chopper flying to a major hospital to receive a heart stint. She’s vaccinated, of course. Makes me sad that an innocent woman like herself trusted some bad people. Lord help her.
Prayers for you and your family, May God’s will be done and may you have Peace through your struggles.
Much appreciated
You mean for a stint in hospital to receive an artery stent.
Correct
Just think how many cases they aren't included in these reports. For every 1 adverse side affect that gets attributed to the jab, there are likely 100's that are ignored or covered up.
I think the committee in question is ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices):
https://www.cdc.gov/faca/committees/pdfs/acip/acip-roster-508.pdf
And there is a means to offer public comment:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fvaccines%2Facip%2Fmeetings%2Fmeetings-info.html
They must be getting coached by Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, how to save your ass emergency meeting.
Methinks it's time to kiss that ass goodbye.
The meeting itself is a joke. An hour, at the end of the week, scheduled a week in the future? Ooh I can feel the urgency.
This may have more to do with "signalling" the bounds of acceptable inquiry. Just like mention of the lab leak theory was drowned out by shrieks right up until a member of the regime mentioned it, at which point it was totally okay to talk about. Talk about jab side effects was banished to the outer dark, but will now be acceptable for people to investigate without the risk of professional ruin.
They can't come right out and say "we may have killed everyone due to our Trump Derangement Syndrome", so they just have to signal that it's okay to think that the vaccine may have flaws.
Strange this comes out right after they admit Trump was right about HCQ and such...
Maybe they're going to end up saying the vaxxes are unsafe AND admit the numbers are going down (have to now!) and that we already have a cure.
The work of white hats???
Just gonna scrub the data.
Tucker had quite a good segment on this tonight very scary.
I’m shocked there are actually articles reporting this. As one commenter said, these are just the reports they are admitting to. I wonder what the real number is.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9672233/The-Latest-WHO-warns-delta-variant-hold-Europe.html#article-9672233
Wait...."higher-than-expected" means there was an acceptable expected...Right??