Yea man, the cabal injected these bullshit rabbit holes in with truther communities and now, someone may have 95% good info to put out, but they also bought the 5% bullshit and intertwined it with the 95%. Now it's way harder to reach anybody new using their content
Idk why people are so blind to nasa. They lie about everything amd people just gobble up their cgi like it's real or some shit. Same with SpaceX. All fake.
You realize nasa fakes just about everything.... right? They have a grand total of Zero actual photographs from space. I repeat, zero, actual photos from space.
Amen. That is the one and only purpose of “flat earth” nonsense - insert it in anywhere and everything else around it instantly becomes lunacy by association,
Fortunately, for whatever reason, the flat-earthers, and “Med Bed”ders, and time-travel discredit efforts that were so prevalent around here 6 months ago have more or less evaporated.
If they return, know both that a) they’re full of sht, and b) they know full well they’re full of sht.
With "flat earth" there are levels of complexity and half truth. You are suppose to ridicule anyone who is even willing to consider or debate it. Why? Lotsa wild theories about all kinds of things. Why is FL so singled out? The reason is, if you look into the issues raised seriously, you have to do certain things. There are biblical references argued. To argue for or against, you will have to read your bible** . You will have to brush up on your math, geometry, geography, world history, physics. You will have to question all things NASA and much of the standard model. Might actually find yourself out in the field testing lasers and balloons yourself. It never was about flat vs globe vs oblate spheroid vs hologram vs back of a turtle...someone just doesn't want you doing all that stuff.
The sphericity of the Earth was known by the 3rd century BC (Eratosthenes), so it is ridiculous to give "flat Earth" arguments any credence or consideration. There is no "half-truth" involved, just sheer ignorance. Those who cannot easily demolish the spurious "flat-Earth" arguments should be ashamed of their own lack of education.
The account from Moses dates from the end of the Bronze Age, and is not intended to be detailed astronomical or other exposition. God was not explaining the universe we know to someone who could understand it. There are hints of a rotating whole Earth in the Book of Job (7th-4th centuries BC).
Hmmm...Let me get out my bible and re read that. You make my point. "God was not explaining the universe we know to someone who could understand it." So,...it was a half truth, depending on context. My point was that it isn't about flat/globe. Someone doesn't want people asking questions and checking things out for themselves, reading the bible, science and history...old maps. What are your thoughts on NASA? Space program all legit? Big Bang? Is the science of virology bogus? Does mind control only work on other people? Are their really "bloodline families"? Frankly, anyone even debating anything contrary to the official narrative should be ashamed of their lack of education.
You are mixing a controversy salad. I will comment on NASA. The space program is legit. We went to the Moon as advertised. After that, the German influence was fired out of the organization and the visionary leadership was replaced by bureaucratic survival, leading us to dead-end programs like the Shuttle and International Space Station (and the search for extraterrestrial life). Stay tuned for the ignominious demise of the Space Launch System, as SpaceX takes the lead.
If one is going to debate, it is folly not to be fully prepared to win. Sometimes, the official narrative is correct, and one has to be able to know when that happens. Murky suspicion is just a recipe for conspicuous failure.
I question the legitimacy of NASA. Went to the moon? Yes. Faked most of what was shown to the public? Yes Any idea why all of a sudden there was a big race to get to the moon? What was suddenly so urgent that we had to go get rocks and set up seismographs? For a very long time the scientific community considered nova events to be the death of a star. Now we suspect a star may well nova many times in it's live, cyclical. It was long a mystery why we found short half-life radio active material on earths surface. Astronomers spent thousands of hours searching for the remnant's of a very near by super nova (had to be very close) to no avail. Turns out it wasn't a super nova at all. Rather, a reoccurring micro-nova...and the star doing it was way closer than we had hoped to discover. Apollo confirmed this.
Wasn't there a video called something like: "How to Create a Mind Slave Using a Stun Gun" produced by NASA in Jon Benet Ramsey's father's office? Yeah, I question the legitimacy too.
You just need to read your history. 1961 and Gagarin is the first man in space, when the world seemed to be balanced between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Kennedy threw down the gauntlet and it was an honest-to-God race that we won. And what are you going to do when you get there? Just walk around and take selfies? There were legitimate scientific questions to answer, some of them necessary before the landing in order to provide information about the stability of the surface.
Read history. Hmmm... A few years before Gagarin. Do you remember "The International Geophysical Year"? 18 month period from mid '57 to 12/31/58. Interesting piece of history there. Prolly by dumb luck we were perfectly positioned to observe the "The Storm". February 9-12, 1958, the Sun-Earth system was seized by an extraordinary event of "space weather" (pretty much where the term came from) It didn't start as competition. Started as cooperation, and with a sense of urgency. Russia launched Sputnik. Second launce was Latka the dog. Third launch,...well, it went to the moon, and all the way around the moon photographing the front and photographing the back. Stark difference that raised many hairs. The race was on, and more urgent than ever. We didn't retrieve rocks because we were tired of selfies and cruising the dune buggy. It's what we went for. We also sent missions to map the gravitational anomalies. (the moon doesn't have a gravitational "center") We also set up seismometers (had planned a nuke detonation but ended up just jettisoning landers) as well as attempting, unsuccessfully, to get a sample of the "lunar shell" below the surface debris. We haven't been back because we found what we went to find.
I would say you are full of bunk. Look up the entry under his name in the 1959 edition of Collier's Encyclopedia. (I happen to have a copy. Read all about it, and learn to spell his name correctly.)
My bad. I've been reading so much lately I got dates confused. I'm pretty sure pythagoras is made up though. There was some weird mathematic based religion and that's all they know for sure. Pythagoras was more than likely a group of men not just 1 man.
My bad, I meant Pythagoras wasn't ever mentioned in books until the 1980s. Ertosthenis' experiment didn't prove anything though. I've never in my life seen parallel sun rays so idk how his stick shadow experiment proved anything except sun rays come in at different angles depending on your location relative to the sun's position in the sky.
Odds are if you've seen anything flat earth it's probably controlled opposition. Anything from the flat earth society is complete nonsense. Even Obama dropped the name a half dozen times in speeches over his presidency to send people down the wrong path. Why would they do that? I don't think anything should be completely discounted. After all there are zero proofs the earth is a globe either.
Please keep in mind, the "flat earth society" is a spoof organization. They exist simply to make the idea look foolish, and they have succeeded, apparently, in the minds of otherwise reasonable and conscientious GAW users. This being a research space, I would think GAW users would be able to recognize that more readily for what it is...
Anyone who actually does some real research on this subject will discover that there are questions about our world that the current globe model cannot answer.
I don't think I know anyone who has gone down that rabbit hole and come out convinced the earth was flat. They do come back much better informed in many areas, with eyes opened to layers of lies and deception and forever skeptical.
How many lies does it take before we just quit believing someone? Look at the connections between the heliocentric model and the freemasons. Did you know according to the ball model we travel around the sun at 66,600 mph? Interesting number they came up with.
And that my friend is why everything FL is ridiculed. Has NOTHING to do with the shape of the earth and EVERYTHING to do with an entire history of fraud and deception one will discover if they bother to look.
100%. It sucks that they use otherwise based pedes to spread this poison but it is a mental virus, so that's how it goes. We <3 you Flat earther pedes. But you're spreading bullshit
Yeah the flat earth thing is dumb, but I never really understood why Discovery Channel faked a very easy experiment on TV to show earth was round.... yet they did it.
There is 100% something secret about the nature of our reality they don't want us to know.
I am beginning to think that the big secret is that humanity is a lot older, there was a pre-flood global civilization that was evil (think "in the days of Noah"), and there are remains of black people under the ice in Antarctica from when the continent was joined up with Africa and Australia.
I actually agree with this a lot. Why does every depiction of pre flood days have to be medieval like? Just because people lived in a medieval era when they imagined it. But, with how evil and global our society is now, I wouldn't be surprised if the civilization was closer to our modern society than barbarians. Same goes for the Tower of Babel, have you seen some of the proposed skyscrapers today that look like the Tower of Babel? I think they call them arcology or something.
The main rebuttal I have always heard is "well where are their ruins?" Considering we don't build things to last anymore, and considering that there have been billions of years of complex life on Earth (the Dinosaurs only go back 60 million years) it seems perfectly reasonable that a corrupt society back then ignored God and didn't make it hard for God to wipe them out since they probably also built cheap buildings. How do we know Noah's Ark wasn't a spaceship?
If we don't trust the Bible is the infallible Word of God, we don't.
With that being said, here's an interesting video about Noah's Ark (and also points out the part that was censored on the actual documentary as aired)-
https://youtu.be/1O8wGjwyS7o
Keep in mind the Ark would not leak like the scientist claims it would if it was sealed on both the inside and outside with pitch.
Genesis 6:14
Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
I think it's silly and unconscionable that GAW folks, who claim to be for research and answering all the crazy and insane questions about our political world, the cabal, Jesuits, demons, etc, will not give this question the time of day.
Someone doesn't want us knowing the truth about where we are (earth), and it seems to me that GAW pedes would jump on that challenge and start making sense of it the way we have every other crazy and improbable thing.
But, no. No research, no questioning. Closed minds and tripe pronouncents is what we get instead: "flat earth stuff is dumb" "flat earthers make us look foolish" "zero credibility" blah blah blah. If you're not exploring the question, and you claim the "foolishness/zero credibility" bit then you're being intellectually dishonest.
This subject was my red pill moment, and some of you poopoo this in a really uneducated and disingenuous way. Not saying we need to use this as a red pill for others, but we can't be here talking about cabals, Moloch, demons, CCP ownership of America, foreign occupying entities, the US CORP, etc, while having a closed mind. It's not genuine. Discernment and maturity are key.
This idea is intertwined with everything else, and the reasons behind it are the same as what we're investigating in our politics today. The cabal playbook hasn't changed in 500 years. This is the OG psy-op, and The District of Columbia is a relatively new monument to it. Research who Columbia is/was, what her real name was, who she was married to, and what she believed. Will raise some eyebrows that our "capital" is named for her.
What the cabal/lefties have is patience and commitment to their mission. Enough to introduce a radical idea ~500 years ago, and strategically reinforce it until it has gradually displaced God/creation in society's thinking and only the globe has "credibility". Some of us here have their hair on fire because the Audit results might be delayed a couple weeks. These same types blast this idea as dumb, because they have too narrow a view of what we're up against. Our enemy is at least several thousand years old, and the DS is loyal to THAT entity. They use EVERYTHING for their purposes. Modern society has not changed that, just their means of communicating. Expand your thinking folks.
The globe earth is a theory, just like the flat earth is a theory, and some experiments can be conducted that lead to some interesting findings, repeatable and objective, like science should be. It may not be flat, but it's at least way bigger than we've been told. Someone knows the truth of it, and we're not allowed to know that truth. Antarctica Treaty, anyone?
Yea man, the cabal injected these bullshit rabbit holes in with truther communities and now, someone may have 95% good info to put out, but they also bought the 5% bullshit and intertwined it with the 95%. Now it's way harder to reach anybody new using their content
You should have edited the video first.
Idk why people are so blind to nasa. They lie about everything amd people just gobble up their cgi like it's real or some shit. Same with SpaceX. All fake.
People are emotionally attached to the NASA narrative as children.
You realize nasa fakes just about everything.... right? They have a grand total of Zero actual photographs from space. I repeat, zero, actual photos from space.
I think they claim to have one. All the rest they admit are paintings/computer graphics.
The one the claim is real is from the moon landings, but those were fake too so they have none lol.
Rat poison is 99% good food.
Agreed. I've always suspected that the recent incarnation of the flat earth movement was seeded by intel agencies as a means of poisoning the well.
Amen. That is the one and only purpose of “flat earth” nonsense - insert it in anywhere and everything else around it instantly becomes lunacy by association,
Fortunately, for whatever reason, the flat-earthers, and “Med Bed”ders, and time-travel discredit efforts that were so prevalent around here 6 months ago have more or less evaporated.
If they return, know both that a) they’re full of sht, and b) they know full well they’re full of sht.
With "flat earth" there are levels of complexity and half truth. You are suppose to ridicule anyone who is even willing to consider or debate it. Why? Lotsa wild theories about all kinds of things. Why is FL so singled out? The reason is, if you look into the issues raised seriously, you have to do certain things. There are biblical references argued. To argue for or against, you will have to read your bible** . You will have to brush up on your math, geometry, geography, world history, physics. You will have to question all things NASA and much of the standard model. Might actually find yourself out in the field testing lasers and balloons yourself. It never was about flat vs globe vs oblate spheroid vs hologram vs back of a turtle...someone just doesn't want you doing all that stuff.
The sphericity of the Earth was known by the 3rd century BC (Eratosthenes), so it is ridiculous to give "flat Earth" arguments any credence or consideration. There is no "half-truth" involved, just sheer ignorance. Those who cannot easily demolish the spurious "flat-Earth" arguments should be ashamed of their own lack of education.
The account from Moses dates from the end of the Bronze Age, and is not intended to be detailed astronomical or other exposition. God was not explaining the universe we know to someone who could understand it. There are hints of a rotating whole Earth in the Book of Job (7th-4th centuries BC).
Hmmm...Let me get out my bible and re read that. You make my point. "God was not explaining the universe we know to someone who could understand it." So,...it was a half truth, depending on context. My point was that it isn't about flat/globe. Someone doesn't want people asking questions and checking things out for themselves, reading the bible, science and history...old maps. What are your thoughts on NASA? Space program all legit? Big Bang? Is the science of virology bogus? Does mind control only work on other people? Are their really "bloodline families"? Frankly, anyone even debating anything contrary to the official narrative should be ashamed of their lack of education.
You are mixing a controversy salad. I will comment on NASA. The space program is legit. We went to the Moon as advertised. After that, the German influence was fired out of the organization and the visionary leadership was replaced by bureaucratic survival, leading us to dead-end programs like the Shuttle and International Space Station (and the search for extraterrestrial life). Stay tuned for the ignominious demise of the Space Launch System, as SpaceX takes the lead.
If one is going to debate, it is folly not to be fully prepared to win. Sometimes, the official narrative is correct, and one has to be able to know when that happens. Murky suspicion is just a recipe for conspicuous failure.
I question the legitimacy of NASA. Went to the moon? Yes. Faked most of what was shown to the public? Yes Any idea why all of a sudden there was a big race to get to the moon? What was suddenly so urgent that we had to go get rocks and set up seismographs? For a very long time the scientific community considered nova events to be the death of a star. Now we suspect a star may well nova many times in it's live, cyclical. It was long a mystery why we found short half-life radio active material on earths surface. Astronomers spent thousands of hours searching for the remnant's of a very near by super nova (had to be very close) to no avail. Turns out it wasn't a super nova at all. Rather, a reoccurring micro-nova...and the star doing it was way closer than we had hoped to discover. Apollo confirmed this.
Wasn't there a video called something like: "How to Create a Mind Slave Using a Stun Gun" produced by NASA in Jon Benet Ramsey's father's office? Yeah, I question the legitimacy too.
You just need to read your history. 1961 and Gagarin is the first man in space, when the world seemed to be balanced between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. Kennedy threw down the gauntlet and it was an honest-to-God race that we won. And what are you going to do when you get there? Just walk around and take selfies? There were legitimate scientific questions to answer, some of them necessary before the landing in order to provide information about the stability of the surface.
Read history. Hmmm... A few years before Gagarin. Do you remember "The International Geophysical Year"? 18 month period from mid '57 to 12/31/58. Interesting piece of history there. Prolly by dumb luck we were perfectly positioned to observe the "The Storm". February 9-12, 1958, the Sun-Earth system was seized by an extraordinary event of "space weather" (pretty much where the term came from) It didn't start as competition. Started as cooperation, and with a sense of urgency. Russia launched Sputnik. Second launce was Latka the dog. Third launch,...well, it went to the moon, and all the way around the moon photographing the front and photographing the back. Stark difference that raised many hairs. The race was on, and more urgent than ever. We didn't retrieve rocks because we were tired of selfies and cruising the dune buggy. It's what we went for. We also sent missions to map the gravitational anomalies. (the moon doesn't have a gravitational "center") We also set up seismometers (had planned a nuke detonation but ended up just jettisoning landers) as well as attempting, unsuccessfully, to get a sample of the "lunar shell" below the surface debris. We haven't been back because we found what we went to find.
What if I told you he was never seen in text books until the 1980s. Eratosthenis that is.
I would say you are full of bunk. Look up the entry under his name in the 1959 edition of Collier's Encyclopedia. (I happen to have a copy. Read all about it, and learn to spell his name correctly.)
My bad. I've been reading so much lately I got dates confused. I'm pretty sure pythagoras is made up though. There was some weird mathematic based religion and that's all they know for sure. Pythagoras was more than likely a group of men not just 1 man.
My bad, I meant Pythagoras wasn't ever mentioned in books until the 1980s. Ertosthenis' experiment didn't prove anything though. I've never in my life seen parallel sun rays so idk how his stick shadow experiment proved anything except sun rays come in at different angles depending on your location relative to the sun's position in the sky.
Odds are if you've seen anything flat earth it's probably controlled opposition. Anything from the flat earth society is complete nonsense. Even Obama dropped the name a half dozen times in speeches over his presidency to send people down the wrong path. Why would they do that? I don't think anything should be completely discounted. After all there are zero proofs the earth is a globe either.
Please keep in mind, the "flat earth society" is a spoof organization. They exist simply to make the idea look foolish, and they have succeeded, apparently, in the minds of otherwise reasonable and conscientious GAW users. This being a research space, I would think GAW users would be able to recognize that more readily for what it is...
Anyone who actually does some real research on this subject will discover that there are questions about our world that the current globe model cannot answer.
Oh yeah I'm fully aware that the flat earth society is controlled opposition. Not everyone else though lol
I don't think I know anyone who has gone down that rabbit hole and come out convinced the earth was flat. They do come back much better informed in many areas, with eyes opened to layers of lies and deception and forever skeptical.
How many lies does it take before we just quit believing someone? Look at the connections between the heliocentric model and the freemasons. Did you know according to the ball model we travel around the sun at 66,600 mph? Interesting number they came up with.
And that my friend is why everything FL is ridiculed. Has NOTHING to do with the shape of the earth and EVERYTHING to do with an entire history of fraud and deception one will discover if they bother to look.
Exactly, the shape doesn't matter, it's the lies. They're hiding the fact that this earth was created from intelligent design.
Bingo!
100%. It sucks that they use otherwise based pedes to spread this poison but it is a mental virus, so that's how it goes. We <3 you Flat earther pedes. But you're spreading bullshit
Yeah the flat earth thing is dumb, but I never really understood why Discovery Channel faked a very easy experiment on TV to show earth was round.... yet they did it.
There is 100% something secret about the nature of our reality they don't want us to know.
I am beginning to think that the big secret is that humanity is a lot older, there was a pre-flood global civilization that was evil (think "in the days of Noah"), and there are remains of black people under the ice in Antarctica from when the continent was joined up with Africa and Australia.
I actually agree with this a lot. Why does every depiction of pre flood days have to be medieval like? Just because people lived in a medieval era when they imagined it. But, with how evil and global our society is now, I wouldn't be surprised if the civilization was closer to our modern society than barbarians. Same goes for the Tower of Babel, have you seen some of the proposed skyscrapers today that look like the Tower of Babel? I think they call them arcology or something.
The main rebuttal I have always heard is "well where are their ruins?" Considering we don't build things to last anymore, and considering that there have been billions of years of complex life on Earth (the Dinosaurs only go back 60 million years) it seems perfectly reasonable that a corrupt society back then ignored God and didn't make it hard for God to wipe them out since they probably also built cheap buildings. How do we know Noah's Ark wasn't a spaceship?
If we don't trust the Bible is the infallible Word of God, we don't.
With that being said, here's an interesting video about Noah's Ark (and also points out the part that was censored on the actual documentary as aired)- https://youtu.be/1O8wGjwyS7o
Keep in mind the Ark would not leak like the scientist claims it would if it was sealed on both the inside and outside with pitch.
Genesis 6:14
Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.
What was the video you were showing him?
https://youtu.be/kXRaUuNVFec
I think it's silly and unconscionable that GAW folks, who claim to be for research and answering all the crazy and insane questions about our political world, the cabal, Jesuits, demons, etc, will not give this question the time of day.
Someone doesn't want us knowing the truth about where we are (earth), and it seems to me that GAW pedes would jump on that challenge and start making sense of it the way we have every other crazy and improbable thing.
But, no. No research, no questioning. Closed minds and tripe pronouncents is what we get instead: "flat earth stuff is dumb" "flat earthers make us look foolish" "zero credibility" blah blah blah. If you're not exploring the question, and you claim the "foolishness/zero credibility" bit then you're being intellectually dishonest.
This subject was my red pill moment, and some of you poopoo this in a really uneducated and disingenuous way. Not saying we need to use this as a red pill for others, but we can't be here talking about cabals, Moloch, demons, CCP ownership of America, foreign occupying entities, the US CORP, etc, while having a closed mind. It's not genuine. Discernment and maturity are key.
This idea is intertwined with everything else, and the reasons behind it are the same as what we're investigating in our politics today. The cabal playbook hasn't changed in 500 years. This is the OG psy-op, and The District of Columbia is a relatively new monument to it. Research who Columbia is/was, what her real name was, who she was married to, and what she believed. Will raise some eyebrows that our "capital" is named for her.
What the cabal/lefties have is patience and commitment to their mission. Enough to introduce a radical idea ~500 years ago, and strategically reinforce it until it has gradually displaced God/creation in society's thinking and only the globe has "credibility". Some of us here have their hair on fire because the Audit results might be delayed a couple weeks. These same types blast this idea as dumb, because they have too narrow a view of what we're up against. Our enemy is at least several thousand years old, and the DS is loyal to THAT entity. They use EVERYTHING for their purposes. Modern society has not changed that, just their means of communicating. Expand your thinking folks.
The globe earth is a theory, just like the flat earth is a theory, and some experiments can be conducted that lead to some interesting findings, repeatable and objective, like science should be. It may not be flat, but it's at least way bigger than we've been told. Someone knows the truth of it, and we're not allowed to know that truth. Antarctica Treaty, anyone?
Researched it. Did my best to keep an open mind and tried to play devil's advocate. Still makes us look dumb.