Hey Bill.. Greta.. AOC… “SPLAIN THIS ONE TO US COMMON FOLK, WOULD YA?”
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
It has all been pushing the atmosphere of FEAR to us citizens based on nothing. The earth has had numerous ice ages all produced by nature not humans. It is all about money, but not for your bank account. The cabal states these BS items and then laughs at us all the way to their bank account.
And all of those ice ages thawed without manmade warming
ooohh...don't forget the little propellants in spray cans!
Yes! In school in early 90s it was the 20th anniversary of earth day and a big lesson plan on chlorofluorocarbons and the ozone! Haha I’m glad I was ZFG even as a kid
No, the earth is wobbling on its axis, at the peaks of its wobble it is the warmest/coldest. I've ice Age and warm periods.
Here is a pretty good list of the everchanging global control hoax..and it started in 1895 and hasn't looked back. You'll notice a cycle of going back and forth between the coming ice age and being cooked by the sun. https://710wor.iheart.com/featured/mark-simone/content/2019-10-08-the-list-of-120-years-of-climate-scares-by-scientists/
And now this shit is happening, which makes a guy wonder, are they warming up certain parts of the world just to mess with people and kill them? Probably.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dbZwKX5ERuFz/
very interesting video
I lived through all of those. I remember them saying that we would all get cancer just by being outside due to the big holes in the ozone layer. I believe none of it.
To be fair, I'd say that the chemistry behind both acid-rain (by sulphuric acid precursors) and ozone depletion by freon and other chloro-fluoro-carbons have been well proven.
The ozone is now repairing itself, and we understand how to reduce pollutants to minimize acidification of rain-water.
The overall "settled science" of consistent trends behind global warming/cooling is a farce. Even the original research on atmospheric retention of CO2 wasn't alarming.
Edit: Included a parenthetical in the first sentence.
Ozone depletion is total mythology.
Data shows fluctuations in the ozone layer all the time. Big nothing burger designed to damage American prosperity. Many scientists have shown this . Your opinion of the "settled science" behind global warming should be extended to your opinions on ozone layer depletion. It is related to a trend not to the emission of any chemicals.
When you agree with part of the truth (on global warming) then you spout cabal falsehoods in another part, it makes me think you are a shill trying to sow confusion and get anons to normalize consensus science as a reliable truth.
Reject climate garbage science!
Yep.
This world isn't a set of TRUE or FALSE dogmatic principles.
Are CFCs harmful, and do they cause ozone destruction under controlled, laboratory conditions (which mimic natural conditions)? Yes.
Are there alternative processes for how the atmosphere can heal/damage itself? Yes.
Are CFCs, then, the_sole_cause for ozone damage? No.
Knowing that CFCs are potentially harmful, should we both limit their production and their release into the environment? Yes.
We can limit them, sure. Freon is not necessary at this point in time.
That said, the climate change worshippers could use this argument against you with coal.
You can be prepared with an argument about how greenhouse gases improve plant life, and that the Earth (as well as the Sun) goes through cycles of heating and cooling (as does the sun).
Of course at this point you will only find the truth on random science documentaries that talk about how the sun is in a hot period right now, with no connection to how that affects the planets that receive that radiation.
God's robust, self-regulating Earth exists for man's use, not for worship. We sacrifice the lives and livelihoods of living men on the altar of reducing carbon and chemical emissions that the Lord designed the Earth to serve man's needs.
The kind of logic you are using is EXACTLY the logic the commievationists use to explain climate change. They say, "oh, it's a complicated system of give and take, but we should limit the production and emission of carbon waste from fossil fuels." They say, "look we have lab experiments and we have data". They say all of this.
If your answer made any sense to me, I would believe that NASA's data and conclusions on climate change are equally accurate.
I don’t quite understand the first part you are making.
Just for clarity, are you claiming that man cannot significantly damage or deplete the planet in any meaningful way, because God designed it to serve man?
My view is more nuanced than you give credit.
We are in agreement that this Earth is a wonderful, self-regulating creation from God. Man was granted dominion over all the earth and all creature within the earth [Gen. 1: 28-30].
I accept that the argument (painting with broad strokes) is identical in structure to the climate change argument.
My only argument is that man can (temporarily) upset God's order. In particular: the presence of cats in Australia, radiation in Chernobyl, CFCs in the atmosphere.
Ironically the ozone layer can repair itself without human intervention but we didn't know this at the time which is why the world and DuPont agreed to rein in CFCs.
Thinking we're dumb enough to believe their lies is the stupidest thing they do.
Will add that to my reading collection thanks. Alex Jones was mentioning there were articles in British newspapers in the early 19th century about how the nobles were threatened by America's free market model and how it threatened their existence. We've come full circle and now most of what we've dismantled is back in the form of other businesses heavily controlled and regulated.
https://archive.org/details/progressprivileg0000tuck
Looks like it's available on Archive.org to borrow. I may try this.
Liberals have been pushing all sorts of bullshit end of the work scenarios ever since Marxism started to spread. You can find articles in the early 1900s where some pinko prick is whining about industrialization harming the environment to the point where some kind of catastrophe is going occur soon. They usually like to predict things 20 years out or thereabouts, so I'm sure the world was going to end in 1930 in those articles.
I just saw an article from 1989 that claimed we were going to have massive problems starting in 2000. Even the Prophet Algore in the Church of Liberalism claimed that things were going to be irreversible by 2015 or so yet they're still out there claiming they can change things IF we simply remove individual liberty from everyone but the elites. It is all weapons grade BULLSHIT.
If you want to see how much your typical communist cares about the environment, read up on how well the USSR and their "friendly (by force) neighbors" treated their part of the planet. Hell, you can get a feel for their concerns based on the level of smog you hear about in the big Chinese cities.
Anytime you see them pushing some kind of environmental catastrophe, it's an attack on free enterprise economics. Communists and their idiot, white liberal supporters don't care about any environmental solutions that involve liberty. They simply want to control how you live so that you don't interfere with their life of luxury. They are selfish scum.
trillions
90s kids: Captain Planet, Bill Nye, D.A.R.E. All lies.
This is all true but Bill Nye in the 90s did discuss actual science back then. Current Bill Nye is a social engineered train wreck.
Just another DS/MSM hoax (one of many).
HOW are we all still here???? ;-)
I'm old enough to remember being taught the world's oil reserves would be depleted by 2030... Little unknow fact that is not taught in schools: the earth replenishes and makes oil...
Treaty of Rome..... 1969
WWG1WGA
State of Fear by Michael Crichton.
well the theory I've seen floated around is that large corporations are creating environmental damage (not necessarily "climate change") and then turning around and saying we need leftist government to fix such problems
instead maybe there is real environmental damage but we could voluntarily deal with it without having to have a big government to police things (pollution for example in libertarian thought has been thought to be a violation of property rights at times)
Did anyone else read acid rain in the purple rain song voice? Surely it wasn't just me
I was born in the 80s and remember "learning" about all of these hoaxes during school. I guess back then it was harder to get everyone on the same page of what hoax to push that decade. In college they were all pretty much on the "global warming" hoax.
Pre internet. It was harder for them to coordinate the distribution of misinformation to us peons. Imagine using snail mail and in person meetings to plot and plan. I remember how impactful fax machines were to getting things the same day vs three or more mail days.
This isn't weather related but Y2K was another
I started listening to a youtube vid last night, about something, and the guy actually said that because of Global Warming, now Malaria was even found in Alaska.
My comment with links was to the outbreaks of Malaria in Norway, above the Arctic Circle back in early 20th century, and calling him out for lying about the ClimateHoax.
Fear mongering at its finest!
Almost like it's been planned . . .
Correction: it was global warming in the 90s too.
I had enough of the same crap shoved down my throat that Greta did to remember, sadly.