I don't believe the "debunking." Why would the triangles be black and then colored in white, including the text of the stamp? I don't see how that would happen in any kind of "outlining algorithm." Nothing else on the envelope was outlined. I haven't see anything proving the actual envelopes had black triangles instead of white.
So I see it as a stupid photoshop mistake, just as there were stupid mistakes made on the Obama birth certificate.
I try to keep up and have now read about the "black triangle being outlined" explanation. I believe this "mistake" is to bring attention to the fact that blank and scribbled ballots were stamped as "approved". 5D chess I guess.
Seriously people, its a solid black triangle that has been postprocessed to remove the fill. Look at the bold text, its also had its fill removed. The red triangle up the top has overlapped text because its red.
I wanted this to be a smoking gun, but its just not, and is distracting us from the real fraud
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard. You’re saying that a process taken that not just removed the “fill” as you call it, but left a perfectly clean 5 pixel stroke on the triangle. Just...because? Why would it do that?
Why would it randomly remove the "fill" in bolded text and not in all text? Unless this was done manually and that makes less sense.
This makes me think more that the pre-printed ones were just sloppy and off.
If the fill was a different shade or color, it could be missing in print or scan, but these are solid colors (even the red bold letters don't have a stroke so it would make more sense that they would just uniformly disappear.
It's arbitrary. If it was a vector, maybe, but that would only be true as long as maintained as a vector, meaning never printed or scanned.
If the scanning or processing software set a threshold for removing all shapes and applying a stroke of a certain size, that could make sense but I would expect to see more fill removed elsewhere and this would concern me that the scans were being automatically tampered with and I would not trust the process without a good explanation.
I am no expert on the subject. I remain open to the possibility: Ballot pictures show a solid black triangle. Feel free to call me a fool all you want.
You can’t just grab some random link and think that it applies to anything. This is for Autocad. Nobody would use autocad for layout and printing documents like this. On top of that, the user above said it was a post process. What is described in this link is not a post process but a setting.
If they were printed in China as some fake ballots are suspected of being, this kind of error is not all that unusual. Mainland Chinese shops do not have the same QC that industry does here, and the poorly paid barely fed people on the line don't watch all that closely and probably didn't know the nefarious purposes their product was intended for, so really thought nothing of layer order. This is my supposition based on discussions I've had with Chinese netizens and Western expats in China over the years.
These ballots alone were the smoking gun for me proof positive of a conspiracy to steal the election. It necessarily involves layers of corruption and is indisputably deliberate deception and fraud.
They never anticipated a forensic audit. Their main focus was physical ballot count (including envelopes) to match the number of machine votes.
haHA! Caught ya!
To anyone is thinking this is debunked because the triangle is whited out, it's not. Look at the black triangle on top. The letter overlaps because it's layered on top. This would be expected if it were imprinted on the paper afterwards. On bottom, the letter doesn't overlap because the triangle being stamped on the envelope over-write it, in effect.
To be honest, I don't think they ever believed they would get caught up in a real audit. They never have before and there has been massive fraud before but not in so many states at the same damn time. I'm sure the dems thought "We the people" would just give up because RINOs wouldn't back us. Little do they know we hate the republicans almost as much as we hate them. The few in the republican party that are patriots are the only shining light from our elected officials.
Hussein had the audacity to try and pass off his "birth certificate" as a real document and his minions screwed that up - he was the supposed President of the US. Apparently, the DIMs don't have access to people who know how to do photo editing.
I'm a novice, self-taught photoshopper for turning photos into ad copy or internet item images. It's part of my job. Even I know how important correct sequence image layering is.
^The most extensive vioter fraud operation in hisory* was sloppy. Pulling off fraud of the magnitude took a multi-faceted effort with many operations and too many hands on deck, and they're all under the microscope now.
Sabotage maybe? (i.e. white hat "mistake")
I can see this happening.
Although the simplest explanation, "these people are stupid", is a definite possibility, it is so big of a mistake that it just makes me wonder.
Kind of like everything Biden says and does.
Touché.
Probably a bit from column A and a bit from column B
Payoffs and payouts that's why.
I don't believe the "debunking." Why would the triangles be black and then colored in white, including the text of the stamp? I don't see how that would happen in any kind of "outlining algorithm." Nothing else on the envelope was outlined. I haven't see anything proving the actual envelopes had black triangles instead of white.
So I see it as a stupid photoshop mistake, just as there were stupid mistakes made on the Obama birth certificate.
I try to keep up and have now read about the "black triangle being outlined" explanation. I believe this "mistake" is to bring attention to the fact that blank and scribbled ballots were stamped as "approved". 5D chess I guess.
They never expected forensics to be involved in their audits.
Zaklee. It had never happened before.
Yup. They just recounted the same BS ballots
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JvnK3qPjVaQ
If rumble had a decent search feature. I wouldn't have used YouTube. YouTube is asshoe.
These people are stupid
And sloppy.
Because they never expected to have an actual audit be done to check.
These people are as stupid as they are evil.
A whoopsie, damn.
https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/green-ballot-envelope-signature-20201013.jpg
Seriously people, its a solid black triangle that has been postprocessed to remove the fill. Look at the bold text, its also had its fill removed. The red triangle up the top has overlapped text because its red.
I wanted this to be a smoking gun, but its just not, and is distracting us from the real fraud
This is the dumbest explanation I’ve ever heard. You’re saying that a process taken that not just removed the “fill” as you call it, but left a perfectly clean 5 pixel stroke on the triangle. Just...because? Why would it do that?
To save ink when printing...
Why would it randomly remove the "fill" in bolded text and not in all text? Unless this was done manually and that makes less sense.
This makes me think more that the pre-printed ones were just sloppy and off.
If the fill was a different shade or color, it could be missing in print or scan, but these are solid colors (even the red bold letters don't have a stroke so it would make more sense that they would just uniformly disappear.
I assume theres a threshold for what is considered filled shape, and what is considered line
It's arbitrary. If it was a vector, maybe, but that would only be true as long as maintained as a vector, meaning never printed or scanned.
If the scanning or processing software set a threshold for removing all shapes and applying a stroke of a certain size, that could make sense but I would expect to see more fill removed elsewhere and this would concern me that the scans were being automatically tampered with and I would not trust the process without a good explanation.
Looks like everything wider than 2x the stroke to me? The triangles, the "sign within the box" text, the border around the signature box...
Just read another post detailing this. Makes sense.
I have never scanned anything with solid images and have it come out as an outline. You have to be a fool to believe this.
I am no expert on the subject. I remain open to the possibility: Ballot pictures show a solid black triangle. Feel free to call me a fool all you want.
You can’t just grab some random link and think that it applies to anything. This is for Autocad. Nobody would use autocad for layout and printing documents like this. On top of that, the user above said it was a post process. What is described in this link is not a post process but a setting.
If they were printed in China as some fake ballots are suspected of being, this kind of error is not all that unusual. Mainland Chinese shops do not have the same QC that industry does here, and the poorly paid barely fed people on the line don't watch all that closely and probably didn't know the nefarious purposes their product was intended for, so really thought nothing of layer order. This is my supposition based on discussions I've had with Chinese netizens and Western expats in China over the years.
It isn't about them being stupid, it's how stupud they think we are.
This! And they’ve never been held accountable for any crime committed before and think that they’ll get a free pass this time too. 🤷🏼♀️
Maybe someone wanted someone else to get caught?
These ballots alone were the smoking gun for me proof positive of a conspiracy to steal the election. It necessarily involves layers of corruption and is indisputably deliberate deception and fraud.
They never anticipated a forensic audit. Their main focus was physical ballot count (including envelopes) to match the number of machine votes. haHA! Caught ya!
They never thought she would lose....
To anyone is thinking this is debunked because the triangle is whited out, it's not. Look at the black triangle on top. The letter overlaps because it's layered on top. This would be expected if it were imprinted on the paper afterwards. On bottom, the letter doesn't overlap because the triangle being stamped on the envelope over-write it, in effect.
There is no black triangle on top, its red.
https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/green-ballot-envelope-signature-20201013.jpg
These people are stupid
A black arrow. That explains it. I don't recall MY (in a different state) ballot being all white like that.
To be honest, I don't think they ever believed they would get caught up in a real audit. They never have before and there has been massive fraud before but not in so many states at the same damn time. I'm sure the dems thought "We the people" would just give up because RINOs wouldn't back us. Little do they know we hate the republicans almost as much as we hate them. The few in the republican party that are patriots are the only shining light from our elected officials.
LefTard normies weren't bothered by Obama's fake birth certificate... Same type aren't bothered by this.
Sounds about right. Nice explanation.
Chinese graphic artists?
The reddit fag excuse now is that the ballots were in color and the black and white copy got magically messed up
Not my job man. lol
Hussein had the audacity to try and pass off his "birth certificate" as a real document and his minions screwed that up - he was the supposed President of the US. Apparently, the DIMs don't have access to people who know how to do photo editing.
Communists are incompetent.
They don't care because NOTHING will happen to them
Make our Ballots like money.
I'm a novice, self-taught photoshopper for turning photos into ad copy or internet item images. It's part of my job. Even I know how important correct sequence image layering is.
^The most extensive vioter fraud operation in hisory* was sloppy. Pulling off fraud of the magnitude took a multi-faceted effort with many operations and too many hands on deck, and they're all under the microscope now.