Technically a 17 year old shouldn't be running around with a rifle unsupervised. At least not out in public. BUT... riddle me this...
As the guy says in the OP the supposed narrative is that Kyle was a crazed white supremacist lunatic who went to the BLM protest to murder peaceful protestors... So why did he take a medical kit instead of extra mags. Kyle only had one freaking mag. If things had gotten just a little bit more out of control he would have run out of ammo and been totally screwed.
I think they're referring to the fact that he was 17 and carrying a rifle. I'm not sure the actual law on that other than one had to be 18 to PURCHASE a rifle.
Oh I know and I think he SHOULD have had every right to have used that weapon. I'm just unsure what the legal protocol is supposed to be in that regard.
Was he conceal-carrying? I'd guess he was, and I don't know the laws of Wisconsin and can't be bothered to research, but they could have a case for that.
Edit: Nope, I'm a dum dum. It doesn't look like he was conceal-carrying.
Maybe he walked by a '"gun free zone" sign by accident, lol I dunno. I'm not a lawyer.
AND, it's long past time to start defending our property as well. He sure did have a right to be there. The cops were barricading themselves. During all this time, most cops were standing down. Appalling.
That’s already been proven. He carried the gun LEGALLY. You only have to see the way he has been trained, his respect for the Police in putting his hands up etc. to know that he was well within the law. He was with friends who were defending their businesses and helping them and he was trained in first aid. There is also vid./pics of him cleaning graffiti off the buildings. Any decent parent would be proud of this young man; Anyone that sees this as not self defence, doesn’t deserve to live in America. The guy is a hero.
"Illegally carrying"? Hey, dumbass, we have this little thing called the Second Amendment!
Many of our states don't understand this..try open carrying in some parts of the country.
That is why WE need to take it back along with a lot of other rights and responsibilities that we used to and should have.
Technically a 17 year old shouldn't be running around with a rifle unsupervised. At least not out in public. BUT... riddle me this...
As the guy says in the OP the supposed narrative is that Kyle was a crazed white supremacist lunatic who went to the BLM protest to murder peaceful protestors... So why did he take a medical kit instead of extra mags. Kyle only had one freaking mag. If things had gotten just a little bit more out of control he would have run out of ammo and been totally screwed.
If he didn't bring the rifle and did the same thing, went to the area with a medical kit to help, he would be dead.
But he did and it saved his life on top of him performing better with the gun than many trained people twice his age would have.
We actually don't know what would've happened if he didn't have the rifle, they specifically were chasing him because he had the rifle.
They'd have found someone else to attack. They were all out to fuck shit up that night. They just fucked with the wrong person.
Like an Army medic. Light gun and medical gear.
I think they're referring to the fact that he was 17 and carrying a rifle. I'm not sure the actual law on that other than one had to be 18 to PURCHASE a rifle.
Constitutionally he's eligible to be a part of an armed militia at his age. So..
Oh I know and I think he SHOULD have had every right to have used that weapon. I'm just unsure what the legal protocol is supposed to be in that regard.
Any "legal" protocol is an infringement on the Second Amendment.....null and void crapola.
Kyle needs to head a company or platoon even and head over to Portland
He was eligible to join the service at the time of his actions.
A friend gave him the rifle for self-defense. Purchasing doesn't apply there.
Was he conceal-carrying? I'd guess he was, and I don't know the laws of Wisconsin and can't be bothered to research, but they could have a case for that.
Edit: Nope, I'm a dum dum. It doesn't look like he was conceal-carrying.
Maybe he walked by a '"gun free zone" sign by accident, lol I dunno. I'm not a lawyer.
It's a little hard to conceal what he was carrying.
"Hey there mister, is that a gun in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"
You're right though - I was just trying to think of gun laws that apply to my state, I don't know anything about Wisconsin (other than cheese).
"Maybe he walked by a '"gun free zone" sign by accident" KEK.
2A.....
AND, it's long past time to start defending our property as well. He sure did have a right to be there. The cops were barricading themselves. During all this time, most cops were standing down. Appalling.
Unsure if it was entirely legal as he was 17 at the time.
That’s already been proven. He carried the gun LEGALLY. You only have to see the way he has been trained, his respect for the Police in putting his hands up etc. to know that he was well within the law. He was with friends who were defending their businesses and helping them and he was trained in first aid. There is also vid./pics of him cleaning graffiti off the buildings. Any decent parent would be proud of this young man; Anyone that sees this as not self defence, doesn’t deserve to live in America. The guy is a hero.
It’s legal in Wisconsin
That being said it should be legal.
As a minor, he cannot purchase or own a weapon in Wisconsin.
There may be a clause that allows him to carry a long barrelled weapon which the Judge will advise the jury on.