It's an automated feed from a computer, so not likely there would be any human involvement.
But if the claim is true, then it should be super easy to prove: just show us where the exact same number was added back, live on TV, like the number that was subtracted, live on TV.
“While the ‘No’ vote was entered correctly at 11:19ET, the ‘Yes’ vote that appeared for 2 minutes on CNN was actually the ‘total’ vote of the combined ballots for Yes/No/ Santa Clara,” Farbman said in an email. “This error was entered at 11:19pm ET and corrected 2 minutes later at 11:21pm ET when we deleted the “total vote” in for ‘Yes’ and entered the correct ‘Yes’ vote.”
So yeah, it appears that the numbers were overinflated accidentally, and the drop in the numbers was the correction. Should have been x for no, and y for yes, but for two minutes, they accidentally showed x+y for yes, instead of just y.
Show me one time a "mistake" like this has ever been favorable to a Republican and maybe I'll give this the time of day. Every single time I've seen this happen it's favorable to Democrats. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Perhaps you're too young to remember George Bush winning a Presidency in a hotly-contested election that likely had some significant irregularities. That definitely went the GOP's way.
You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
Best you can come up with for an example is over 20 years old and you can't even point out a specific irregularity, just "likely had" them. Pretty convincing, got me there bud. I'm a believer. /s
Oh, I have no intention of convincing you of anything. I’m not here to change minds. Just to understand how your minds are made up in the way they have been.
It's the null hypothesis. In order to advance another, you would need to demonstrate why their explanation is likely impossible or being mischaracterized.
It's not my excuse. It's theirs. But in a sense, yes, I do accept that humans are human and sometimes make simple mistakes. I've caught enough typos in your own posts to believe that you are human. I am human. They are human. We all make mistakes. Nothing to be ashamed of.
I understand why the world would be considerably more suspicious if you assume that your enemies and allies alike are machines whose behavior is compelled via a perfectly-tuned algorithm toward their objectives. I do not believe the world to work that way.
But I think it's a given that you and I don't quite see reality from the same perspective. So this should not be particularly shocking news to you that one of us is being fooled by our perceptions.
I'm not saying it's "acceptable." I'm saying that I do accept that it happens. What should the consequences be? I honestly don't care. That's not the kind of question I'm here to discuss.
But this is sort of a common theme for you guys.
It would be "unacceptable" for the military to perform a major ceremony in a way that Q people feel violates their expectations of how that ceremony is supposed to go. Or how they choose to handle problems. Or how they choose to wear their uniform.
But the mere fact that your interpretation of how things SHOULD be isn't mandating that reality actually works that way.
In reality, the military is largely made up of teenagers and young adults, some of whom are not even really interested in much more than getting college paid for or who did not feel mature enough to live on their own post-school without a structured life and use the military to grow up a bit.
So while you would find it "unacceptable" that the military is NOT the perfectly-tuned machine their commercials claim them to be, those of us with some experience find it hilarious that anyone here could expect the military to even properly clean a barracks "to standards", let alone carry out a Plan with the complexity that would be necessary for the Q stuff to still be active and secret at this point.
The military commercials will obviously show them being Super Awesome All the Time. But I don't believe propaganda. For someone who chastises me (mistakenly) about watching too much television, I would expect you to hold that same value.
Hell, you'd be lucky to find perfect haircut compliance in any unit that has more than a year out of basic.
Yes, I think people are human. I don't entertain a fantasy notion of reality in which Important People and People Doing Important Things are immune from mistakes. You guys watch like hawks, and will see those mistakes and variations and judgement calls, and assume it's part of a Plan, either black or white, rather than just humans being human.
I have enough experience with Important People (such as the military) to know that sometimes people are both chaotic and subject to the whims of chaos, and I'm apparently more comfortable with that than you are.
Was it human error that a lot of people who showed up to vote were turned away because they were told they already voted when they didn’t? Is there going to be a fact check on that one, too?
Humans arent even touching the data, it gets sent over to them from the election management system. There is no "human error" when showing tracked data.
If it is true, it’s amazing how they catch an error that helps Patriots in 2 minutes but errors that help Dems need to be called out publicly before they do anything about them (if they do anything).
Fucking total 100% pure uncut bullshit. Errors ALWAYS benefit the dems never anyone else. FYI this Calf election was watched a lot closer than anyone even knows. Right Newsom? He knows he lost and is shitting his pants over it being exposed in real time.
That's gotta be the funniest thing I've seen this year. To get caught red handed, offer a shitty excuse and then post a link about where to get the facts. The delusion is out of this world.
only the yes votes changed. and they only went down. when i count things the number gets bigger. i didn't know they did negative voting in california. must be that common core math.
“Fact checked and fixed” by the infiltrated media and counters that where around during the 2020 election. Yep I totally believe this “fix” without a full forensic audit. I call BS! Forensic Audit the shit now to be sure!!
That's called "you caught us" and were scrambling with excuses. Don't look over here look over there. Notice how the "errors" only ever happen in on direction? Nuff said.
All the errors are one-way. I don't believe this for one second.
This is absolute BS. There is no guy entering the numbers.
The votes coming in come in via a feed. They just inject them into their report live like any other internet feed. It refreshes, new numbers.
Someone pulled the USB stick out too soon
Was just going to add this.
It's absolutely flabbergasting how stupid they think we are.
It's an automated feed from a computer, so not likely there would be any human involvement.
But if the claim is true, then it should be super easy to prove: just show us where the exact same number was added back, live on TV, like the number that was subtracted, live on TV.
Just making the claim in a tweet means nothing.
Unless the number added was what was incorrect. In which case, removing it was the correction.
Well then, it would not have been "an error that was solved within 2 minutes."
Why not? Fat-finger a number, then remove the number.
Here's the actual source of the story from the above screenshot:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-537000968712
So yeah, it appears that the numbers were overinflated accidentally, and the drop in the numbers was the correction. Should have been x for no, and y for yes, but for two minutes, they accidentally showed x+y for yes, instead of just y.
Show me one time a "mistake" like this has ever been favorable to a Republican and maybe I'll give this the time of day. Every single time I've seen this happen it's favorable to Democrats. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Perhaps you're too young to remember George Bush winning a Presidency in a hotly-contested election that likely had some significant irregularities. That definitely went the GOP's way.
You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
Best you can come up with for an example is over 20 years old and you can't even point out a specific irregularity, just "likely had" them. Pretty convincing, got me there bud. I'm a believer. /s
Oh, I have no intention of convincing you of anything. I’m not here to change minds. Just to understand how your minds are made up in the way they have been.
That’s making the assumption that RINO Bush and the GOP were good! Bush winning was still communism winning, regardless if it was Bush or Gore.
How about it goes the way of the communist every time? That seems the most accurate, to me.
Eh, you and I are going to disagree on what actually constitutes a "communist." Do you just want to stick with anti-Trumper or something?
It's the null hypothesis. In order to advance another, you would need to demonstrate why their explanation is likely impossible or being mischaracterized.
It's not my excuse. It's theirs. But in a sense, yes, I do accept that humans are human and sometimes make simple mistakes. I've caught enough typos in your own posts to believe that you are human. I am human. They are human. We all make mistakes. Nothing to be ashamed of.
I understand why the world would be considerably more suspicious if you assume that your enemies and allies alike are machines whose behavior is compelled via a perfectly-tuned algorithm toward their objectives. I do not believe the world to work that way.
Well, it detaches from what YOU consider reality.
But I think it's a given that you and I don't quite see reality from the same perspective. So this should not be particularly shocking news to you that one of us is being fooled by our perceptions.
I'm not saying it's "acceptable." I'm saying that I do accept that it happens. What should the consequences be? I honestly don't care. That's not the kind of question I'm here to discuss.
But this is sort of a common theme for you guys.
It would be "unacceptable" for the military to perform a major ceremony in a way that Q people feel violates their expectations of how that ceremony is supposed to go. Or how they choose to handle problems. Or how they choose to wear their uniform.
But the mere fact that your interpretation of how things SHOULD be isn't mandating that reality actually works that way.
In reality, the military is largely made up of teenagers and young adults, some of whom are not even really interested in much more than getting college paid for or who did not feel mature enough to live on their own post-school without a structured life and use the military to grow up a bit.
So while you would find it "unacceptable" that the military is NOT the perfectly-tuned machine their commercials claim them to be, those of us with some experience find it hilarious that anyone here could expect the military to even properly clean a barracks "to standards", let alone carry out a Plan with the complexity that would be necessary for the Q stuff to still be active and secret at this point.
The military commercials will obviously show them being Super Awesome All the Time. But I don't believe propaganda. For someone who chastises me (mistakenly) about watching too much television, I would expect you to hold that same value.
Hell, you'd be lucky to find perfect haircut compliance in any unit that has more than a year out of basic.
Yes, I think people are human. I don't entertain a fantasy notion of reality in which Important People and People Doing Important Things are immune from mistakes. You guys watch like hawks, and will see those mistakes and variations and judgement calls, and assume it's part of a Plan, either black or white, rather than just humans being human.
I have enough experience with Important People (such as the military) to know that sometimes people are both chaotic and subject to the whims of chaos, and I'm apparently more comfortable with that than you are.
Audit Santa Clara, and validate the data feed.
I replied with the source of the story that the Tweet was referencing. Which was the fact check. Because I check sources.
There is no such thing as fat fingering an API data stream.
AND hang out to dry the moron who did it!
In other words, "never happened".
Seems to be a bunch of election errors these days. I'm sure they are all honest mistakes. Who doesn't get a few million votes wrong from time to time?
I’ve heard this excuse before.
Was it human error that a lot of people who showed up to vote were turned away because they were told they already voted when they didn’t? Is there going to be a fact check on that one, too?
Humans arent even touching the data, it gets sent over to them from the election management system. There is no "human error" when showing tracked data.
If it is true, it’s amazing how they catch an error that helps Patriots in 2 minutes but errors that help Dems need to be called out publicly before they do anything about them (if they do anything).
Yeah, gonna need some proof...
We need to know the name of the guy they fired over this, so we don’t accidentally hire him for something important
how many times will people get fooled by this?
Election fraud is a pretty simple explanation too, and since you are the AP...I'm gonna say I find election fraud more believable.
All propagandists for the commies need to be pit to deaths for their crimes.
RIGHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
oops accidentally deleted 400,000 votes whoopsy!
This stinks to high heaven! Everyone knows California is solid red, and always has been!!!
This is what happens when you cover most of your tracks.
I smell bull 💩.
Haha, they got caught and had to make up a bs story, dumbasses.🙄🤣
The exact same type of "error" happened in every swing state during the presidential election.
Some day we will find the there who did it. We need individuals who pull this shit to lose their anonymity.
Fucking total 100% pure uncut bullshit. Errors ALWAYS benefit the dems never anyone else. FYI this Calf election was watched a lot closer than anyone even knows. Right Newsom? He knows he lost and is shitting his pants over it being exposed in real time.
Horse shit!
Riiiiight.
Yeah, that is how they stole Trump's presidential election also, human error--of 81 million votes!!
That's gotta be the funniest thing I've seen this year. To get caught red handed, offer a shitty excuse and then post a link about where to get the facts. The delusion is out of this world.
only the yes votes changed. and they only went down. when i count things the number gets bigger. i didn't know they did negative voting in california. must be that common core math.
weird, same thing happened in november
They always have excuses that nobody can confirm.
A seven digit error? lol
“Fact checked and fixed” by the infiltrated media and counters that where around during the 2020 election. Yep I totally believe this “fix” without a full forensic audit. I call BS! Forensic Audit the shit now to be sure!!
That's called "you caught us" and were scrambling with excuses. Don't look over here look over there. Notice how the "errors" only ever happen in on direction? Nuff said.
Hahahahaha. "Get the facts" and "AP (Associated Press)" do not belong in the same universe or epoch, let alone in the SAME SENTENCE.
These self-congratulatory idiots should own stock in Pepto Bismol, as they cause more nausea than old pork food poisoning.
Then CNN should come forward on the record.