Stayed out of the vax race. I remember reading Merck's rational a year and a half ago. They said they would have a cure/ effective treatment for this and all cov and if lucky something for those suffering adverse reactions to the vax.
Same reason we've been joking about Pfizer making Pfizermectin. Same as Ivermectin, but brand name so they can charge $500 a bottle instead of $5 a bottle.
So if Merck makes a patentable drug that is Ivermectin Version 2.0. [Just like Ivermectin but we switched a couple atoms around) and charges higher prices, then they can get some ol'mighty dollar for themselves.
At this point, I might not even be as angry with them as I should be if it stops the vaccines.
Idgas if they make money off of it. If it does the same job of their ivermectin pill it will cure people and put the deadly mRna vaxx out of business and thats what i care about atm because the kid jab mandates are murder.
Great point, nothingberg. Whether "Monupiravir" is safe and effective or actual cyanide, even TRYING to get it approved for COVID will red-pill millions because THAT story will generate chatter and articles about ivermectin, HCQ, quercetin+zinc, and so on. In short, it will help spread the word that the vaccines are totally unnecessary.
And if it DOES get approved, then vax mandates should immediately go away -- there certainly won't be any reason to vaccinate anyone. Of course, that's been true from the start, but after an approved therapeutic for COVID, there won't be any phony OFFICIAL reason for the vax. Well, until [they] manufacture another excuse to inject us with poison.
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.
The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for people 12 through 15, for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised people, and for a single booster dose in people: [more]
I would not get too excited here folks about this drug EIDD-2801. There are huge safety concerns with this drug. Other drugs in this class, like Remdesivir, have been around for some time and were developed to treat other viral infections. Why were they not approved? Because they were shown to have safety concerns and could not meet the challenge of normal FDA approval. EIDD-2801 has been shown to potentially cause genetic damage and could not show it was safe.
Because of all the money being thrown around to develop drugs to treat Covid, many companies blew the dust off their previous failures - like the jabs, under an EUA where they can bypass all the safety studies. This was the case for Remdesivir that was developed to treat Ebola and was a horrific failure. Do not be fooled. They have not done the proper safety studies on this drug either - and what studies have been done, do not look good.
Bright's EIDD-2801 concerns date to November 2019, more than 1 month before China made the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan public. Researchers have intensively studied its active element and found in test tube and animal experiments that it inhibits the replication of a range of RNA viruses, including influenza. EIDD-2801 acts as a defective RNA building block when a virus uses an enzyme known as a polymerase to copy its genome. Remdesivir, the only COVID-19 treatment that so far has worked—albeit modestly—in a careful study, similarly inhibits the viral polymerase.
It would not be unusual for BARDA to consider a drug like EIDD-2801. But Bright notes in his complaint that "similar experimental drugs in this class had been shown to cause reproductive toxicity in animals, and offspring from treated animals had been born without teeth and without parts of their skulls."
Raymond Schinazi, an Emory University chemist who has extensively studied the active ingredient in EIDD-2801 but has no connection to DRIVE, notes that his former pharmaceutical company, Pharmasset, abandoned it in 2003 after discovering its mutagenic properties. Schinazi says the small chemical tweaks made to increase the ingredient's bioavailability and transform it into EIDD-2801 are unlikely to change its mutagenicity. "Thank goodness someone is raising the red flag," about EIDD-2801, Schinazi says. "You don't develop a drug that's mutagenic. Period."
What a crock. We know that Remdesivir causes severe acute kidney damage and pneumonia that has killed many. This drug has even fewer safety studies than Remdesivir. Someone is trying to blow smoke up our ass again. Don't buy it.
We know of very successful and safe treatments for whatever the hell is going around. It is Ivermectin and HCQ, along with various supplements - especially quercetin and zinc. We do not need any more expensive and potentially toxic drugs and jabs. It is not about health, it is about the money.
You are welcome. I just don't want people getting too worked up over possible treatments that offer nothing but toxicity and false hope. We already have treatments. Anything that actually does work, is suppressed because there is no money in it. We have a big problem right now with lots of money being passed around that is fueling this disaster. Lots of piggies lined up at the trough.
No way Merck isn't in on this. My prediction is that they "discover" their med.s help with the vaccine side effects so that it's a 2fer. Get the jab and take your med.s citizens.
an anon leaked that merck was working on a vax and covid cure medicine, not injection, back this early spring. I bought merck stocks then. this is not financial advice.
It will be under EUA just like Remdesivir. That is not the same thing as an FDA approved treatment. Nothing changes, just one more toxic drug in the mix to poison everyone with and make lots of cash for Pharma.
Really? We’re all gonna give love to Merck now? Let Merck make their trillions for the FDA approved treatment when there are other treatments that work? If this gets approved and saves lives the media will love it. Then what you think?
I don't see how this new drug would arrest the vaccine mandates. There would need to be a pill which stops transmission (yeah, like Ivermectin) to provide an alternative to what they say the vaxx does. This one is more like Tamiflu, which has to be taken during the first few days of infection. Big money will be spent seeing the doctors for scripts and then paying for the pills. ( And, a 50% reduction in hospitalization and death is significantly inferior to the 80%+ recoveries of the doctors like McCullough, etc., who use several different drugs to treat different phases of symptoms.)
Stayed out of the vax race. I remember reading Merck's rational a year and a half ago. They said they would have a cure/ effective treatment for this and all cov and if lucky something for those suffering adverse reactions to the vax.
IverMERCKtin
Hahaha
FTW💥👆🏼
I still won't trust any shit out of big pharma and will stick to HCQ and ivermectin.
Yup, I'd trust horse paste over Pharma.
Agreed; at least with horse paste, you know what's in it.
Merck are the owners and producers of Ivermectin..................................
So why invent a new drug that does the same....
There is something that doesn't add up and I can't help but suspect that whitehats are doing the math on this one...
Same reason we've been joking about Pfizer making Pfizermectin. Same as Ivermectin, but brand name so they can charge $500 a bottle instead of $5 a bottle.
So if Merck makes a patentable drug that is Ivermectin Version 2.0. [Just like Ivermectin but we switched a couple atoms around) and charges higher prices, then they can get some ol'mighty dollar for themselves.
At this point, I might not even be as angry with them as I should be if it stops the vaccines.
Idgas if they make money off of it. If it does the same job of their ivermectin pill it will cure people and put the deadly mRna vaxx out of business and thats what i care about atm because the kid jab mandates are murder.
Why?
To get around the media generated stigma of Ivermectin.
To build their single pill as a complete regimen the "independent" testers can't fuck with.
Great point, nothingberg. Whether "Monupiravir" is safe and effective or actual cyanide, even TRYING to get it approved for COVID will red-pill millions because THAT story will generate chatter and articles about ivermectin, HCQ, quercetin+zinc, and so on. In short, it will help spread the word that the vaccines are totally unnecessary.
And if it DOES get approved, then vax mandates should immediately go away -- there certainly won't be any reason to vaccinate anyone. Of course, that's been true from the start, but after an approved therapeutic for COVID, there won't be any phony OFFICIAL reason for the vax. Well, until [they] manufacture another excuse to inject us with poison.
BTW, here's a snip from the FDA Comirnaty approval announcement (bold added):
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.
The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for people 12 through 15, for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised people, and for a single booster dose in people: [more]
I would not get too excited here folks about this drug EIDD-2801. There are huge safety concerns with this drug. Other drugs in this class, like Remdesivir, have been around for some time and were developed to treat other viral infections. Why were they not approved? Because they were shown to have safety concerns and could not meet the challenge of normal FDA approval. EIDD-2801 has been shown to potentially cause genetic damage and could not show it was safe.
Because of all the money being thrown around to develop drugs to treat Covid, many companies blew the dust off their previous failures - like the jabs, under an EUA where they can bypass all the safety studies. This was the case for Remdesivir that was developed to treat Ebola and was a horrific failure. Do not be fooled. They have not done the proper safety studies on this drug either - and what studies have been done, do not look good.
Emails Offer Look Into Whistleblower Charges of Cronyism Behind Potential COVID-19 Drug
What a crock. We know that Remdesivir causes severe acute kidney damage and pneumonia that has killed many. This drug has even fewer safety studies than Remdesivir. Someone is trying to blow smoke up our ass again. Don't buy it.
We know of very successful and safe treatments for whatever the hell is going around. It is Ivermectin and HCQ, along with various supplements - especially quercetin and zinc. We do not need any more expensive and potentially toxic drugs and jabs. It is not about health, it is about the money.
You are welcome. I just don't want people getting too worked up over possible treatments that offer nothing but toxicity and false hope. We already have treatments. Anything that actually does work, is suppressed because there is no money in it. We have a big problem right now with lots of money being passed around that is fueling this disaster. Lots of piggies lined up at the trough.
No way Merck isn't in on this. My prediction is that they "discover" their med.s help with the vaccine side effects so that it's a 2fer. Get the jab and take your med.s citizens.
an anon leaked that merck was working on a vax and covid cure medicine, not injection, back this early spring. I bought merck stocks then. this is not financial advice.
sounds experimental, risky, and possibly irresponsible. just 2 cents.
Hmm 33 you say
He pulled that number out of thin air.
An actual red pill.
So red lol
Please hurry up.........
I guess this is why the push is on in my province to get everyone clot shotted as soon as possible.
Read my post on this thread. It is not the wonder drug some are thinking it is. Experimental and dangerous. Not much different from Remdesivir.
I sure hope you're right. I am with you. Apple flavor is not too bad.
Yea I could not care less, if it gets approved wont the EUA on the clot shots end as there is a treatment.
It will be under EUA just like Remdesivir. That is not the same thing as an FDA approved treatment. Nothing changes, just one more toxic drug in the mix to poison everyone with and make lots of cash for Pharma.
I will stick with safe horse paste lol.
Mmmm.... I like apple flavor.
I thought I ordered the apple, I got plain flavor.
Really? We’re all gonna give love to Merck now? Let Merck make their trillions for the FDA approved treatment when there are other treatments that work? If this gets approved and saves lives the media will love it. Then what you think?
I don't see how this new drug would arrest the vaccine mandates. There would need to be a pill which stops transmission (yeah, like Ivermectin) to provide an alternative to what they say the vaxx does. This one is more like Tamiflu, which has to be taken during the first few days of infection. Big money will be spent seeing the doctors for scripts and then paying for the pills. ( And, a 50% reduction in hospitalization and death is significantly inferior to the 80%+ recoveries of the doctors like McCullough, etc., who use several different drugs to treat different phases of symptoms.)
most in hospital are double clot shotted.
Kind of wondering about CytoDyn as well with Leronlimab.
It was all positive results on their "testing" then all of a sudden, screeching halt when "vaccines" came into play.
Funny that.
I had no idea. Is there a name for this? Please, God. Make this true.