Jehovah Witness are misguided by Cabal, as all organized religion is.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
The Deep State has infiltrated many religious denominations. They have produced contaminated Bible translations that dilute the power of God, obfuscate the relationship of Jesus Christ to God and minimize certain sinful lifestyles.
I have produced a document that outlines what the satanists have done to corrupt the Holy Bible. You can see it here.
I urge everyone to return to using a King James version Bible. It is the only Bible version that is not copyrighted. God has preserved it but the devil's minions have tried to replace it with their corrupted "translations".
Serious question for you - Is King James most accurate? I have heard many people debate after the apocrypha was removed if any versions are accurate. I have seen still others claim that Bible editing has gone back as far as the time of Constantine. Curious what is believed to be the most complete and accurate version with nothing redacted or removed?
The King James version is written in the English current at the time. Additional scrolls have been discovered and translated, improving on the accuracy of a modern English Bible translation. To say that the King James version is the only authentic Bible translation is like saying, "Well, your Bible is in French, and therefore, invalid". Yes, there are some modern versions that tweak some verses to slightly change what may be the original intent. I use an NIV Bible, which is probably the most thoroughly researched version out, and written in modern English, so much more understandable than middle English. Of course, you need to be able to read Greek to get the original version of New Testament texts, but not too many people can do that. Old Testament texts are subject to much less certainty, but we have to go with what we have.
The NIV is corrupted, friend.
The NIV translation is based on the Nestle-Aland text. which is a combination of Tischendorf's Codex Sinaiticus (rediscovered in a Catholic convent wastepaper basket), Westcott and Hort's manuscripts (based on Codex Vaticanus, a Roman Catholic preserved Alexandrian bible), and Richard Francis Weymouth's The Resultant Greek Testament. These manuscripts were Alexandrian manuscripts and are written in classical Greek.
What I can tell you is that the KJV is based on the Masoretic text (Hebrew Old Testament) and Textus Receptus (Koine Greek New Testament) preserved by Orthodox Christians who fled the Roman Catholic inquisitors and the Muslim invaders of Constantinople.
In fact, I can use the NIV Bible to prove the Alexandrian scripts were corrupted, because the "fact-checkers" didn't realize they needed to edit these passages too! Pay close attention to Acts 6:8-14 in the passage below for mention of the Alexandrians and their role in falsely accusing and turning Stephen over to the Sanhedrin.
Acts 6:1-12
1 In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Hellenistic Jews[a] among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. 2 So the Twelve gathered all the disciples together and said, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. 3 Brothers and sisters, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them 4 and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.”
5 This proposal pleased the whole group. They chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit; also Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas from Antioch, a convert to Judaism. 6 They presented these men to the apostles, who prayed and laid their hands on them.
7 So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.
Stephen Seized
8 Now Stephen, a man full of God’s grace and power, performed great wonders and signs among the people. 9 Opposition arose, however, from members of the Synagogue of the Freedmen (as it was called)—Jews of Cyrene and Alexandria as well as the provinces of Cilicia and Asia—who began to argue with Stephen. 10 But they could not stand up against the wisdom the Spirit gave him as he spoke.
11 Then they secretly persuaded some men to say, “We have heard Stephen speak blasphemous words against Moses and against God.”
12 So they stirred up the people and the elders and the teachers of the law. They seized Stephen and brought him before the Sanhedrin. 13 They produced false witnesses, who testified, “This fellow never stops speaking against this holy place and against the law. 14 For we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs Moses handed down to us.”
Koine Greek was the Greek of the common people and understood throughout the Roman Empire. Classical Greek was only understood by the scholars AKA the academics.
Which version of Greek do you think the Apostles and early Christians would logically have chosen to spread the Gospel message to as many people as possible based on the above information?
If your answer to this question is the same as mine, you'll see why I choose translations based on the Textus Receptus, which include the KJV.
Now, the King James is not perfect. The translators didn't know what a certain word meant so they translated it as unicorn.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h7214/kjv/wlc/0-1/
With that being said, the word doesn't affect any doctrinal statements and the meaning is "probably the great aurochs or wild bulls which are now extinct. The exact meaning is not known."
The 3-page preface to my NIV is pretty thorough in explaining how it was done through a large group from many denominations. Any attempt to alter the truth would seem to be pretty rare. I'll take my ability to understand 99.99% of the same text better, because it's in modern English, in exchange for the POSSIBLE mis-translation of a VERY minor portion of the Bible.
The 3-page preface to your NIV was written by commies, just saying.
The language in the KJV is more direct and has the benefit of more poetic language.
Romans 10:17-18 (KJV)
17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
18 But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.
Romans 10:17-18 (NIV)
17 Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word about Christ.
18 But I ask: Did they not hear? Of course they did:
“Their voice has gone out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.”[a]
Is "Yes, verily" really harder to understand than "Of course they did?"
Granted, these are subjective things and not a big deal.
But what about doctrinal issues because of words being removed?
Matthew 9:13 (KJV)
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Matthew 9:13 (NIV)
13 But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice.’[a] For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
That part about repentance is important and was removed from the NIV. It was also removed from Mark 2:17.
Mark 2:17 (KJV)
17 When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Mark 2:17 (NIV)
17 On hearing this, Jesus said to them, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
Or entire verses being removed?
Acts 8:36-38 (KJV)
36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
The NIV removes Acts 8:37 completely, but did add a footnote to later versions.
Acts 8:36-38
**36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?” [37] [c] 38 And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him. **
c. Acts 8:37 Some manuscripts include here Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” The eunuch answered, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”
Matthew 23:14 was also removed from the NIV. There's a footnote but it doesn't provide an explanation of what was removed. It just says-
b. Matthew 23:14 Some manuscripts include here words similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47.
Matthew 23:13-15 (NIV)
13 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to. [14] [b]
15 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.
Now let's see what they removed.
Matthew 23:13-15 (KJV)
13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
Can't have that part about stealing from the widows while saying long prayers as a pretense (i.e. pretending to be devout in public), now can we?
There are many more verses removed, but I hope you'll at least consider researching exactly what's been removed. The only substantial difference between the Jehovah's Witness Bible and the NIV is that the NIV includes footnotes.
But I'll be honest. I'd rather somebody reads the NIV than let their KJV collect dust on their shelf and pray the Holy Spirit reveals all truth to the NIV readers that the enemy removed from the text.
So what version of the Bible was the correct one before the KJV?
The texts it was translated from, the Masoretic Hebrew Old Testament and the Textus Receptus written in Koine Greek.
Again, there are some translation errors in the KJV, notably the use of the word unicorn to represent an extinct animal of some kind. Nobody is sure of the true meaning of the word, but modern translators have agreed to translate it as wild ox.
Numbers 23:22 (KJV)
God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.
Numbers 23:22 (NIV)
God brought them out of Egypt; they have the strength of a wild ox.
None of these errors affect anything of a doctrinal nature, while removing verses about the importance of repentance do.
The Vatican has fragments of the Alexandrian bibles, which were written in classical Greek, not Koine Greek, and carefully edited to remove evidence of Christ's divine nature. Codex Sinaiticus, another Alexandrian text, was found in a wastepaper basket in a Catholic convent on Mount Sinai by Tischendorf.
You can actually see how Codex Sinaiticus was edited in many places by viewing it on the official website- https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/
I know Wikipedia is a questionable source, but all of the above information can be verified there, including the fact the manuscript was edited in numerous places.
https://archive.md/tPHg8
Thankfully, it is due to persecution of the true believers that the real Bible was preserved throughout the Dark Ages, because the Orthodox Christians fled as far away as Russia to escape from both the Roman Catholic inquisition as well as Muslim invaders of Constantinople.
There was also the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls in 1947 which verifies the Masoretic Hebrew and Textus Receptus (Koine Greek) are authentic. The Book of Enoch was also rediscovered at that time.
All of the Greek texts among the Dead Sea Scrolls are written in koine, the common dialect of the post-classical Hellenistic and Roman worlds and the New Testament language. A total of 27 Greek manuscripts have been identified from the Qumran caves.
https://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/learn-about-the-scrolls/languages-and-scripts?locale=en_US
For me it is the King James version all the way. It is a word for word translation that is uncorrupted by the Westcott-Hort translation of the New Testament in the 1800's.
The OT is something you can be reasonably sure is honest. Too many copies made since the Jews were commanded that every male write their own Torah scroll.
The NT is harder. When reading, read with the Interlinear handy. Use Biblehub.com for s clickable link to each word and its translation and othet instances it is found in the scriptures.
Hebrews 4:9 is translated incorrectly in the KJV.
When reading the NT look for inconsistencies between books and verses.
There is controversy surrounding Matthew 28:19 which presents the trinitarian baptismal formula. This formula is not repeated anywhere else in the Bible.
Hebrews 4:9
9 there doth remain, then, a sabbatic rest to the people of God,
That's from Young's Literal Translation, which is based on the Textus Receptus NT as well. It appears the KJV translators didn't include the sabbatic part of that verse, although it's gleaned from the context.
I still swear by the KJV for reasons stated above.
I bought The Hebrew Bible by Robert Alter and The New Oxford Annotated Bible New Revised Standard Edition With The Apocrypha.
The Apocrypha is written in Greek. What type of stupid kike are you to buy a heeb bible to read the Greek New New Testament of Jesus Christ?
This book presented a simple and down-to-earth argument (for me anyway) that the KJV is the most convincing English version of the Bible.
https://archive.org/details/sam-gipp-the-answer-book-a-helpful-book-for-christians/
The Cabal voted on what would constitute your bible at the Council of Nicea. What you believe to be the complete and total truth was put together by a group of men.
Don't Christians find this disturbing at all?
They conveniently left out all the books that address life as a journey of awakening and connecting with God without an intermediary, such as the Book of Thomas. They also voted on whether Christ was a man who was divinely inspired or divinity incarnate. Divinity incarnate won the roll call.
Because it is consistent with OT and NT that Jesus was uniquely God-man, because without being fully God and man. God has no part in the sacrifice, but when God is the one being sacrificed through Jesus it makes much more sense. Think the binding of Issac. Also that God would make good His promise of redemption with Himself by His own hand. It also solves the problem of evil, in that "why does God allow bad things to happen?" - who answers for God allowance of imperfection only God can make that kind of sacrifice. He died to reconcile a creation broken by allowed autonomy to Himself.
Why would someone want a translation that is to afraid to use God's name, be it any translation or version of his name?
Your name checks out.
I know a family of Jehovah's witnesses, I used to be best friends with one. They were cool before Trump. Then I discovered how leftist they are.
Literally found out about it on cuckbook (before I left cuckbook for good), he went to the Women's Pussy hat march where Madonna said she would blow up the Trump White House. I told him how retarded he and his wife are.
His brother works for left wing Hollywood in California. I said peace out, bros. Haven't talked to them for a while now. Sold their souls. Maybe one day they will turn around.
Good pdf 👍
Now that is certainly interesting. You know that didn’t just happen by coincidence.
You can spot a lot of interest pointing up with a Nikon P900.
Real Eyes
Realize
Real Lies!
Seeing as it comes up as Vaccinationscenter Silkeborg, yes, you know that didn't happen by coincidence.
they deny there is a hell also.
They do.
https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/wp20100401/Is-Jesus-the-Archangel-Michael/
i always wondered why they always said they were waiting for 'the new world order' now i know
Jehovah Witness members are sadly misled into being in a cult.
Listen to Hard Bastard on YouTube, he escaped from Jehovah's Witnesses and does a great news aggregate channel.
Jehovah's Witnesses was founded by 33rd degree Freemason and Knights Templar Charles Taze Russell.
https://williamcooperrevisited.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/the-occult-roots-of-the-jehovahs-witnesses/
https://archive.md/7cSJ
Jehovah Witnesses are misguided PERIOD.
That's an interesting way to say 'cult'.
I will never understand these entire denominations that hyper focus on one part of the Bible while ignoring the rest.
Like Holy Rollers. Literally built an entire religion around 3-4 Bible passages... and got them 100% wrong. Speaking in Tongues did not mean flopping around on the floor speaking demonic gibberish... it was just a euphemism for the fact that they were able so speak any language on earth.
It's pretty hard to preach the Gospel of Jesus to the Koreans if they can't understand Aramaic... so God granted them the ability to speak any language they encountered.
The JW's have built an entire religion around one word. One word. Not only that, but God's "True Name" is entirely inconsequential to your personal salvation. It doesn't matter in the slightest. Not even a tiny little bit. But they built a whole religion around it.
I will never understand people.
As a bible student that only wishes to aligned with the Word, finds that any attacks on each other's religions is going to get us no where.
This is just more separation. One of our closest friends, a JW that we talk and study with too almost got the vax before coming to learn what it was. Anyone can be misguided by the devil, and we need to work together to bar ourselves from his influences.
Fuck JW's. The whole lot of them. They will divide family based on blind obedience to the church.
Forcing people to make the choice between a false church and family is as evil as it gets.
The cabal has convinced a certain group that they're all sinners and the Creator is some kind of judgemental overlord who must be unquestioningly obeyed or else.
I think it's a hospital. Vaccinationscenter Silkeborg, Helsinkivej 3A, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark Vaccinationscenter Silkeborg https://maps.app.goo.gl/83UksKoWuZthGjjr6
It's still a JW building. They just offer "vaccinations" now. Masonic lodges joined in too.
they are in the domain of lucifer.
You were across the street https://goo.gl/maps/TJ9KZJieSbbiJ68V6
Probably a disgruntled person who doesn't like them.