If Arizona decertifies, Biden is no longer the president of the UNITED States.
He becomes a walking constitutional crisis.
Decertification needs to happen as soon as possible.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (110)
sorted by:
This is correct. Congress cannot certify until all states have certified.
So, what happens when a state decertifies? We're gonna find out.
Devolution. The government is incapacitated, and the military must act.
Especially when foreign interference proven...Iβm totally on board the devolution train. Nothing else really makes sense at this point. Although I wonder if they are waiting for mass US protests like in Europe before the reveal. This is what concerns me...
What about the pedo that just resigned?
Thatβs been bugging me for days the way it played out. I think itβs possible he was controlled by white hats and was sniffed out. He wasnβt big enough to move coverage but he was a yes or no vote. Now they can move in someone who theoretically isnβt diddling kids and the Dems control that vote.
We think we got a win. Iβm not so sure.
Patel Patriot theorized in his devolution series that Trump used a Presidential Executive Action Document (PEAD) to suspend counting the EVs sometime prior to the Jan 6th Joint Session of Congress. There are no instructions in the Constitution for rectifying a stolen election. If the votes were never actually certified, however, there is no need to decertify them as audit results are revealed.
It also means Trump has been in power the entire time.
This would verify the meaning of "enjoy the show".
Yes! Now the only question is whether a president has the power to suspend the counting or not. The count seems to have occurred, but who knows
"We're in territory we've never been in before"
There is a first time for everything. When a law has no precedent, it called a Case of First Impression.
To adopt the most persuasive rule of law, courts will look to various sources for guidance. These sources include:
It seems to me that because at least 15 other election have been thrown out due to election fraud, mainly absentee vote fraud, that the court could draw some conclusion under "the law in other jurisdictions"
Since it is our Custom that those who commit fraud, not benefit from their crime, that seems like it could give weight to overturning election too.
Lastly Legislative History and Intent would be applicable. It certainly was not the intent of law to allow for voting machine companies, in league with foreign countries to run algorithms to swap votes.
And there's going to be different opinions and interpretations from people on our side. I've already seen the arguing.
unzips
Soon please!
Sooooo Were we go as one we must go all???πππππ
I, for one, great appreciated your comment