https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7595
I will no longer refer to Michael Flynn as General. F-Linn is only the General of the Deep State. Sad, but true. That is my opinion based of facts. You should draw your own conclusions based on FACTS, not emotions.
Hits me right in the feels since I remember this audio clip from Gen. Flynn:
Audio transcribed:
Hey everybody, this is definitely General Flynn and I just want you to know that I fully endorse Lin Wood, and I mean everything I say when I post something - I don't post much, but when I do, I mean what I say - so just wanted to let everybody know that, this is definitely me, and I want you all to have a great weekend and let's pray that Lin Wood pulls this off in South Carolina for the good of the country. God Bless America.
https://t.me/SidneyPowell/2495
Every good movie needs a good betrayal, right?
UPDATE:
Patrick Byrne, friend of Flynn, responds:
https://rumble.com/vpufcl-i-hate-to-break-it-to-you-folks-but-lynn-wood-is-a-tacky-kook.html
WOOD RELEASED THE PHONECALL HE HAD WITH BYRNE!!!
https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7600
https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7603
https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7605
Those more tech-savvy than me - please upload and share!!!
I wonder if a lot of this infighting... (Flynn, Lin, MTG, Kyle, Sidney, etc, etc) is a part of a bigger strategy to help plausible deniability??
It's so over the top.
Yeah this. Definitely this.
Almost WWF like.
Well, since deep staters frequent our li'l site for info, I'd like to say, as a lifelong critical thinker, that I fully believe each of these players are sincerely fighting and each traitorous to the Plan. Consequently, I've now lost all hope with Q, disappointed that, apparently, "something" actually can stop what is coming. We Go Alone, and this movie will end with a dud, non Biblical ending-- God loses, Satanic panic wins.
Trust the gdamned Plan. We knew deep down long before Q affirmed that somehow something had to give, that even though we felt alone that somehow this NWO/Agenda 21/30 crap with FEMA re-education enslavement camps parked off every rail station couldn't seriously be successful in this modern world, in the U.S. no less, post 3rd Reich, especially with something even the smartest of Germans never had... internet, AKA free, at your fingertips ww library of information.
Then again there's somehow STILL since creation a ww parasitic death cult involved in human trafficking/sacrafice, drug trade, financial oppression blah blah but I digress...
Sheep abound, but somehow I, YOU, knew deep down all along that we were born for something much bigger, even as we lost fam/frens/finances and gained labels (conspiratard)... but when Q came about we finally knew we really weren't alone, we actually had a flicker of hope, even turning some of us back toward God (not necessarily religion).
We seek Truth bc we wish to be free, yet we don't even know where we actually came from (unless you run w Darwinism). Is there really a firmament? Were there giant, cannibalistic giants-- therefore the flood? Grey's? Frozen aliens in Antactica? Why really haven't we been bk to the moon for 40 yrs, especially when 1 shuttle full of H3 would power the U.S. for a yr? So many questions...
Let the movie play out, as our collective jobs start after it ends... then it's up to us to help guide the sheep (God's chosen shepherds?) out of their deepstate induced slumber. WWG1 bitches ;)
Of course it is
It is disconcerting but I think there is strategy behind changing out your visible leadership frequently. The enemy doesn't know who is worth going after, the public doesn't rally around one figurehead before white hats are ready. Just keeps things fluid, seems wise given our enemy.
Also, could be training for us in discernment. Keep changing out the 'favorites', putting new faces in front of us. Until we respond correctly just keep shifting and shifting.
This whole infighting thing is so odd, every one made it a full year without something like this happening, and now all the sudden they're all airing out their grievances on social media? TG of all places? They're acting overly dramatic if you ask me, like highschool. I wonder what is really going on, I feel like it's a distraction.
Check out Byrne's response.
https://rumble.com/vpufcl-i-hate-to-break-it-to-you-folks-but-lynn-wood-is-a-tacky-kook.html
33 minutes can be cut down by changing the playback speed to 1.25, it's worth the watch.
We need everyone to go on Joe Rogan or Bannon's podcast and talk it out
Well... If Flynn's DS and the MSM wants to use Wood's statements, then they'll have to admit his other statements are true as well.
If Flynn is DS then we are in some advanced ass psyop and all in deep shit. Flynn would actually have the knowledge of how to create a psyop like Q. He also has stated publicly that there is no plan and we have to figure this out together. It is all really strange. Maybe none of them are trustworthy.
Don't forget: Wood stated as fact that Jeffery Epstein is still alive.
For fun, here's Byrne's response to the Wood controversy:
https://rumble.com/vpufcl-i-hate-to-break-it-to-you-folks-but-lynn-wood-is-a-tacky-kook.html
It's interesting theater to say the least.
What I saw was, when you cant attack the message you attack the messenger which Patrick did passive aggressively the entire video.
Perfectly fair assessment.
Part of me is excited to see how this plays out. Really curious to see what everybody's next move is!
Question though. If Lin Wood attacks Trump, how should we respond? I think he should make that part off-limits. I don't want the base to split in any way against remedying the election fraud to get the nation to address it.
You say fair assessment but then assert a hypothetical that magnifies the issue you’re pushing. That’s a little disingenuous
You're misunderstanding me.
Allow me to clarify:
The line of questioning here infers that addressing Election Fraud is a "conditional" factor separate from whether or not I like Lin Wood.
My question is, "how should I respond to Lin should that condition be broken?" Or in other words, in your Opinion, if Lin Wood in this unpredictable theater decides to withdrawal his support of Trump, how do you think I should respond? How would you respond?
He hasn't rescinded support. There is no disingenuity in asking, nor is there in setting contingencies and drawing 'red lines.'
I see where you’re coming from. I don’t think you have the right variables on your thought experiment. Liking Lin Wood isn’t the same as trusting Lin Wood. I don’t think many of the educated opinions about Lin Wood and what he says are centered around liking Lin Wood.
The YAGNI principle ("You Aren't Gonna Need It") is a practice in software development which states that features should only be added when required.
Basically you don’t want to solve problems until you need to because it’s a waste of time and you won’t have the same context in which to make the decisions from.
I think some have forgotten that Lin Wood was publicly (in front of a very large audience) attacked first by Kyle Rittenhouse. He has published the receipts and timelines to counter that attack. He is also backed by some very credible people working on the election fraud.
Patrick Byrne lost me when he implied after that meeting at the White House with Trump & a few others that the President was being played and unaware of what was going on. It was like he was putting himself out there as better informed & smarter than President Trump. I haven't really followed him since.
As far as MTG, I haven't totally agreed with Lin on her but she has lost me with this stunt of a Congressional Medal for Rittenhouse....seriously?? We have people rotting in a DC jail and being abused since January and instead of screaming every day at every microphone about it, you're worried about Rittenhouse? I'm beginning to see why Lin Wood no longer supports her.
I'm teetering on General Flynn. I've been disappointed in him with a few things...especially his stand on Q and election fraud and that questionable prayer. I have a feeling he's more DC politics that we know. I'll be disappointed but then, General Mattis whom I adored turned out to be not who I thought he was. Right now I'm just watching....I totally side with Lin Wood on the FightBack and bail controversy. If I needed a good civil lawyer that does defamation cases...he's my guy!
Why is Lin causing so much distraction? Maybe trying to lure the enemy to the gate?
Patrick Byrne posted his response:
https://rumble.com/vpufcl-i-hate-to-break-it-to-you-folks-but-lynn-wood-is-a-tacky-kook.html
It's pretty interesting to hear his side, worth watching.
Watched it / pretty convincing that Lin is a whack … or is he? Could they be setting a trap? Dunno - but it feels weird
I totally thought that Byrne was in recovery mode.
Great GIF.
My money's on the cat.
Moves and counter moves.
Kansas city shuffle :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag31JHU8LPU
My question is: which character in this tragedy/comedy play going on would be the most detrimental to the patriot movement if in fact he/she was a DS plant? I think I know the answer.
Infighting to be expected. We may not like everybody on the team, but to win everybody comes together on game day to post a win.
Veritas Omnia Vincula Vincit ...
Cool, more obfuscating and shit flinging.
Everyone involved is just flinging shit at one another.
And we don’t touch the poop, do we?
This is so weird
This gives the left the impression the right is weak. Could be on purpose.
Watching Lin Woods melt down ... yup, I've got butter on this popcorn.
Exposing the truth isn’t a melt down
I'm in genuine agreement. I feel like this is some kind of swansong by Lin, to distance himself from the rest of the pack for the greater good. It looks like he's running out in front of a semi.
From a plan point of view, you're making good sense, since the MSM has hit-pieces circulating every which way about him and he could at this point be considered a liability to the credibility that the plan needs.
Who knows. It all seems kinda forced to me.
I agree with this point (seems forced). Sudden high drama doesn't smell right.