A second photo of Trump with Ghislaine.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (168)
sorted by:
Not sure if OP is a shill*, but it is important to remember for this board, because I see so many posting images of other people in the same room as Epstein or Maxwell as if that is enough to convict them of being partners in crime.
The trend seems to be benefit of doubt only to people we agree with politically, and none to those we don't. This is not becoming of a free-thinker.
We know the backstory with Trump and Epstein. He met him a couple of times many, many years ago, and within weeks banned him and his entire family from all of his properties. Trump was no fan or friend of Epstein -- clearly.
Being seen together is one thing, being on the flight logs is another. Whether it's Trump or Kamala.
*Edit: Based on his or her comment history, and contrary to the admin's comment, I have no reason to believe OP is a shill. I think it's pretty clear this was just an attempt to slow the roll on the broad acceptance of some other posts that were doing the exact thing Leftists do with pictures like this, which is assume guilt by association.
If there are real connections between someone and Epstein/Maxwell (e.g., Clintons), providing only a photo with them attending the same event HURTS that argument, because it makes the argument look weak. If there are data connecting people involved in the trafficking, let's post and research that. If not, I'd advocate leaving the baseless speculation for TDW.
And yet we still have this current Kamala and Ghislaine GA post at 100 upvotes labeled
https://greatawakening.win/p/140JAeoJEH/the-company-they-keep-says-it-al/c/
People on this board are so sensitive.
I never said he was guilty by association. Just figured the pics were relevant.
These pics have been around this community of people either here, voat, reddit or the chans for years but not everyone has seen them because they are just waking up. I have no problem with you posting these. I've seen them multiple times. I've also seen one log with Trumps name on epstein's plane flying from fla to NY. He was never on the plane to the island.
I forgot about the flight log. That's also a good point.
My hope is that the trial exposes a lot of the connections, so we can mitigate the wild speculations. I think we'll know if the trial is bringing out the real information if the Clintons are implicated (or a stepping stone to Clinton prosecution is provided). If not, it's safe to assume the trial is just a show.
That's just one log. The possibility still looms that he could have been at the island. I would not be surprised if it turns out the Q team picked him because he was the LEAST compromised.
I hope it's not the case and that he genuinely is a good guy. But we must acknowledge all possibilities and be willing to accept the truth no matter what it is.
I heard 45 needed to get back to NYC urgently and found out that Epstein’s brother(?) was heading back there and hitched a ride. Both Epstein and 45 have properties in Palm Beach.
It was nearly 2 years ago when I first went down the Pedogate rabbit hole.
Here's what I found on Trump: https://summit.news/2019/07/08/lawyer-for-epstein-victim-says-trump-was-only-high-powered-person-who-helped-him/
Video is gone now of course and I can't find it now, but i downloaded it: https://files.catbox.moe/cm56ie.mp4
Which is exactly why I named Kamala. Double-think doesn't just exist on the Left.
no you never said anything... like what point are you trying to make? Obviously you have intent... waht is it?
Thanks for the Downvote...I Love them...Means I'm right on track...
I am the one who downvoted, because your previous comment was barely coherent.
OP stated pretty clearly why the pics are relevant. You can disagree with his or her reason, but it was provided.
Also, ellipses are not a one-size-fits-all replacement for all other punctuation.
Because people are not generally the easiest to deal with, here is the cold, hard truth people aren’t acknowledging:
The Patriots tapped Trump. They selected him. Trump was a sinner - very much so.
We don’t know why he flipped to the side of good - we do know he had some pretty sick friends before that point.
Before MENTAL RETARDS claim this picture is fake - it isn’t. Trump was very close with these people, which made his betrayal of them even more personal.
If we can not acknowledge that every man and woman is corruptable, and may have been corrupt at one point in their lives, then we do not deserve salvation, for we are denying sin exists.
Well that's an interesting theory.
But my point was more that Maxwell and Epstein were everywhere for a long time. Being at the same party, having your picture taken together, etc., doesn't mean anything in itself. So posts showing Kamala and Maxwell attending the same party as if that alone somehow is evidence that Kamala had nefarious association with the couple is asinine, especially when the same people will then give trump a massive benefit of doubt.
Freedom of association. Unless they're on the flight logs or have a more substantial connection to the human trafficking, I couldn't care less about the pictures they have together.
Yes Trump is a sinner just like every man who has walked the earth exception of Jesus. And Trump sins out in the open he likes beautiful women look how many times he’s been married. He’s in going good company with David in the BibleBut he isn’t sick F Who likes to do it with kids cause that’s the Real story
Hi Tendie! 😁🖐🤗
Absolutely this. He knew what was operating next to him. He ultimately chose to do something about it.
What I’m interested in is his conversation with the Patriots that addressed the “How” and the “Why.”
Whether it was redemption for past sins, a desire to right wrongs he had previously ignored, or what - I will always be curious what set him on the course of single handedly taking these stones and arrows for us.
We were born into sin but one whom the Lord takes for Himself DOES NOT CONTINUE to sin. They are kept by the grace (unmerited power and favor) given by God to do so. That's the entire point of Romans 7 (being a slave to sin) and Romans 8 (being freed from it). God does not give His Spirit to "sinners saved by grace" but to those who prove obedient, like Cornelius.
Posers, liars and devils do come in His name and those are the "sinner saved by grace" people. Using grace as an excuse for sins is a Christian hallmark but it doesn't work that way.
As far as Donald Trump, I know his real role on earth and he IS the rightful president but I fear for this world. God appoints leaders, for good and evil. Remember that.
It's not correct to say unless you are living a perfect sinless life you won't gain entry to heaven. None of us are perfect. And our best works are filthy rags. It is absolutely trying to be more Christ like on this earth and having a savior who took it all past, present and future is what should drive us to be better. And agreed not be the once saved always saved I can do what I want group.It's continually a work in progress but we humans are always going to fall short.
You know. I've actually been quietly entertaining this avenue of thinking myself too for a while. It's refreshing to see someone else say it out loud
What amazes me is how many can not reconcile the fact that a man can be redeemed from sin to truly become great again.
Saul became Paul. Trump became GEOTUS. Some can’t appreciate that.
The story of American redemption will mean nothing if these people - and the normies - can not be led out of the darkness. The absence of salvation.
I think they can, but this kicking and screaming is very telling.
Donald Trump was NEVER one of them (evil) and he was not friends with such evil scum either. You have some research to do!
https://butnothingshappening.com/trump-donald-trump/
And on that note, I would like to remind everyone here that Donald Trump is NOT on any flight logs to the island, but we do know that he hitched a ride on Epstein's plane at some point from FL to NJ.
But HERE is the reality gut punch that all anons need to consider, and something I've always wished I could find more to dig on: both IVANA and IVANKA took multiple trips to Epstein Island, according to Epstein's notorious "little black book."
...what do we do with that? What does that mean? I've always wandered.
Me too. Whether it be scouting for intel or property estimation.. or what we really hope it isn't for. Might explain the Kushner marriage.. I feel like both the "left" and the "right" have their cutoff switch when it comes to investigating because they worry too much about pride and not the truth. Which is why i'm down to jump down anyone's throat that begins to harass me about two sided politics.
Sauce? I've never heard of this and can't find any proof.
This this the first I’ve read this. Interesting and sad.
What was the timeframe on that? Did Trump's daughter end up on Epstein Island as a minor? And was this before or after Trump cut ties with Epstien?
Yes, people need to understand the difference of a person having their picture taken with someone at an event where there are dozens/hundreds of people before said person found out they were a Pedo.
VS
A person is having their picture taken with, flying with, staying on a private island with someone after being charged with being a Pedo.
I am a business owner that attends events with hundreds of people, and I have my photo taken with other people all the time. However, nobody to my knowledge that I have taken a picture with is a Pedo.
Now, if a couple of years from now, someone I regularly conduct business with or interfaced with at an event is revealed to be Pedo. I'll be damned if other people would claim I'm a Pedo by association.
However, if after someone is revealed to be a Pedo and I continue to maintain a relationship with a Pedo, then I deserve a bullet in the brain.
OP is DEFINITELY 100% a shill.....No doubt in my mind whatsoever....
You should hook me up with your crystal ball dealer.
But seriously, claiming you "definitely 100%" know without a doubt is just stating your own ignorance. OP's comment history is not that of a baseless shill, and moreover, his or her reasons for posting the image check out. I was also irritated by the acceptance of the Kamala and Maxwell post on this board.
You can believe whatever you like, but neither you nor I know one way or another.
Firstly, don't be so condescending...Secondly..." his or her reasons for posting the image check out."....What might those reasons be besides me posting one of Harris and Maxwell...? Lastly...why are you irritated by the "acceptance" of said post...? I can see more of a connection between Harris and Maxwell than between Trump and Maxwell knowing what we Know...
My goal wasn't to be condescending, just straightforward.
The reason you stated is the reason, and the irritation comes from the speculation being driven solely by the picture of them attending the same party, and nothing else. It is certainly plausible that Kamala had a connection to them, but that picture doesn't further any arguments to be made to that end.
Just about everyone in the public arena has had their picture taken with or been at an event with Epstein and Maxwell. It is foolish to react with "that picture speaks volumes!" (which was the general reception of the image on this board) when in reality, it says almost nothing.
The point OP is claiming to make is that if a photo Kamala and Ghislaine means Kamala is somehow connected to their dealings, then we have to make the same assumption about Trump. And if not Trump, then not Kamala.
It's about consistency.
If there's a case to be made that Kamala was connected to Epstein's endeavors, then there needs to be more evidence than an innocuous photo that shows them at the same event.